@sSubZerOo said:
@Bigboi500 said:
@thegerg said:
@richietickles: It won't, that's not how the US justice system works.
Because that would be too efficient, practical and save too much money.
Maybe because most people here find it more important that we don't execute innocent people (which we have numerous times in the past) instead of saving some money? Just a thought.
He's already been proven guilty beyond a reason of doubt, so what's the hold up? His rights have been upheld to the fullest. He did the crime, got caught, exorcized his rights, was found guilty in a court of law by a group of his peers. Now there's no reason to dick around for twenty years and let him live off of tax payer money while he appeals and re-appeals and re-re-appeals, again, all at the tax payers expense.
Execute him and get it over with. Think of what all that wasted money could do for people and infrastructure of the US instead of being caught up in the legal system and going to the pockets of the already filthy rich.
If you agree with the US's justice system, you have to accept the verdict from the process of it and comply with the results.
His victims never received this much consideration or civil treatment.
Log in to comment