@and1salttape said:
I will not deny that I'm self-centered, and also, to some extent, narcissistic. But never at the cost of anyone else. In fact, the source of my narcissism is exactly how reliable I am. As for my selfishness, I only start to show it if someone interferes too much in my matters -- so very few people actually know I am selfish.
I will consider that, nonetheless. The problem is the stark contrast between the people in the professional/academic circles and the ones in family, or friends. The former respect me, the latter are either intimidated or appalled.
This is going to be a long one but what the hell? I'm not sleeping and I need to spend some time on something other than work so here goes:
Self confidence is something that you have or you don't. It's not something that's conveyed by telling everyone how self confident you are. The more someone tells people that, the less true it sounds.
Let me give you a parallel example. I had a friend/roomate (no longer either, for a lot of reasons) whom we'll call Anne who considered herself to be quite beautiful (she'd done some modelling as a side gig). One time she came home upset by something someone said to her at the club. A guy walked up to her at the bar and said something along the lines of "Wow, you must never have to pay for your own drinks."
Now this pissed her off and upset her quite a bit. There are plenty of reasons to be annoyed at a statement like this and I'm not defending it. It implies that she's a freeloader, it pretty sexist (although likely unintentionally and the guy was just trying to come up with a more clever icebreaker than "HUR HUR HUR YOU PRURTY!!!!"), etc. She was instead upset because she was annoyed at how people didn't get that being beautiful is actually a burden and makes her life more difficult than normal people in a lot of ways. She even went to far as to imply that since I wasn't as good looking as she was that I wouldn't understand although she stopped herself just short of actually saying this.
Now what I tried to explain to her (unsuccessfully) is that her looks weren't her problem. It's the fact that this is how she thinks of her looks (and other colorful personality traits all related to narcissism that stemmed from low self-esteem) that alienated her from pretty much most people and eventually even me, her best friend since around the time we were both in high school (at least a decade). Her problem was entirely her personality.
Now beauty is subjective, and generally I would never "rate" someone I know (because it's incredibly gross) but since you have no idea what these people look like I'm going to make an exception in this instance to give you some relative idea of what we are talking about. I'd call Anne pretty, and put her at maybe a 7 to 7.5. She'd done some modeling and in good circumstances I'd say that most would probably call her pretty as well, maybe even beautiful for some. However, she didn't have a ton of friends (she'd probably say she was too discerning). I wouldn't exactly call myself a 10, so while I was utterly convinced that I was right I level set with a few female friends just to make sure I wasn't the crazy one. I asked a good friend of mine whom we'll call "Sam". Sam was/is a straight up 10. I doubt anyone who likes girls would rate her at anything less than a 9. On at least one occasion I had another female friend notice Sam in one of my club photos and ask "Wow, who is this? I'm straight but I'd totally switch for her." Sam is a very attractive woman, but on top of that she's also one of the best/nicest people I've ever known. Her basically "knocking it out of the park" in terms of looks and personality got her a -lot- of attention from guys back in the day.
I posed what Anne said to me as a "hypothetical scenario" for an unnamed friend (she knew Anne as my friend so I didn't want to mention names). Sam, who by pretty much anyone's estimation is noticeably better looking, had a very different reaction. When I told her what my unnamed friend said, her reaction was "Oh my god. You know someone who thinks like that? Why would you be friends with someone like that?" This was the reaction from pretty much every other pretty friend I posed this scenario to.
You absolutely should love yourself, there's nothing wrong with that just as if you're religious (I'm not) there's nothing wrong with say... loving Jesus. However, with either scenario, if you spend a significant portion of your time making sure that others know how much you love yourself/Jesus then you are going to severely limit your social circle. Narcissists tend to hang out with other narcissists with similar interests so they can circle-jerk each other's egos and as overtly religious hang out with other overtly religious people who also spend all their time talking about how religious they are (I'm not talking about people with deep faith in their belief system, I'm just talking about people who in any religion can't have a conversation about any topic without going out of their way to remind you how awesome they are at their religion). This extends to any belief/interest, even self-interest.
Introspection is great, but nobody (and I mean nobody) sees themselves the way that others see them because -everybody- has inherent biases. We have emotions and that's a core part of our being and it's pretty much impossible to evaluate an emotional topic without your emotions playing a part in that evaluation. Lots of people didn't really like Anne. If I asked Anne why, she would have told me that they didn't like her because they were intimidated by her looks or her intellect. However, if I asked the people who didn't like her why they didn't like her, they would have used some pretty choice words and "smart" and "pretty" would not have been among them. Now think, honestly. If I went and asked your friends whom you don't get along with why you don't get along, are you absolutely certain that their responses would be "because we are intimidated by him" or would they have some other choice negative ways to describe you as a person as being the culprit?
Even in this thread, I see a lot of you explaining what you regard as your positive traits (even defensively so). This doesn't speak to me of someone with a great degree of confidence. Confident people don't waste words trying to convince others of how confident they are. I count eleven self-aggrandizing statements in your opening paragraph alone. Now I'm not saying you don't have positive traits. You may even be right about yourself in some ways (although the more you try to tell people that, the less likely it is to be true). Anne's problem was not based on over-confidence, it was based on some incredibly deep rooted insecurities about pretty much everything (her looks, her intellect, her general decency as a human being, etc). She would often make self-aggrandizing statements, or try to explain why she was right on a topic because of some element of her background even though she never really did much with her life, literally never left the state until she was older, never started a career, and only eventually went college in her 30s to get a bachelors, only to return to her old job right after. She made things about herself often. I suspect your problem is much like Anne's and has less to do with how awesome you are and more to do with how you treat people (based on how awesome you think you are). You sound like a younger guy who's still trying to figure shit out (if I had to guess I'd say early to mid 20s at latest) and that's fine. You've got time. But if you still feel this way when you get to your 30s or 40s, you might find that you missed out on a lot in life. The smartest person in the world can still be humble, the most beautiful person in the world can still be kind, the fastest person in the world can still be patient, and the strongest person in the world can still be gentle. It's up to you to choose how you interact with other people. I learned a -long- time ago that being right all the time is not the most important thing in human interaction. It doesn't matter if you're the smartest guy in the room or not if you can't deal with other people because nobody will listen to you even if you're right.
In my job, I have to be both technical and I have to manage teams of up to a couple dozen people. When I'm staffing a project, I'll have to consider the temperament and personality of everyone I staff on a project just as much as I have to gauge their technical ability to do their job. I (and most managers/directors) will take a resource who's less capable technically but works and interacts well with others over the "smartest guy in the room but who can't help but let everyone it" every single time because those are the people I can use. If someone works to the exclusion of everyone else (even if they aren't doing it on purpose) then the project suffers for it. I've had more than a few of those guys in my time and most of them didn't last. This extends to my customers as well. Even if I have to explain something technical to someone ten times and I find it agonizing, making them feel dumb for not getting it the first time doesn't help anyone. It doesn't matter if they have trouble getting it or not. Everyone is good at different things, and if you hang out with people long enough pretty much everyone who has good intensions will show you some way in which they have value that you may have missed based on initial judgements, and the longer that takes the more those ways will generally surprise you.
-Byshop
Log in to comment