2 Russian men held hands in public. People reacted horribly.

  • 77 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for MakeMeaSammitch
MakeMeaSammitch

4889

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 MakeMeaSammitch
Member since 2012 • 4889 Posts

Damn, that last reaction.

Avatar image for Maroxad
Maroxad

23912

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Maroxad
Member since 2007 • 23912 Posts

While I believe in freedom of speech,

Those two guys who responded with violence took it way too far.

Avatar image for gwynnblade
Gwynnblade

931

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Gwynnblade
Member since 2015 • 931 Posts

Didn't they know holding hands can lead to pregnancy?

Avatar image for alim298
alim298

2747

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#4 alim298
Member since 2012 • 2747 Posts

Thank you but I'm not going to watch that gay porn video.

Avatar image for deactivated-5b797108c254e
deactivated-5b797108c254e

11245

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 0

#5 deactivated-5b797108c254e
Member since 2013 • 11245 Posts

That's really shameful behaviour...don't like gay people, don't look but getting violent because two people you don't even know are holding hands? Bunch of assholes...

Avatar image for alim298
alim298

2747

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#6 alim298
Member since 2012 • 2747 Posts

But really the western culture (or should I say the non-middle eastern culture since that is Russia) sometimes astonishes me. I mean here in middle east it's quite normal if two men hold hands and no one would think they're gay. Kisses on the cheeks and hugs are also really common especially among relatives.

I mean you don't have to declare your hatred of the same gender to prove your straightness but that seems to be the trend in non-middle eastern societies.

Avatar image for deactivated-5b19214ec908b
deactivated-5b19214ec908b

25072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#7 deactivated-5b19214ec908b
Member since 2007 • 25072 Posts

I really hope things improve other there. My best friend is Russian and I've heard lots of horrible things that happen there. I really worry about her and all the other people that have to live in barbaric cultures.

Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8  Edited By deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

You have to truly be scum of the earth if you would seek to do harm to someone because they are gay.

It's not surprising. There are certain individuals on these forums that have no qualms if gays are murdered.

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

Wow,that is really terrible.

Avatar image for plageus900
plageus900

3065

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#10 plageus900
Member since 2013 • 3065 Posts

God forbid...

It's not uncommon in some countries for guy friends to hold hands. Oh the horror!

Seriously these assholes need to get a grip, especially the last dickhead at the end.

On another note, there are some seriously hot Russian women.

Avatar image for megane
Megane

685

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#11 Megane
Member since 2015 • 685 Posts

Preference is genitalia sure gets people riled up, but I have to wonder how long they were walking around like that for, I doubt there are many places (if any) where you wouldn't get homophobia eventually.

Avatar image for bmanva
bmanva

4680

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#12 bmanva
Member since 2002 • 4680 Posts

Anyone who get uncomfortable and violent around homosexuality are insecure about their own sexuality. Some are closet gay themselves.

Avatar image for ribstaylor1
Ribstaylor1

2186

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#13 Ribstaylor1
Member since 2014 • 2186 Posts

Ya from all the shit I see on the internet I'd never want to live in russia. Seems to me the country is stuck in the 70's, hell if it wasn't for the technology that's there I'd put it even farther behind that era.

Avatar image for GazaAli
GazaAli

25216

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 GazaAli
Member since 2007 • 25216 Posts

@bmanva said:

Anyone who get uncomfortable and violent around homosexuality are insecure about their own sexuality. Some are closet gay themselves.

I've heard this argument more than I care to remember and it sounds equally asinine each time. People of certain creeds antagonize homosexuality out of ideology, while other folks feel purely secular aversion towards it. In some societies it's culturally motivated, and in others it constitutes a part of a certain morality. The crux of it is that there are many reasons behind animosity towards homosexuality, the least prevalent and most tenuous of which is the one you mentioned.

Avatar image for Maroxad
Maroxad

23912

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15  Edited By Maroxad
Member since 2007 • 23912 Posts

@GazaAli said:
@bmanva said:

Anyone who get uncomfortable and violent around homosexuality are insecure about their own sexuality. Some are closet gay themselves.

I've heard this argument more than I care to remember and it sounds equally asinine each time. People of certain creeds antagonize homosexuality out of ideology, while other folks feel purely secular aversion towards it. In some societies it's culturally motivated, and in others it constitutes a part of a certain morality. The crux of it is that there are many reasons behind animosity towards homosexuality, the least prevalent and most tenuous of which is the one you mentioned.

What you call asinine, is actually a phenomenon that has been studied and documented by the academia itself.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/files/u47/Henry_et_al.pdf

363 citations as well. Of course, it doesnt even take an academic paper to realize as much, a lot of prominent anti-gay supporters, turned out gay or buying a prosititute of the same sex.

Most notably, Ted Haggard.

Edit: Lol, someone even has a website listing prominent homophobes who are gay

Avatar image for GazaAli
GazaAli

25216

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16  Edited By GazaAli
Member since 2007 • 25216 Posts

@Maroxad said:
@GazaAli said:
@bmanva said:

Anyone who get uncomfortable and violent around homosexuality are insecure about their own sexuality. Some are closet gay themselves.

I've heard this argument more than I care to remember and it sounds equally asinine each time. People of certain creeds antagonize homosexuality out of ideology, while other folks feel purely secular aversion towards it. In some societies it's culturally motivated, and in others it constitutes a part of a certain morality. The crux of it is that there are many reasons behind animosity towards homosexuality, the least prevalent and most tenuous of which is the one you mentioned.

What you call asinine, is actually a phenomenon that has been studied and documented by the academia itself.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/files/u47/Henry_et_al.pdf

363 citations as well. Of course, it doesnt even take an academic paper to realize as much, a lot of prominent anti-gay supporters, turned out gay or buying a prosititute of the same sex.

Most notably, Ted Haggard.

I didn't reject clandestine homosexual arousal as a possible reason for antipathy to homosexuality; instead, I rejected it as the sole reason behind it. It was his blanket statement that I called asinine, not the premise itself.

Also, that's a laughable sample size.

Avatar image for deactivated-5b19214ec908b
deactivated-5b19214ec908b

25072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#17 deactivated-5b19214ec908b
Member since 2007 • 25072 Posts

@GazaAli said:
@Maroxad said:
@GazaAli said:
@bmanva said:

Anyone who get uncomfortable and violent around homosexuality are insecure about their own sexuality. Some are closet gay themselves.

I've heard this argument more than I care to remember and it sounds equally asinine each time. People of certain creeds antagonize homosexuality out of ideology, while other folks feel purely secular aversion towards it. In some societies it's culturally motivated, and in others it constitutes a part of a certain morality. The crux of it is that there are many reasons behind animosity towards homosexuality, the least prevalent and most tenuous of which is the one you mentioned.

What you call asinine, is actually a phenomenon that has been studied and documented by the academia itself.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/files/u47/Henry_et_al.pdf

363 citations as well. Of course, it doesnt even take an academic paper to realize as much, a lot of prominent anti-gay supporters, turned out gay or buying a prosititute of the same sex.

Most notably, Ted Haggard.

I didn't reject clandestine homosexual arousal as a possible reason for antipathy to homosexuality; instead, I rejected it as the sole reason behind it. It was his blanket statement that I called asinine, not the premise itself.

Also, that's a laughable sample size.

Which is not what he said. He said they are insecure, which you have to be to hate anyone for anything that doesn't have a direct effect on people. He clearly said only some are actually gay, and last time I checked some doesn't mean all.

Avatar image for groomy
Groomy

6

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Groomy
Member since 2015 • 6 Posts

I wish there was a way to turn the views of those around... Many nations have succeeded, let's hope this place will eventually do the same.

Avatar image for bmanva
bmanva

4680

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 bmanva
Member since 2002 • 4680 Posts

@GazaAli said:
@bmanva said:

Anyone who get uncomfortable and violent around homosexuality are insecure about their own sexuality. Some are closet gay themselves.

I've heard this argument more than I care to remember and it sounds equally asinine each time. People of certain creeds antagonize homosexuality out of ideology, while other folks feel purely secular aversion towards it. In some societies it's culturally motivated, and in others it constitutes a part of a certain morality. The crux of it is that there are many reasons behind animosity towards homosexuality, the least prevalent and most tenuous of which is the one you mentioned.

Sounds like I hit one too close to home there.

And in your fervor to defend homophobia, you missed the point and it wasn't all homophobic individuals are homosexuals themselves.

Avatar image for Master_Live
Master_Live

20510

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

#20 Master_Live
Member since 2004 • 20510 Posts

@Maroxad said:

While I believe in freedom of speech,

Those two guys who responded with violence took it way too far.

You don't say.

Avatar image for bmanva
bmanva

4680

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#21 bmanva
Member since 2002 • 4680 Posts

@alim298 said:

But really the western culture (or should I say the non-middle eastern culture since that is Russia) sometimes astonishes me. I mean here in middle east it's quite normal if two men hold hands and no one would think they're gay. Kisses on the cheeks and hugs are also really common especially among relatives.

I mean you don't have to declare your hatred of the same gender to prove your straightness but that seems to be the trend in non-middle eastern societies.

That's funny because Islamic countries have some of the most intolerant laws when it comes to homosexuality. Their perception of what constitute as homosexual behaviors might differ from the west but they prosecute them just the same as Russians if not more harshly.

Avatar image for effec_tor
Effec_Tor

914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 5

#23 Effec_Tor
Member since 2014 • 914 Posts

@bmanva said:
@alim298 said:

But really the western culture (or should I say the non-middle eastern culture since that is Russia) sometimes astonishes me. I mean here in middle east it's quite normal if two men hold hands and no one would think they're gay. Kisses on the cheeks and hugs are also really common especially among relatives.

I mean you don't have to declare your hatred of the same gender to prove your straightness but that seems to be the trend in non-middle eastern societies.

That's funny because Islamic countries have some of the most intolerant laws when it comes to homosexuality. Their perception of what constitute as homosexual behaviors might differ from the west but they prosecute them just the same as Russians if not more harshly.

Yemen: According to 1994 penal code, married men can be sentenced to death by stoning for homosexual intercourse. Unmarried men face whipping or one year in prison. Women face up to seven years in prison.

Iran: In accordance with sharia law, homosexual intercourse between men can be punished by death, and men can be flogged for lesser acts such as kissing. Women may be flogged.

Iraq: The penal code does not expressly prohibit homosexual acts, but people have been killed by militias and sentenced to death by judges citing sharia law.

Mauritania: Muslim men engaging in homosexual sex can be stoned to death, according to a 1984 law. Women face prison.

Nigeria: Federal law classifies homosexual behavior as a felony punishable by imprisonment, but several states have adopted sharia law and imposed a death penalty for men. A law signed in early January makes it illegal for gay people countrywide to hold a meeting or form clubs.

Qatar: Sharia law in Qatar applies only to Muslims, who can be put to death for extramarital sex, regardless of sexual orientation.

Saudi Arabia: Under the country’s interpretation of sharia law, a married man engaging in sodomy or any non-Muslim who commits sodomy with a Muslim can be stoned to death. All sex outside of marriage is illegal.

Somalia: The penal code stipulates prison, but in some southern regions, Islamic courts have imposed Sharia law and the death penalty.

Sudan: Three-time offenders under the sodomy law can be put to death; first and second convictions result in flogging and imprisonment. Southern parts of the country have adopted more lenient laws.

United Arab Emirates: Lawyers in the country and other experts disagree on whether federal law proscribes the death penalty for consensual homosexual sex or only for rape. In a recent Amnesty International report, the organization said it was not aware of any death sentences for homosexual acts. All sexual acts outside of marriage are banned.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2014/02/24/here-are-the-10-countries-where-homosexuality-may-be-punished-by-death/

Avatar image for bmanva
bmanva

4680

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#24  Edited By bmanva
Member since 2002 • 4680 Posts
@effec_tor said:
@bmanva said:
@alim298 said:

But really the western culture (or should I say the non-middle eastern culture since that is Russia) sometimes astonishes me. I mean here in middle east it's quite normal if two men hold hands and no one would think they're gay. Kisses on the cheeks and hugs are also really common especially among relatives.

I mean you don't have to declare your hatred of the same gender to prove your straightness but that seems to be the trend in non-middle eastern societies.

That's funny because Islamic countries have some of the most intolerant laws when it comes to homosexuality. Their perception of what constitute as homosexual behaviors might differ from the west but they prosecute them just the same as Russians if not more harshly.

Yemen: According to 1994 penal code, married men can be sentenced to death by stoning for homosexual intercourse. Unmarried men face whipping or one year in prison. Women face up to seven years in prison.

Iran: In accordance with sharia law, homosexual intercourse between men can be punished by death, and men can be flogged for lesser acts such as kissing. Women may be flogged.

Iraq: The penal code does not expressly prohibit homosexual acts, but people have been killed by militias and sentenced to death by judges citing sharia law.

Mauritania: Muslim men engaging in homosexual sex can be stoned to death, according to a 1984 law. Women face prison.

Nigeria: Federal law classifies homosexual behavior as a felony punishable by imprisonment, but several states have adopted sharia law and imposed a death penalty for men. A law signed in early January makes it illegal for gay people countrywide to hold a meeting or form clubs.

Qatar: Sharia law in Qatar applies only to Muslims, who can be put to death for extramarital sex, regardless of sexual orientation.

Saudi Arabia: Under the country’s interpretation of sharia law, a married man engaging in sodomy or any non-Muslim who commits sodomy with a Muslim can be stoned to death. All sex outside of marriage is illegal.

Somalia: The penal code stipulates prison, but in some southern regions, Islamic courts have imposed Sharia law and the death penalty.

Sudan: Three-time offenders under the sodomy law can be put to death; first and second convictions result in flogging and imprisonment. Southern parts of the country have adopted more lenient laws.

United Arab Emirates: Lawyers in the country and other experts disagree on whether federal law proscribes the death penalty for consensual homosexual sex or only for rape. In a recent Amnesty International report, the organization said it was not aware of any death sentences for homosexual acts. All sexual acts outside of marriage are banned.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2014/02/24/here-are-the-10-countries-where-homosexuality-may-be-punished-by-death/

Give Putin sometime, I'm sure he will get Russia there in the next few years.

Avatar image for HAZE-Unit
HAZE-Unit

10564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25  Edited By HAZE-Unit
Member since 2007 • 10564 Posts

@alim298 said:

But really the western culture (or should I say the non-middle eastern culture since that is Russia) sometimes astonishes me. I mean here in middle east it's quite normal if two men hold hands and no one would think they're gay. Kisses on the cheeks and hugs are also really common especially among relatives.

I mean you don't have to declare your hatred of the same gender to prove your straightness but that seems to be the trend in non-middle eastern societies.

That first part is not true at all, if two men holds hands they are gay, they look weird, people look at them another way and lots of comments could come out from guys, no two straight men holds hands like they are a couple, I am middle-eastern too and I can vouch holding hands is not considered normal.

Kissing cheeks and hugs ( btw hugs is universally acceptable so it shouldn't be in the discussion at all) is another story, doesn't mean anything, it's totally weird however, if the kiss on the cheek is sexual.

Normal kisses on the cheek for greeting is like a hi or hello in the west when a female/male kiss a female friend when they meet, just a tap on the cheek to make it relatable for western guys, sometimes it's not even a kiss in our culture, just two cheeks slightly hitting each-other like when two glasses of wine hitting/touching for a toast, I don't even remember any one time where the whole lips actually touched my cheeks with their saliva all over....yikes!!

I have a question for my fellow western guys here, why is it considered totally socially normal and acceptable for women to kiss each-other for greeting but it's considered weird or gay for males to do the same?

Avatar image for horgen
horgen

127503

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#26 horgen  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 127503 Posts

I'm not surprised people are starring at them. Didn't have audio on so whatever was said, I didn't get it.

The last guy... Wow... He really had a problem with them.

Avatar image for whipassmt
whipassmt

15375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#27 whipassmt
Member since 2007 • 15375 Posts

@bmanva: I don't think Putin will start killing people for homosexual activity.

Avatar image for fenriz275
fenriz275

2383

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#28 fenriz275
Member since 2003 • 2383 Posts

Every Russian friend I've had in this country has said that getting out of Russia was the best decision they or their parents ever made. Despite what we want to believe or what the propaganda that comes out of there says it's a hellhole unless you're one of the elite. In the old days it meant being a communist party official while now it means being a Putin crony. They change the labels but the system is the same.

Avatar image for hrt_rulz01
hrt_rulz01

22374

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 hrt_rulz01
Member since 2006 • 22374 Posts

They're definitely still a bit backwards over there aren't they :(

Avatar image for drunk_pi
Drunk_PI

3358

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 Drunk_PI
Member since 2014 • 3358 Posts

It's not surprising considering how religious Russia is and how the church and the state is connected. Of course, that's surprising considering that I always thought Russia was more atheist because of the Soviet Union.

But hey, I guess some of those asshole's masculinity was threatened because they're secretly gay. Or whatever.

Avatar image for uninspiredcup
uninspiredcup

58939

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 2

#31  Edited By uninspiredcup
Member since 2013 • 58939 Posts

Very interesting,

For balance though, it would have been more so - interesting to see them try it across multiple countries. In area's of America, it would probably illicit a similar reaction I suspect.

Avatar image for alim298
alim298

2747

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#32  Edited By alim298
Member since 2012 • 2747 Posts

@bmanva:It's funny because it's gay? Because I don't recall mentioning anything about prosecution and whatnot. Do you think it's funny? Are you homophobic? I feel sorry for you man...

@effec_tor: I saw you at the Guardian.

@HAZE-Unit said:

That first part is not true at all, if two men holds hands they are gay, they look weird, people look at them another way and lots of comments could come out from guys, no two straight men holds hands like they are a couple, I am middle-eastern too and I can vouch holding hands is not considered normal.

Kissing cheeks and hugs ( btw hugs is universally acceptable so it shouldn't be in the discussion at all) is another story, doesn't mean anything, it's totally weird however, if the kiss on the cheek is sexual.

Normal kisses on the cheek for greeting is like a hi or hello in the west when a female/male kiss a female friend when they meet, just a tap on the cheek to make it relatable for western guys, sometimes it's not even a kiss in our culture, just two cheeks slightly hitting each-other like when two glasses of wine hitting/touching for a toast, I don't even remember any one time where the whole lips actually touched my cheeks with their saliva all over....yikes!!

I have a question for my fellow western guys here, why is it considered totally socially normal and acceptable for women to kiss each-other for greeting but it's considered weird or gay for males to do the same?

You must live in one of those westernized middle eastern countries I assume? Because men holding hands never was gay at least until a decade ago or something. It's only weird because it's something couples do these days which they've learned from western culture. Before they got westernized there was no such thing as "romantically holding hands" because it's not all that romantic to begin with. But westernization is a b****.

Yep that's how kisses on the cheeks work. I prefer mere handshakes myself but usually when you meet a relative or a friend after a long time, kisses on the cheeks are obligatory.

And that question is my question too. Western culture is soooo weird sometimes.

Avatar image for LuminousAether
LuminousAether

322

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 LuminousAether
Member since 2005 • 322 Posts

@GazaAli said:
@Maroxad said:
@GazaAli said:
@bmanva said:

Anyone who get uncomfortable and violent around homosexuality are insecure about their own sexuality. Some are closet gay themselves.

I've heard this argument more than I care to remember and it sounds equally asinine each time. People of certain creeds antagonize homosexuality out of ideology, while other folks feel purely secular aversion towards it. In some societies it's culturally motivated, and in others it constitutes a part of a certain morality. The crux of it is that there are many reasons behind animosity towards homosexuality, the least prevalent and most tenuous of which is the one you mentioned.

What you call asinine, is actually a phenomenon that has been studied and documented by the academia itself.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/files/u47/Henry_et_al.pdf

363 citations as well. Of course, it doesnt even take an academic paper to realize as much, a lot of prominent anti-gay supporters, turned out gay or buying a prosititute of the same sex.

Most notably, Ted Haggard.

I didn't reject clandestine homosexual arousal as a possible reason for antipathy to homosexuality; instead, I rejected it as the sole reason behind it. It was his blanket statement that I called asinine, not the premise itself.

Also, that's a laughable sample size.

Methinks the lady doth protest too much.

Avatar image for gamerguru100
gamerguru100

12718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#34 gamerguru100
Member since 2009 • 12718 Posts

What do you expect? It's Russia.

Pro tip if you ever go to Russia: Don't be non-white or gay.

Avatar image for OmegaTau
OmegaTau

908

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35  Edited By OmegaTau
Member since 2007 • 908 Posts

pushing homosexulaity = population control in the grand scheme of things.

in a biblical perspective it's considered an abomination which means it's hateful

that's why people out there hate the lifestyle.

adapting to the environment or survival of the fitites as some call it the lifestyle will die out.

just something to think about.....

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#36 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

@OmegaTau: what exactly is that supposed to make us think about?

Avatar image for OmegaTau
OmegaTau

908

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37  Edited By OmegaTau
Member since 2007 • 908 Posts

@lostrib said:

@OmegaTau: what exactly is that supposed to make us think about?

If Natural selection is a true theory hetorosexuals have nothing to worry about it if they dislike homosexuals.

Avatar image for GazaAli
GazaAli

25216

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 GazaAli
Member since 2007 • 25216 Posts

@toast_burner said:
@GazaAli said:

I didn't reject clandestine homosexual arousal as a possible reason for antipathy to homosexuality; instead, I rejected it as the sole reason behind it. It was his blanket statement that I called asinine, not the premise itself.

Also, that's a laughable sample size.

Which is not what he said. He said they are insecure, which you have to be to hate anyone for anything that doesn't have a direct effect on people. He clearly said only some are actually gay, and last time I checked some doesn't mean all.

I suggest you polish your reading comprehension skills before attempting to engage others in discussions. You'll save yourself first and foremost but others too the bane of reiteration and superfluous explication.

He specifically said that anyone who feels antipathy to gays is insecure about his sexuality which is blatantly wrong. It is understood that sexual insecurity is related to a confused and repressed sexual identity that may be too ashamed to make the jump to the other side of the isle. This is the direction Maroxad steered the discussion to, and I obliged accordingly. But to humor you for a second, your statement that one has to be insecure to hate someone for something is just as asinine as his blanket, baseless statement.

You could have figured this much by yourself, which makes me wonder whether you genuinely misconstrued my post or whether that was a poor attempt at equivocation.

Avatar image for GazaAli
GazaAli

25216

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 GazaAli
Member since 2007 • 25216 Posts

@bmanva said:
@GazaAli said:
@bmanva said:

Anyone who get uncomfortable and violent around homosexuality are insecure about their own sexuality. Some are closet gay themselves.

I've heard this argument more than I care to remember and it sounds equally asinine each time. People of certain creeds antagonize homosexuality out of ideology, while other folks feel purely secular aversion towards it. In some societies it's culturally motivated, and in others it constitutes a part of a certain morality. The crux of it is that there are many reasons behind animosity towards homosexuality, the least prevalent and most tenuous of which is the one you mentioned.

Sounds like I hit one too close to home there.

And in your fervor to defend homophobia, you missed the point and it wasn't all homophobic individuals are homosexuals themselves.

We all make asinine statements every now and then. As long as we keep it to a minimum - and most importantly - as long as we don't obstinately defend such statements, they don't shame us in any way.

You made an asinine statement when you spewed that baseless, blanket statement, which isn't disgraceful. But it's disgraceful to stand by it after its asininity came to light, let alone to use equivocation for that end. In no where did I claim that you said all "homophobic" individuals are homosexuals themselves, so I'm not sure where you're pulling this one from. Also, explain how I defended homophobia in my post; I'd be very curious to learn about that.

Avatar image for LuminousAether
LuminousAether

322

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40  Edited By LuminousAether
Member since 2005 • 322 Posts

@OmegaTau said:

pushing homosexulaity = population control in the grand scheme of things.

in a biblical perspective it's considered an abomination which means it's hateful

that's why people out there hate the lifestyle.

adapting to the environment or survival of the fitites as some call it the lifestyle will die out.

just something to think about.....

Eating shellfish is an abomination in the Bible. Wearing clothing created from two materials is an abomination in the Bible. All sins are equal in the eyes of God, so eating shrimp and wearing polyester is just as bad as sodomizing your same-sex lover. It's this kind of "pick and choose" theology that makes the anti-homosexual because of religion crowd look so small minded, bigoted, and ignorant about their own faith. The Bible is very explicit. Judge not lest ye be judged yourself. Love your neighbor as yourself. Don't point out the speck in your brother's eye and ignore the beam in your own.

So any time you see a Christian try to use religion as their reason for homophobia, you can instantly and without any doubt know that they are not a true believer, not an ardent believer in the faith. You can know that by the tenets of their own faith that they will be in Hell with the sinners, because they are sinners based on the scriptures of their own faith.

Avatar image for deactivated-5b19214ec908b
deactivated-5b19214ec908b

25072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#41  Edited By deactivated-5b19214ec908b
Member since 2007 • 25072 Posts

@GazaAli said:
@toast_burner said:
@GazaAli said:

I didn't reject clandestine homosexual arousal as a possible reason for antipathy to homosexuality; instead, I rejected it as the sole reason behind it. It was his blanket statement that I called asinine, not the premise itself.

Also, that's a laughable sample size.

Which is not what he said. He said they are insecure, which you have to be to hate anyone for anything that doesn't have a direct effect on people. He clearly said only some are actually gay, and last time I checked some doesn't mean all.

I suggest you polish your reading comprehension skills before attempting to engage others in discussions. You'll save yourself first and foremost but others too the bane of reiteration and superfluous explication.

He specifically said that anyone who feels antipathy to gays is insecure about his sexuality which is blatantly wrong. It is understood that sexual insecurity is related to a confused and repressed sexual identity that may be too ashamed to make the jump to the other side of the isle. This is the direction Maroxad steered the discussion to, and I obliged accordingly. But to humor you for a second, your statement that one has to be insecure to hate someone for something is just as asinine as his blanket, baseless statement.

You could have figured this much by yourself, which makes me wonder whether you genuinely misconstrued my post or whether that was a poor attempt at equivocation.

What makes it wrong? Being insecure about your sexuality doesn't necessarily mean you're gay when you want to be straight. All it means is that you're insecure. Like I said you'd have to be insecure to have a problem with homosexuality.

Instead of just saying "lalalala you're wrong lalalala!!!" why don't you actually put some thought in to your posts?

Avatar image for deactivated-5b797108c254e
deactivated-5b797108c254e

11245

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 0

#42  Edited By deactivated-5b797108c254e
Member since 2013 • 11245 Posts

People just need to get over this gay hatred...even humpback whales are coming out!

Loading Video...

Avatar image for YearoftheSnake5
YearoftheSnake5

9716

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 55

User Lists: 0

#43 YearoftheSnake5
Member since 2005 • 9716 Posts

Russia is a rather homophobic country, so I'm not surprised. It's still terrible, though.

Avatar image for iambatman7986
iambatman7986

4575

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#44 iambatman7986
Member since 2013 • 4575 Posts

It's sad 2 people can't walk down the street while holding hands without gathering negative attention. It shouldn't matter if it's a man/woman, man/man, or woman/woman.

Avatar image for MlauTheDaft
MlauTheDaft

5189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 MlauTheDaft
Member since 2011 • 5189 Posts

@korvus said:

People just need to get over this gay hatred...even humpback whales are coming out!

Loading Video...

Uhm, let's just say I expected something a little more.... Graphic... Am I weird?

Avatar image for Renevent42
Renevent42

6654

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#46  Edited By Renevent42
Member since 2010 • 6654 Posts

Very brave of them

Avatar image for deactivated-5b797108c254e
deactivated-5b797108c254e

11245

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 0

#47 deactivated-5b797108c254e
Member since 2013 • 11245 Posts

@MlauTheDaft: I said humpback, not sperm-whale =P

Avatar image for MlauTheDaft
MlauTheDaft

5189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 MlauTheDaft
Member since 2011 • 5189 Posts

@korvus: Hah :) Well, it was a cute video regardless.

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#49 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

@OmegaTau said:
@lostrib said:

@OmegaTau: what exactly is that supposed to make us think about?

If Natural selection is a true theory hetorosexuals have nothing to worry about it if they dislike homosexuals.

what does that have to do with your previous posts?

Avatar image for Maroxad
Maroxad

23912

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 Maroxad
Member since 2007 • 23912 Posts

They are right though, insecurity is a big part that causes homophobia (hence, why so many homophobes are suppressed homosexuals themselves). Another big problem are echo chambers. In echo chambers, dogma thrives and intellectualism dies.

@OmegaTau said:
@lostrib said:

@OmegaTau: what exactly is that supposed to make us think about?

If Natural selection is a true theory hetorosexuals have nothing to worry about it if they dislike homosexuals.

Homosexuality is a successful trait as long as they are passed around in smaller ammounts. Homosexuals will not rear children of their own, instead looking out for their nephews and nieces.