The gameplay is unthought of. The grafics are weak. The game is buggy. They're made in a hurry to come out with the movie. I've sort of enjoyed one. It was Eragon but it wasn't great.
There are only 2 movie-based games I've ever enjoyed playing: Goldneye 007 and Chronicles of Riddick.
Other than those two, I just pass by all the other movie tie-ins found in store game sections as if they didn't exist. They're not even worth a glance.
I absolutely ahte them. They're just slapped on in a day, have MASS glitches, boring gameplay, terrible graphics and are very short. There's also no surprise in them cuz they're based on the movie. I think they're a waste of time, money, and gaming
Those games suck.but there are 1 game that's even better than the movie, the only Chronicles of Riddick. Oh, and Star war games, they are not bad but also not that great
Those games suck.but there are 1 game that's even better than the movie, the only Chronicles of Riddick. Oh, and Star war games, they are not bad but also not that greatNeroiam
xmen? anyway in my experience movie games always suck if i see a movie game taht looks interesting i find im usually better off to not get my hopes up, havent been impressed by a movie game yet. they are just cheap ways to milk the movies for all theyre worth before every one forgets about it.
Well, I don't. If they made something after the film release so it could go in to the plot better, and be better made, then I think they could have something. But for now it's a cheap cash in.
There's a lot of great games that are a ton of fun that came from movies.
Riddick and Spider-Man has already been said
The Simpson game that came out the same time as the movie was fun, so was the Transformers game that came on the DS
If you want to go all over the place Chicken Little Ace In Action for the Wii was a very nice Ratchet and Clanky type game and then Cars was also good.
Heck, one of the greatest games of all time was connected to a movie.
The gameplay is unthought of. The grafics are weak. The game is buggy. They're made in a hurry to come out with the movie. I've sort of enjoyed one. It was Eragon but it wasn't great.
What game did you like that came from a movie?
Angry_Bosmer
Exactly! Slap a name on a box and you got 100,000 copies sold.
The gameplay is unthought of. The grafics are weak. The game is buggy. They're made in a hurry to come out with the movie. I've sort of enjoyed one. It was Eragon but it wasn't great.
What game did you like that came from a movie?
Angry_Bosmer
Same, I thought it was decent, if not worth the money I paid for it :| Still an enjoyable experience. The funny thing is, even though all of these movie games are based on books/movies, the plot is always cut in half, which is half of every good source of novel/film...
they are usually just cash-ins since the developers are zetta confident that the game will sell well even if it is riddled with crappy gameplay/graphics etc etc
I agree with the above post on the name. Also I think games based on movies usually arn't that good, one exception imo would be the lord of the kings the return of the king.
Great reference. Anyways, the developers have no reason to make them good. The people who are going to buy them will normally buy them anyways just because they are fans of the movie. People who buy them if they are good are just extra cash to the makers. Also because of the deadline for release of the movie, developers aren't given as much time to be Hideo Kojima for a game. They have no reason nor time to make a game a true gem it seems.
the main problem is allway that you can't convert a 2 hour movie in a good game respecting the story. and the fact that the persons that are responsable for the marketing of the game prefear that the people buy they (half made)games right after seeing the movie than risk to bring the game to late to profit from the hype of the movie.
Log in to comment