This topic is locked from further discussion.
any reasons 3 is better then 2?Ratchet-Man
Like I said, 2 isn't even a real Mario game. It was a completely separate platforming game in Japan that just had Mario sprites pasted into it for the US release. So all the mechanics (you can't even stomp on enemies!) and general feel of the game are different. Yeah, a lot of people still like the game, but it doesn't feel like Mario. SMB3 really took off where the original left off, keeping the classic gameplay whileexpanding Mario's abilities, adding tons of secrets, etc.
im wouldnt get super mario world for snes becuz i still have my snes and SMW and it still works and STILL have the both controllers.Ratchet-ManWell, if you want to see the evolution of them, play them in order. Or play 1, then 3, and then 2 if you want something different. If you just want to playthe cream of the crop for the NES get 3.
i would go with Mario 3... awesome game..
Thus i loved mario 2 :oops: , it is a complete different concept
oh.. and bonk 3 is fun :)
[QUOTE="chang_1910"]i would go with Mario 3... awesome game..
Thus i loved mario 2 :oops: , it is a complete different concept
oh.. and bonk 3 is fun :)
LINKloco
Leave Bonk out of this!!:P
:(
i mentioned it bc he/she was consider a bonk game as well :cry: :cry:
:P
LOL. No love for 2? I think it was a much better game then 1... also you can play as Luigi and Toad... what more can anyone want.Giff1988
I think it's better than one too. Great boss battles. One is nostalgic and paved the way for platformers and deserves all its credit, but still had room to improve and that's where SMB3 comes along, but it is still a good game.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment