NiGHTS, what is your opinion?

Galaxy will Destroy the Little Glory it will Have.alchemist007

yes, i do agree, NiGHTS 2 is just a big cash in and probably hasn't there been spent a long developement time for it.

I predict it will be a bad game. And if I'm wrong I predict it will be a good game ;)

NiGHTS into Dreams was an awesome game on Sega Saturn. I had the chance to play it. The concept might be boring but it's the atmosphere of dreams of 2 kids and the music that made the game. Also, there's was Reala. Reala is the sibling of NiGHTS. I can't say they are brothers/sisters since both aren't male or female.

NiGHTS: Journeys of Dreams is looking to continue this way. That's why I'm looking it.

i don't really have an opinion on it because all i've seen in the trailers is the guy flying around in circles doing nothing... maybe someone could enlighten me?ZumaJones07

You pretty much have the gist of it. The original NiGHTS was all about flying around in circles, doing nothing. ;)

it looks good graphically. gameplay look alright they need some more variety and the boss battle looked plain awkwardAsadMahdi59

The graphics look mediocre actually. Very plain, no textures, jaggies everywhere.....it's a mess.

it might be good..when i was younger i loved nights on the saturn.....but.....for sum reason im just not hyped for it....i may rent b4 i buy

[QUOTE="AsadMahdi59"]it looks good graphically. gameplay look alright they need some more variety and the boss battle looked plain awkwardDuckman5

The graphics look mediocre actually. Very plain, no textures, jaggies everywhere.....it's a mess.

idk im like the onlyone who thinks the game has good graphics.

[QUOTE="Duckman5"]

[QUOTE="AsadMahdi59"]it looks good graphically. gameplay look alright they need some more variety and the boss battle looked plain awkwardAsadMahdi59

The graphics look mediocre actually. Very plain, no textures, jaggies everywhere.....it's a mess.

idk im like the onlyone who thinks the game has good graphics.

You got Assassins Creed in your sig but you think NiGHTS has good graphics? Open your eyes man.

i heard the first one is really goodi'm try

[QUOTE="alchemist007"]Galaxy will Destroy the Little Glory it will Have.osbassgordo

yes, i do agree, NiGHTS 2 is just a big cash in and probably hasn't there been spent a long developement time for it.

I predict it will be a bad game. And if I'm wrong I predict it will be a good game ;)

Big cash in on what? Nights into Dreams for the Saturn was a cult classic. If Nintendo was going to try and cash in on the Nights title, it would have been for the N64 or the Gamecube. If Nintendo were to try and quickly cash in on the Nights title, they would have made a sequal years ago when more people would remember what Nights was. That's my opinion anyways.

I'm getting it for two reasons. Firstly, those who played the original have spoken highly of it. Secondly, although a sequel, NiGHTS is one of the most original Wii titles, and I like to support originality.Raiko101

Hey, I'm all for supporting originality, but if it's not a good game why support it? I'll check the reviews first, I'm almost sure I won't buy it (too many games this year) but I'll probably rent it if it gets good reviews.

Based on my experience with the original game, I'm not excited for this game much at all.
I never liked the gameplay, or the over all look of it.

It's just not for me. I'm not even tracking it.

[QUOTE="Raiko101"]I'm getting it for two reasons. Firstly, those who played the original have spoken highly of it. Secondly, although a sequel, NiGHTS is one of the most original Wii titles, and I like to support originality.7arek

Hey, I'm all for supporting originality, but if it's not a good game why support it? I'll check the reviews first, I'm almost sure I won't buy it (too many games this year) but I'll probably rent it if it gets good reviews.

I'm kind of surprised at the hate that the game is getting, the graphics don't seem to be completely mind blowing but all we've really seen is screenshots, which always look horrible. Another argument is that its the "new" Sega. People forget that Sonic was concieved to work as a 2D title, and made a pitiful jump to 3D (3D Sonic sucked at Adventure 1, but thats my opinion). Sonic wasn't meant to work in 3D. Billy Hatcher is the only other 3D Sonic Team game I know of, which was actually a decent game. NIGHTS was concieved as a 3D title and was widely regarded as a game. I can understand if the gameplay is simplistic, but if that wasn't an issue then, I fail to see how its an issue now.

I'm not on the "ZOMG MUST BUY!" side of this game, but I'm moderately interested in it and just wish it wouldn't get so much hate for, more or less, shallow reasons.

Galaxy will Destroy the Little Glory it will Have.alchemist007

It is not for everyone. If you are questioning yourself don't get it.l8bitz

So there are probably tons of us confused and questioning ourselves. It doesn't look too exciting.

[QUOTE="osbassgordo"]

[QUOTE="alchemist007"]Galaxy will Destroy the Little Glory it will Have.chefstubbies

yes, i do agree, NiGHTS 2 is just a big cash in and probably hasn't there been spent a long developement time for it.

I predict it will be a bad game. And if I'm wrong I predict it will be a good game ;)

Big cash in on what? Nights into Dreams for the Saturn was a cult classic. If Nintendo was going to try and cash in on the Nights title, it would have been for the N64 or the Gamecube. If Nintendo were to try and quickly cash in on the Nights title, they would have made a sequal years ago when more people would remember what Nights was. That's my opinion anyways.

Sega is NiGHTS developer not Nintendo. Nintendo has nothing to do with the equation what so ever. If sega wanted to they could have had this on the 360 or the PS3.

[QUOTE="chefstubbies"][QUOTE="osbassgordo"]

[QUOTE="alchemist007"]Galaxy will Destroy the Little Glory it will Have.ryustruck

yes, i do agree, NiGHTS 2 is just a big cash in and probably hasn't there been spent a long developement time for it.

I predict it will be a bad game. And if I'm wrong I predict it will be a good game ;)

Big cash in on what? Nights into Dreams for the Saturn was a cult classic. If Nintendo was going to try and cash in on the Nights title, it would have been for the N64 or the Gamecube. If Nintendo were to try and quickly cash in on the Nights title, they would have made a sequal years ago when more people would remember what Nights was. That's my opinion anyways.

Sega is NiGHTS developer not Nintendo. Nintendo has nothing to do with the equation what so ever. If sega wanted to they could have had this on the 360 or the PS3.

Obviously. But Sinse Nights 2 is coming on a nintendo platform, Nintendo is making money off it too yes? But what I questioned was your comment about it being a big cash in. If it were a quick cash in for anyone, they wouldn't have waited 11 years right?

[QUOTE="ryustruck"][QUOTE="chefstubbies"][QUOTE="osbassgordo"]

[QUOTE="alchemist007"]Galaxy will Destroy the Little Glory it will Have.chefstubbies

yes, i do agree, NiGHTS 2 is just a big cash in and probably hasn't there been spent a long developement time for it.

I predict it will be a bad game. And if I'm wrong I predict it will be a good game ;)

Big cash in on what? Nights into Dreams for the Saturn was a cult classic. If Nintendo was going to try and cash in on the Nights title, it would have been for the N64 or the Gamecube. If Nintendo were to try and quickly cash in on the Nights title, they would have made a sequal years ago when more people would remember what Nights was. That's my opinion anyways.

Sega is NiGHTS developer not Nintendo. Nintendo has nothing to do with the equation what so ever. If sega wanted to they could have had this on the 360 or the PS3.

Obviously. But Sinse Nights 2 is coming on a nintendo platform, Nintendo is making money off it too yes? But what I questioned was your comment about it being a big cash in. If it were a quick cash in for anyone, they wouldn't have waited 11 years right?

Sega has run out of franchises to **** up. They didnt Wait for anything.

[QUOTE="chefstubbies"][QUOTE="ryustruck"][QUOTE="chefstubbies"][QUOTE="osbassgordo"]

[QUOTE="alchemist007"]Galaxy will Destroy the Little Glory it will Have.ryustruck

yes, i do agree, NiGHTS 2 is just a big cash in and probably hasn't there been spent a long developement time for it.

I predict it will be a bad game. And if I'm wrong I predict it will be a good game ;)

Big cash in on what? Nights into Dreams for the Saturn was a cult classic. If Nintendo was going to try and cash in on the Nights title, it would have been for the N64 or the Gamecube. If Nintendo were to try and quickly cash in on the Nights title, they would have made a sequal years ago when more people would remember what Nights was. That's my opinion anyways.

Sega is NiGHTS developer not Nintendo. Nintendo has nothing to do with the equation what so ever. If sega wanted to they could have had this on the 360 or the PS3.

Obviously. But Sinse Nights 2 is coming on a nintendo platform, Nintendo is making money off it too yes? But what I questioned was your comment about it being a big cash in. If it were a quick cash in for anyone, they wouldn't have waited 11 years right?

Sega has run out of franchises to **** up. They didnt Wait for anything.

Nights into Dreams was released on the Sega Saturn in 1996. It's now 2007. You're saying they didn't wait for anything, yet there's an 11 year gap between the two titles.

All arguing aside, I am looking forward to this game, as I think it has a lot of potential. I will be disappointed if it turns out to suck, but not too surprised though.

I'm kind of surprised at the hate that the game is getting, the graphics don't seem to be completely mind blowing but all we've really seen is screenshots, which always look horrible. Another argument is that its the "new" Sega. People forget that Sonic was concieved to work as a 2D title, and made a pitiful jump to 3D (3D Sonic sucked at Adventure 1, but thats my opinion). Sonic wasn't meant to work in 3D. Billy Hatcher is the only other 3D Sonic Team game I know of, which was actually a decent game. NIGHTS was concieved as a 3D title and was widely regarded as a game. I can understand if the gameplay is simplistic, but if that wasn't an issue then, I fail to see how its an issue now.

I'm not on the "ZOMG MUST BUY!" side of this game, but I'm moderately interested in it and just wish it wouldn't get so much hate for, more or less, shallow reasons.

jmangafan

There's a video available

[QUOTE="ryustruck"][QUOTE="chefstubbies"][QUOTE="ryustruck"][QUOTE="chefstubbies"][QUOTE="osbassgordo"]

[QUOTE="alchemist007"]Galaxy will Destroy the Little Glory it will Have.chefstubbies

yes, i do agree, NiGHTS 2 is just a big cash in and probably hasn't there been spent a long developement time for it.

I predict it will be a bad game. And if I'm wrong I predict it will be a good game ;)

Big cash in on what? Nights into Dreams for the Saturn was a cult classic. If Nintendo was going to try and cash in on the Nights title, it would have been for the N64 or the Gamecube. If Nintendo were to try and quickly cash in on the Nights title, they would have made a sequal years ago when more people would remember what Nights was. That's my opinion anyways.

Sega is NiGHTS developer not Nintendo. Nintendo has nothing to do with the equation what so ever. If sega wanted to they could have had this on the 360 or the PS3.

Obviously. But Sinse Nights 2 is coming on a nintendo platform, Nintendo is making money off it too yes? But what I questioned was your comment about it being a big cash in. If it were a quick cash in for anyone, they wouldn't have waited 11 years right?

Sega has run out of franchises to **** up. They didnt Wait for anything.

Nights into Dreams was released on the Sega Saturn in 1996. It's now 2007. You're saying they didn't wait for anything, yet there's an 11 year gap between the two titles.

All arguing aside, I am looking forward to this game, as I think it has a lot of potential. I will be disappointed if it turns out to suck, but not too surprised though.

Sega spent that 11 years bastardizing the Sonic franchises. Now that they have nothing else to Bastardize they are going after Nights

[QUOTE="osbassgordo"]

[QUOTE="alchemist007"]Galaxy will Destroy the Little Glory it will Have.chefstubbies

yes, i do agree, NiGHTS 2 is just a big cash in and probably hasn't there been spent a long developement time for it.

I predict it will be a bad game. And if I'm wrong I predict it will be a good game ;)

Big cash in on what? Nights into Dreams for the Saturn was a cult classic. If Nintendo was going to try and cash in on the Nights title, it would have been for the N64 or the Gamecube. If Nintendo were to try and quickly cash in on the Nights title, they would have made a sequal years ago when more people would remember what Nights was. That's my opinion anyways.

lol, nintendo isnt making the game

[QUOTE="chefstubbies"][QUOTE="ryustruck"][QUOTE="chefstubbies"][QUOTE="ryustruck"][QUOTE="chefstubbies"][QUOTE="osbassgordo"]

[QUOTE="alchemist007"]Galaxy will Destroy the Little Glory it will Have.ryustruck

yes, i do agree, NiGHTS 2 is just a big cash in and probably hasn't there been spent a long developement time for it.

I predict it will be a bad game. And if I'm wrong I predict it will be a good game ;)

Big cash in on what? Nights into Dreams for the Saturn was a cult classic. If Nintendo was going to try and cash in on the Nights title, it would have been for the N64 or the Gamecube. If Nintendo were to try and quickly cash in on the Nights title, they would have made a sequal years ago when more people would remember what Nights was. That's my opinion anyways.

Sega is NiGHTS developer not Nintendo. Nintendo has nothing to do with the equation what so ever. If sega wanted to they could have had this on the 360 or the PS3.

Obviously. But Sinse Nights 2 is coming on a nintendo platform, Nintendo is making money off it too yes? But what I questioned was your comment about it being a big cash in. If it were a quick cash in for anyone, they wouldn't have waited 11 years right?

Sega has run out of franchises to **** up. They didnt Wait for anything.

Nights into Dreams was released on the Sega Saturn in 1996. It's now 2007. You're saying they didn't wait for anything, yet there's an 11 year gap between the two titles.

All arguing aside, I am looking forward to this game, as I think it has a lot of potential. I will be disappointed if it turns out to suck, but not too surprised though.

Sega spent that 11 years bastardizing the Sonic franchises. Now that they have nothing else to Bastardize they are going after Nights

lolz i agree w/ you totally ryustruck. LOLZ

[QUOTE="chefstubbies"][QUOTE="osbassgordo"]

[QUOTE="alchemist007"]Galaxy will Destroy the Little Glory it will Have.osbassgordo

yes, i do agree, NiGHTS 2 is just a big cash in and probably hasn't there been spent a long developement time for it.

I predict it will be a bad game. And if I'm wrong I predict it will be a good game ;)

Big cash in on what? Nights into Dreams for the Saturn was a cult classic. If Nintendo was going to try and cash in on the Nights title, it would have been for the N64 or the Gamecube. If Nintendo were to try and quickly cash in on the Nights title, they would have made a sequal years ago when more people would remember what Nights was. That's my opinion anyways.

lol, nintendo isnt making the game

Damn...there are so many morons on this board. Nintendo Wii is the console Nights 2 will be on. Which means Nintendo will make money, just like Sega who's developing the game itself.

I love how people like to read only bits and pieces of posts and spout off some dumba** comment.

Damn...there are so many morons on this board. Nintendo Wii is the console Nights 2 will be on. Which means Nintendo will make money, just like Sega who's developing the game itself.

I love how people like to read only bits and pieces of posts and spout off some dumba** comment.

chefstubbies

Will you just calm down?

[QUOTE="ryustruck"][QUOTE="chefstubbies"][QUOTE="ryustruck"][QUOTE="chefstubbies"][QUOTE="ryustruck"][QUOTE="chefstubbies"][QUOTE="osbassgordo"]

[QUOTE="alchemist007"]Galaxy will Destroy the Little Glory it will Have.osbassgordo

yes, i do agree, NiGHTS 2 is just a big cash in and probably hasn't there been spent a long developement time for it.

I predict it will be a bad game. And if I'm wrong I predict it will be a good game ;)

Big cash in on what? Nights into Dreams for the Saturn was a cult classic. If Nintendo was going to try and cash in on the Nights title, it would have been for the N64 or the Gamecube. If Nintendo were to try and quickly cash in on the Nights title, they would have made a sequal years ago when more people would remember what Nights was. That's my opinion anyways.

Sega is NiGHTS developer not Nintendo. Nintendo has nothing to do with the equation what so ever. If sega wanted to they could have had this on the 360 or the PS3.

Obviously. But Sinse Nights 2 is coming on a nintendo platform, Nintendo is making money off it too yes? But what I questioned was your comment about it being a big cash in. If it were a quick cash in for anyone, they wouldn't have waited 11 years right?

Sega has run out of franchises to **** up. They didnt Wait for anything.

Nights into Dreams was released on the Sega Saturn in 1996. It's now 2007. You're saying they didn't wait for anything, yet there's an 11 year gap between the two titles.

All arguing aside, I am looking forward to this game, as I think it has a lot of potential. I will be disappointed if it turns out to suck, but not too surprised though.

Sega spent that 11 years bastardizing the Sonic franchises. Now that they have nothing else to Bastardize they are going after Nights

lolz i agree w/ you totally ryustruck. LOLZ

So ryustruck seems to think that 11 years is rushing a quick cash in game and osbassgordo is in complete agreement?

And you guys also agree that Sega is going to bastardize the Nights franchise, even though there was only ever one nights game on the Saturn? How can a franchise have only one game?

Wow, we have a couple of geniuses on this board here. LOL

let sega hold on to what they have

sonic secret rings was really cool for the most part so maybe itll be neato too

[QUOTE="osbassgordo"][QUOTE="ryustruck"][QUOTE="chefstubbies"][QUOTE="ryustruck"][QUOTE="chefstubbies"][QUOTE="ryustruck"][QUOTE="chefstubbies"][QUOTE="osbassgordo"]

[QUOTE="alchemist007"]Galaxy will Destroy the Little Glory it will Have.chefstubbies

yes, i do agree, NiGHTS 2 is just a big cash in and probably hasn't there been spent a long developement time for it.

I predict it will be a bad game. And if I'm wrong I predict it will be a good game ;)

Big cash in on what? Nights into Dreams for the Saturn was a cult classic. If Nintendo was going to try and cash in on the Nights title, it would have been for the N64 or the Gamecube. If Nintendo were to try and quickly cash in on the Nights title, they would have made a sequal years ago when more people would remember what Nights was. That's my opinion anyways.

Sega is NiGHTS developer not Nintendo. Nintendo has nothing to do with the equation what so ever. If sega wanted to they could have had this on the 360 or the PS3.

Obviously. But Sinse Nights 2 is coming on a nintendo platform, Nintendo is making money off it too yes? But what I questioned was your comment about it being a big cash in. If it were a quick cash in for anyone, they wouldn't have waited 11 years right?

Sega has run out of franchises to **** up. They didnt Wait for anything.

Nights into Dreams was released on the Sega Saturn in 1996. It's now 2007. You're saying they didn't wait for anything, yet there's an 11 year gap between the two titles.

All arguing aside, I am looking forward to this game, as I think it has a lot of potential. I will be disappointed if it turns out to suck, but not too surprised though.

Sega spent that 11 years bastardizing the Sonic franchises. Now that they have nothing else to Bastardize they are going after Nights

lolz i agree w/ you totally ryustruck. LOLZ

So ryustruck seems to think that 11 years is rushing a quick cash in game and osbassgordo is in complete agreement?

And you guys also agree that Sega is going to bastardize the Nights franchise, even though there was only ever one nights game on the Saturn? How can a franchise have only one game?

Wow, we have a couple of geniuses on this board here. LOL

Dude you were called out for making an idiotic statement showing you don't know much, and now your looking like an even bigger idiot trying to defend yourself.