[QUOTE="Alx1231"]
[QUOTE="dotWithShoes"] Okay? So the GameCube required them to not try to compete hardware wise. Nintendo has delivered at least 1 title(most of which are highly reviewed) in most of their franchises, established a new franchise(Wii series of games), all the while supporting their console and handheld system. Where other developers went with the games they made for the Wii means nothing to my question, I asked what NINTENDO has done differently, and that's only made a system that wasn't among the top consoles in terms of computing power. Everything else they have done has been, same ole Nintendo(which, ironically is what everyone always complains about but then say they changed this generation and that's bad)goblaa
I don't think nintendo changed. The reason I couldn't see myself getting the Wii was because of the controls. I don't think about the sacrifices they made for the casual. I just never seen myself playing with motion controls. To me, graphics have nothing to do with the enjoyment of a game. Control does.
Well, I feel bad for you I guess. Have you tried motion controls? Almost all of them require very little movement and the wiimote's pointer is like a revolution in control.
All I'm saying is that some of this gens best games are motion controlled. It's a shame to miss them because of some pre-conceived notion of them that you could find out is false.
I have played the Wii before lol. I'm a gamer, just because I don't own a console doesn't mean I don't have friends who who have it. I played Mario Galaxy on the Wii and Mario Kart which are both very fun games. The issue I had with the Wii was the dozens apon dozens of piles of crap that the system does have on it. I've decided that I will be getting the Wii just for Skyward Sword but that doesn't mean that I'm not gonna go looking for the awesome games for it now that I actually do have the opportunity to play it.
Log in to comment