Gamespot is fix'd

I wonder how much money Sega payed CNET once they saw the 3.5 review of Sonic Unleashed for the 360

What other explanation there is?

http://www.gamespot.com/wii/action/sonicunleashed/index.html

If you read the reviews for both version you'd know the explanation. The two versions are pretty different.

Besides, if SEGA wanted to pay up Gamespot for a good score, don't you think they'd want more than a 7/10?

If you read the reviews for both version you'd know the explanation. The two versions are pretty different.

vashkey

Not much explanation for a change this drastic in score.

Besides, if SEGA wanted to pay up Gamespot for a good score, don't you think they'd want more than a 7/10?

vashkey

But then people will get suspicious, don't you think?

[QUOTE="vashkey"]Besides, if SEGA wanted to pay up Gamespot for a good score, don't you think they'd want more than a 7/10?

Mikethechimp

[QUOTE="Mikethechimp"][QUOTE="vashkey"]Besides, if SEGA wanted to pay up Gamespot for a good score, don't you think they'd want more than a 7/10?

Black_Knight_00

I don't believe in reviewer bribery, (at least in this case)Black_Knight_00

Me neither. But Tom looks like the kind of guy that can be bossed around easily; I can easily see how CNET excecutive would have told him to give a certain review score, and he'd comply.