A Hard Drive Is Completely Useless

  • 112 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Jaysonguy
Jaysonguy

39454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#1 Jaysonguy
Member since 2006 • 39454 Posts

Here's what it comes down to, if you have the option between an SD card or a hard drive and you pick the hard drive you fail the test.

The Wii does not need a hard drive for one very important reason

They fail much too often.

All studies have shown one discouraging thing when it comes to hard drives. They are no better today then they were almost 2 decades ago. Instead of becoming error free they have plateaued when it comes to failure rate. A drive bought today fails at the same rate as a drive bought in 1994.

Now the way that Nintendo has tied everything to the Wii that means for a large chunk of users a failed hard drive means games lost forever. Even today people don't register their Wii at Nintendo.com and ask questions about what happens if your Wii dies. Adding a storage device that is shown to fail no matter what would only cause problems for the user and the company.

On the other hand if Nintendo expanded the SD slot funtions in the Wii everyone would use solid state memory for their saves. Solid state is better by leaps and bounds. You can put an SD card in your pocket and throw it in the laundry and once your jeans are clean the SD card will still work.

Putting saves on SD cards are idiot proof, you'd have to really try to lose your data.

Plus pricing is attractive, 4 gig cards right now are 20-40 dollars (depending where you shop) that's more then enough storage for even the downloadiest of the downloaders.

Wii users should be be pushing for solid state instead of the inferior method so many talk about.

Avatar image for lancea34
lancea34

6912

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 lancea34
Member since 2007 • 6912 Posts
Maybe they will make a USB key instead?
Avatar image for ECG_24
ECG_24

1653

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 ECG_24
Member since 2008 • 1653 Posts

First of all HDD's have greatly improved in two decades. They have become faster, higher capacity, and more durable. Your talk of failure rates is grossly exaggerated.

Second, SD cards are not without their own drawbacks. They have very slow write/read speeds and were never designed to handle continuous use.

Avatar image for deactivated-5967f36c08c33
deactivated-5967f36c08c33

15614

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 deactivated-5967f36c08c33
Member since 2006 • 15614 Posts
The problem is that SD cards can't hold as much as a hard drive.I don't want to switch between SD cards every time I want to play a different WiiWare title.
Avatar image for linkyshinks
linkyshinks

1332

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 linkyshinks
Member since 2006 • 1332 Posts

Thank you ECG.

Avatar image for feryl06
feryl06

4955

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#6 feryl06
Member since 2006 • 4955 Posts

Where are you getting your numbers about hard drive failures from today and 1994? Do you even know what you are talking about?

Here's what it comes down to, if you have the option between an SD card or a hard drive and you pick the hard drive you fail the test.

The Wii does not need a hard drive for one very important reason

They fail much too often.

All studies have shown one discouraging thing when it comes to hard drives. They are no better today then they were almost 2 decades ago. Instead of becoming error free they have plateaued when it comes to failure rate. A drive bought today fails at the same rate as a drive bought in 1994.

Now the way that Nintendo has tied everything to the Wii that means for a large chunk of users a failed hard drive means games lost forever. Even today people don't register their Wii at Nintendo.com and ask questions about what happens if your Wii dies. Adding a storage device that is shown to fail no matter what would only cause problems for the user and the company.

On the other hand if Nintendo expanded the SD slot funtions in the Wii everyone would use solid state memory for their saves. Solid state is better by leaps and bounds. You can put an SD card in your pocket and throw it in the laundry and once your jeans are clean the SD card will still work.

Putting saves on SD cards are idiot proof, you'd have to really try to lose your data.

Plus pricing is attractive, 4 gig cards right now are 20-40 dollars (depending where you shop) that's more then enough storage for even the downloadiest of the downloaders.

Wii users should be be pushing for solid state instead of the inferior method so many talk about.

Jaysonguy
Avatar image for Jaysonguy
Jaysonguy

39454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#7 Jaysonguy
Member since 2006 • 39454 Posts

First of all HDD's have greatly improved in two decades. They have become faster and larger. Your talk of failure rates is grossly exaggerated.

Second, SD cards are not without their own drawbacks. They have very slow write/read speeds and were never designed to handle continuous use.

ECG_24

Completely wrong on both counts

Hard drive failure is just as common today as it was in the 90's. While size and speed has increased the failure rate has not gone down. HERE

As you can see in the 2nd and 3rd years of a drive's life there's close to a 10% chance it will fail. One out of every ten is not a small amount.

As for the speeds of solid state you're talking about a myth. Solid state made today is able to read and write incredibly fast (faster then hard drives made for consumer use) to where it's used in cameras that need to take multiple pictures in a second and is now used in military applications HERE

If speed is an issue there are solid state options to be purchased. Though you'll never need that speed and it will never effect performance of a game.

Avatar image for cjm23
cjm23

910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 cjm23
Member since 2007 • 910 Posts

lol I thought this was funny

lol

Anyways, these failure rates you speak of - Where did they come from? I've owned plenty of hard drives, and none of them have failed me yet? More than ten, too. And even if one DID fail, Im sure Nintendo's customer support would take care of it.

Avatar image for Rocky32189
Rocky32189

8995

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Rocky32189
Member since 2007 • 8995 Posts

"They fail much too often.

All studies have shown one discouraging thing when it comes to hard drives. They are no better today then they were almost 2 decades ago. Instead of becoming error free they have plateaued when it comes to failure rate. A drive bought today fails at the same rate as a drive bought in 1994"

The disk drive that is currently in everyone's Wii is much more likely to fail than any hard drive. Also, I hope you don't own a computer because then you've violated your own argument.

"On the other hand if Nintendo expanded the SD slot funtions in the Wii everyone would use solid state memory for their saves. Solid state is better by leaps and bounds. You can put an SD card in your pocket and throw it in the laundry and once your jeans are clean the SD card will still work."

Nintendo doesn't allow us to read files directly off the SD cards, and solid state memory is much more expensive than hard drives. SD cards are extremely slow. Try copying an N64 game, and you'll know what I'm talking about.

"Plus pricing is attractive, 4 gig cards right now are 20-40 dollars (depending where you shop) that's more then enough storage for even the downloadiest of the downloaders."

The Wii isn't compatible with cards over 2 GB.

Avatar image for cjm23
cjm23

910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 cjm23
Member since 2007 • 910 Posts

They fail much too often.

All studies have shown one discouraging thing when it comes to hard drives. They are no better today then they were almost 2 decades ago. Instead of becoming error free they have plateaued when it comes to failure rate. A drive bought today fails at the same rate as a drive bought in 1994

The disk drive that is currently in everyone's Wii is much more likely to fail than any hard drive. Also, I hope you don't own a computer because then you've violated your own argument.

On the other hand if Nintendo expanded the SD slot funtions in the Wii everyone would use solid state memory for their saves. Solid state is better by leaps and bounds. You can put an SD card in your pocket and throw it in the laundry and once your jeans are clean the SD card will still work.

Nintendo doesn't allow us to read files directly off the SD cards, and solid state memory is much more expensive than hard drives.

Plus pricing is attractive, 4 gig cards right now are 20-40 dollars (depending where you shop) that's more then enough storage for even the downloadiest of the downloaders.

The Wii isn't compatible with cards over 2 GB.

Rocky32189

Couldn't have said it better myself.

Avatar image for Jaysonguy
Jaysonguy

39454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#12 Jaysonguy
Member since 2006 • 39454 Posts

"They fail much too often.

All studies have shown one discouraging thing when it comes to hard drives. They are no better today then they were almost 2 decades ago. Instead of becoming error free they have plateaued when it comes to failure rate. A drive bought today fails at the same rate as a drive bought in 1994"

The disk drive that is currently in everyone's Wii is much more likely to fail than any hard drive. Also, I hope you don't own a computer because then you've violated your own argument.

"On the other hand if Nintendo expanded the SD slot funtions in the Wii everyone would use solid state memory for their saves. Solid state is better by leaps and bounds. You can put an SD card in your pocket and throw it in the laundry and once your jeans are clean the SD card will still work."

Nintendo doesn't allow us to read files directly off the SD cards, and solid state memory is much more expensive than hard drives. SD cards are extremely slow. Try copying an N64 game, and you'll know what I'm talking about.

"Plus pricing is attractive, 4 gig cards right now are 20-40 dollars (depending where you shop) that's more then enough storage for even the downloadiest of the downloaders."

The Wii isn't compatible with cards over 2 GB.

Rocky32189

1. There is no disk drive in the Wii. As for me owning a computer I'm not sure what you mean. No computer owner should expect their data to survive on a hard drive, that's why backing up is mandatory if you have a computer.

2. That's why I said expand. Also you're just repeating a myth that I've already debunked, anyone with a high end camera knows that speed is not an issue if you're willing to pay.

3. I repeat, that's why I said expand

Solid state does not fail, hard drives do.

Avatar image for haziqonfire
haziqonfire

36390

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#13 haziqonfire
Member since 2005 • 36390 Posts
Yeah, Flash Memory is more reliable than a HDD. I really just want some sort of storage solution more than a HDD.
Avatar image for WolfWatch
WolfWatch

882

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#14 WolfWatch
Member since 2007 • 882 Posts

If hard drives were likely to fail as often as you appear to make them sound then probably many of us wouldn't be responding. I am sure many of us here have never had a hard drive problem. I've had two in the last thirteen years. While on the other hand I have lost data, broken, and completely lost SD and flash cards/drives several times over the last few years. Whether it is my fault or not I would prefer to have a bulky (more likely slim) HD than greater SD support.

Whether or not a HD would be a good thing or bad for the Wii is one matter. You are simply bashing the HD completely. The HD isn't useless, if you think so then you should toss out the ones in your computer and hook it up to flash memory. A good comparison might have been better pointing out the pros and cons -.

Avatar image for ECG_24
ECG_24

1653

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 ECG_24
Member since 2008 • 1653 Posts

Solid state does not fail.

Jaysonguy

That statement is so wrong I don't even know what to say.

Avatar image for Rocky32189
Rocky32189

8995

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Rocky32189
Member since 2007 • 8995 Posts

1. There is no disk drive in the Wii. As for me owning a computer I'm not sure what you mean. No computer owner should expect their data to survive on a hard drive, that's why backing up is mandatory if you have a computer.

2. That's why I said expand. Also you're just repeating a myth that I've already debunked, anyone with a high end camera knows that speed is not an issue if you're willing to pay.

3. I repeat, that's why I said expand

Solid state does not fail, hard drives do.

Jaysonguy

1. Of course there is a disk drive in the Wii. Whether you want to believe it or not, the Wii does have moving parts inside it, which are as likely or more likely to fail than a HDD. If hard drives are completely useless, why does every computer come with one, and why are you using one? The answer is because, all things considered, HDD are a much better storage solution. The fact that they are vastly cheaper far outweighs the nearly insignificant failure rate.

2. The SD cards which are currently compatible with the Wii are all incredibly slow. Also, I could buy a 100 GB HDD with an insignificant rate of failure for the nearly the same price as you could buy 4 GB of Solid State memory that runs at a comparable speed.

3. Everything has a failure rate to some capacity, and the rate of failure for HDD's is so small it's not even an issue.

Avatar image for cjm23
cjm23

910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 cjm23
Member since 2007 • 910 Posts
SSD are too expensive, SD cards are too small (memory and physical size), and if you get a big one (32gb) you will be paying a butt-load of money ($200+). Even a 16gb one is $100+ bucks. You could get a 250gb USB HDD for around $100 bucks, or a 500gb one for $150-$200.
Avatar image for ECG_24
ECG_24

1653

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 ECG_24
Member since 2008 • 1653 Posts

SSD are too expensive, SD cards are too small (memory and physical size), and if you get a big one (32gb) you will be paying a butt-load of money ($200+). Even a 16gb one is around $70 bucks. You could get a 250gb USB HDD for around $100 bucks, or a 500gb one for $150-$200.cjm23

I purchased an external 500 GB HDD for $80 with a mail in rebate so it just shows how inexpensive they are.

Avatar image for cjm23
cjm23

910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 cjm23
Member since 2007 • 910 Posts

[QUOTE="cjm23"]SSD are too expensive, SD cards are too small (memory and physical size), and if you get a big one (32gb) you will be paying a butt-load of money ($200+). Even a 16gb one is around $70 bucks. You could get a 250gb USB HDD for around $100 bucks, or a 500gb one for $150-$200.ECG_24

I purchased a 500 GB HDD for $80 with a mail in rebate so it just shows how inexpensive they are.

My Point exactly.

P.S.-Does anyone know why I just got a warning? I deleted one of my posts, could that be it? It said offensive material or something, and it said it was deleted by a mod or admin, but I'm pretty sure I deleted it. And it wasn't even offensive. Anybody?

Avatar image for Lub1
Lub1

517

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Lub1
Member since 2005 • 517 Posts
an external hard drive would be ok by me, or good sd-cards of 4 or 8 gig. External drive is a pain though, I don't wanna have an ugly thing on top or next to my wii :p
Avatar image for cjm23
cjm23

910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 cjm23
Member since 2007 • 910 Posts

an external hard drive would be ok by me, or good sd-cards of 4 or 8 gig. External drive is a pain though, I don't wanna have an ugly thing on top or next to my wii :pLub1

Ya, that's why I think Nintendo will make there own. Nobody wants an ugly USB hard drive sittin on top or next to their Wii. They want It flush with the system, like the 360's.

Avatar image for ECG_24
ECG_24

1653

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 ECG_24
Member since 2008 • 1653 Posts

To clear up confusion about SSD, there are different types of SSD.

This is your standard run-of-the-mill SD card. They are cheap, durable, but very slow and have limited write cycles (meaning they will eventually fail).

VS.

This is the kind of SSD that is slowly making its way into laptop and desktop computers. The advantages you've been hearing about SSD are linked to these. But this kind of SSD is still ridiculously expensive and is not what we're talking about in this topic.

Avatar image for TheLordMagnus
TheLordMagnus

3783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 TheLordMagnus
Member since 2006 • 3783 Posts

LOL Harddrives don't fail any more often than other standard computer equipment, such as graphics cards. Coincidentally, the Wii's graphics card has failed on many consumers, causing them to return their system to Nintendo. But I guess if graphics cards fail, we shouldn't use them in our products! ROFL....All technology breaks down over time, including cars. Should we not drive cars? This logic is beyond stupid.

Avatar image for rcignoni
rcignoni

8863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 rcignoni
Member since 2004 • 8863 Posts

You can't save certain games onto SD cards, you can't play VC games off of SD cards. SD cards are sloooooow.

Yes, I KNOW I can delete/redownload the games I have already bought, but it's honestly much easier and more attractive to just load them off of an HDD. Besides, with an HDD it opens the door to demos/videos/DLC, since lazy developers will no longer have an excuse to not make these things.

Avatar image for rcignoni
rcignoni

8863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 rcignoni
Member since 2004 • 8863 Posts

To clear up confusion about SSD, there are different types of SSD.

This is your standard run-of-the-mill SD card. They are cheap, durable, but very slow and have limited write cycles (meaning they will eventually fail).

VS.

This is the kind of SSD that is slowly making its way into laptop and desktop computers. The advantages you've been hearing about SSD are linked to these. But this kind of SSD is still ridiculously expensive and is not what we're talking about in this topic.

ECG_24
The Wii won't accept any SD card higher than 4GB.
Avatar image for Picklechugger
Picklechugger

1465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#27 Picklechugger
Member since 2004 • 1465 Posts

I just want more memory for my Wii. I'd prefer an SD card, but I really don't know if it could work or not. A hard drive is too bulky for me, and prolly too expensive (I don't like spending more than $20 on stuff like that). I'd buy it, though, if Nintendo made it.

I also like getting along, we should do that. Let's just all join hands and sing a song about world peace, okay?

Avatar image for famicommander
famicommander

8524

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 famicommander
Member since 2008 • 8524 Posts
SD cards are simply too expensive. Hard drives are much more cost-effective. I can get at least a 40GB hard drive for the price of a 4GB SD card.
Avatar image for cjm23
cjm23

910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 cjm23
Member since 2007 • 910 Posts

I just want more memory for my Wii. I'd prefer an SD card, but I really don't know if it could work or not. A hard drive is too bulky for me, and prolly too expensive (I don't like spending more than $20 on stuff like that). I'd buy it, though, if Nintendo made it.

I also like getting along, we should do that. Let's just all join hands and sing a song about world peace, okay?

Picklechugger

Why can't we be friends?

Why can't "wii" be friends? (that was a horrible pun)

Sing everybody!

Avatar image for ECG_24
ECG_24

1653

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 ECG_24
Member since 2008 • 1653 Posts
[QUOTE="ECG_24"]

To clear up confusion about SSD, there are different types of SSD.

This is your standard run-of-the-mill SD card. They are cheap, durable, but very slow and have limited write cycles (meaning they will eventually fail).

VS.

This is the kind of SSD that is slowly making its way into laptop and desktop computers. The advantages you've been hearing about SSD are linked to these. But this kind of SSD is still ridiculously expensive and is not what we're talking about in this topic.

rcignoni

The Wii won't accept any SD card higher than 4GB.

Obviously you didn't read my post. Nowhere did I mention higher capacity SD cards. The bottom pic is not an SD card.

Avatar image for Potat4o
Potat4o

35

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 Potat4o
Member since 2008 • 35 Posts
Although I don't agree with your reasons, I do think that Flash Memory is the way to go. It takes less power and it is much faster.
Avatar image for Cheezy-Beezy
Cheezy-Beezy

1329

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#33 Cheezy-Beezy
Member since 2007 • 1329 Posts

hahaha wow u guys are arguin over stupid things

by the looks of it neither is going to change there

opinion on it. But i would choose savin on SD cards

cuz if ur wii crashed like mine in a week and lost ur saved

data and vc games it sucks SD is a smarter way to go id

rather get a brand new wii then nintendo repairin it takin a month

then sendin it back. Im not lazy so ill keep on usin my sd cards

Avatar image for presto7640
presto7640

817

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#34 presto7640
Member since 2004 • 817 Posts
[QUOTE="ECG_24"]

First of all HDD's have greatly improved in two decades. They have become faster and larger. Your talk of failure rates is grossly exaggerated.

Second, SD cards are not without their own drawbacks. They have very slow write/read speeds and were never designed to handle continuous use.

Jaysonguy

Completely wrong on both counts

Hard drive failure is just as common today as it was in the 90's. While size and speed has increased the failure rate has not gone down. HERE

Here's an article that talks about that study and a couple other recent ones. It helps explain the MTBF ratings used in the study you posted, and why it really isn't a very reliable rating for the consumer. It doesn't necessarily mean that drives are failing more often than they should. ARTICLE

I think we should also remember that these articles are studies done on large data centers. These drives would be under duress 24 hours a day, and probably don't reflect what a Wii disk drive would be going through.

But, I do agree that a simple tweak allowing better SD support would be the best solution...for the moment.

Avatar image for orangeturtle472
OrangeTurtle472

2636

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#35 OrangeTurtle472
Member since 2007 • 2636 Posts
And i hate how u cant save brawl and mario kart wii files on an SD card
Avatar image for gonzales1
gonzales1

2591

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 gonzales1
Member since 2003 • 2591 Posts

Here goes Jaysonguy again going against the crowd. :roll: Love it.

This is what Nintendo needs to do- DO release external USB HDD in various models- possibly 20, 40, and 60GB.

Leave the SD card function intact but allow for SDHC to backup important information IN CASE of HDD failure.

Avatar image for Dark_Link142
Dark_Link142

6726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#37 Dark_Link142
Member since 2004 • 6726 Posts
You're absolutely right. SD cards! :D
Avatar image for Dark_Link142
Dark_Link142

6726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#38 Dark_Link142
Member since 2004 • 6726 Posts

Here goes Jaysonguy again going against the crowd. :roll: Love it.

This is what Nintendo needs to do- DO release external USB HDD in various models- possibly 20, 40, and 60GB.

Leave the SD card function intact but allow for SDHC to backup important information IN CASE of HDD failure.

gonzales1

That seems incredibly pointless. Instead of creating a 20/40/60GB HDD, why not just make the SD card be able to store what we want. It's small, affordable, and reliable.

Why go for an expensive and clunky hard drive that have higher fail rates and that have a ridiculous amount of space you're never going to use, unless you plan on buying the entire virtual console game collection and all the Wiiware games?

Avatar image for gonzales1
gonzales1

2591

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 gonzales1
Member since 2003 • 2591 Posts
[QUOTE="gonzales1"]

Here goes Jaysonguy again going against the crowd. :roll: Love it.

This is what Nintendo needs to do- DO release external USB HDD in various models- possibly 20, 40, and 60GB.

Leave the SD card function intact but allow for SDHC to backup important information IN CASE of HDD failure.

Dark_Link142

That seems incredibly pointless. Instead of creating a 20/40/60GB HDD, why not just make the SD card be able to store what we want. It's small, affordable, and reliable.

Why go for an expensive and clunky hard drive that have higher fail rates and that have a ridiculous amount of space you're never going to use, unless you plan on buying the entire virtual console game collection and all the Wiiware games?

If you are wanting to play WiiWare/VC games off of a SD card then think again. An SD card's read/transfer spead is a lot slower than an HDD.

Avatar image for bobbetybob
bobbetybob

19370

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#40 bobbetybob
Member since 2005 • 19370 Posts
Fine then make it so we can read from SD cards. When people say "We want a hard-drive" they mainly mean, we want a way to expand memory, they just use hard-drive because it's what the other two systems have in them. I'd be fine with reading from SD-Cards, I mean, you can buy a 2 GB SD card for super cheap, I'd be happy using multiple SD cards. But that's the problem, we can't even do that.
Avatar image for theweakbear
theweakbear

2245

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#41 theweakbear
Member since 2005 • 2245 Posts
Wii's probably fail more than hard drives do. Mine did twice, yours did three times, Jaysonguy. And all of friends who have Xbox 360's never had their hard drive fail, not my really old computer, not my semi-old computer, not my new computer, not my dad's or mom's laptops have had the hard drive fail. Yet on the other hand I see Wii's breaking all the time I see it on the boards and my friend's Wii after a year is showing some problems. I mean seriously, Jaysonguy, you really think Nintendo isn't implementing a hard drive because of high failure rates? Sure an SD card is fine for the amount of stuff we are getting, but if anyone wanted more, like REAL downloadable content, then you'll need a hard drive, and your reason not to get one is stupid to say the least.
Avatar image for Darkman159
Darkman159

255

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#42 Darkman159
Member since 2005 • 255 Posts

I think nintendo is already doing something about the storage problem. According to this very reliable site called Zentendo, Nintendo is testing "USB Devices" on the wii right now. The only logical thing i can think of they doing is either a hard drive or something to make USB memories compatible. Here is the link:

http://www.zentendo.com/news.php?newsId=1222

Avatar image for maverick_41
maverick_41

1195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 47

User Lists: 0

#43 maverick_41
Member since 2007 • 1195 Posts
Yea, I got a 1 GB a year ago and it it still has A LOT of memory left on it.
Avatar image for grahamx
grahamx

153

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 grahamx
Member since 2005 • 153 Posts
Nintendo should create it's own brand of Solid State Drives, that have a good 20-40 gigs of free space. They should wait a year or two to do this so prices would go down.
Avatar image for PyroPice
PyroPice

443

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#45 PyroPice
Member since 2007 • 443 Posts
[QUOTE="ECG_24"]

First of all HDD's have greatly improved in two decades. They have become faster and larger. Your talk of failure rates is grossly exaggerated.

Second, SD cards are not without their own drawbacks. They have very slow write/read speeds and were never designed to handle continuous use.

Jaysonguy

Completely wrong on both counts

Hard drive failure is just as common today as it was in the 90's. While size and speed has increased the failure rate has not gone down. HERE

As you can see in the 2nd and 3rd years of a drive's life there's close to a 10% chance it will fail. One out of every ten is not a small amount.

As for the speeds of solid state you're talking about a myth. Solid state made today is able to read and write incredibly fast (faster then hard drives made for consumer use) to where it's used in cameras that need to take multiple pictures in a second and is now used in military applications HERE

If speed is an issue there are solid state options to be purchased. Though you'll never need that speed and it will never effect performance of a game.

wow,,,,,,,jayson guy, you lose,,,,,,,again, you are so full of it, how often do harddrives fail on the other consoles? not very....at all, you are just rying to rile up wii owners becaus you know they want a harddrive so they can have DLC and play games straight off of it, sc cards you cant do that on (right now) and max capacity is 4 gbs, any decent harddrive laughs at 4gbs........

Avatar image for PyroPice
PyroPice

443

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#46 PyroPice
Member since 2007 • 443 Posts
[QUOTE="Rocky32189"]

"They fail much too often.

All studies have shown one discouraging thing when it comes to hard drives. They are no better today then they were almost 2 decades ago. Instead of becoming error free they have plateaued when it comes to failure rate. A drive bought today fails at the same rate as a drive bought in 1994"

The disk drive that is currently in everyone's Wii is much more likely to fail than any hard drive. Also, I hope you don't own a computer because then you've violated your own argument.

"On the other hand if Nintendo expanded the SD slot funtions in the Wii everyone would use solid state memory for their saves. Solid state is better by leaps and bounds. You can put an SD card in your pocket and throw it in the laundry and once your jeans are clean the SD card will still work."

Nintendo doesn't allow us to read files directly off the SD cards, and solid state memory is much more expensive than hard drives. SD cards are extremely slow. Try copying an N64 game, and you'll know what I'm talking about.

"Plus pricing is attractive, 4 gig cards right now are 20-40 dollars (depending where you shop) that's more then enough storage for even the downloadiest of the downloaders."

The Wii isn't compatible with cards over 2 GB.

Jaysonguy

1. There is no disk drive in the Wii. As for me owning a computer I'm not sure what you mean. No computer owner should expect their data to survive on a hard drive, that's why backing up is mandatory if you have a computer.

2. That's why I said expand. Also you're just repeating a myth that I've already debunked, anyone with a high end camera knows that speed is not an issue if you're willing to pay.

3. I repeat, that's why I said expand

Solid state does not fail, hard drives do.

did you seriously just suggest the wii had no dick drive when it clearly reads disks?

Avatar image for ECG_24
ECG_24

1653

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 ECG_24
Member since 2008 • 1653 Posts
The Wii has both disc and disk. DVD disc drive and solid state disk.
Avatar image for PyroPice
PyroPice

443

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#48 PyroPice
Member since 2007 • 443 Posts
Fine then make it so we can read from SD cards. When people say "We want a hard-drive" they mainly mean, we want a way to expand memory, they just use hard-drive because it's what the other two systems have in them. I'd be fine with reading from SD-Cards, I mean, you can buy a 2 GB SD card for super cheap, I'd be happy using multiple SD cards. But that's the problem, we can't even do that.bobbetybob
Sd cards are too slow to red direcetly off of, that is the real problem.......
Avatar image for monty_4256
monty_4256

8577

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 monty_4256
Member since 2004 • 8577 Posts

umm a failed hard drive doesn't mean everything is lost, and it certainly isn't just as useful as an SD card

the reason why hard drives are more useful than SD cards is the read and write rate, SD cards... are... slow, very very slow. They don't let us boot off them because they can't, if they did the whole games would have to be on the RAM, which with wiiware, just isn't possible

an SD card IS NOT and SSD, an SSD has a SATA drive bay connected to it, which is again leaps and bounds better than the SD card communication bays.

SD cards are not solid state drives, so please check this before posting such a topic

Avatar image for Jaysonguy
Jaysonguy

39454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#50 Jaysonguy
Member since 2006 • 39454 Posts
[QUOTE="Jaysonguy"][QUOTE="Rocky32189"]

"They fail much too often.

All studies have shown one discouraging thing when it comes to hard drives. They are no better today then they were almost 2 decades ago. Instead of becoming error free they have plateaued when it comes to failure rate. A drive bought today fails at the same rate as a drive bought in 1994"

The disk drive that is currently in everyone's Wii is much more likely to fail than any hard drive. Also, I hope you don't own a computer because then you've violated your own argument.

"On the other hand if Nintendo expanded the SD slot funtions in the Wii everyone would use solid state memory for their saves. Solid state is better by leaps and bounds. You can put an SD card in your pocket and throw it in the laundry and once your jeans are clean the SD card will still work."

Nintendo doesn't allow us to read files directly off the SD cards, and solid state memory is much more expensive than hard drives. SD cards are extremely slow. Try copying an N64 game, and you'll know what I'm talking about.

"Plus pricing is attractive, 4 gig cards right now are 20-40 dollars (depending where you shop) that's more then enough storage for even the downloadiest of the downloaders."

The Wii isn't compatible with cards over 2 GB.

PyroPice

1. There is no disk drive in the Wii. As for me owning a computer I'm not sure what you mean. No computer owner should expect their data to survive on a hard drive, that's why backing up is mandatory if you have a computer.

2. That's why I said expand. Also you're just repeating a myth that I've already debunked, anyone with a high end camera knows that speed is not an issue if you're willing to pay.

3. I repeat, that's why I said expand

Solid state does not fail, hard drives do.

did you seriously just suggest the wii had no dick drive when it clearly reads disks?

I'm talking hard disk drive, not optical drive