I don't think I've heard people comparing these three before, and I wouldn't put any in my top 10 RPGs (Skyrim especially wouldn't make my top 50).
I liked Dragons Dogma - it was sort of like Monster Hunter with party AI. I didn't *love* the game though, since everything outside of the combat was fairly mediocre, and I wasn't so hooked by the combat to forgive everything else.
Dark Souls is really good. 'nuff said. I think it gets overrated in a few areas (the difficulty really drops out after the early stages of the game, there are a bunch of trial-and-instant-death sections that you can't predict, the backstory is a lot better than the actual plot, etc.) - but hey, it's a really solid action-RPG.
Then Skyrim...look, maybe I'm a little biased, because I played it at launch where it was obviously unfinished and key features (like dragons) didn't actually work, but I really don't see why people praise this one? It's your typical Bethesda sequel - stripping down the depth and ramping up the action - which would be fine if the combat wasn't pretty terrible, and if many character skills/types weren't unviable, and if the quests weren't poorly written, and if any of the programming worked properly.
Pretty world, decent music, hilarious bugs - that's about the extent of my praise for Skyrim.
As for what Remaster is better...eh, I don't know. These games came out last gen, so I don't see the point of buying the remastered versions just yet - the originals are still perfectly fine, if a little less convenient to play.
Log in to comment