[QUOTE="Panzer_Zwei"][QUOTE="NorthernRoses"]
Alas the Guru has spoken!
To be honest Sonic was ruined long, long, long ago, at least with SoR there's still time for it to be saved. And with any sense no developer will try to "better" it. Sonic is a brand, sought to be exploited and commercialised. SoR is many peoples LIVE'S! especially when it came to slugging it out on the arcade versions. Ah memories.
Emerald_Warrior
Yeah, although Sonic for SEGA is far from being what Mario is to Nintendo. The main SEGA divisions never cared about Sonic really. That's the main differece. The consumer market where Sonic reigned, was only their secondary business.
But in the defence of SEGA, most of their franchises that have been rundown through the mud recently (Golden Axe, Alien Syndrome, etc.) weren't developed by them. They were projects of the SEGA western divisions who hired other developing studios to make them, since the real SEGA developers weren't interested.
I disagree with the Sonic statement. They STILL use Sonic as their mascot on tons of images.Well he is the company mascot and image, just like Pac-Man is the mascot of NAMCO. However, in the case of Nintendo, in a way they were founded around Mario, so he is very tied to their philosophy. This is not the case of SEGA. Without Yu Suzuki and AM2, there never would've been any SEGA consoles in the first place.
Sonic was created in the '90s to compete against Mario, and apparently in a design constest they had. SEGA also spent a whole generation without an official Sonic game. This would be unthinkable in the case of Nintendo.
Nintendo is Mario, but SEGA is not Sonic.
Log in to comment