This topic is locked from further discussion.
As in character VS character?
Or series VS series?
My answer is the same for both: Mario.
I never cared for Sonic, even when I was young. Â Not the character or the game in which he stared.
Not that I love Mario as a character, really, but I find the Mario games to be much more fun than Sonic games. Â And I don't find Mario annoying like I do Sonic.
I've always been way more of a Mario fan myself. Sonic is alright though; I am interested in Lost Worlds, and do feel like checking out Sonic CD and Generations.
Mario is definitely the stronger series overall, but I do enjoy the unique marriage of racing and platforming that only Sonic provides.
Sonic. I still like Super Mario Bros. 1, 3, and the Galaxy games, but that's about it. That, and even when I was a kid, I always thought Mario was a boring and lame character too.
I've never understood how people can choose Sonic as a better franchise or are we only comparing the platformers on NES/SNES vs Genesis?
I've played most of the Sonic games and a lot of the Mario games. Sonic has had like six good games 1, 2, 3, CD, the DS one whos names I forget, and Colors. Mario has had dozens of good games in about six different genres. I'd choose Mario if he only had the first two Paper Mario games and Mario RPG, or just the Mario and Luigi games on handhelds, and I've always preferred the 2D Mario games on the NES and SNES to the Sonic Genesis games. Sonic was always a short fun game I would be able to rush through as a kid that barely changed it's gameplay with the new titles, every old Mario title improved or was very or completely different (with the exception of the second one, Lost Levels).
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment