@Bigboi500 said:
The gaming media in all forms can't be trusted to be truthful in any way these days. If companies like Microsoft are paying random internet fanboys to lie they're no doubt paying reviewers as well. I'm sure other companies are doing the same thing.
I don't know how many times Ive seen reviewers of Microsoft games start off a review by saying Microsoft flew them to their corporate headquarters for lunch, a tour, they got to meet bill gates and other stuff like that before their review. Or sometimes they would talk about being invited to a private beach house. All of that is bribing in its own sense and skews a reviewers perception because even if the game sucks the reviewer would be a lot less likely to notice or say something bad because they would feel guilty at how nice they were treated.
Then how many times have you seen a Microsoft privately held announcement party where you would hear a lot of cheering and clapping and crowd fanfare but when you look at the actual crowd hardly anyone is doing it? Because they pay people to do it. Like at the xbox one reveal event it was know it was all faked applause from Microsoft employees as press people were tweeting the sound wasn't coming from the audience.
They buy off limited time exclusive DLC for their system for games like call of duty.
That's what Microsoft does, they fix problems by throwing money at it. Their game systems are awful, their first party games were once decent but now a pathetic slide show of the same old shit, their customer service is awful, and their ability to treat their customers like customers is lacking. But they don't care because when something goes badly they throw money at it.
Log in to comment