Is there any situation where a Co-Op Campain/Missions are better than survival?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Micsunderland2
Micsunderland2

1329

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Micsunderland2
Member since 2004 • 1329 Posts

As much as im looking forward to Battlefield 3, the one thing that disapoints me is the co-op missions.They look bland, but who knows, they could turn out to be a blast.

But once i beat them, im not sure if ill want to play them again.

However, modes like COD Zombies, and GOW Horde 2.0 have nearly infinite replay value.

DO many of you out there actually prefer a co op campaign to a co op survival mode?

I cant think of one situation where a wave based mode hasnt been better than a similiar mission mode.

Avatar image for wiouds
wiouds

6233

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 wiouds
Member since 2004 • 6233 Posts

I find that pit fight like more boring than the mission. You appear in the same area and do the same thing. The same small area again and again.

Avatar image for ristactionjakso
ristactionjakso

6118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 39

User Lists: 0

#3 ristactionjakso
Member since 2011 • 6118 Posts

depends who you are.

I find black ops zombies very boring, and very repetitive. I hate zombie mode. I prefer co-op missions like spec ops where it can be played solo, splitscreen, or co-op online.

Avatar image for doubalfa
doubalfa

7108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 30

#4 doubalfa
Member since 2006 • 7108 Posts
*looks at borderlands campaign. *looks at Mad Moxxis Underdome Riot. sure there are situations where co-op is better than survival mode
Avatar image for Black_Knight_00
Black_Knight_00

77

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#5 Black_Knight_00
Member since 2007 • 77 Posts
MW3 is gonna have both co-op and survival. I think it's a first time for first person shooters