@james47 said: Crysis for some it might not be a good game, BUT IT IS A GOOD GAME.
So to repeat, I'm bashing the games 'after' the first game and its expansion. Sure I still found a lot of flaws with the first game but it's not as bad as my thoughts with Crysis 2 and Crysis 3, and then adding Ryse to the mix. So to repeat again; the original Crysis isn't all that bad. If you skipped my notes of praise? That's noone elses fault other than those that refuse to read.
@james47 said:
@RSM-HQ:
How about this. You tell me a game that should be a movie...
Know very well that it's an unpopular opinion, but I usually don't enjoy movies in general. What isn't however, is that gaming movies are much, much worse.
If you read my first comment it's insisted the only one I found manageable was Silent Hill.
Many factors are for this. The Director and movie staff wanting big changes from the original source, or the source being too similar towards the game (out of fan fear) so it doesn't translate to a cinematic experience/ cramping a 15-20 games plot within 2-3 hours.
I mean. . We've all had a thought that seems cool but wouldn't actually work. That's just how this thread is going down. No one's taking away your love for the idea. You keep that, and with pride.
But that doesn't mean I'll, or anyone else will agree, we have our own likes and dislikes. And something's to be said if even @Macutchi stated "wouldn't make a good film" to a Crysis movie :P
Log in to comment