COD Advanced Warfare, good or recycled trash?

  • 55 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for spacecatthe1st
SpaceCatThe1st

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By SpaceCatThe1st

Poll COD Advanced Warfare, good or recycled trash? (36 votes)

Good, yes! 33%
Recycled trash. 67%

Just saw the teaser trailer for COD Advanced Warfare, it looks decent I guess, what are your thoughts?

 • 
Avatar image for Lulu_Lulu
Lulu_Lulu

19564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By Lulu_Lulu
Member since 2013 • 19564 Posts

Only Time will tell.

One thing you can be sure of is that its gona sell real good thanks to my homeboy K-Speezy ! :p

word !

Avatar image for spacecatthe1st
SpaceCatThe1st

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#2 SpaceCatThe1st
Member since 2014 • 25 Posts

@Lulu_Lulu: K-Speezy being who? xP

Avatar image for turtlethetaffer
turtlethetaffer

18973

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 144

User Lists: 0

#3  Edited By turtlethetaffer
Member since 2009 • 18973 Posts

The game's not released yet. But, if I had to take a guess, I'd say that the changes to the technology are superficial at best and won't really effect the gameplay in too significant a way. Could be wrong, though.

Avatar image for Lulu_Lulu
Lulu_Lulu

19564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4  Edited By Lulu_Lulu
Member since 2013 • 19564 Posts

@SpaceCatThe1st

LOL. Kevin Spacey dude !

Avatar image for spacecatthe1st
SpaceCatThe1st

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#5 SpaceCatThe1st
Member since 2014 • 25 Posts

@Lulu_Lulu: Ohhhh! Haha my bad!

Avatar image for ariabed
Ariabed

2121

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#6 Ariabed
Member since 2014 • 2121 Posts

I welcome the changes hopefully they will give the series a well needed lift, looks promising.

Avatar image for the_last_ride
The_Last_Ride

76371

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 122

User Lists: 2

#7 The_Last_Ride
Member since 2004 • 76371 Posts

It's a copy paste with Titanfall rip off features

Avatar image for speedfreak48t5p
speedfreak48t5p

14297

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 62

User Lists: 0

#8 speedfreak48t5p
Member since 2009 • 14297 Posts

Recycled trash.

Avatar image for ariabed
Ariabed

2121

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#9  Edited By Ariabed
Member since 2014 • 2121 Posts

@speedfreak48t5p: I know it's just your opinion but it could turn out to be really good, or really bad, it's to early to start bashing it, you may have to eat your words :p

Avatar image for hrt_rulz01
hrt_rulz01

21561

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 hrt_rulz01
Member since 2006 • 21561 Posts

@The_Last_Ride said:

It's a copy paste with Titanfall rip off features

Yeah seems like it.

If the SP campaign is decent, I might give it a go. Otherwise, I'll pass on it like the last few games.

Avatar image for Archangel3371
Archangel3371

38995

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#11 Archangel3371
Member since 2004 • 38995 Posts

Looks great to me, can't wait for it.

Avatar image for behardy24
Behardy24

5324

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#12 Behardy24
Member since 2014 • 5324 Posts

Can't say anything about it since no gameplay has been showcased yet, but I'll like to see how the element of the exoskeletons will effect the mutiplayer.

Avatar image for branketra
branketra

51726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 9

#13  Edited By branketra
Member since 2006 • 51726 Posts

It has potential.

Avatar image for 187umKILLAH
187umKILLAH

1414

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#14 187umKILLAH
Member since 2010 • 1414 Posts

Instead of jumping on the hate train I'll reserve my judgement until I see more game play and hear more info.

Avatar image for Metamania
Metamania

12034

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#15 Metamania
Member since 2002 • 12034 Posts

I know this much. Doesn't matter what they do with the franchise, it's still the same game that's going to sell billions. Also, have they played a lot of Crysis or something? They seem to be heavily inspired by that.

Avatar image for cooolio
cooolio

586

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#16  Edited By cooolio
Member since 2013 • 586 Posts

@hrt_rulz01 said:

@The_Last_Ride said:

It's a copy paste with Titanfall rip off features

Yeah seems like it.

If the SP campaign is decent, I might give it a go. Otherwise, I'll pass on it like the last few games.

It is easy to say that it is ripping of Titanfall because it is the most recent FPS with a futuristic setting, bu AW is taking more from Crysis. Anyway, like many have already said, it will still sell millions. Be that as it may, I actually doubt that this will be recycled, at least when it comes to SP. Some fresh details mentioned upgrading your suit with points from each mission. That by itself suggest more tactical freedom and open areas in the campaign.

Avatar image for blangenakker
blangenakker

3240

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 blangenakker
Member since 2006 • 3240 Posts

Because we can totally tell how a game is going to turn out from an announcement trailer. It might be the same, it might not. At least its not being developed by zombie Infinityward

Avatar image for the_last_ride
The_Last_Ride

76371

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 122

User Lists: 2

#18 The_Last_Ride
Member since 2004 • 76371 Posts

@hrt_rulz01 said:

@The_Last_Ride said:

It's a copy paste with Titanfall rip off features

Yeah seems like it.

If the SP campaign is decent, I might give it a go. Otherwise, I'll pass on it like the last few games.

i haven't given Activision money since BLOPS 1

Avatar image for the_last_ride
The_Last_Ride

76371

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 122

User Lists: 2

#19 The_Last_Ride
Member since 2004 • 76371 Posts

@cooolio said:

@hrt_rulz01 said:

@The_Last_Ride said:

It's a copy paste with Titanfall rip off features

Yeah seems like it.

If the SP campaign is decent, I might give it a go. Otherwise, I'll pass on it like the last few games.

It is easy to say that it is ripping of Titanfall because it is the most recent FPS with a futuristic setting, bu AW is taking more from Crysis. Anyway, like many have already said, it will still sell millions. Be that as it may, I actually doubt that this will be recycled, at least when it comes to SP. Some fresh details mentioned upgrading your suit with points from each mission. That by itself suggest more tactical freedom and open areas in the campaign.

Then why are there mechs and big jumps suddenly in? They are trying to stay relevant

Avatar image for mjorh
mjorh

6749

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#20 mjorh
Member since 2011 • 6749 Posts

It's too soon to make a decision ...

Avatar image for elkoldo
elkoldo

1832

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 elkoldo
Member since 2009 • 1832 Posts

Recycled shit.Hasn't it always been like that?

Avatar image for cooolio
cooolio

586

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#23 cooolio
Member since 2013 • 586 Posts

@The_Last_Ride said:

@cooolio said:

@hrt_rulz01 said:

@The_Last_Ride said:

It's a copy paste with Titanfall rip off features

Yeah seems like it.

If the SP campaign is decent, I might give it a go. Otherwise, I'll pass on it like the last few games.

It is easy to say that it is ripping of Titanfall because it is the most recent FPS with a futuristic setting, bu AW is taking more from Crysis. Anyway, like many have already said, it will still sell millions. Be that as it may, I actually doubt that this will be recycled, at least when it comes to SP. Some fresh details mentioned upgrading your suit with points from each mission. That by itself suggest more tactical freedom and open areas in the campaign.

Then why are there mechs and big jumps suddenly in? They are trying to stay relevant

The closest thing we saw to a mech was that guy in a big exo suit. They said that they have been developing it for 3 years, but we all know that even if it is true people will not believe it. But whatever the case, the fact is that it will not play like Titanfall.

Avatar image for mwright469
MWright469

168

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#24 MWright469
Member since 2014 • 168 Posts

Calling it right now: this game is going to fucking suck.

Avatar image for the_last_ride
The_Last_Ride

76371

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 122

User Lists: 2

#25 The_Last_Ride
Member since 2004 • 76371 Posts

@cooolio said:

@The_Last_Ride said:

@cooolio said:

@hrt_rulz01 said:

@The_Last_Ride said:

It's a copy paste with Titanfall rip off features

Yeah seems like it.

If the SP campaign is decent, I might give it a go. Otherwise, I'll pass on it like the last few games.

It is easy to say that it is ripping of Titanfall because it is the most recent FPS with a futuristic setting, bu AW is taking more from Crysis. Anyway, like many have already said, it will still sell millions. Be that as it may, I actually doubt that this will be recycled, at least when it comes to SP. Some fresh details mentioned upgrading your suit with points from each mission. That by itself suggest more tactical freedom and open areas in the campaign.

Then why are there mechs and big jumps suddenly in? They are trying to stay relevant

The closest thing we saw to a mech was that guy in a big exo suit. They said that they have been developing it for 3 years, but we all know that even if it is true people will not believe it. But whatever the case, the fact is that it will not play like Titanfall.

That's bs, Sledghammer helped out on MW3, so two years tops...

Avatar image for Salt101010
Salt101010

63

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Salt101010
Member since 2011 • 63 Posts

It's definitely going to be interesting whether it's good or not. I'm gonna reserve judgement until it comes out.

Avatar image for Archangel3371
Archangel3371

38995

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#27  Edited By Archangel3371
Member since 2004 • 38995 Posts

@The_Last_Ride said:

@cooolio said:

@The_Last_Ride said:

@cooolio said:

@hrt_rulz01 said:

@The_Last_Ride said:

It's a copy paste with Titanfall rip off features

Yeah seems like it.

If the SP campaign is decent, I might give it a go. Otherwise, I'll pass on it like the last few games.

It is easy to say that it is ripping of Titanfall because it is the most recent FPS with a futuristic setting, bu AW is taking more from Crysis. Anyway, like many have already said, it will still sell millions. Be that as it may, I actually doubt that this will be recycled, at least when it comes to SP. Some fresh details mentioned upgrading your suit with points from each mission. That by itself suggest more tactical freedom and open areas in the campaign.

Then why are there mechs and big jumps suddenly in? They are trying to stay relevant

The closest thing we saw to a mech was that guy in a big exo suit. They said that they have been developing it for 3 years, but we all know that even if it is true people will not believe it. But whatever the case, the fact is that it will not play like Titanfall.

That's bs, Sledghammer helped out on MW3, so two years tops...

That doesn't mean that they also couldn't have been working on this game as well.

Avatar image for the_last_ride
The_Last_Ride

76371

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 122

User Lists: 2

#28 The_Last_Ride
Member since 2004 • 76371 Posts

@Archangel3371: Still doesn't mean it's going to be good...

Avatar image for CTR360
CTR360

9027

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#29  Edited By CTR360
Member since 2007 • 9027 Posts

i rent the ps4 version not hyped

Avatar image for Archangel3371
Archangel3371

38995

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#30 Archangel3371
Member since 2004 • 38995 Posts

@The_Last_Ride said:

@Archangel3371: Still doesn't mean it's going to be good...

I never said that that means it'll be good I just said that just because they helped with MW3 that doesn't mean that they couldn't have also been working on Advanced Warfare as well.

Avatar image for DuaIFace
DuaIFace

581

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31  Edited By DuaIFace
Member since 2009 • 581 Posts

I already played (and still own---even though it has horrible controls/animations/ect) this game---it's called MGS4.

I swear Hideo Kojima beats everyone to everything in his games. Like all the time. Ideas, plots, you name it.

Avatar image for the_last_ride
The_Last_Ride

76371

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 122

User Lists: 2

#32 The_Last_Ride
Member since 2004 • 76371 Posts

@Archangel3371 said:

@The_Last_Ride said:

@Archangel3371: Still doesn't mean it's going to be good...

I never said that that means it'll be good I just said that just because they helped with MW3 that doesn't mean that they couldn't have also been working on Advanced Warfare as well.

They didn't have the full team for 3 years

Avatar image for Archangel3371
Archangel3371

38995

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#33 Archangel3371
Member since 2004 • 38995 Posts

@The_Last_Ride said:

@Archangel3371 said:

@The_Last_Ride said:

@Archangel3371: Still doesn't mean it's going to be good...

I never said that that means it'll be good I just said that just because they helped with MW3 that doesn't mean that they couldn't have also been working on Advanced Warfare as well.

They didn't have the full team for 3 years

Yeah so? People still could have done other things or whatever or maybe those that were helping could have also been doing some stuff on Advanced Warfare as well. Helping another team with a game doesn't automatically preclude them from doing anything else.

Avatar image for darthgumballs
DarthGumballs

226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#34  Edited By DarthGumballs
Member since 2013 • 226 Posts

I'm excited for it. I don't understand why people think having the same mechanics is a bad thing. When something is fun, it should stay fun. I mean what do you want them to do, guns are guns and soldiers are soldiers. Do you want them to turn it into a cartoon with lasers or something? A shooter is a shooter. New maps, tweaked gameplay and a fun story are all they need every year to have me salivating for more.

Avatar image for Kevlar101
Kevlar101

6316

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 29

User Lists: 0

#35  Edited By Kevlar101
Member since 2011 • 6316 Posts

@elkoldo: @mjorh: Why is it that the two of you always post in pairs? One of you posts somewhere, the other probably isn't far behind. Haha just wondering :P

Avatar image for Kevlar101
Kevlar101

6316

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 29

User Lists: 0

#36 Kevlar101
Member since 2011 • 6316 Posts

@darthgumballs said:

I'm excited for it. I don't understand why people think having the same mechanics is a bad thing. When something is fun, it should stay fun. I mean what do you want them to do, guns are guns and soldiers are soldiers. Do you want them to turn it into a cartoon with lasers or something? A shooter is a shooter. New maps, tweaked gameplay and a fun story are all they need every year to have me salivating for more.

Because why would you pay $60 for a game that makes such small changes that it could easily pass as DLC? Seriously, each game is just new maps and some new guns. That is DLC material, not sequel material.

Avatar image for elkoldo
elkoldo

1832

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 elkoldo
Member since 2009 • 1832 Posts

@Kevlar101: Lmao... :))))

I don't know why it's like that! It's true that we're both from the same country, but we live in different cities, miles away from each other.It's mere coincidence I swear!

Honestly, I laughed pretty hard here Kevlar =P

Avatar image for mjorh
mjorh

6749

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#38 mjorh
Member since 2011 • 6749 Posts

@elkoldo said:

Recycled shit.Hasn't it always been like that?

Have voted for recycled shit but we gotta wait....

@Kevlar101 said:

@darthgumballs said:

I'm excited for it. I don't understand why people think having the same mechanics is a bad thing. When something is fun, it should stay fun. I mean what do you want them to do, guns are guns and soldiers are soldiers. Do you want them to turn it into a cartoon with lasers or something? A shooter is a shooter. New maps, tweaked gameplay and a fun story are all they need every year to have me salivating for more.

Because why would you pay $60 for a game that makes such small changes that it could easily pass as DLC? Seriously, each game is just new maps and some new guns. That is DLC material, not sequel material.

THIS !

Avatar image for Archangel3371
Archangel3371

38995

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#39 Archangel3371
Member since 2004 • 38995 Posts

@Kevlar101 said:

@darthgumballs said:

I'm excited for it. I don't understand why people think having the same mechanics is a bad thing. When something is fun, it should stay fun. I mean what do you want them to do, guns are guns and soldiers are soldiers. Do you want them to turn it into a cartoon with lasers or something? A shooter is a shooter. New maps, tweaked gameplay and a fun story are all they need every year to have me salivating for more.

Because why would you pay $60 for a game that makes such small changes that it could easily pass as DLC? Seriously, each game is just new maps and some new guns. That is DLC material, not sequel material.

There's also a new campaign with new story, dialog, characters, environments. New content beyond just maps for other modes as well such as Zombies and Extinction. Sometimes there's even new modes as well such as Safeguard and Squads in Ghosts. Saying each new game is just new maps and guns is just not true and each game is just as much sequel material as most every other game out there.

Avatar image for Kevlar101
Kevlar101

6316

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 29

User Lists: 0

#40  Edited By Kevlar101
Member since 2011 • 6316 Posts

@Archangel3371 said:

@Kevlar101 said:

@darthgumballs said:

I'm excited for it. I don't understand why people think having the same mechanics is a bad thing. When something is fun, it should stay fun. I mean what do you want them to do, guns are guns and soldiers are soldiers. Do you want them to turn it into a cartoon with lasers or something? A shooter is a shooter. New maps, tweaked gameplay and a fun story are all they need every year to have me salivating for more.

Because why would you pay $60 for a game that makes such small changes that it could easily pass as DLC? Seriously, each game is just new maps and some new guns. That is DLC material, not sequel material.

There's also a new campaign with new story, dialog, characters, environments. New content beyond just maps for other modes as well such as Zombies and Extinction. Sometimes there's even new modes as well such as Safeguard and Squads in Ghosts. Saying each new game is just new maps and guns is just not true and each game is just as much sequel material as most every other game out there.

A new campaign? The Modern Warfare trilogy is painful. The same game three times.

Ghosts was awful. Rorke is such a boring antagonist, that I can't even call him a bad one. He is just so generic and bland and just a BORE.

I actually like the Treyarch COD games. They are quite good. They keep doing interesting things with their titles. They are the ones who are actually trying to put some effort into the series.

Avatar image for madgame23
madgame23

400

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 36

User Lists: 0

#41 madgame23
Member since 2005 • 400 Posts

Ill wait to cast my vote on the game till i see actual footage not videos and such. Last time i was fed into the hype COD i bought Ghosts and that was mistake ill not make again. Sledgehammer made MW3 and while i was not impressed at all with that game, the SP was good. I said before that i wouldnt buy another COD, i may break that again but wont buy any season passes and such.

Avatar image for blangenakker
blangenakker

3240

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 blangenakker
Member since 2006 • 3240 Posts

Is this Sledgehammer's first proper Call of Duty, didn't they work with Infinityward for MW3?

Avatar image for the_last_ride
The_Last_Ride

76371

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 122

User Lists: 2

#43  Edited By The_Last_Ride
Member since 2004 • 76371 Posts

@Archangel3371: it's still going to suck

Avatar image for Archangel3371
Archangel3371

38995

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#44  Edited By Archangel3371
Member since 2004 • 38995 Posts

@Kevlar101: Well you may not like it but it's still new content and is certainly more then merely new maps and some new guns.

Avatar image for Archangel3371
Archangel3371

38995

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#45 Archangel3371
Member since 2004 • 38995 Posts

@The_Last_Ride: lol Way to refute my points there but whatever floats your boat I guess.

Avatar image for darthgumballs
DarthGumballs

226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#46  Edited By DarthGumballs
Member since 2013 • 226 Posts

@Kevlar101 said:

@darthgumballs said:

I'm excited for it. I don't understand why people think having the same mechanics is a bad thing. When something is fun, it should stay fun. I mean what do you want them to do, guns are guns and soldiers are soldiers. Do you want them to turn it into a cartoon with lasers or something? A shooter is a shooter. New maps, tweaked gameplay and a fun story are all they need every year to have me salivating for more.

Because why would you pay $60 for a game that makes such small changes that it could easily pass as DLC? Seriously, each game is just new maps and some new guns. That is DLC material, not sequel material.

Because it's worth every freaking penny, every freaking year. If it weren't it wouldn't be the #1 selling game for about the last 10 years.

Avatar image for Kevlar101
Kevlar101

6316

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 29

User Lists: 0

#47  Edited By Kevlar101
Member since 2011 • 6316 Posts

@darthgumballs said:

@Kevlar101 said:

@darthgumballs said:

I'm excited for it. I don't understand why people think having the same mechanics is a bad thing. When something is fun, it should stay fun. I mean what do you want them to do, guns are guns and soldiers are soldiers. Do you want them to turn it into a cartoon with lasers or something? A shooter is a shooter. New maps, tweaked gameplay and a fun story are all they need every year to have me salivating for more.

Because why would you pay $60 for a game that makes such small changes that it could easily pass as DLC? Seriously, each game is just new maps and some new guns. That is DLC material, not sequel material.

Because it's worth every freaking penny, every freaking year. If it weren't it wouldn't be the #1 selling game for about the last 10 years.

Wow, you got defensive pretty fast.... O...O

Avatar image for Minishdriveby
Minishdriveby

10519

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#48 Minishdriveby
Member since 2006 • 10519 Posts

Trailer seemed cool although I guess that's the point of trailers. I still want to eventually buy a CoD; I'll probably pick up world at war later this year.

Avatar image for Netret0120
Netret0120

3594

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#49 Netret0120
Member since 2013 • 3594 Posts

I immediately thought of titanfall when i saw it. This is their answer to it. Variety is good for us the consumers.

Avatar image for Kalipto55w
Kalipto55w

28

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#50  Edited By Kalipto55w
Member since 2013 • 28 Posts

The trailer didnt really get me hyped as much, but this one isnt bad https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZiT4do7wkzE&list=UUjT09LQuBXiO0q98Y_UgVsA altough it isnt offical :)