Don't know how but the game is being sold in Turkey (the PS3 version). I only finished Assassin's Creed 1 in the series and played a little bit of Assassin's Creed 2 and to compare it to those games I think the pace of the game is too slow. I'm at the end of the 5th sequence and the action is just going to start with Connor. Don't want to give spoilers so that's where I'll stop. The colonial American and native American settings are good but it feels like I'm playing Red Dead Redemption instead of Assassin's Creed. The European cities were far more interesting. (I haven't been to New York yet in the game.) Haven't played the multiplayer yet so I can't comment on that. I read what I wrote again and in seemed too negative because I am enjoying the game very much these are just neat picking I guess. Just wanted to give a little review. Can provide screens if you want..
Here are some shots that I uploaded to be proof that I have the game. http://imgur.com/Oz9Ek http://imgur.com/gpkJt http://imgur.com/Tjtzu http://imgur.com/onoBo I can take more in game pictures but don't want to spoil the fun for you. So here is the box, the ps3 disc screen, the press start screen and Hayhtam infront of the Faneuil Hall in Boston. The combat is too simple just tap the "o" button when someone is attacking and then press the square button to finish him off. To shoot something you just have to press triangle when the target is highlighted I didn't see him miss. Only when hunting if the animal runs away too fast you can miss. You can manual aim buy pressing the L1 button if you want to get the feeling of aiming but it's pointless most of the times.
How is the combat? Not being able to heal until you finish? Combo chains are easy to pull off?
HipHopBeats
I haven't done any combos except mashing the square button several times. Won't being able to heal while in combat isn't a problem because you don't take that much damage the game isn't hard. I talked about the rest of the combat in the post before this
The game is more on the British and the Native American side than on the American side. I think that this mostly because of Shaun's database entries(as you know he is British). And since that Connor is Native American.
How are the graphics? I read you have the PS3 version. I personally play on PC so I expect it to be a little better than console but with this new engine, I was really hoping for some sharp detail on all the landscapes, weapons, clothing, etc. Is it better/worse than AC2: Revelations? How about Skyrim as a benchmark?
The game is more on the British and the Native American side than on the American side. I think that this mostly because of Shaun's database entries(as you know he is British). And since that Connor is Native American. esoes05
I disagree, there's a lot of "American side"
To answer other people. chains are slightly harder to pull off, i think its at a good difficulty. Bows are manual if u hold left trigger, but you can still auto target a little bit with out aiming like in previous ACs
The graphics show it's difference in the cutscenes the expressions on the faces are really good. Other than that having the large forest place(Frontier) and the sea the graphics are different from the prev games but I can't say that they are really really better than them. I can't say anything about the PC graphics since I'm playing on the PS3.
You can buy different clothes but I never changed mine. You assign different stuff to the triangle button like your pistol, bow and arrow, traps and baits etc. For combat I just basically use my sword and pistol as a combination. For hunting you can assign your bow, bait, traps to the triangle button.
Log in to comment