Zuckerberg tried PS4 VR headset a week before Facebook bought Oculus Rift

Founder of social networking giant tested out Sony's Project Morpheus a week before surprise $2 billion acquisition of Oculus VR.

332 Comments
No Caption Provided

Just a week before paying $2 billion to buy Oculus VR--maker of the Oculus Rift virtual reality headset--Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg tried out Sony's own virtual reality headset, Project Morpheus, it has been revealed.

PlayStation marketing executive Guy Longworth said today during a Games Marketing Summit 2014 session that he remembers Zuckerberg asking, "Can I have a tech demo?" for Project Morpheus. Longworth said he wondered why, at the time, Zuckerberg might want to see Sony's headset.

Now, it appears Zuckerberg wanted to check in on the rival to Oculus Rift to make sure he was making the right decision in buying Oculus VR.

"I wish he bought ours," Longworth said with a smile, referencing Facebook's surprise purchase of Oculus VR, which was approved today by the Federal Trade Commission, according to a Reuters report. "All the folks at Oculus have got big smiles on today."

Just because Facebook chose Oculus Rift over Project Morpheus, it doesn't mean that Sony has become soured on the prospects for virtual reality. Not at all, according to Longworth.

"If you think about VR, not just in terms of gaming, I think wearable technology is a huge trend that's going to continue," he said. "I think that being able to have experiences that are truly deep and immersive...that it somehow makes you feel you are there...is something that people want. If you could really deliver that in the future, that would be huge."

Ubisoft senior vice president of sales and marketing, Tony Key, also spoke during the panel. He said virtual reality technology like Oculus Rift or Project Morpheus represents a "breakthrough, technologically speaking," but explained that he believes it won't take off unless the content is there.

"How many people are willing to put this thing on their head? It all depends on the content," Key said. "It's going to be content-driven in the end whether these things are successful or not." Key went on to say that he tried Oculus Rift and it made him sick.

Finally, head of product planning for Xbox, Albert Penello, offered some quick thoughts on virtual reality before the panel came to an abrupt end. He said "I think [VR is] great," going on to note that he gets the same feeling using VR today that he did when he first tried Kinect in 2008. In short, he said he's excited about the future for VR, but said there are still hurdles to overcome. Microsoft is reportedly working on its own VR/AR technology, and even paid as much as $150 million to acquire assets related to wearable technology earlier this year.

Got a news tip or want to contact us directly? Email news@gamespot.com

Join the conversation
There are 332 comments about this story
332 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for goodemon
goodemon

435

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

Haha kinectvwas a total bust. But Morpheus with move support is going to be sick!

Upvote • 
Avatar image for clasiker_raggim
Clasiker_Raggim

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

"I wish he bought ours," Longworth said with a smile"

Are you aware mister Longworth about the fact that this would have destroyed the project for gaming technology? Would you sell the entire company for enough money if you'd own Sony if Dumberberg would say that he wants to change its profile from making games to making dildos?

Why are you working for Sony again?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for NikoKun
NikoKun

107

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >> Just FYI, FB certainly did not "destroy" the Oculus Rift, as a gaming technology. The Rift is just as gaming oriented as it ever was, it's always been about games, and that's still the main goal. In order for the technology to be useful for ANYTHING, it has to be good at games first, that's just the nature of good VR. What's good for games, is good for everything else.

VR was ALWAYS going to end up being used for more than just gaming, and that's great. It will change the world, not just the gaming industry. That's always been the whole point, from the very beginning.

So if you're point was that FB has killed Oculus for gaming, you're crazy, there's no evidence of that, and plenty to show it's still a hardcore gaming device. Anyone who puts any effort into following the VR/Oculus community, can see that, clear as day.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for packers904
packers904

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >> it's a business at the end of the day, and yeah sony would totally sell out for that money and would never look back.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for -s3r6i0-
-S3R6i0-

156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

The PS4 VR is already owned by Sony. It makes sense to say this now that you've invested in the competition.


Anyway, I don't care if the Oculus Rift doubles as a vibrator, Mark Zuckerburg can shove it up his @$$. I will never put money into that guy's pocket.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for ElFlechero
ElFlechero

223

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >> Don't worry; I'm sure he has a way to make money off of you every day already anyways. Cheers!

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Alecmrhand
Alecmrhand

472

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

Zuckerberg could have built his own headset for a small percentage of 2 billion. It makes zero business sense to overpay for a piece of tech that is being reproduced by other companies this very second.


Zuckerberg just bought MySpace instead of starting Facebook....

Upvote • 
Avatar image for gamespotpanayis
gamespotpanayis

26

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >> Of course it makes sense. He took a look at what Sony could produce, with it's enormous R&D budget and hardware know-how. Facebook has the resources but not the know how.. so they would expect to produce something not quite as good as Morpheus on a good day.

He was obviously so impressed at the quality of the Rift over Morpheus that a demo of Morpheus just made up his mind.

2 Billion is a whole lot of money, but now they own technology they would probably have never been able to produce themselves.

Of course, whether the technology is worth that price, who knows?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for P90SupportClass
P90SupportClass

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

Btw. Eddie makuk looks like a stalker

Upvote • 
Avatar image for FlyingAce1016
FlyingAce1016

59

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Soo basically Oculus rift was bettter obviously or zucker would have fucking bought sony xD thank god he didnt though still facebook oculus saddens me :( glad they are mostly leaving it alone other than funding them

Upvote • 
Avatar image for NikoKun
NikoKun

107

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >> Oculus Rift IS better than Sony's Morpheus prototype, in virtually every way. Sure, Sony will eventually make great VR hardware, but that takes time, and they're still in the prototyping stage, whereas Oculus is already focused on making their Consumer model.. Zuckerberg bought Oculus because it was currently the best, and closest to a consumer viable device. It will beat Sony's to market. Also, Sony never would have sold to anyone anyway, so that'd be impossible.

Another thing to note, the PS4 was not designed for VR, so it will never be as good at VR as the PC experience will be. Sure it will work, but it wont be an ideal experience. Sony is going to have to release a new console, like PS5 or PS4VR in a few years, if they want to really compete in the VR world.

2 • 
Avatar image for dysonlu
dysonlu

225

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

If Oculus Rift was worth $2B, Sony would have cost at least 10x more.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for okmarshall
OKMarshall

27

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Of course it makes sense for them to buy Oculus over the Sony VR. Facebook is a PC and mobile based service which is what the Oculus will work with. The Sony VR is at the moment exclusive to PS4 and is owned by them to be used by them. Why would Sony even sell it to Facebook when they are a massive company in their own right. Makes no sense.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for gamespotpanayis
gamespotpanayis

26

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >> It's not exclusive to PS4.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for nobody490
nobody490

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Nah, as long as you have to wear a big, uncomfortable device on your head, I don't think VR will ever become popular.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for gamespotpanayis
gamespotpanayis

26

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >> I dont see this as much different to wearing gaming headphones.. except it covers your eyes.

I understand it's supposed to be pretty comfortable.. but I guess each user's experience will vary.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for NikoKun
NikoKun

107

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >> But they wont be a "big, uncomfortable device on your head". That's just how the prototypes look.

The consumer models will be light weight, so you'll barely notice them, and compact to be roughly the size of ski goggles, eventually maybe even the size of sunglasses.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Senor_Kami
Senor_Kami

8529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

This is some TMZ level shit right here.

2 • 
Avatar image for annabiabrum
annabiabrum

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

@Senor_Kami im a lawyer

Upvote • 
Avatar image for TimberWolf_CLT
TimberWolf_CLT

185

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

I wonder if Tony Key cares that he makes me ill? Funny how he seems to be trying to dismiss the technology by adding that "oh, by the way" statement. jmo

Anyway, Oculus at this point has invested a lot of effort into reducing the sensing/movement lag time and that will help with the motion sickness. I also get the feeling that FOV also has an effect on it as a result of eye separation distances and also peripheral vision. Making it adjustable could help both headsets.

On the other hand some folks will probably always have motion sickness using this tech. Such is the nature of our adaptive analog balance system.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for silversoul420
Silversoul420

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@TimberWolf_CLT The Oculus team already achieved sub 20ms latency, so latency is not an issue anymore. Motion blur also makes you sick extremely fast but they also adressed that issue with their low persistence display technology, As for FOV I've never heard about someone wearing sky goggles getting motion sickness.

Lack of positional tracking will make you sick as well but their tracking system with LEDs and a camera fixes that.

The hardware is already almost motion sickproof however certain features in apps/games will always make you sick as it also happens in real life. You will also naturally adapt to whatever you use.

Developers must be educated on how to develop for VR. For that purpose the Oculus team released a pdf document a few months ago containing useful info explaining what should and what shouldn't be done while developing for VR.

The Oculus Rift is ready to rock but they won't release it until its absolutely perfect.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for TimberWolf_CLT
TimberWolf_CLT

185

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

@silversoul420 Excellent points and info, thank you!

I was reiterating the latency issue purely because I remember suffering with that back with the equipment in the 70's. I don't get motion sick but even I struggled with that back then.

I was really impressed when I received the first dev kit and ran it against their demos and then Skyrim and other games. All of those bad VR memories faded away. My only gripe was the screen and feeling like I was looking at the world with my nose pressed against a screen door. That was fine when I was 4 but not trying to play a game. :) However they have that well in hand and with financial backing from FB (crap, I mentioned the evil empire didn't I?) I'm curious to see what custom parts they get made for them.

I'm scraping up the money for a DEV2 kit and am looking forward to seeing the current gen in action. Maybe even open the screen door and step outside this time... :)

Upvote • 
Avatar image for borednerdy
borednerdy

26

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

<< LINK REMOVED >> About 8 years ago, I was a "research test subject" on a virtual reality goggle prototype. I am pretty sure that they ALL will make you sick, at least at first. I went 5 minutes before I had to stop, but gradually worked my way up over the span of 2 hours, and I then was able to go as long as I wanted without getting sick. They will all just take getting used to! :)

Upvote • 
Avatar image for TimberWolf_CLT
TimberWolf_CLT

185

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

@borednerdy @TimberWolf_CLT You make an excellent point, thank you. With that in mind, I hope that with minimizing the lag we can lower that threshold. If not, it's going to be a hard sell for some people.

Your experience shows just how adaptable humans are. Which circles back to the need for great existing content to make folks want to adapt.

I've been working with VR since the '70s and this current time seems to be the closest we've ever been to mass acceptance. Should make for an interesting time.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for borednerdy
borednerdy

26

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@TimberWolf_CLT I agree, I can't wait for the advances to come! I think the main source of the motion sickness was movement on a horizontal plane rather than any lag issues. Looking around was fine, but when I started walking around and opening doors, it felt very odd without the physical gratification of doing so. I'm sure there are ways to minimize that though, so it will be cool to see what they come up with. I'm excited! :)

Upvote • 
Avatar image for billlabowski
billlabowski

91

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

People were trying it and getting ill. They had a prototype at CES this year but cut it short because it wasn't looking good for them. It needs work. Who would want to buy Sony's VR in the first place? It's connected to a closed platform. Oculus was the obvious choice. Do I like that Oculus is owned by Facebook? No. But Oculus is the better product, it is for an open platform and will sell better than Sony's VR. It's just facts.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for silversoul420
Silversoul420

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@billlabowski I agree with you except for this: "They had a prototype at CES this year but cut it short because it wasn't looking good for them" - What do you mean? The prototype wasn't good enough? Please give me the source to that.

I saw a few videos and read a few reviews/articles about the Crystal Cove prototype and while most said its not perfect (low resolution, 1080p) its pretty much close to it. The positional tracking and OLED display are great, there's no motion blur and no motion sickness (although they were only being demoed for about 5-15min).

As for Sony's VR HMD, they were demoing 2 games (at least) and 1 of them was being played on a PC. Still Oculus > Sony.


Upvote • 
Avatar image for LJNkickstarter
LJNkickstarter

61

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Whatever people say here that Mark didnt buy Morpheus because Ocolust is much more better.. Sony is huge they wont sell their product to Zuckerberg.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for silversoul420
Silversoul420

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

<< LINK REMOVED >> Sony tried to buy OculusVR for billions. However the Oculus team is not stupid. Sony is "huge" and they have a VR team that has only been drinking coffee and watching TV for the past decade until Oculus came around.

Sony never took much interest in VR to begin with and the best VR experts in the world are currently part of the Oculus Team. Now that FB invested $2B on Oculus, Sony is not so "huge" anymore when it comes to VR.

The Oculus Rift is much better than Project Morpheus regardless if you are a Sony fanboy or not.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for MAD_AI
MAD_AI

28

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >>

Then why did they invite him to test the product? They weren't going to sell him their product for sure, but he would've been a huge investor in it.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for zerocrit
Zerocrit

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Is that what the article said?....... Cuz I read "PlayStation marketing executive Guy Longworth said today during a Games Marketing Summit 2014 session that he remembers Zuckerberg asking, "Can I have a tech demo?" for Project Morpheus. Longworth said he wondered why, at the time, Zuckerberg might want to see Sony's headset."

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Pewbert
Pewbert

449

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

"I wish he bought ours" - because it's all about getting that money rather than developing an amazing product.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Tangsta03
Tangsta03

368

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

An actual Jurassic Park via VR. Make it happen and I'm on board! :)

Upvote • 
Avatar image for warhawk-geeby
warhawk-geeby

2173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

All I know is...

E3 is going to be outrageously good. Battle of the big guns!

Upvote • 
Avatar image for PS4andXoneGamer
PS4andXoneGamer

143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Clever dude that Zuckerberg

Upvote •