Xbox One's controversial parity policy criticized by Stealth Inc. developer

"For us, it’s an annoyance," says Curve Studios marketing manager Rob Clarke on Xbox One policy.

217 Comments
No Caption Provided

The UK developer behind recently unveiled Wii U exclusive Stealth Inc. 2, Curve Studios, has called Microsoft's launch parity clause--which only lets indie developers release games on Xbox One if they haven't already launched for PS4, PC, or Wii U--an "annoyance" and a "shame".

"For us, it’s an annoyance," said Curve Studios marketing manager Rob Clarke in an interview with IGN. "It’s preventing us from bringing some of the older stuff through and doing what we want. There’s 40 of us, and we’re still saying we should be able to work around it, so you can imagine how hard it is for smaller developers in one and two man teams who are faced with having to release on PlayStation and Xbox simultaneously. "

Clarke adds that Curve Studios is hopeful about being on Xbox One at some stage. "We’ve been with ID@Xbox since launch," he adds. "We weren’t in the initial announcement only because it conflicted with something going on with Sony at the time. We’ve had the kits for a long time and we’ve been talking to them for a long time about Xbox One. Almost six months. Hopefully we’ll get there soon, but then that’s because we’re big enough to handle the launch parity thing."

Microsoft's launch parity clause has attracted its fair share of criticism from, well, pretty much everybody. "Hopefully Microsoft will drop it," says Clarke. "They’ve been told by a lot of the industry it’d be better if they did, but they haven’t yet. It’s a shame. The frustrating thing for a lot of developers is they have dropped it for a lot of people, but it’s not very clear why. Is it a case of size? Is it a case of how well you know people at the company? It’s not a great way to treat indies because they see it as being unbalanced. I went to a UKIE [trade association] talk about how to get your game on Microsoft systems, and a lot of the reaction seemed to be the demand was there among the developers, but it just isn’t clear."

Microsoft has said that the launch parity clause is considered on a case-by-case basis, but that it will continue in the future. "The winners in all of this are game players," said Microsoft exec Phil Harrison about both Microsoft and Sony's attempts to lure indie developers to their fancy new consoles.

GameSpot may get a commission from retail offers.

Got a news tip or want to contact us directly? Email news@gamespot.com

Join the conversation
There are 217 comments about this story
217 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for binbin90
binbin90

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

ID@Xbox with this parity clause still puts quite a limitation for developers in general.....even if they get devkits for free

Upvote • 
Avatar image for coruscant
coruscant

3406

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

Its just hypocritical of MS when they often pay companies to release DLC or even games on Xbox first.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for bdrtfm
BDRTFM

4450

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

This is a sticky one. I don't like Indie's. I don't think I've ever played one that I found enjoyable for more than a few minutes. I do get them for the kids, however, as they enjoy them now and again.


On one hand, I can see MS wanting release parity if they are expected to shell out free dev kits and other perks. It makes good sense in theory. However, when Sony announces that they have 1000 developers making indies for them right now and MS only has 250 then, Houston, we have a problem. I'm thinking when you're already facing an uphill battle, you might not want to start adding any extra hurdles.


At the same time, I don't want the Xbox One to be flooded with hundreds of crap indies like the PS4 will undoubtedly be with so many games coming out. Its like both companies are going to opposite extremes. MS is saying we expect X and Y before you can publish. Whereas, Sony seems to be letting anyone and everyone publish anything on their console. I'm not sure which idea disturbs me more?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Stepn2myworld
Stepn2myworld

28

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >> Actually, Microsoft is not saying X and Y before you publish. They are saying, if you haven't released to another platform, THEN, you can ONLY release on Xbox One. Keep your console Microsoft. If an indie title becomes a huge hit, Microsoft will follow the money. That is the reason it is on a case by case basis.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for dannydopamine8
DannyDopamine8

33

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

indie games are garbage anyways.. once you get over the "support indie dev" feel-good hipster crap you are just left with a shitty game in the long run

3 • 
Avatar image for anvilone
anvilone

27

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

anvilone  Staff

I have mixed feelings about this because I haven't forgotten the EPIC sea of garbage on the 360 XBLIG market.

2 • 
Avatar image for repetitious
repetitious

369

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

You mean the indie market in general, right?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for major_retard
Major_Retard

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

<< LINK REMOVED >> After E3 it'll be Indie Station 4 vs AAA X1

Upvote • 
Avatar image for softassassin1
softassassin1

26

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Your screen name suits your bot comment very nicely.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Sideways8_4ever
Sideways8_4ever

26

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

thats funny, because the xbone is an annoyance to everyone

3 • 
Avatar image for greaseman1985
greaseman1985

1498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 5

<< LINK REMOVED >> Yes of course, its an annoyance to the millions of people that have made it the third fastest selling console in history.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Sevenizz
Sevenizz

4149

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

So, play by their rules or you can't play? For indi titles, no one is going to pay for timed exclusivity and customers aren't going to pick one console over another based on indis. MS is saying in this genre, that is stupid to play the timed or exclusive game. And good for them.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for kargion
kargion

502

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

"The winners in all of this are game players".....Awesome Indie game is out on PS4......can't come to xbox1 now due to releasing first on ps4. Sounds like to me gamers on xb1 are not winning. Re-think the policy so your xb1 gamers get games no matter what.

3 • 
Avatar image for greaseman1985
greaseman1985

1498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 5

<< LINK REMOVED >> We're getting real games, not crappy indie "games".

Upvote • 
Avatar image for deactivated-5a1d4b615a3a3
deactivated-5a1d4b615a3a3

1423

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

@kargion It can release on the X1, you either speak with Microsoft and discuss your case or you find a publisher to release it on your behalf. The release parity clause only applies if you are wanting to self publish.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for SavageEvil
SavageEvil

719

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >> Which is where Sony is going to trounce MS if they aren't careful. If developers start making lots of fans on PS4, you know what is going to follow right? Gamers go where the games are, if you lock out any game for any reason or make it harder than it needs to be then you are doing yourself no favors since you need games on your games console.


Double speak abound at MS, we are about indies but if you want to self-publish it's got to be on our system first or else no way. We are about games and indies, as long as you play by our arbitrary and contrary rules. MS are the only company doing this and it's not like you hear indie developers championing these clauses now do you?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for deactivated-5a1d4b615a3a3
deactivated-5a1d4b615a3a3

1423

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

You are right, the X1 is currently the most restricted console. I however prefer it this way, it means the X1 will not be bombarded with all the trash the more open systems will. The bigger more prolific Indies will release there games on both systems regardless, whether by meeting the release parity criteria or striking a deal with MS. Its a win win as far as I'm concerned.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Sevenizz
Sevenizz

4149

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

You need to calm down - indis are indis for a reason.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for sandman338
Sandman338

109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 5

The way I understand it is that Microsoft is providing free software to create games with and the parity clause states that the developer can't release it on another platform first. This article makes it sound like the developer has to release somewhere else first. Also, the parity clause does not say that can't release it on multiple platforms, only that it has to also release on Microsoft platforms at the same time.


I don't really see a problem with asking a developer not to release their games somewhere else first if Microsoft is giving them free software to make the game with. I know that other companies make the developers paid thousands of dollars for game creation software.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for kargion
kargion

502

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >> This is a major problem. I am lost on why people think because they give them the kits for free they should be forced to release on all plats at the same time. If your an indie developer and you have say PC and WiiU done you want to get that out the door to start making money to keep moving on the PS4, and say xb1 version. But now you can't go on xb1 because of this stupid clause. It needs to change. This is not for gamers, this is to make sure xb1 gets the games same time as other platforms so someone doesn't go "oh that game is on ps4 right now, ill just get a ps4".

5 • 
Avatar image for sandman338
Sandman338

109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 5

<< LINK REMOVED >><< LINK REMOVED >> If the article above is stating it correctly than I agree with you across the board. What I was saying is that I think the article above is not stating it correctly. I believe that the parity clause says that they can NOT release games on other systems first IF they use the free Microsoft Dev Kits.

I can see what you are saying about if they were to finish a version of the game for another system before they finished the Xbox version but if they are using a dev kit from Microsoft that is designed for Xbox then I can't see why they would finish a different version first. If they can't 'handle' the launch parity than why not put it out on Xbox first and then the other systems?

Let's be honest, there is no corporation that is really here for the gamer. Every corporation is here to make money and the more they can convince us that 'they' are the ones that care about us not the 'other' company the better their cash flow is. So to think that a corporation would give you a free dev kit and not expect to something in return is wishful thinking.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for SavageEvil
SavageEvil

719

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >> This hurts Xbox One only owners, but many of them wouldn't even stand up and take a stance against it. Nope just sit there and think every thing out of MS mouth is truth and the right way. Sad to see defense of such draconian slave driver like mentality, but this is to be expected when people love a faceless corporation that only seeks to pad it's wallet by any means necessary even if it include shafting nearly half it's customers.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Hvac0120
Hvac0120

2038

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Sevenizz Only releasing an indie title on a single platform is often times dumb because you take a game that is already going to struggle and decreasing its visibility and ability to get itself noticed. For small teams, that exclusiveness could break them.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Sevenizz
Sevenizz

4149

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

We don't really care - these are just indi titles. Have you seen the majority of the selection?

MS is saying that playing the timed or exclusive game in this segment is dumb - and they're right.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for KilltheFANBOYS
KilltheFANBOYS

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >> I think that same way. There may not be harm to ask them to put timed exclusivity or simultaneous release on games. But then again we can't say what's right and wrong from business point of view.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for SavageEvil
SavageEvil

719

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >> It was just explained that if the indie outfit is small they can't handle a launch parity, what are you blind? For someone with such a handle you should commit something that removes said annoyances.


The fact that MS plays favorites with different indies is telling and pretty much a BS stance after Mr. Spencer went on about exclusives hurt gamers and they are all about games...double speak since actions are clearly different from the words coming out of Spencer's mouth. Meaning that Spencer isn't in as much control as we are led to believe.


Keep the faith buddy!

2 • 
Avatar image for greaseman1985
greaseman1985

1498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 5

<< LINK REMOVED >><< LINK REMOVED >>If the indie outfit is small chances are the game is complete shit.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for SavageEvil
SavageEvil

719

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >> Wrong, he even stated it in the article "There’s 40 of us, and we’re still saying we should be able to work around it, so you can imagine how hard it is for smaller developers in one and two man teams who are faced with having to release on PlayStation and Xbox simultaneously. "


Seriously you shouldn't go around assuming things, he stated that they thought they could go around and do the launch parity thing but it's a no go. No matter how similar the One and PS4 are in order to ensure things work on both perfectly you will have to have teams that can focus on each.


They have a dev kit also stated in the article, doesn't mean that they have to put out a game. Fact that you want to defend this sort of crap is full on console bias. Sony hasn't given an such clauses, they don't care where it launched first although they will try to court devs to their system. They don't say if you don't give it to us first, then we don't want it.


MS are behaving like virginity hunters.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for deactivated-5a1d4b615a3a3
deactivated-5a1d4b615a3a3

1423

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >><< LINK REMOVED >> Of course they would be able to handle the launch parity, they will most likely be making a PC version of the game as that is the most open platform, therefore porting the game to X1 will be a doddle as the ecosystem is very similar.


Besides, if they have signed up to the << LINK REMOVED >><< LINK REMOVED >> program, they must be well aware of the clause and thus savvy enough to make the X1 a primary platform for development, at least if they are planning to self publish.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for SavageEvil
SavageEvil

719

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >> Sorry about that, didn't mean to be a jerk early on.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for KilltheFANBOYS
KilltheFANBOYS

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@SavageEvil No need to attack me bro. I am not here to start an argument. I agree with your view.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for SavageEvil
SavageEvil

719

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >> Really? If you want more games on your machine, would you A )have some arbitrary clause that puts unrealistic stipulations on smaller indie developers that they cannot afford to comply with or B) remove the restriction. It's more about what makes the most sense, MS is playing a game where they want games on their console first, nothing wrong with that but problem is if an indie developer has had success on one console or he sees that the larger installed base makes sense to deliver their wares to first to take advantage of that. Why should they forego making money just to satisfy some arbitrary and cutting of your nose to spite your face attitude MS is giving them? Indies are there to make money too, not just MS.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for KilltheFANBOYS
KilltheFANBOYS

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >><< LINK REMOVED >> Like I clearly said. I don't know what's right and what's wrong in a matter like this.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for KilltheFANBOYS
KilltheFANBOYS

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Hmm! I am confused. They say it does not allow games to be released on Xbox One that are already released on other platforms, yet the last time I checked I found Contrast on the list. Wasn't that game given for free on PS+ on launch?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for HAMMERCLAW
HAMMERCLAW

55

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

It's a two edged sword. If you release on another platform first and your game bombs, they'll say no. If your game turns out to be popular, they'll say yes. That's where the case-by-case thing comes in.So, it's your choice; shoot yourself in the foot or don't. It might not be good for indies, but it will certainly keep some crap games off the Xbox.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for KilltheFANBOYS
KilltheFANBOYS

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@HAMMERCLAW Crap games off the xbox? I heard a Soda Drinking Game for XB1. Now isn't that crap?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Thanatos2k
Thanatos2k

15182

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Microsoft supports indies, ha. Yeah right.

4 • 
Avatar image for HAMMERCLAW
HAMMERCLAW

55

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >> Oh, right. They just give indies a free SDK AND free hardware to develop their games on. How awful of them.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for kargion
kargion

502

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >><< LINK REMOVED >> And then tell them how and when to release their games. Yes that is awful of them. If your an indie dev you need the game out the door and start making money. If you have PC done and ps4 and xb1 going to take time so be it, but MS says sorry no you have to wait, keep taking a loss so you can release on all plats at same time. Yea MS is wrong in this. Dead wrong.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for deactivated-5a1d4b615a3a3
deactivated-5a1d4b615a3a3

1423

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >><< LINK REMOVED >><< LINK REMOVED >> Simple, if you are wanting to take advantage of self publishing on the X1, you make the X1 one of your primary platforms, leaving the X1 as an afterthought is clearly not what MS want.


If for some reason you can't satisfy the release parity criteria, just get a publisher to release on the X1 instead.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for KilltheFANBOYS
KilltheFANBOYS

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I see that people are unhappy with X Box One. Why may I say?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for kargion
kargion

502

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >> I have both, i like my xb1 for titan fall, ps4 works better imo right now and you have more games to play. Both are close to the same in the end.

Upvote •