What's New in Company Of Heroes 2: Ardennes Assault?

Three's a company.

18 Comments

GameSpot may get a commission from retail offers.

Having found success with its previous Company of Heroes 2 standalone expansion, the multiplayer-only Western Front Armies, Relic is looking to repeat the trick with the exclusively single-player Ardennes Assault. Its story is a reimagining of 1944's Battle of the Bulge--a conflict that saw the German army attempt to wrestle control of Belgium away from American forces--but it's not a historically accurate retelling of those events. Instead, Relic say the goal with Ardennes Assault is to provide players with a means to influence and change the events of that year.

As such, the campaign is set across a map of Belgium split into different regions, each representing individual battles for you to fight and conquer. Win a skirmish in a region and it's under your control for the rest of the campaign, but the impact of dismantling German positions is felt elsewhere. Taking a particular region can cause enemy reinforcements to populate an adjacent area, which in turn forces you to rethink your original strategy for something more reactive, lest those fresh dangers get out of hand. Replayability is the aim here, with the emphasis firmly placed on multiple playthroughs creating new conflicts and problems.

Please use a html5 video capable browser to watch videos.
This video has an invalid file format.
00:00:00
Sorry, but you can't access this content!
Please enter your date of birth to view this video

By clicking 'enter', you agree to GameSpot's
Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

It works rather well, in part thanks to the additional complexity that comes via the provision of three different companies--support, mechanised and airborne--which are persistent throughout the campaign. Each comes with its own abilities in combat, but what's more important is to stay aware of their relative health and experience levels. Using a specific company in battle is both a risk and a reward in that it's possible for them to die, and take no further part in the campaign, but winning engagements is the only way to improve their skills.

You have to balance the use of each company to suit not only your preferred play style, but also to facilitate your wider strategy for the war. It's all very well and good saying that you're going to concentrate on making your mechanised company as good as it can possibly be, but if they end up being wiped out, your remaining support and airborne units are going to find it tough going if they've never been in battle before. Like it or not, presuming you're playing on a challenging difficulty level, all three companies must be thought of as a single, larger entity. We're stronger together, and all that.

This becomes especially poignant when deciding which areas of the map to attack with each company. The three move around the map independently of one another, meaning it's possible--if you're not thinking ahead--for one to get cut-off from the others and potentially become surrounded by the Germans. Here you have a tough choice to make: does the greater goal make an attempted rescue worthwhile, or would you be better off continuing with the original plan and hoping the besieged company can make it out alive?

Gallery image 1Gallery image 2Gallery image 3Gallery image 4Gallery image 5Gallery image 6Gallery image 7Gallery image 8Gallery image 9Gallery image 10

Battles play out differently depending on which company you use. Aside from the obvious fact that you need to alter your approach in line with a company's skill set, some missions start you off in different positions. It doesn't take an enormous leap in thinking to understand that attacking a town from the east with your support troops offers a fundamentally different confrontation than a southerly approach with a mechanised division. Again, replayability is key.

Your support company specialises in explosives and blasting its way straight through enemy lines in the most direct way possible. Airborne is much more clandestine and thoughtful, and totally in their element when positioned behind enemy lines and given the freedom to disrupt key units and assets before they become a threat. They do have access to airstrikes once unlocked, but for the most part they're a brains over brawn outfit.

Mechanised is like a combination of the two, requiring equal parts courage and contemplation. Infantry troops are useful for scouting ahead and clearing a path of obstacles, making it safe for the heavy vehicles to roll in and start dealing the real damage. Distracted by the commotion caused by tanks, any infantry still alive can take advantage of the disruption to flank your opponent and pin them down.

No Caption Provided

While there are plenty of welcome changes to companies, the core rules dictating combat remain the same as in Company of Heroes 2, which is no bad thing. Capture points must be controlled to earn resources that can be spent to improve and buff your forces, while staying behind cover and intelligently taking advantage of high ground and differing terrain conditions makes it incredibly difficult for the enemy to catch you unawares. The missions I saw tended to feature a healthy number of buildings, making the identification of key structures from which to defend a position vital. Company of Heroes 2's combat was skilful and considered, and Ardennes Assault does a good job of adding to those fun mechanics, without damaging what was so great about them in the first place.

What's most interesting about Ardennes Assault, though, is its wider format. While not a new idea, the standalone expansion, on the surface of it, seems to make everyone a winner. Relic can concentrate on releasing more content more quickly, reacting to audience feedback with each new outing and testing new features without the fear of an entire franchise failing. For the audience, it promotes a 'pick and choose' kind of mentality: you might not be interested in this particular content, but that's fine because there's likely to be more just around the corner. And hey, there's a lot of World War II left to explore yet.

Got a news tip or want to contact us directly? Email news@gamespot.com

Join the conversation
There are 18 comments about this story
18 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for grenadehh
Grenadehh

Ha to say CoH2s combat was skillful is a good joke.

Avatar image for arrowhead927
arrowhead927

£30 tho! abit much for an expansion

Avatar image for Smosh150
Smosh150

Ok this is ridiculous, just checked Steam and it says the price for the DLC is $40! How can you charge $40 for an addition like this, but only $20 for two whole new factions. Heck this DLC is literally the same price as COH2 itself.

Avatar image for c0mmanderKeen
c0mmanderKeen

<< LINK REMOVED >> this dlc is a lot more expensive than COH2 itself, considering how often the game is on sale! Ridiculous!

Avatar image for traintow
TraintoW

Its hard to play CoH after you've played assault squad. CoH still has some fun aspects though definetly will consider buying this expansion but in the coming years it would be nice to see CoH get a little more realistic

Avatar image for tr4newreck
Tr4newreck

@traintow it has to be a playable and a "fun" game in the end.... ultra realism isn't for the masses

Avatar image for oflow
oflow

Apples to oranges. I personally hate assault squad it's buggy and has horrible translation.

Coh isn't really about realism it's more about traditional rts

Avatar image for Smosh150
Smosh150

<< LINK REMOVED >> Can't really see how COH can become more realistic other than increasing the scale of the maps and implementing many of the features in the BK. Though I do prefer Assault Squad, I just hope that DMS implements the new features such as the improved close quarters fighting from Call to Arms into AS2 as they do use the same engine. AS just has a lot of issues that hold it back such as poor AI(they don't really seem to be self aware or have any self preservation in them), though it does excel in many other areas as well.

Avatar image for grenadehh
Grenadehh

<< LINK REMOVED >><< LINK REMOVED >> You mean other than actually being realistic, versus utterly unrealistic? A puma taking out a T34? Yea, no. Roaming blobs of Volks and USF all with anti-tank? Yea,no.


No realism in CoH2, sorry.

Avatar image for Smosh150
Smosh150

<< LINK REMOVED >><< LINK REMOVED >><< LINK REMOVED >> When did I say realistic? Company of Heroes doesn't have an ounce of realism, the only thing I said that could be interpreted as me meaning realistic was saying a feasible damage system(Oh and I was referring to the BK mod for the original COH with that bit too, I understand that isn't 100% realistic, but it isn't an insane damage model like vanilla).

Avatar image for traintow
TraintoW

<< LINK REMOVED >><< LINK REMOVED >> This is true. I just cant get over the fact that my Shermans are taking six rounds and still cruising like nothing happened.As for Assault Squad I guess the AI is pretty crappy I always pretend that I am just that good though LoL seems to help

Avatar image for Smosh150
Smosh150

@traintow @Smosh150 lol yea, when I play multiplayer I suck, mainly just because I haven't played multiplayer enough to learn how to play against other players. Makes me yearn for a traditional skirmish mode, but I don't think that is possible. Though the main thing as to why the AI sucks for me, is nobody tries to take cover, stands still when under fire and just goes prone, they just don't care about anything even when you turn on the free will movement which really does nothing other than having them run amok, close quarters especially in buildings is just impossible other than having them sprint into the center of a room then stop and fire on the enemy. And you are right about the realism in COH, tis why the Blitzkrieg mod is needed on COH2, I like having historically accurate units and a feasible damage system along with other abilities like the hold ground stance so they will stay in cover.

Avatar image for Smosh150
Smosh150

<< LINK REMOVED >> BK mod*

Avatar image for Smosh150
Smosh150

ooooooooh, as much as I love the linear missions like in the original COH campaign(which was fantastic), this just sounds really amazing. Will definitely pick this up, maybe they will slip in modding tools at one point too, would love to have the Blitzkrieg mod for COH2.

Avatar image for an_advert
an_advert

Sounds a lot like Warhammer Dark Crusade. I like it :)

Avatar image for dementedlullaby
dementedlullaby

I still haven't played Western Fronts....Shame. CoH2 is pretty great and they've put a lot of work into the game since launch. Could do without commanders but it's an ace game otherwise.

Avatar image for oflow
oflow

It's decent worth picking up on the steam sale. They game has changed a lot since they brought out WF resources are different, commanders are now on a rotation system, CP is different they made the game a lot more infantry heavy til late game. I'm not a big fan of how the US forces play but they are decent. The new German faction has a lot of OP units makes the game pretty challenging.

This stand alone space seems more like a big single player coop mission. Not a huge fan of the theater of war because of the bad CPU AI in coh2 dunno if I'm gonna get this.

Avatar image for Smosh150
Smosh150

<< LINK REMOVED >> I like the WF DLC, but yea the US play style doesn't make sense. The US forces used should be like the commonwealth in the original game as US forces were a much more mobile force.