Violent Video Game Tax Proposed In Pennsylvania

Politicians want to tax violent video games 10% extra.

212 Comments

Lawmakers from Pennsylvania have put forth a bill that proposes a 10% excise tax on violent video games. House Bill 109 seeks to impose the so-called "sin tax" on games sold at retail that are rated by the ESRB as M for Mature or Adults-Only. The money would go into a fund called the "Digital Protection for School Safety Account" that aims to enhance security measures at schools in the wake of the school shootings in Parkland, Florida and Newtown, Connecticut.

State representative Chris Quinn, a republican, initially put forth the bill in 2018, but it never made it out of committee during the 2018 legislative session. The new version is similarly worded.

The 10 percent tax would be in addition to applicable state and local taxes. The sales tax rate in Pennsylvania is 6%, which means a standard $60 game costs around $64. With the extra 10 percent tax on violent games, the cost of an M-rated game like Red Dead Redemption 2 would make the game end up costing about $70.

Explaining the bill last year, Quinn said violent video games might be an element in the rise of school shootings in America. "One factor that may be contributing to the rise in, and intensity of, school violence is the material kids see, and act out, in video games," he said.

Quinn cited the National Center for Health Research's statement that studies demonstrate a link between violent video games and increases in aggressive thoughts and behaviors. Quinn's comments conveniently leave out the same statement's disclaimer that other factors like mental illness, access to weapons, and adverse environments should be considered as other risk factors. Not only that, but the National Center for Health Research's own reporting states that studies have not shown that aggression leads to increased instances of deadly violence or criminal activity.

Expectedly, the Entertainment Software Association, which lobbies on behalf of the video game industry, is taking a hard line against this bill. In a statement to Variety, the ESA the bill is a violation of the US Constitution.

"Numerous authorities--including scientists, medical professionals, government agencies, and the US Supreme Court--found that video games do not cause violence," it said. "We encourage Pennsylvania legislators to work with us to raise awareness about parental controls and the ESRB video game rating system, which are effective tools to ensure parents maintain control over the video games played in their home."

After the Sandy Hook shooting, a lawmaker from Connecticut proposed a similar tax in 2013. Also that year, a state representative from Missouri proposed a sales tax on games rated M and above. In both cases, the funds would have gone towards mental health programs. However, the bills never became law.

Got a news tip or want to contact us directly? Email news@gamespot.com

Join the conversation
There are 212 comments about this story
212 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for gamingdevil800
gamingdevil800

6875

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 76

User Lists: 0

I'm not from the USA so I can't say I understand how state by state tax works but what's to stop someone ordering a game cheaper online from a different state and getting it delivered? In the end though all this does is hurt the consumer who has to pay more.

2 • 
Avatar image for restatbonfire
RestatBonfire

1113

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By RestatBonfire

@gamingdevil800: partially why I buy digital. A digital game costs 59.99 flat, if I bought it at the store it would be about 64.30 I have 6% sales tax in my state

Upvote • 
Avatar image for darkelf83
darkelf83

991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

@restatbonfire: That's slowly changing and digital store fronts are having to charge you tax based on where you live.

2 • 
Avatar image for f-lambda
F-Lambda

9

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@darkelf83: Would a VPN get around that?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for restatbonfire
RestatBonfire

1113

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@darkelf83: haven't seen it yet but that would suck

2 • 
Avatar image for zmanbarzel
ZmanBarzel

2123

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@gamingdevil800: Ordering online is gradually becoming less and less an option for saving money on tax. For some time, many (all?) states had a line on their tax forms for what's called "use tax," where you were supposed to willingly declare and pay your state's tax on items you had purchased out of state. (It actually dates back to ordering from catalogs.)

Because people don't like to willingly cough up more money than absolutely necessary — because we're not stupid — that use tax frequently went unpaid. State legislators pressured online retailers to automatically collect the tax, which many, including Amazon, are doing in more and more states.

States (and especially local retail groups) have been trying to get the U.S. Congress to pass some kind of nationwide solution, but so far, nothing.

4 • 
Avatar image for Jinzo_111887
Jinzo_111887

2419

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Jinzo_111887

@zmanbarzel: "Because people don't like to willingly cough up more money than absolutely necessary — because we're not stupid..." PlayStation Plus, Xbox Live Gold, and Nintendo Switch Online leave me questioning that, but maybe the people paying for those are not like most people.

3 • 
Avatar image for kami_amaya
kami_amaya

148

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Or, how about a tax on stupid parents who don't know, or care, what games their kids have their hands on?

Or a tax on violent media, we could start with books. Specifically, the bible.

10 • 
Avatar image for spectrexr1
spectreXr1

582

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@kami_amaya: people don't read the Bible lol if they didn't they wouldn't go around killing each other . Politics and religion shouldn't mix and neither should video games and politics . Politicians are so croocked themselves this is funny

Upvote • 
Avatar image for soliaired50
Soliaired50

391

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@kami_amaya: Don't forget the Quran too.

6 • 
Avatar image for Jinzo_111887
Jinzo_111887

2419

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Jinzo_111887

@kami_amaya: I'd suggest they start with R rated movies as I wonder how Hollywood would respond.

10 • 
Avatar image for f-lambda
F-Lambda

9

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@Jinzo_111887: Hollywood would respond the same way they have for the past few decades, but to a greater degree: buying PG-13 ratings for it's most profitable movies. Unlike the ESRB, CARA and the MPAA have no integrity.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for restatbonfire
RestatBonfire

1113

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Jinzo_111887: ever seen the pianist? Brutal.

Upvote •