The Gearbox/3D Realms legal battle over Duke Nukem is heating up

3D Realms fires back at Gearbox, saying they believe that they not only have the rights to make a new Duke Nukem game, but also that they own the Duke trademark itself.

160 Comments
No Caption Provided

The legal tussle between Gearbox Software and 3D Realms over Duke Nukem is heating up. 3D Realms said this week that not only does it have the rights to develop its own Duke Nukem game, but it also retains the rights to the Duke Nukem trademark. But first, some history.

After 3D Realms--which is now owned by Interceptor Entertainment--teased new Duke game called Duke Nukem: Mass Destruction last month, Gearbox announced that it was suing the studio over unauthorized use of the IP and trademark violation.

Now, 3D Realms has filed a complaint against Gearbox and provided Polygon a statement explaining just why it needed to do so.

"On March 17, 2014, 3D Realms filed its answer to the complaint by Gearbox Software in Dallas, Texas. 3DR denies all allegations set forth in the complaint. In its answer, 3DR has submitted evidence showing that Gearbox at no point intended to enter into good faith negotiations but instead sought to force former owners, Scott Miller and George Broussard, to improperly surrender what rightfully belonged to 3DR."

"It is our position that 3DR retains the right to develop the tentatively titled 'Duke Nukem Survivor' [working title for Duke Nukem: Mass Destruction] game for specific platforms. This game was previously licensed for development to Interceptor Entertainment. Furthermore, it is our position that the Trademark for 'Duke Nukem' was never assigned to Gearbox, but remains the sole property of 3DR."

An Interceptor Entertainment representative added another statement on the matter. "It's unfortunate that Gearbox has shown no intention of finding a peaceful solution with us. We will however continue to work towards a solution," the spokesperson said.

In 2010, the Borderlands developer announced it acquired the rights for the Duke Nukem IP. It helped see Duke Nukem Forever to the finish line after more than a decade in development, and announced plans to develop other games in the franchise.

"Gearbox was the only home appropriate for the Duke Nukem brand," Broussard said at the time. "They are very talented and possess the perfect perspective and understanding of the brand. Their vision for its future direction is exciting and unbelievable. I personally cannot wait for fans to see their unique take on the franchise."

In 2013, 3D Realms sued Gearbox alleging unpaid Duke Nukem Forever royalties, but then abandoned its claim, and apologized for what it called a “misunderstanding.”

GameSpot may get a commission from retail offers.

Got a news tip or want to contact us directly? Email news@gamespot.com

Join the conversation
There are 160 comments about this story
160 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for berserker66666
berserker66666

1754

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

It's time to kick ass and chew bubblegum........

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Megavideogamer
Megavideogamer

6542

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

Looks like they will have to put up their dukes and fight it out. Meanwhile the next Nuke Em game will be released in about 20 years.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Redsyrup
Redsyrup

1368

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

It's fair to say they'll be duking it out in court.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for AyatollaofRnR
AyatollaofRnR

789

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

If Gearbox does own the IP then 3DR has no case. If they don't why do they think they own the IP?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for hystavito
hystavito

4755

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >> I guess this stuff isn't so clear and simple as it should be :).

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Takeno456
Takeno456

222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Ok I don't care who ends up owning it. If the series is going to be as much garbage as the last Duke title was I'll pass on it.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for DrKill09
DrKill09

6238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >> Go play the new Rise of the Triad. Interceptor know how to make great games. ROTT 2013 was released for $15, and is superior to Duke Forever ($60) in every way.


If they could get the rights back to Duke, then the series would be great once again.


With Duke Forever, the mishandling of Brothers in Arms, and the abysmal Aliens Colonial Marines, Gearbox have shown they can't develop an FPS worth a DAMN anymore.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for quakke
quakke

225

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 5

<< LINK REMOVED >>

It won't, since the new one is not going to be a CoD-clone. Haven't you seen that CoD and BF are already dying if you look at the declining sales numbers? DNF was bad because it only pretended to be Duke game, while gameplay was CoD. Hide behind cover regenerating health..

Upvote • 
Avatar image for UnrealPro
UnrealPro

337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

I hope Gearbox loses the Duke Nukem IP forever.

4 • 
Avatar image for MJ-X
MJ-X

174

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >>

I saw what u did there :D

Upvote • 
Avatar image for tightwad34
tightwad34

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >> Booooo!

Upvote • 
Avatar image for deactivated-5d14bade6a0c4
deactivated-5d14bade6a0c4

720

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

I don't really care who owns Duke as long as they make more Duke. I've played the hell out of Duke Nukem Forever and it's expansion.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for PS4Lives
PS4Lives

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

This kinds of shit is naked to public. I know how 3DRealms didn't compensated financially from the last game but this shows how evil and tight the publishers are.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for quakke
quakke

225

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 5

<< LINK REMOVED >>

What has this to do with publishers? 3DR is one of the industry veteran developers and Gearbox is one of the industry's shitty developers.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Lum_Yatsura
Lum_Yatsura

506

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >><< LINK REMOVED >>3DR doesn't understand the scope of what selling an IP entails. As long as that continues, we will not see an end to these squabbles.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for PS4Lives
PS4Lives

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Publishers are so.............

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Paul2004
Paul2004

317

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I think this is a losing battle, they havent taken action against Duke Nukem Forever even tho they claim to own the IP (Abandoning a claim doesnt count IMO, its admitting defeat) so why would any court side with them ?. If they really believed that they owned the IP then they should have stuck to their guns and proven it then and there, no company would stand back and let another use its IP without a "Donation" at the very least.

The last game was terrible and i would rather have the original team try to remake the series but for now this seems near impossible.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for DrKill09
DrKill09

6238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

I say if they can't reclaim the IP, make a spiritual successor, like the creators of Mega Man and Castlevania are doing.


I would rather play "Nuke Dukem" than another Gearbox made Duke Nukem.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for DrKill09
DrKill09

6238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

I wish 3D Realms and Interceptor entertainment luck, but I don't think they have a chance. Who knows.


That said, Interceptor Entertainment have shown with screens of Duke 3D Reloaded and the Rise of the Triad reboot that they are a better developer than Gearbox.


Gearbox gave us the decent, but disappointing DNF on pc, with GOD AWFUL console ports. And who could forget the total pile of shit Aliens Colonial Marines? Horrid AI, ugly graphics, and no sense of atmosphere. The icing on the cake was the fake trailers. Instead of next gen graphics, we got a game that looked and played like a budget Dreamcast title.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Radnen
Radnen

68

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

DnF was a terrible gam *(yes it's a gam not a game)* but I don't fault gearbox on that. I'm sure if gearbox had made it from the beginning it wouldn't have been so bad. Also the Aliens franchise wasn't also entirely in their hands. I think gearbox is getting a bad rap lately and here's hoping the next game they make is finally done right (in house with full developmental control).

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Doomerang
Doomerang

222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

The contract clearly stated that Gearbox owned all future rights to Duke Nukem Forever. That means that they also owned the trademark unless contested. Gearbox had announced back in 2010 that they had acquired ownership of Duke Nukem, and not once did 3D Realms ever contest the ownership of the trademark. The royalties lawsuit does not count, because 3DR abandoned it before it reached a conclusion.


I honestly don't know how 3DR or their owners can think they have any rights to the Duke Nukem franchise outside of the pre-Forever games, especially in terms of the trademark. They had four full years to contest ownership of the trademark and they never did, and they never made any complaint in the past four years about being "forced" to do this. There is no way that a judge would find in favor of 3DR, and 3DR should fire their lawyers if their lawyers are the people who believed that such a case is winnable.


If it turns out that their lawyers had told them that this was a stupid thing to do and 3DR went along with the statement anyways, then we should all point our fingers at 3DR and laugh.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for souldomain1984
Souldomain1984

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

I have no clue about such things. But it seems to me they didn't have a clue, either.


Funny! ><


Some industry veterans they are. Now I know where those shitty AAA games come from.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for dark_jedi79
dark_jedi79

26

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Pitchford wants the right to make more shitty games damnit!!

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Hoaph
Hoaph

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Gearbox should just let 3Drealms develop the game...it'll be ready in 2026.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for DrKill09
DrKill09

6238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >> Still funny, but Interceptor Entertainment are a LOT quicker at developing games than 3DR.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for quakke
quakke

225

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 5

<< LINK REMOVED >>

Joke's old.

Broussard had really good intentions with the game. He wanted to make the best possible game ever created, only it backfired and went horribly wrong.

CoD being the worst game ever, DNF ain't that low, but DNF is right after CoD.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Ripper_TV
Ripper_TV

2972

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 34

User Lists: 1

Gramps Brussard just gone bonkers.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for DrKill09
DrKill09

6238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

@Ripper_TV I think that happened years ago when he kept ordering DNF be remade on newer engines... even though Duke 3D was on a dated engine when it came out, and was still a massive hit.


Duke was never about cutting edge graphics; it was about gameplay, interactivity, and character, as were Blood and Shadow Warrior. Both of which were extremely dated graphically by the time they came out.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for dlCHIEF58
dlCHIEF58

3519

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >>

It's not him, he sold 3D Realms to Interceptor Entertainment who is putting forth this claim. Broussard already commented last month that he had sold the rights to Gearbox in an interview. Interceptor is grasping at straws.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Hurvl
Hurvl

2224

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

It's look like there's no winners in this fight and that actually suits me fine. Gearbox hasn't done much good lately except the Borderlands games and 3D Realms hasn't done anything at all, couldn't even finish Duke Nukem Forever, so I have no expectations concerning whatever future game they might be working on. Let them fight over the right... to party, um I mean, the right to the Duke Nukem trademark :P.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Barighm
Barighm

11479

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

I don't see how there can be a legal battle. I've SEEN the agreement of the sale. It clearly states the ENTIRE Duke property, in every sense of the word, was transferred to Gearbox. It was purchased for $2 million which, fyi, covered 3D Realms current operating dept of roughly the same. That doesn't sound like a "forced" business deal made in "bad faith". That sounds like a fair and even trade. And last I heard, the bosses of the two devs are good friends.


I'll bet this is coming from these Interceptor Entertainment guys. They know what they lost. They want it back.

2 • 
Avatar image for dlCHIEF58
dlCHIEF58

3519

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >>

Actually 3D Realms did retain the rights to the old, already released Duke Nukem games as well as the film rights. They did sign over all future rights to Gearbox, so I don't know where Interceptor (who bought 3DR) thinks they still retain the rights unless Broussard bamboozled them when he sold out.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Ripper_TV
Ripper_TV

2972

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 34

User Lists: 1

<< LINK REMOVED >> Brussard and Pitchfork friends? Not anymore..

Upvote • 
Avatar image for DeadrisingX1
DeadrisingX1

1850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 157

User Lists: 0

Give it away Gearbox; not too many can forgive you for what you did to Duke Nukem: Forever.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Barighm
Barighm

11479

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >> Did what? Take 3D Realms' turd and polish it? They didn't really develop the game, dude. They just took what was broken and taped it together the best they could.


Not that I'm defending Gearbox, I don't like what they have done to Borderlands 2, but misinformation is misinformation.

5 • 
Avatar image for Xristophoros
Xristophoros

7640

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

gearbox is such a shady company. do they have no shame? false advertising with aliens was embarrassing as well. it's not like anyone gives two shits about duke these days, but it is the principle. hey, i will give the benefit of the doubt that gearbox may in fact have the rights, but their arrogance does not give me much hope in that being the case. pitchfork is as sly as they come.

7 • 
Avatar image for Ripper_TV
Ripper_TV

2972

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 34

User Lists: 1

<< LINK REMOVED >> Dont' forget, Pitchfork likes to think of himself as a "MAGICIAN".

Upvote • 
Avatar image for dark_jedi79
dark_jedi79

26

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >><< LINK REMOVED >> Whenever he's overly enthusiastic is when you know a game is going to be shit.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Barighm
Barighm

11479

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >> I wouldn't say 1.5 million sales of a game with a rotten review score is a good example of no one giving "two shits".

2 • 
Avatar image for dark_jedi79
dark_jedi79

26

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >><< LINK REMOVED >> They'll be lucky to move 100,000 units on a sequel

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Xristophoros
Xristophoros

7640

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >> nostalgia is its only saving grace. how many of those 1.5 million people regret their purchase of the last duke game? 1.45 million? duke was never a good franchise to begin with. it was big and dumb in all respects and got popular in the 90s for passing the line. people will not make the same mistake twice and buy into this trashy series.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Xristophoros
Xristophoros

7640

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >> fine, i stand corrected on that point :D

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Ripper_TV
Ripper_TV

2972

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 34

User Lists: 1

<< LINK REMOVED >> You're not correct actually. Duke was the first shooter, where the protagonist HAD a personality.

3 • 
Avatar image for Xristophoros
Xristophoros

7640

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >> the fps genre owes its debt to wolfenstein,doom, quake and unreal. duke nukem was an oddball in the bunch that did nothing new except show nude strippers. you are giving it too much credit. it may be a classic to some, but that doesn't mean it is worthy of that title. big and dumb games can be fun and worth the time, but duke is not one of them due to the poor execution in most respects.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for TheWatcher000
TheWatcher000

206

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >><< LINK REMOVED >>

Duke was never a good franchise to begin with? Duke Nukem' 3D is considered one of the all time classics and a cornerstone of the shooter genre.


As for being big and dumb, compared to Call Of Duty, that is a laughable statement.

3 • 
Avatar image for Barighm
Barighm

11479

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >> I'm sorry, but you're stating your opinion as fact. Your dislike of the game proves absolutely nothing. The game sold well and Gearbox's forums was flooded with people praising the game and that was despite previews, trailers, and all sorts of pre-release material that clearly showed the game was crap. Yes, DNF sucked, but the market is there and Gearbox has a much better chance of delivering a good game than 3D Realms does.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for ff7100
FF7100

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

Let the gamer's have say on this, if its games good 3D Realms gets to keep it if not get sue'd by Gearbox both ways we win

Upvote • 
Avatar image for dark_jedi79
dark_jedi79

26

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >> If another Duke game gets made everyone loses

Upvote • 
Avatar image for tomservo51
tomservo51

698

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

Fighting over a long dead franchise. sad.

Upvote •