Please use a html5 video capable browser to watch videos.
This video has an invalid file format.
00:00:00
Sorry, but you can't access this content!
Please enter your date of birth to view this video

By clicking 'enter', you agree to GameSpot's
Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Feature Article

The Division 2's Dark Zones Are Less Intimidating, But Will Make You More Devious

The new no man's land.

GameSpot may get a commission from retail offers.

One of The Division's most notable achievements in 2016 was its rather unorthodox approach to PvP gameplay. Within the center of post-outbreak Manhattan was the Dark Zone, an isolated, untamed space where you could engage in timed events, small skirmishes, and even backstabbing temporary allies. With The Division 2, Ubisoft has some interesting plans for expanding the Dark Zone concept, most of which will have you rethinking how you'll tackle the infamous no man's land.

We recently played several hours of the upgraded multiplayer mode, designed by original Rainbow Six developer Red Storm Entertainment. In the first game, the Dark Zone incorporated competitive multiplayer gameplay into the core systems and mechanics of the online world, allowing the agents to seamlessly transition between engagements against AI and other players in the volatile region. The developers refer to this gameplay loop as PvPvE: player-versus-player-versus-environment. While inside the zone, there are many opportunities to acquire powerful loot, but with significantly greater risk tied to it, thanks to tougher enemies and the threat of shady players looking for a chance to steal your loot.

No Caption Provided

Though clever in its design, and offering some fun encounters, the Dark Zone in the original game--even after several updates--was largely dominated by the hardcore playerbase. This gave the setting a reputation for being uninviting for those that weren't used to the steep learning curve and sink-or-swim setup. With this in mind, The Division 2 places a larger emphasis on making the Dark Zones more worthwhile for all players, offering more reasons to stay and explore the new systems at work. Furthermore, the sequel will feature not one, but three separate zones across Washington D.C.--DZ East surrounding Capitol Station, DZ South encompassing the waterfront, and DZ West within Georgetown.

Over the course of the campaign, your agent will be tasked to investigate the Dark Zones, allowing you to get your feet wet before things kick off. During our session, we opened the massive door leading into Dark Zone East and established various safe houses throughout the region. The on-boarding process for each Dark Zone also offers up some interesting narrative details, revealing what went wrong in the area and which faction of enemies has taken over. After completing the zone's introductory missions, the core content in the region will unlock, letting you enter skirmishes against AI and other players, or team up with others to secure loot.

In another promising change, Dark Zone loot has been significantly overhauled. In the first Division, anything you found in the Dark Zone had to be "extracted" before it could be used. Extractions required you to make a last stand in a certain area to get gear airlifted out while enemies and other players swarmed in to stop you and steal the loot. For the most part, loot found in the zones in The Division 2 won't require extraction and will be free to use upon pickup. However, you'll still find contaminated weapons that will require extraction, but they're now for rarer types of gear. This is big improvement because it not only rewards those who can only invest so much time in the zones, but it also lessens the frustrations found from getting easily sniped by opportunistic players upon extraction.

No Caption Provided

The sequel also does more to balance the initial power dynamics within the zones, normalizing all players' stats to ensure they're on an even playing field. The developers described this change as "fair, but intense," with the expressed purpose of allowing players of varying skill levels to see what they can find in the untamed areas. While this may bother some of the hardcore players, this change makes exploration of the Dark Zones more viable during the initial grind. However, you'll still come across players possessing unique loadouts and skill levels, ensuring most encounters will be unpredictable.

One of the more devious aspects of the original Dark Zone was its Rogue gameplay system. At any point, players could choose to turn on one another and steal their loot before it reached extraction. While this was intended to be a strategic choice within the first game, it more often than not resulted in severe griefing from high-level players. In The Division 2, the Rogue system has gone through an overhaul, redesigning the general loop to offer more options outside of the strictly PvP design from the last game.

To put it simply, Rogue status activates when you decide to get greedy. Throughout the zones are loot caches and special events that tie into the Rogue loop. If you decide to break into a locked loot chest, as opposed to using a Dark Zone key, then you'll immediately become Rogue for a limited time, momentarily placing you on the map for others to see. Even looting dead players will briefly turn you Rogue. While you may want to keep a low profile and wait for things to die down, special events will open up for Rogue players, allowing you rack up credits and resources, which can be turned in to unique vendors hiding out in the Dark Zone.

Please use a html5 video capable browser to watch videos.
This video has an invalid file format.
00:00:00
Sorry, but you can't access this content!
Please enter your date of birth to view this video

By clicking 'enter', you agree to GameSpot's
Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Potentially, you could reach the upper Rogue tiers without engaging in combat. The more Rogue actions and events you take on, the better the rewards and the higher your status will become. If enough time passes, you'll eventually become a main target for others, opening up a manhunt within the zone. In our session, some of the most intense moments came from when we were Rogue, which meant we were constantly looking over our shoulders to make sure we weren't being followed by other players looking to take us down. With more incentive to enter Rogue status outside of general PvP hijinks, there could be some potentially challenging scenarios for players to tackle--especially for those who aim to stealth through the Dark Zone.

With that said, getting a handle on the new Rogue mechanics sometimes resulted in cumbersome and awkward moments. While it's easy to go Rogue, simply by engaging in nefarious actions or simply activating it with the press of a button, the system itself can feel a bit too nebulous. A big issue we came across was that it was difficult, trying to get a sense of when you could actually target other players, or if they could target you. Likely intended as a safe-guard against griefing, you can only fire upon other players if they share Rogue status. So if you see another Rogue player in the wild, and you're not of similar status, you'll need to enable it to engage.

As it stands, this approach can create a minor disconnect from the overall pacing and dynamic systems in the Dark Zone. In one case during a Rogue mission, we found ourselves trading bullets with another group, only for the fight to abruptly come to an end once we found out another player turned in a quest--which immediately disabled the Rogue status for all of us in mid-fight. Having said that, the developers are still tweaking aspects of the design, so the final game may see a change.

No Caption Provided

At first glance, many of these changes seem to lessen the risk and ensuing dread that was synonymous with the Dark Zone. While that's certainly true to an extent, it also serves as a sampling for what's to come during the end-game. After the campaign's completion, one zone will become a contested area, and this will switch to a different location each week. Essentially a hardcore version of the Dark Zone, level and gear balancing will be disabled, player status is neutral by default, and friendly fire will be active at all times. With these changes, the contested Dark Zones could become some of the most chaotic and unpredictable areas the series has seen yet.

While the Dark Zone is still the main attraction for The Division 2's competitive gameplay, the developers have also added in an additional layer that exists outside of the PvPvE loop. Picking up from the previous game's 1.8 update that brought in 4v4 PvP, The Division 2 will also have traditional competitive multiplayer modes. Known as Conflict, this organized form of PvP will allow players to take part in standard team deathmatch and domination game types against others--with all their levels normalized. Conflict will also feature unique stat-tracking and rewards exclusive to the mode, including new cosmetics. However, at launch there will only be three maps and two game types, which quickly became repetitive during our hands-on. The developers were clear in stating that more competitive offerings will come during post-launch, which they aim to keep supporting for the long term.

The Division 2 felt very familiar to the original game, and that's OK. As it stands, the original game had a pretty spectacular post-launch period, and seeing that the sequel aims to keep that second wind going is reassuring. While some of the new innovations and changes in the sequel still need some work, it is interesting to see that its developers are trying to rethink the various elements of the competitive multiplayer, and how it can all coalesce within the online world. If you want to get some hands-on time with The Division 2 yourself, Ubisoft recently revealed plans for the upcoming private beta, which you can register for now on their site.

Got a news tip or want to contact us directly? Email news@gamespot.com

Back To Top
32 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for ExoticCharm
ExoticCharm

832

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

My biggest issue with dark zones in the first game was how they went from an interesting PvPvE experience to being strictly PvP. Ubisoft caved in on the demands from PvP players and kept modifying things until it became a "no risk, all rewards" situation for them. That wasn't how the mode was initially designed. Now add in the insane time-to-kill from tankiness, excessive amounts of healing, server-hopping 8 member rogue squads, and the fact that for the longest time the DZ was the only place to get good loot. It's no wonder things fizzled out.

At least it looks like the Division 2 is trying to take care of griefers and dial things back a bit. However, from everything they have announced so far, it sounds like they are still spending too much time catering to the PvP crowd and not adding enough for the PvE crowd.

Avatar image for phili878
phili878

1560

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

Divison 1 was pretty bad. You needed like 1000 headshots on highed end enemies to down them.

Avatar image for brownin
brownin

1

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Personally they don't need to change any of the game mechanics. I enjoyed the Dark Zone from day 1 the way it was. I spent a lot of time in there solo and with up to 3 friends. I got all of the pieces of the green PVP dark zone gear, so had the passive that fully healed me once every X amount of seconds. This meant I was able to stay in there on my own and would hardly ever die to even 4 people chasing me. I put in the effort to get all the pieces and were therefore rewarded with the ability to survive more so than the average player. This gear also helped me in the first raid, as I would have been downed a couple of times if it weren't for the gear set bonus.

I haven't played the first one since completing the first raid then giving up as there was nothing more to do at the time, so I don't know in what state it is in now but all I would ask for would be more content on release than TD1 had.

I had people running in the way of me while firing, so I learnt how to deal with it.

There were people standing on top of buildings sniping people, so I learnt to deal with it.

I would be jumped by 4 people, so I learnt to deal with it.

Being kept on your toes the whole time is what made the Dark Zone so enjoyable and when you did manage to extract loot you felt a sense of achievement even it was just to be deconstructed for materials.

Dumbing any of that down just removes from the overall experience that I enjoyed so much.

I'm getting the game either way but I'd like to think I will have at least some of the enjoyment I got from release of the first game.

Avatar image for donny
Donny

8

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

downgraded again?

Avatar image for Deckard2323
Deckard2323

194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

No Steam = no buy

Avatar image for off3nc3
off3nc3

711

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

@Deckard2323: Nobody cares about you son.

Avatar image for Zenmuron666
Zenmuron666

55

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

Edited By Zenmuron666

I'll pass. Enjoyed D1. A lot. Even played DZ but was done with that quickly.

I enjoy PvE more these days. Not paying for a (big) part of the game I'm not interested in.

Loads of fun to those getting D2 though

Avatar image for listerofsmeg
ListerofSmeg

52

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

It all sounds very promising. I'm not the greatest PVP player in the world but I think the new "anti griefing" measures are a bit over the top. If you go into the DZ, you know what to expect. Whats the point of having PVP if I can only use it i certain circumstances?

Now they're taking away the intense feeling when you're about to extract stuff and youre all wondering whether your partner will stab you on the back? Games developers are becoming such fucking wimps. They are hell bent on not allowing you to fail or lose or feel bad. Its ridiculous.

Avatar image for spider-man_4
Spider-Man_4

6

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

Edited By Spider-Man_4

@listerofsmeg: They're doing this because a lot gamers lose their minds if they do not get their way

Avatar image for Warlord_Irochi
Warlord_Irochi

3846

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 7

"The sequel also does more to balance the initial power dynamics within the zones, normalizing all players' stats to ensure they're on an even playing field."

People will keep complaining that they can't do anything against a group of 4 people, which is... well... normal.

Avatar image for jaykobwerdnahs
jaykobwerdnahs

138

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

The DZ in D1 got way better the more people stopped playing.

Avatar image for Ohaidere
Ohaidere

4089

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

Edited By Ohaidere

Griefers pretty much made the dark zone more tedious than tense. Old school just isn't that appealing in this environment

Avatar image for Warlord_Irochi
Warlord_Irochi

3846

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 7

@Ohaidere: Agreed. That's why I receive this as good news:

"you can only fire upon other players if they share Rogue status. So if you see another Rogue player in the wild, and you're not of similar status, you'll need to enable it to engage."

This new system that they are implementing could be a nice anti-griefing mechanic.

Avatar image for Pierce_Sparrow
Pierce_Sparrow

1327

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 0

I am not a fan of Ubi trying to force players into the PVP experience. I thought the DZ stuff in the original game was all right, but between the griefing and the extremely repetitive nature of the DZ, it just stopped being worthwhile. Ubi should be focusing it's energy into the PVE. What they need is more content for it, a LOT more content. THAT was the worst part of the game. It was such a short experience. I'll never understand why these AAA companies trying to make AAA games with MMO concepts don't just fully embrace the MMO idea. If you're going to make it like an RPG, then make it an RPG.

Avatar image for Warlord_Irochi
Warlord_Irochi

3846

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 7

@Pierce_Sparrow: If they learned the lessons correctly, they'll do with Division 2 what they did with Division 1 after patch 1.4 Basically the game now is what you just described; a lot of PvE content for both groups and solo players.

Avatar image for untouchables111
untouchables111

1606

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

looking fwd to the game. high hope the post launch game of TD1 is captured in large in TD2

"Potentially, you could reach the upper Rogue tiers without engaging in combat" - This sounds boring and wont last. competition and other players standing in the way is what made the grind ....A grind.

"So if you see another Rogue player in the wild, and you're not of similar status, you'll need to enable it to engage." - hmmm like and dislike this idea. Rogue represented bad plaers doing bad things. I think this is the wrong direction. This come off more like having a second set of PVP engagements. :Like DZ-PVE then DZ2 rouge...i dont get it.

Avatar image for Warlord_Irochi
Warlord_Irochi

3846

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 7

@untouchables111: That will give griefers the middle finger, but indeed it can potentially hurt PvP

Avatar image for xxmavr1kxx
xxmavr1kxx

389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@untouchables111: I know of myself and a whole slew of other players that just didnt enjoy the Dark ZOne because of greifers.

I like the idea of not being able to be a target if I am just taking on an NPC in an event int he dark zone. Although I could see people purposely running into your firing line to turn you rogue.

Avatar image for RELeon
RELeon

470

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@xxmavr1kxx: Well, if they do it like they eventually did in D1, you won't be able to shoot other players unless you choose to go rogue with a button press, or already rogue. They knew that was a problem in D1, people purposely running into your fire in order to force you rogue. So they tweaked it.

Avatar image for jaykobwerdnahs
jaykobwerdnahs

138

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@xxmavr1kxx: Agreed on all counts.

Avatar image for cjtopspin
cjtopspin

801

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

The massive volume of rounds you need to put on target is ridiculous.

Avatar image for pharoe777
pharoe777

621

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

@cjtopspin: that's because this game is an RPG first, then a shooter

Avatar image for siarhei
siarhei

2840

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

@pharoe777: how about more squishy enemies then instead of few sponges?

Avatar image for pharoe777
pharoe777

621

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

Edited By pharoe777

@siarhei: I don't know, maybe bring that up to the devs? The game is an action RPG and the mechanics play as such, it is what it is.

Avatar image for cjtopspin
cjtopspin

801

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@pharoe777: Ok...then change the ability to aim...not ballistics. It shouldn't take an entire magazine of .223 to kill ONE dude. That's retarded.

Avatar image for pharoe777
pharoe777

621

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

@cjtopspin: again, this is an RPG game first, then a shooter...just think of the "firearms" as being a "sword" in some other action RPG

Avatar image for starjay009
starjay009

792

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

An easy decision for me to NOT buy TD2. Plus, it will not be on Steam and only on EPIC store.

To those who do get it, enjoy. But the developers have got it wrong again. Make ALL areas available to every kind of player. Have separate game modes like in the old days. Don't shut off vast areas to those who still wish to enjoy the game in the PvE style just because you wish to cater to the online, social interaction bulls**t going on these days with pretty much all games. The Dark Zone in the first game was TOXIC to say the least. We don't need some folks to lecture us 'how we don't know how to tackle it...' etc. I have tried it many times and it s**ked big time. Sure, some of us will always love it. I respect that.

Avatar image for untouchables111
untouchables111

1606

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@starjay009: ya know there was a point in time as a gamer i would agree with this foot stomping rant that "i paid for the game so i'm owed access to all aspects"... unfortunately that style of game only exist in...well almost no game does that now...

"Make ALL areas available to every kind of player" = solo PVE game play..like skyrim. u can start a new game and walk right to the other side of the map...

^^^ thats not going to EVER be a thing in PVP/PVP combo games..just doesnt work.

DZ was very annoying for me. i did avoid it but i also went against trying to learn how to build better gear sets to withstand the HC player base.

Dont buy the game, thats the only "entitlement" you can have.

Avatar image for Acheron18
Acheron18

120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

So once again a considerable part of the game will be locked behind forced PvP. No thanks. This was the biggest flaw with the first game and apparently Ubi has learned nothing.

A large number of players just want PvE and not giving them that option is stupid. Do you really think the player base will be larger if you force unwanted systems on gamers?

Oh, Ubisoft.

Avatar image for pongman75
Pongman75

760

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

Gona be a good game.