Suicide Squad Game Announced By Batman Developer Rocksteady

@moistcarrot: I feel ya. I quit right after Logan

@BassMan:

I was also, I don’t know much about DC or this, but after Batman feels like more of the same

@bdrtfm: Obviously you're referencing Avengers/Spider-Man from Crystal Dynamics as a joke but Batman from Rocksteady has had exclusive content in the past. Arkham Knight got exclusive content for PS4 because Sony paid for it. Then the original Arkham Asylum got the Joker bonus content because the PS3 port suffered from performance issues over the 360 version, so it was meant as a sort of apology for PS3 users. Arkham City on Wii U would get bonus costumes for Batman and Catwoman for similar reasons to the AA PS3 issues.

I doubt any version will get exclusive content for this unless MS or Sony pay for it. It was highly rumored MS might buy WB Games division so that could play into things too.

@bdrtfm: Superman :D

@donewithgamespot: That's true, but even a piece of crap that accidentally finds its way into the disc drive of a console has a better chance of being better than those movies, so its not a fair thing to say.

@daidochus: That's not Bizarro. That's clearly normal Caucasian colored skin while Bizarro is albino white.

@daidochus: The original Suicide Squad was a prime example of how to have diversity without shoving it down people's throats.

@daidochus:

I'm absolutely certain that the "woke crap" that you so ignorantly described as a problem has nothing to do with how terrible Suicide Squad is.

@_Shuyin_: Game isn't worth a port. Too bad PS4 doesn't have BC. You can however subscribe to PlayStation™Now with a recurring subscription fee of $9.99 (+ applicable tax) per month.

@openmind23: Harley Quinn.

I doubt they’ll pay for the rights to Margot Robbie‘s likeness.

@notjm: and to rub it in you are killing superman. who knows maybe batman will even be an ally of sorts

@notjm: Devs controlled by major (movie) publishers usually don't have that much control over what games they make.

@The_PlagueLord: You are a 90s kid arent you? LOL I ask that you go back and watch power rangers just to see how cringy it is as an adult! Both TMNT and power rangers just wouldnt sell in today's climate, they are both exclusively 90s things that will probably never be popular again, its party because they were so ingrained with the 90s culture (esp TMNT) with the 'cowabangas', skateboarding and their very 90s teen personalities that would not work now.

@The_PlagueLord: Fark no to TMNT. The Arkham combat system was cool at first, and it really works for Batman due to his nature as a tool-laden ninja, but TMNT has always been a hardcore brawler, including in the shows themselves. The turtles even make fun of how un-ninja like they are in the show.

And, frankly, I'm so over the Arkham combat system. For all of the stuff they have introduced, the core concept is so simple that you can completely ignore everything new and just focus on the basic principles in every game and still beat them no prob. And the devs clearly knew this given the major new additions to the games weren't even related to the combat system, but things like open world exploration and vehicle combat (I'd love to see them use the tank mechanics for a Blaster Master game. They're perfect for that kind of game).

What TMNT really needs is evolved brawler mechanics. I'm surprised the brawler sub-genre has been stuck as 2D retro games for so long. It seemed like they were making headway there with The Warriors, but since then things have stalled and every new game in that field is either an Arkham rip-off, a 2D retro brawler, or a fighting game.