GameSpot may receive revenue from affiliate and advertising partnerships for sharing this content and from purchases through links.

Star Citizen Will Let You Buy Land For Up To $100 Per Parcel

The incredibly ambitious PC space game adds another microtransaction option.

119 Comments

Star Citizen is the most successful crowdfunded project of any kind in history, and now developer Cloud Imperium Games has rolled out another way for the super-ambitious PC space game to make more money before launch. The developer today started allowing players to start the process of buying parcels of virtual land. For $50, you can get a single 4km x 4km parcel of land that you can use as you see fit in the game. You also get what Cloud Imperium is calling a "Geotack marking beacon," which lets you know the exact coordinates of your land. This beacon also informs you in real time of weather and has motion-detection to inform you if someone is using your property without permission (more on that later).

For $100, you can get an 8km x 8km parcel of land with the same Geotack beacon. On its website, Cloud Imperium said when Star Citizen launches you'll be able to buy parcels of land with in-game credits or through normal gameplay progression. The studio is offering the land for real money now to support the ongoing development of Star Citizen.

In a detailed FAQ explaining the new land-buying system, Cloud Imperium said players who purchase land won't have an advantage over those who do not. But what about players claiming the "best" plots of land? Cloud Imperium pointed out that there are "billions of square kilometres" available in the game, so there is no telling for sure what will be the "best" place to hunker down. Some players might want to buy land based on the natural resources it has, while others might want to be close to trade routes. Others might simply want a place with a nice view.

"This--combined with the fact that there's an enormous amount of real estate available--means that prospecting and the purchase of land are two pieces of a supply-and-demand equation governing how rapidly land of a distinct perceived value will come on the market," Cloud Imperium said.

When you're scouting for a parcel of land, you will have to consider factors like the ones mentioned above, along with the grade of the terrain, as this can affect your ability to establish an outpost. Players can destroy others' beacons, but this is a criminal offence in the game, so it's a risk. Beacons can be replaced, but it's unclear if this is a free service. Additionally, you can mine another players' land for resources, but again, this is a crime and the in-game authorities could come after you. Players concerned about security can implement defence drone, hire mercenaries, or even pay for a defence contract.

Another very important note is that, for now, all your $50 or $100 gets you is a "claim license" for the land. No one can claim land before the feature actually goes live, and there is no word yet as to when that may happen. For now, your money is going towards the ongoing development of Star Citizen

For lots and lots more on Star Citizen's new land-buying system, check out this in-depth FAQ. Star Citizen has brought in an astonishing $168 million in crowdfunding, and that figure only stands to climb higher and higher still.

Got a news tip or want to contact us directly? Email news@gamespot.com

Join the conversation
There are 119 comments about this story
119 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for gamingdevil800
gamingdevil800

7159

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 76

User Lists: 0

Edited By gamingdevil800

Get the feeling this won't live up to peoples expectations, the game will probably be alright but not what they promised. Next year will be 6 years since it started to development but honestly might be 2020 by the time we see this releasing. Problem is they've probably already made a tonne of cash so there is nothing to worry about for them if the launch is a flop.

5 • 
Avatar image for deactivated-63e36b38d9211
deactivated-63e36b38d9211

991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

@gamingdevil800: I feel like this is going to be "No man's sky" on steroids. I might be wrong, but it feels that way.

3 • 
Avatar image for mogan
mogan

18955

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

mogan  Moderator

@gamingdevil800: "Get the feeling this won't live up to peoples expectations"

Oh, word? Surely not! : p

7 • 
Avatar image for ccgod
ccgod

7915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

@gamingdevil800: Can't really have a flop at launch if most people already own the game. Hopefully the single player element will be out in 2018. And its "really" only been in development for 3years considering all the early problems they had. I would start dev counter when they got 3 studios and over 360 employee's not when it was 5 guys trying to get things together for a couple years

3 • 
Avatar image for nikolistary
nikolistary

1025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

So glad a pal I know who worked on this turd for years quit for an actual developer and not these scumbags. The shit he told me. Hoo boy what a fucking mess.

13 • 
Avatar image for gamingdevil800
gamingdevil800

7159

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 76

User Lists: 0

@nikolistary: Would be nice if you could elaborate the internal problems.

7 • 
Avatar image for a687947
a687947

155

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@gamingdevil800: he'd have to actually know the person he's claiming to first to be able to do that

8 • 
Avatar image for ccgod
ccgod

7915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

@nikolistary: they seem to be doing alright lol great new update is out. Going from space station to landing on a planet back into space then back down with no load screens is really nice.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for ccgod
ccgod

7915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

You should issue a retraction. You're not buying land you're buying land protection for when you do buy land in UEE controlled space. Land will be sold in game only in UEE controlled space, so you're pretty much buying protection right now. Seems silly to do so right now but not gonna tell people how to spend their money.

2 • 
Avatar image for danielduncan
danielduncan

38

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@ccgod: So it is blatant extortion then. They create the conditions that make you need protection then charge you for said protection. That is the very definition of extortion, it gets no clearer than that. It is a scam, that IS what it is.

2 • 
Avatar image for ccgod
ccgod

7915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

@danielduncan: You don't "need" protection but it makes it better you can set up a base without a land claim then someone else can claim it and you lose your base.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for danielduncan
danielduncan

38

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@ccgod: I am not seeing an argument against extortion here, or am I mistaken?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for ccgod
ccgod

7915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

@danielduncan: Do you not pay taxes for police and fire ? Is that extortion?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for danielduncan
danielduncan

38

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@ccgod: That is not an argument against this, you are merely drawing a parallel. You just can't not call it extortion. You tried, failing that you attempted to change the subject.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for eddienoteddy
eddienoteddy

42085

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

eddienoteddy  Staff  Online

@ccgod: Thank you for pointing this out. We are updating the text now.

3 • 
Avatar image for davillain
DaVillain

56318

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

DaVillain  Moderator

@eddienoteddy: Thanks Eddie :)

Upvote • 
Avatar image for xantufrog
xantufrog

17875

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 5

Edited By xantufrog  Moderator

@ccgod: what you just said makes it sound even worse to me. This whole thing sounds ridiculous. People can do what they want, but count me out of buying virtual land in a game that simply will not be a part of my life in 10 years - regardless of whether the servers are still alive or not

2 • 
Avatar image for JudoHedgehog
JudoHedgehog

43

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@xantufrog: "No see it's cool, instead of buying nothing you're actually buying nothing."

Upvote • 
Avatar image for ccgod
ccgod

7915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

Edited By ccgod

@xantufrog: yea you're essentially paying for a police presence on your land. It's mostly for people who play solo and want to know they'll be protected while farming or mining on their land. I wouldn't buy it but I don't plan on owning land or anything like that either.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for xantufrog
xantufrog

17875

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 5

Edited By xantufrog  Moderator

@ccgod: crazy stuff!

Upvote •