Spider-Man Spinoff Film The Sinister Six May Still Happen

Writer/director Drew Goddard certainly hopes so.

7 Comments

The sheer number of superhero movies being released over the next few years means that it's easy to forget some of the casualties that have occurred along the way. One of those was The Sinister Six, a spinoff from Sony's Amazing Spider-Man movies, that was postponed indefinitely when the studio struck a deal with Marvel Studios to reboot the Spider-Man films.

Now writer/director Drew Goddard has revealed that he believes his script for the movie could still fit into the Marvel Cinematic Universe. As he explained in an interview with io9, his Sinister Six was very much a standalone story.

No Caption Provided

"My vision of that movie was a summer annual," he said. "So you didn't have to worry about continuity. It was just, 'We take Peter, put him on an adventure, we put him back in his life.' I intentionally wanted a movie that didn't have to worry about mythology and continuity.

"It was important to me to make a movie that could stand on its own. So the good news is, you know, it slots in very well to any plan anybody ever wants. We just need to let a couple years go by, I think."

Goddard has himself worked with Marvel on their Netflix hit Daredevil, and while an appearance in 2016's Captain America: Civil War and the standalone 2017 movie are to be the webslinger's first cinematic appearances for Marvel, it's clear that The Sinister Six is not necessarily dead.

The Sinister Six are a group of supervillains, each of them one of Spider-Man's arch-enemies. Originally organised by Doctor Octopus, they first appeared in The Amazing Spider-Man Annual #1 in 1964.

The closing scene of 2014's The Amazing Spider-Man 2 set up the spinoff film; however, its underwhelming box office led to the deal that would allow Spider-Man to appear in Marvel's own films. Despite the disappointment of the postponement, Goddard explains that as a fan it made perfect sense.

"I love that you get to see Spider-Man in Marvel movies," he said. "I think that's a great thing. I'm on board with that decision because as a fan that's what I want. So who knows what the future holds? This is Hollywood, man, you've gotta play the long game."

Disclosure: ViacomCBS is GameSpot's parent company

Got a news tip or want to contact us directly? Email news@gamespot.com

Join the conversation
There are 7 comments about this story
7 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for Hurvl
Hurvl

2224

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

"The Amazing Spider-Man 2 underwhelming box office led to the deal that would allow Spider-Man to appear in Marvel's own films" Yeah, it "only" made 709 million dollars which clearly is quite laughable, not at all Amazing. It was the least successful of all Spider-Man movies and had a 255 million dollar budget, but it's still funny to think of 700+ millon dollar box office as a failure. The Sinister Six could make for an interesting movie.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Gblazer01
Gblazer01

122

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

Edited By Gblazer01

I don't really care about what majority of people say, but the amazing spider-man movies were - well - amazing. I feel like Andrew Garfield's spider-man was more reminiscent of the Ultimate/Modern comic book Spiderman, wise-cracking and all, more so than the original trilogy and which is what I actually loved about the "amazing" franchise. Putting aside the grudge I have against the original trilogy's interpretation of Venom, I feel the Amazing Spider-man franchise simply had A LOT more potential than the original with Toby. NOT TO MENTION THE SECOND MOVIE ENDED WITH SUCH A FLIPPIN' CLIFFHANGER THAT I DON'T KNOW HOW I'M GOING TO COPE WITH THE FACT THAT THERE WON'T BE A THIRD "AMAZING" MOVIE.

Regardless, a Sinister Six movie NEEDS to be made, especially when DC are about to release their own villians-only movie via "Suicide Squad". If anything I say NOW is the right time to make a SS movie, strike while the iron is hot right?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for plug313
PLUG313

76

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I hope they get Andrew Garfield back for this one I really liked him as Peter Parker

Upvote • 
Avatar image for omotih
omotih

1556

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

the guy in the middle with the glasses ... GN

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Hurvl
Hurvl

2224

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@omotih: That's Doctor Octopus, the main villain in the Spider-Man 2, but they sure made characters look silly in previous decades. The starfish-face guy in the middle is Electro, so perhaps the Amazing Spider-Man 2's portrayal of Electro doesn't look so strange in comparison.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for crushbrain
crushbrain

191

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

MovieSpot. ComicSpot.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for normanislost
normanislost

1748

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@crushbrain: yourcommentsaddhitswhichmeansmorecomicsandmoviesspot

Upvote •