Project Cars 2 On Xbox One X Will Look "Significantly" Better Than PS4 Pro, Dev Says

@lonesamurai1: Nice of you to bog down these comment boards with your pathetic cheers, but this statement you made is pretty insightful since it actually applies to you (instead of whom you thought). "Any rational person reading this discussion would laugh your ass off this site because you've proven nothing that is definitive or concrete."

lol

@lonesamurai1: Here is the honest essence of a fanboy.

@lonesamurai1: . . . and he's back with another pointless post. But it fits right in with the rest of them.

"I'm through with you."

LOL

@lonesamurai1: ooh. More cheerleading drivel from the anti-Xbox fanboy.

"what do you have on Xbox, nothing."

"They have hardly any games from their own devs worth looking at, and certainly nothing from other places."

"enjoy having nothing to play on your shiny 30fps checkerboard console,"

So your claim is that Xbox has no games, even though there are over 1,700 games to play?

And then you back it up by saying Xbox has no games three different ways, and that Switch has more games?

LOL

"since I have done nothing else except provide proof and data"

LOL

Your entire post was SHATTERED by one little fact (1700+ games).

You're hopeless! Get some pom-poms and continue your pathetic rant. "Boo Xbox!"

lol

"I'm through with you."

Let's hope.

LOL

@lonesamurai1: No worries. No bad news. Just pointless news.

"Yep I'm a fanboy,"

Exactly. I'm glad you recognize that. Fanboy opinions ("platforms that actually are fun") are typically dogmatic statements that are not based on reality, but fandom. You see, platforms are not "fun". Games are fun.

lol

@lonesamurai1: "Xbox One X and PS4 Pro are no different from one another."

It's a bit like saying the GTX 1070 and RX 480 are no different from one another. But of course there's a lot more to it than that.

"As I said, the Switch is the only worthy console."

This statement is pretty hilarious, and your supporting points even more so. Not a single fact in there, apart from "it's a mobile console." Convincing. Ah well, this is the way fanboys roll.

@lonesamurai1: Uh huh. Yet more baseless fanboy opinions, and yet more inability to distinguish fact from opinion. And of course, yet more double standards.

"The console can't do anything different," after raving about "extra power" on PCs. You'll acknowledge a little bit more power on PC, but not one console from another.

@lonesamurai1: Yeah, you've said a lot of things. Accuracy isn't your forte.

@lonesamurai1: "You don't even have the console and you're already seeing compromises, that's sad,"

Your logic is flawed here. Console performance gets better over time, not worse.

So you have money to spend. Goodie for you. Just because you're willing to waste money on a few percentage points doesn't negate the fact that this console is a great value. Not everyone who has "plenty of spending money" is willing to blow it on a slight improvement, but they actually appreciate a good performance to cost ratio. The fact that 25% more than a 1070 is the cutting edge makes all your PC talk way overblown and exaggerated. The fact is that the best PCs just aren't that far above what the One X offers in terms of gaming. The only reason that consoles aren't doing three monitors is because they're designed for TVs. Nobody puts three TVs together. But the One X is certainly capable of doing three screens; 1070s and less powerful cards can pull it off fine.

And there's more to this Bungie PR than what they claim. It goes beyond just performance for sure. If they're that concerned with rendering space and objects, all they'd have to do is drop some resolution. Their textures on all the other consoles are low res anyway. Besides, they always refer to running it "on console". In terms of capability, there's nothing stopping them from getting a better performance on just the one console that has more power than the rest.

@lonesamurai1: You missed the point. I realize this may be hard to grasp for you, so let's go ahead and use your suggestion.

1070 vs. Titan XP. A $400 card vs. a $1200 card.

Going from a 1070 to a Titan, you're looking at 200% increase in cost, with roughly a 25% increase in performance. Is this perhaps starting to sink in now? So where is the value? Those little percentage points of increase after a certain point of saturation are getting very costly.

So you can (hopefully) see, then, why the One X is such a great value. You're not merely getting a GPU. You're getting a package deal; a whole system, with all that it entails, including peripherals, for $100 more than a 1070. That's called a good value.

I realize you'd like to distract the topic into talking about puppies and fanatics, but this console just happens to be a really good value, unlike your future PC builds you've been drooling over. Maybe think on that.

@lonesamurai1: You were done a long time ago. It's pretty simple. $500 Xbox One X vs. $2000 PC. The One X is a much better value. That extra $1500 doesn't accrue much more performance; certainly not even closely proportionate to the extra cost. It's four times the cost, but is it four times the performance? Not even close.

It's somewhat like deciding between the 1080 Ti vs. the Titan Xp. Sure, the Titan is more powerful, but is it "almost double the cost" more powerful? Nope. The extra performance just doesn't justify the price.

"These upgraded consoles, like the PS4 Pro and Xbox One X, just feel out of place"

This is the statement of a threatened fanboy. Nothing more nor less. Although it's a mistake to lump PS4 Pro with the One X.

@lonesamurai1: Oh, so a PC isn't a product. Your claims just keep getting better.

You're right, though. The One X is definitely outclassed by a PC that costs four times as much. Most people would consider that "expected", though.

@lonesamurai1: lol

So your entire premise is based on a "we shall see"? Might as well call Microsoft liars now.

lol

@lonesamurai1: Ah, so which in-house games are upscaled?

@lonesamurai1:

Oh. So if you say that your in-house games (the ones you control) will be in 4k, but the others will be up to developers, you'd better be sure that all of the games are actually 4k, or it's a lie.

Got it.

@lonesamurai1:

Oh okay, so this console that's $500 but performs like a $1500 PC is crap because it won't do 4k/60 like the next-gen GPUs that haven't come out yet?

Good point.

"Microsoft, they really shouldn't be promising you guys the impossible."

Are you seriously claiming they did? Maybe you can show me this "famous promise" that all you fanboys keep parroting. Where's the "4k/60 on all titles" promise?

lol

@lonesamurai1: "It doesn't matter what your hardware is like, you control the performance outcome, no matter the GPU or CPU."

Um, yeah it matters.

"My track record is stellar,"

lol

"You can't win this."

Win what? You don't even have a primary claim. The fact is that the One X offers an incredible performance value at $500. End of story.