Feature Article

PlayStation Vita Slim Review

GameSpot may receive revenue from affiliate and advertising partnerships for sharing this content and from purchases through links.

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

The original PlayStation Vita is a remarkable gaming handheld. It's powerful, with an amazing 5-inch OLED display, and features a wide range of inputs, including two analog sticks and a pair of touchscreens. As great as it is, Sony thinks it could be better, and it's beginning to rapidly phase out the original Vita in favor of a slimmer model with a few notable improvements. Apart from being refined in a number of ways, the new Vita Slim is also more consumer friendly than the barebones Vita of old; for the time being, every new Vita Slim is bundled with a free memory card (8GB) and a free voucher for Borderlands 2 and its 6 DLC packs. With the Slim redesign, the Vita has never been sleeker, or a better value, but its stunning OLED screen has been replaced by a standard LCD panel, and it's possible that people with an eye for detail may find the downgrade too noticeable to overlook.

Though the original Vita is a strong piece of hardware, it has its share of issues that needed to be addressed. The battery life is great in standby mode, but during gameplay, it typically taps out around the four-hour mark. The lackluster battery performance was compounded by the system's proprietary charging port. It negates the viability of common USB cables and requires a USB port with a data connection in order to accept a charge; common USB cables and wall chargers won't cut it.

Please use a html5 video capable browser to watch videos.
This video has an invalid file format.
00:00:00
Sorry, but you can't access this content!
Please enter your date of birth to view this video

By clicking 'enter', you agree to GameSpot's
Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Thankfully, Sony replaced the Vita's proprietary USB port with the now-common micro-USB standard. You no longer need a special Vita-only cable, you don't need to rely on finicky port restrictions, and common USB wall chargers are now your Vita's best friend. Plus, the battery in the new Vita is reported to last at least an hour longer than the old model, despite having the same capacity.

While it's good to see that the Vita's new screen doesn't hamper its battery life, it does have a negative impact on the overall Vita experience. Sure, LCD panels are cheaper to produce, which allows Sony to shave a few dollars off of the Vita price tag, but with a persistent backlight, colors look washed out on the LCD panel. If you've used the original Vita in any capacity, you know how impressive the OLED display can be, and the moment you look at the new model in action, you instantly recognize that it fails to produce images that are as crisp or vibrant as those of the original. If you've never used the old model, the shift in screen technology won't stand out as much, but you still won't find the display on the new Vita particularly impressive.

...you still won't find the display on the new Vita particularly impressive.

Still, you can find improvements in other areas that make the new Vita an attractive proposition. The new USB port is one, but if you look around, you find that the buttons have also been improved--in particular the start, select, and PlayStation home buttons. These three buttons were previously ovoid and sat flush with the surface, making them unusually difficult to press. Now, they are represented like any other button: they're circular and raised up, making them far easier to use, especially when you're trying to take screenshots by pressing the start and home buttons at the same time.

The new Vita also comes with 1GB of built-in memory, which means that you don't need to have a memory card in order to link a PSN account and play games, but oddly, you can't use the internal storage and the included 8GB memory card at the same time.

Vita Slim (front) and the original Vita (rear)
Vita Slim (front) and the original Vita (rear)

Finally, the new Vita is 20 percent slimmer and 15 percent lighter than the old model. The original Vita was comfortable as is, but the Vita Slim is even more welcoming now that it's less bulky, and because it incorporates softer materials throughout the chassis.

There's no getting around the fact that the new Vita has an inferior screen compared to its predecessor, but it's easy to appreciate the reduction in size, weight, and price. Plus, the changes made to the USB port and the buttons make it a much friendlier system to use overall. Even though they won't look as good, the same games that worked on the old Vita work on the new model, so at the end of the day, the new Vita is worth considering for all of its advantages if you aren't bothered by the new screen.

Got a news tip or want to contact us directly? Email news@gamespot.com


doc-brown

Peter Brown

Peter used to work at GameSpot. Now he just lurks at GameSpot.

Back To Top
296 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for Toysoldier34
Toysoldier34

2384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

I just recently got a Vita and I have been loving it. I already had like 30 games for it from PS+ and games I had got for PSN, PS1, and PSP.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for hwahee
hwahee

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Frankly, people make too much of a deal over the old vs. new screens. The games aren't going to be way less fun to play just because the colors are a little less vibrant.

3 • 
Avatar image for bafalcon
bafalcon

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >> And so they should, who would want to play games on something that looks inferior to its previous model

Upvote • 
Avatar image for snxx
snxx

170

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 29

User Lists: 1

<< LINK REMOVED >><< LINK REMOVED >>Because it's cheaper is one reason.

2 • 
Avatar image for XNEXUS666X
XNEXUS666X

99

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

Glad the build quality and screen are worse than the original, otherwise I'd be tempted to buy a slim as well.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for canuckbiker
canuckbiker

161

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Gaming on the vita just wouldn't be the same for me without a nyko power grip. Hopefully they make a model that fits the slim.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for BradBurns
BradBurns

1166

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Is the screen difference really that noticeable? I got the OLED Crystal White Vita but I kinda want this one too..

Upvote • 
Avatar image for sunbeam4
sunbeam4

33

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

@BradBurns got it since the UK release. graphics looks smashing. only minor con I've got is my X button started to "silently squeak" when pressed "sideways" after a week. and the back surrounding plastic will take a week or two to properly wear in.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for kingtrax
KingTrax

27

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 5

<< LINK REMOVED >> Give a hoot, don't pollute.

3 • 
Avatar image for BradBurns
BradBurns

1166

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >><< LINK REMOVED >> Never be a dirty birdy.

2 • 
Avatar image for kingtrax
KingTrax

27

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 5

I've got the old Vita but the longer battery vs. better colors...it's not quite as easy a choice as some of you say.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for homey_d_clown
Homey_D_Clown

301

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@kingtrax

I went out and purchased the original Vita when the new one was announced. Specifically cause I know the difference in the screen quality from OLED and LCD and for 1 extra hour of battery life just wasn't worth it.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for eternaldragoonx
eternaldragoonx

540

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

I'll pick this up when they put the OLED screen back.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for meedokicky
meedokicky

1321

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >> as in never? :P

Upvote • 
Avatar image for zintarr
zintarr

2212

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

The PS VITA has better games than the PS4 and Xbox One combined.


Toukiden: The Age of Demons + Soul Sacrifice = Gaming Happiness!!!

Upvote • 
Avatar image for OldKye
OldKye

399

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >> Well it's been out a lot longer if they made them backwards compatible like they use to we might not have noticed so much I realize it costs more to do but then charge a few bucks more and you wont have to explain why you only have like 4 games for 6 months after launch lol.


I still remember playing PS1 games(from disk not buying them again and downloading only the highest rated) on my PS3 before they took it off I know full well games like Saga Frontier are never coming to PSN lol.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for profilia
Profilia

2226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Profilia  Moderator

I just want the vita tv.

5 • 
Avatar image for kyubi678
kyubi678

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I will buy Vita when they gonna build new "Yugioh" game on this platform

Upvote • 
Avatar image for enoughofthis
enoughofthis

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >> same would love to play online with that

Upvote • 
Avatar image for PsychoChick966
PsychoChick966

30

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I will definitely get the original Vita over the Slim, when the time comes. The difference in the screens is remarkable. That's worth something to me. I don't want something cheaper....just less expensive. I'd rather spend more money for quality.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Threesixtyci
Threesixtyci

4451

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@PsychoChick966

Actually, the difference isn't all that remarkable. OLED has a much larger viewing angle, and if you are judging the two screen from pictures, alone, the pictures aren't straight on shots. With a handheld... small view angles isn't a big deal, so review pictures do lie a bit.


But if you do want the old one, you best buy it now, 'cause you won't be able to find retail boxed versions for much longer.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for darkljolly
Darkljolly

26

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 5

<< LINK REMOVED >> You better get one now. Oled Vitas are getting very hard to find cheap

Upvote • 
Avatar image for PsychoChick966
PsychoChick966

30

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >><< LINK REMOVED >> I wish I could... it just isn't in the money cards at the moment. :-(

Upvote • 
Avatar image for BradBurns
BradBurns

1166

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >><< LINK REMOVED >> I have one.

Personally, I've never really seen a screen that can compare to its quality, Except maybe an old CRT TV. But even then, it still beats those old fat tubes out because of its deeper blacks. Yes, it has deeper blacks than a CRT, which I didn't think was achievable yet.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for MarkAndExecute
MarkAndExecute

450

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Still perfectly happy with my old one. I really don't think all those new features are worth the trade-off for an inferior screen.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Born_Lucky
Born_Lucky

1730

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

So, they want to improve sales?


Yeah . .. making the screen crappier ought to do it.


morons

16 • 
Avatar image for Threesixtyci
Threesixtyci

4451

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >>

It's called lowering manufacture costs and not losing money on every unit sold.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for GOGOHeadray
GOGOHeadray

27

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Aren't new models something which is usually reserved for E3? its telling me that the vita wont have a big footprint at the conference.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Xenro4
Xenro4

179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >> Because it's the PS4's time to shine?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for blutfahne
Blutfahne

276

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Can I connect Vita wirelessly and watch netflix and stuff like that? surf the web? watch pron?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Ferrets_one
Ferrets_one

164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >> Oh yes! You can watch as much PRON as you want!!

Upvote • 
Avatar image for psx_warrior
psx_warrior

1757

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >><< LINK REMOVED >>Maybe he was trying to say Tron.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for ahpuck
ahpuck

3636

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 100

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >> yes

Upvote • 
Avatar image for coasterguy65
coasterguy65

7133

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

If Sony really wants to sell Vitas they need to lower the price on the memory cards. A 16GB Vita card it $40+, a 16GB SDHC card is around $8. They are crazy charging those prices and expecting it to not hurt sales.

16 • 
Avatar image for daabulls23
daabulls23

1223

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >> I wish they at least would have stuck with the pro duos, but I guess they have to sell those new accessories. Moving to SD cards would've been amazing.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for enuo9
enuo9

87

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

The fact that the Vita still hasn't taken of the way it should continues to mystify me.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for FallenOneX
FallenOneX

2639

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >> Launch price, games, and the price of memory cards combined was the cause. Most people could deal with two of them at the most, all three was just ridiculous.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Sevenizz
Sevenizz

6462

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

People have embraced smartphone gaming and Nintendo caters to the kids who don't own one...yet.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for abHS4L88
abHS4L88

272

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >>

Yet the 3DS still has a massive adult user base, go figure. Also (at least in the US), it's pretty standard for kids to own smart phones, even tablets so I don't know where you're getting your "facts."

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Micropixel
Micropixel

1383

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

@Sevenizz - My nephew (who isn't even 5 yet) has a tablet to play with.

2 • 
Avatar image for vecryn
vecryn

49

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >> a lot of kids where I live are walking around with smart phones. Just about every major carrier offers them for free when you renew your contract. They might not be an iphone or a new galaxy5 etc but I don't know of any carrier that doesn't offer some form of smart phone for 0. Heck you can even get an HTC one from sprint now for free at times. So kids having them is very likely. Sprint even offers free tablets, and they make tablets just for kids.


I can't speak for it being everywhere, but the vast majority of the kids where I live have smart phones.

2 • 
Avatar image for abHS4L88
abHS4L88

272

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >>

Unfortunately nearly every parent I know allows their kids to either own a phone or a tablet (some both).

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Sevenizz
Sevenizz

6462

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Same place you got your 'facts' - an educated guess. One can argue we're both correct. But I don't know many parents who let their kids own a smartphone. Teens yes, but kids?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for GOGOHeadray
GOGOHeadray

27

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

<< LINK REMOVED >> Simple; people dont want home console experiences on portable devices.

Upvote •