New Battlefield 5 Story Trailer Rises To The Occasion

So many triggered misogynists in comments.

Finally, some representation for my black great grandmother, who was one of the many lesbians that won WW2. Only now can we say, that it wasn't in vain that she perished at the hands of a German who shot her down with a rifle using fiber optic sights and extra fast bullets. If only she would have opened a few more loot boxes...

Finally a woke af game tells the real story of how africans and women won World War 2. So brave EA/Dice, so brave.

Mary Sue ftw...

i dont know why swedish game makers think they are smart or different? they killed Wolfenstein ip with some bullshit story and now battlefiled is look like TR lol what is this ? EA you are doomed.

20th November seems so far away

‘Battlefield 5 Story Trailer Is All About Rising To The Occasion’

Shame it’s not about WW2.

Am I the only one who wants this game to fail because I hate EA?

I mean sure the sjw stuff is cancer too. But I want EA to learn some respect for their customers....or go away, either one is fine by me.

World War Politically Correct

Here is a fact, every operative member of the Heavy Water Operation that took place in Rjukan Norway were MALE. No I am not a misogynist for stating a fact! No there is nothing to be triggered about that, and yes it is quite disheartening to see historical facts being omitted for political messaging. You know who also did that? HOLOCAUST DENIERS. This is why as a passionate and proud Norwegian citizen I HATE THIS MISREPRESENTATION OF FACTS!

Here are to the REAL Heroes of the operation.
Einar Skinnarland
Jens-Anton Poulsson
Arne Kjelstrup
Knut Haugland
Claus Helberg
Joachim Holmboe Rønneberg
Knut Haukelid
Fredrik Kayser
Kasper Idland
Hans Storhaug
Birger Strømsheim
Leif Tronstad
Knut Haukelid, alias "Bonzo"
Knut Klonteig
Knut Lier-HansenRolf Sørlie (local resistance)
Einar Skinnarland (base wireless operator)
Gunnar Syverstad (plant lab assistant)
Kjell Nielsen (plant transport manager)("Larsen") (senior plant engineer)
(NN) (car procurer and driver)

As a Norwegian I find it incredible that now that Dice had an opportunity to actually tell the Rjukan operation in a accurate manner and they completely missed the entire point of it, in favour for some political message. What a joke.

Why is a game that's rated M censored?

And still only 64 players - even in Battle Royale mode?

I remember back in the days when BF was ground-breaking with their 64 players cap... but that was, what, more than 15 years ago?

Since then, we have seen games like MAG pushing 256 players on claustrophobic resources limitations that was PS3... hundreds of players fighting for single choke-point in Planetside 2... 100 players per game in Fortnite and PUBG... even CoD did better with 80 players in new Blackout mode.

Not saying that more is always better, but some maps/modes/real battles' recreations would benefit from more players, and it is about offering more options to gamers. With configurable servers and sessions, players can always reduce down to 64, 32... less if they want... but it would be epic to have max number doubled, or more... and BF was always about epic large battles recreations.

Just imagine... if Dice would ever decide to try recreate, say, Napoleon wars... US revolution... Civil War... Cavalry attack made with 5 players on horses really would not do it... or battery of 3 cannons... or 8 infantrymen in single line order.

I'm really disappointed with lack of improvements on base formula. Sure, there are fine adjustments applied... improved visuals... but these modern BF games really don't feel that much different from BF3, or BF:BC2 multiplayer. Why not having 10-player squads instead of 4-player teams? Faction-based comms that cover more than one fire-team? Persistent battle worlds where all the maps are connected to make one whole, and players can move from one front to the other and provide support where his/her side needs it the most?

Yep I am referring to things that worked well in Planetside 2. Game had (probably still does) its fair share of issues, but some stuff that players could experience there, in its peak... relief troops delivered by 10+ air transporters... assault of 40 armored vehicles, north of 500 players fighting for one base... I haven't been playing PS2 for 2 or 3 years now, but I still remember some of these moments, much more vividly than anything that I have experienced in BF.

Formula is getting really tired, for me. I have played some BF1... but not more than 2 months, if that. I want to like BFV... but just don't feel enough motivated to get it. So... probably not.

That's nice, dear.

Ignoring all the political crap, all I care about is a good SP. Something to the quality of Halflife 1/2 which came superb on both fronts.

Gaming has went into a ditch where, if it's MP focused, we fully expect the SP to be short, and crap.

Alot of people who bought Halflife 2, were buying it for Counterstrike: Source. And vice versa, alot of people who bought a game like Portal 2, were buying for the SP, and coop, ended up being astounding, arguably better.

They can pour all the flashy, dramatic mocap, crap in the world. But if your SP is 6 hours of boring linear repetitive crap, who cares? It's just a waste of money and time.