MAG unloading Jan. 26

Sony's 256-player PS3-exclusive military shooter now officially delayed until next year; community event planned for PAX.

485 Comments

When stores listed the PlayStation 3-exclusive shooter MAG as being delayed last month, Sony Computer Entertainment America was dismissive. "We have made no announcements in regards to MAG's launch date," said a rep. "Retailers are speculating."

Happy New Year?
Happy New Year?

Today, they speculate no longer. "The team at Zipper and SCEA are happy to announce that MAG will hit North American retailers on January 26th, 2010," read a chipper PlayStation Blog post today from SCEA director of development Seth Luisi. No reason was given for the delay of the game, which Sony said would ship this year at its Electronic Entertainment Expo press briefing in June.

Developed by former SOCOM specialty studio Zipper Interactive, MAG is an ambitious online military shooter that will feature 256 players in a single game. Each player will assume a different rank on each side, viewing the battlefield according to their station. Commanders will see the action from a top-down view from which they can direct lower-level soldiers, who will see from a first-person POV on the front lines. GameSpot's E3 preview has more information on the title, which may--or may not--be pay-to-play.

As a consolation prize for the delay, SCEA is having a MAG Community party in downtown Seattle during next month's Penny Arcade Expo. For more details on the event and instructions on how to RSVP, head over to the PlayStation Blog.

Please use a html5 video capable browser to watch videos.
This video has an invalid file format.
00:00:00
Sorry, but you can't access this content!
Please enter your date of birth to view this video

By clicking 'enter', you agree to GameSpot's
Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

$3.88 on Amazon
Buy
$3.90 on Walmart
Buy

GameSpot may get a commission from retail offers.

Got a news tip or want to contact us directly? Email news@gamespot.com

Join the conversation
There are 485 comments about this story
485 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for shadow-qtr
shadow-qtr

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

any one got the code for this game? if any one got more than 1 code please send it to me my PSN : shadow-ahedgehog

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Bruly11
Bruly11

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

[This message was deleted at the request of the original poster]

Upvote • 
Avatar image for king_chapeton15
king_chapeton15

268

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

just saw beta videos on youtube theres no lag you will only lag if you have a crappy connection of course but other than that those with 2wire or d-link will do fine

Upvote • 
Avatar image for the_mitch28
the_mitch28

4684

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Hahah i'm jealous of the PS3 mic problem, I would prefer it that way... -much- less annoying.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for kejigoto
kejigoto

2307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

Definitely confused as to how this will all play out considering there really hasn't been any complete gameplay footage of an entire battle... Plus I can easily see certain positions not wanting to ever be filled and people dropping out whenever they end up in that spot. Plus if battles average around an hour long it just seems like it will be abit much for a single game. Good job on Sony's part for making a game of this size, I just don't see it working out too well once real gamers get involved and the usual nonsense of online play sets in on this.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for sensual-_-panda
sensual-_-panda

63

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

1vs1 factions, not 3 at once

Upvote • 
Avatar image for skywarp001
skywarp001

199

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

wondering and confused how the three factions fight in 1 mode/battle. is it 3 teams all verse eachother? or is it 1 vs 1 team depending on map type like battlefield style?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Alphamale001
Alphamale001

350

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I know what my wife is getting my for my B-day!

Upvote • 
Avatar image for claykenobi
claykenobi

484

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

@HollowDarkstar Actually SCEA (Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc.) does have a large part in the production and creation of the game..The SCEA certification signifies that its holders can handle advanced design responsibilities and lead roles in creating applications.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for KingDustero
KingDustero

77

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@rholding2000 Did you even watch the gameplay or watch the interviews? The game doesn't split the people up or keep them in one area. ALL 256 could be in the middle of the map if they wanted to. A player doesn't have to stay with is squad or do what his squad leader wants him to do. Now this player would be hated by his squad and wouldn't get as much XP, but he could go to the other side of the map if he wanted to. This game is a true 128v128 battle. The thing is that it isn't a team death match. It basically an objective game. Both teams are split up into smaller 8 man teams. Each has a leader who tells his team what to attack or defend depending on what side they're on. As you can see from the map in the gameplay there is one center area of the map with objectives for the defending team to defend on the outside of the square. On all four sides the attacking team is split up. They have to make their way to the center of the map and take control or destroy the objectives. If one side is completely taken over by the attacking team on onee side then they could go and help take over another side.l They aren't stuck in that area to do nothing once they complete all of their objectives. Basically what I'm trying to say is that there aren't any visible or invisible walls that are keeping players away from each other. Anyone can go anywhere they want to. They don't need to stay in an area or even next to their squad. @billyjunxix The devs confirmed that the game WON'T be Pay to Play. The 60 bucks or whatever you normally pay for a game will be all that you will have to pay.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for HollowDarkstar
HollowDarkstar

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@REA24409 Sony Didn't Make The Games, They're Only Exclusive To Sony. Don't Be Preaching Them Lies.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for HUNTER-VENOM
HUNTER-VENOM

242

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I feel another HAZE in the air.......

Upvote • 
Avatar image for claykenobi
claykenobi

484

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

I'm staying optimistic at least until it's release reviews.. I don't think Sony would attempt a game like this if there wasn't at least a little confidence they could pull it off successfully. If it's great, a lot of people will be buying a PS3. A lot of people..

Upvote • 
Avatar image for SirSpoon84
SirSpoon84

470

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

"comment on this video" GET RID OF THE COMMERCIALS!! SPECIALLY THE LONG ONES!!! BLARG!

Upvote • 
Avatar image for shadowhunter0
shadowhunter0

2120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@ Hvac0120 from his profile it seems that he doesn't even have a ps3 here is just anther xbot that jealous that we get to play the game and he doesn't

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Hvac0120
Hvac0120

2038

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@BigDaddy973 The Playstation Network can handle a game like this just fine. What makes you think that it cannot? As mentioned by @viewtifuljon111, Resistance 2 has 60 player battles and they run very well on the network. It sounds to me like you have a problem with your personal network, you have never played a game on the PSN, or you are just making negative comments for the sake of doing so. _

Upvote • 
Avatar image for BigDaddy973
BigDaddy973

882

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

I just feel the Playstation Network is not up to par for this kind of game.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for viewtifuljon111
viewtifuljon111

109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@ GBPackersrule Wait, what? What was wrong with the 60 player battles in Resistance 2? I remember them. I thought they were pretty neat. Not my cup of tea, but still fun, and most surprisingly lag free. Even on my sad little connection where I get ~45 kb/s downloads.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Hvac0120
Hvac0120

2038

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@TripSe7en Games like Socom and now MAG encourage PS3 owners to go out and get a mic. I'm not really worried about this game lacking communication between teammates. ----------------------------------------- I signed up for the Beta. I'm hoping I get in. I'm anxious to give this game a try. Even without the 256 player hype, I think this game has a lot of promise with the way it handles teams and battles. _

Upvote • 
Avatar image for TripSe7en
TripSe7en

887

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Over Ambitious IMO... if I wanted to play 8v8, I'd play SOCOM, or even better RSV2 on XBL.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for gobbo00
gobbo00

392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I would be very suprised if this game makes that deadline, look how long killzone 2 took. Late 2010 seems more realistic, APB has 156 less players on subsription based servers. The game sounds like the best online shooter ever until you see it's on PSN. Land of mutes & wirless connection theifs.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for rholding2000
rholding2000

208

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 0

been following the comments on this game and there are a lot of valid comments which make me further think that this game could be 256 players split up. Yes 256 gamers will make up the game but you wont ever see them. Youll be in a squad of 8, vs 8 when ur objective is held you stay there and defend and hope the other teams of 16(u and enemy) all green light so to speak. the option of moving to other games/areas will be available . . . i dont know, i jthought about that while playing a 32 vs 32 on CS:source on a very good connection with a top end pc and it isnt all that great, too many nades spoil the broth!!!

Upvote • 
Avatar image for kvan33
kvan33

710

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Shouldn't this be called MOG - Massively Overrated Game?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for TripSe7en
TripSe7en

887

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

If this was on XBL I would play it, but I can't stand playing strategic shooters on the PSN because no one has a mic to communicate with and the network is so cumbersome when it comes to adding and managing a friends list or party...

Upvote • 
Avatar image for picklesrocks
picklesrocks

289

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 36

User Lists: 0

it looks ok, the only real selling point is the fact that it has 256 players, actualy shooting looks kinda boring

Upvote • 
Avatar image for NielsNL
NielsNL

4346

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Delays > Rushed games

Upvote • 
Avatar image for REA24409
REA24409

863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@GBPackersrule Wow, way to go champ, you managed to name 1 crappy game Sony made. Resistance1 and 2, Killzone1 and 2, the Ratchet and Clank series, the Socom series, the God of War series, and many other titles were all made by Sony and were all great games! Sony usually does always get the job done. And by the way go Bears.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for GBPackersrule
GBPackersrule

355

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

@Clive-Owen "SONY always does the job well" Really? Explain Lair.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for killerfox39967
killerfox39967

91

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I hate to disappoint everyone, but this game will definitely lag. DO you really think they selected anything but extremely high-end connections for the test demo? The average game will have plenty of people with bad connections. And anyway you only fight like 8 people at a time.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for billyjunxix
billyjunxix

465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

I like this game, this game has a lot of potential but if its a PAY AND PLAY then i wont get it, this is the other reason why i chose PS3 to play for free.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for GBPackersrule
GBPackersrule

355

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

Game looks good. Just hope it doesn't go the way of Haze. The idea of 256 multi-player already sounds like a failure waiting to happen. Remember the supposed 60 player battles on Resistance? Because I don't. Or the months long battles in EndWar? Pff. Yeah right. But as a whole it looks promising. Definitely worth a look.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for monson21502
monson21502

8230

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

brendanhunt1 Posted Aug 16, 2009 8:43 pm GMT is there more than 1 map yes only one. thats why it was delayed. so they can get the DLC ready. just like warhawk it will be 8 bucks per map

Upvote • 
Avatar image for parrot_of_adun
parrot_of_adun

7177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@feryl06- "" Is that a joke? It's been made very clear that it will be 128 vs 128, but each player is assigned to a SQUAD (of 8.) within the team.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for HollowDarkstar
HollowDarkstar

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@WolfGrey If You Noticed Those Were Developers. Of Course They'd Have Good Connection Unlike Lower-Class People.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for king_chapeton15
king_chapeton15

268

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

@oishio u copied that comment from other users

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Jhraxlin
Jhraxlin

422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

If I had a PS3 I'd probably get this, but alas, I do not. If I did though, Sniper all the way. =}

Upvote • 
Avatar image for WolfGrey
WolfGrey

3799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

@HollowDarkstar Lol.No offense but speaking they have already done testing involving the gameplay with the larger amount of players without any lag, its you who needs to get their facts straight. And by going by the amount of gamers now between the two online, a big movement will most likely happen.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Arturo84
Arturo84

418

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

i hope the 256 gameplay is smooth and free if so am willing to give sony my money

Upvote • 
Avatar image for oishio
oishio

72

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

finally, a reason to turn the PS3 on again....... better clear off the dust.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for maverick_76
maverick_76

2188

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

I can't wait to play this, finally we can have full scale battles, freaking awesome!

Upvote • 
Avatar image for name-unknown
name-unknown

107

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

it probly won't take the 360 out thats crazy talk. but it will definitely compete with a lot of its games.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Fallen119
Fallen119

77

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

They should have a free for all mode for this game imagine that!

Upvote • 
Avatar image for irunfar
irunfar

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I'm guessing they delayed the release until next year to help beef up their revenue numbers. By now, companies have given up hope on this fiscal year, so that move makes sense. It should help their stock a little bit... Still, I'm sick of waiting for this one.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Blood_Diamond
Blood_Diamond

418

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

@beekayjay: Cash grab aka the EA games business plan

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Javieralijandro
Javieralijandro

2667

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I hope this isnt another socom confrontation, at release.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for CWSoccer07
CWSoccer07

249

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Why are people complaining about others that are critical about this game will work? It's a completely valid point. Games aren't made to support 256 multiplayer on purpose. It's all about networking logistics. Think about it, with most games, sending information to the clients' (gamers) console requires a certain amount of bandwidth, and vice versa. Now most games are 16 players max (most, not all), and that usually pushes players bandwidth and latency. Now multiply all that data by 16. It's not that we don't want it to work and want it to fail, but come on, you have to be realistic as well. I just don't see how it would work in the real world where you have people on the East Coast playing people on the West Coast, and you have people likely sharing their bandwidth with other family members.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for HollowDarkstar
HollowDarkstar

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@WolfGrey Do Really Think This 'Game' Will End The Xbox 360? The Xbox 360 Is Also Going To Get Price Cuts. Lag Will Overrun The Fun If You Like It Or Not. Get Your Facts Straight. There WILL Always Be Lag In A Game, And My Making It 256 Players Will Be Horrible. Your Voice Chat Would Most Likely Lag And Make It Hard For You To Understand Commands.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for brendanhunt1
brendanhunt1

2333

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

seriously though ABP does look good. (although CURRENTLY not confirmed on ANY console just pc) im getting MAG when it comes out.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for brendanhunt1
brendanhunt1

2333

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

"come on. what online only game will be equiped with one map" .....ABP.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for D3A7HJ0K3R
D3A7HJ0K3R

330

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

yay is all i have to say.

Upvote •