League Of Legends Dev To Pay $10 Million To Settle Gender Discrimination Lawsuit

Riot Games will pay every woman who worked at Riot since 2014.

5 Comments

Riot Games, the massive game developer behind League of Legends, will pay $10 million to settle a gender discrimination lawsuit. The news was revealed in court documents filed on Monday and first reported on by The Los Angeles Times.

Every one of the approximately 1,000 female employees who worked at Riot from November 2014 until the settlement is complete will get a share of the $10 million pool. Divided equally, it would work out to $10,000 each, but that won't be how it works. The Times reports that the payouts will depend on the length of their employment and their status as full-time versus contractor. The settlement was first announced in August, though this is the first time we're hearing about the monetary terms.

"We're pleased to have a proposed settlement to fully resolve the class action lawsuit," a spokesperson for Riot said. "The settlement is another important step forward, and demonstrates our commitment to living up to our values and to making Riot an inclusive environment for the industry's best talent."

Riot and the plaintiffs who brought forward the class-action lawsuit have agreed to the terms, but a judge still needs to finalize and approve the deal before payments go out. Other terms of the settlement are unknown.

An August 2018 expose from Kotaku's Cecilia D'Anastasio contained numerous serious and dramatic accusations about the "bro culture" within Riot. Among the details was that managers were said to have had lists where they ranked women by attractiveness.

In August this year, when the settlement was first announced, Riot maintained that it doesn't have systemic issues related to gender discrimination, though it did acknowledge that the workplace environment was less than ideal.

"After extensively reviewing these issues, we can confidently state that gender discrimination (in pay or promotion), sexual harassment, and retaliation are not systemic issues at Riot," the company said. "But, what we also learned during this process was that some Rioters have had experiences that did not live up to our values or culture. In addition, we've encountered considerable fatigue among Rioters, who have been drained by constant engagement with the internal and external dialogues emerging from these lawsuits and recurring media cycles."

The new settlement filing includes language that speaks to Riot's commitment to bettering its internal company culture. According to the Times, this includes improving programs for sexual harassment reporting and discrimination. New measures have also been undertaken for hiring, pay, and promotion practices. Additionally, Riot has hired a chief diversity officer and launched new internal employee committees to measure Riot's progress on these fronts.

Riot is owned by Chinese internet giant Tencent. The free-to-play MOBA reportedly brings in billions of dollars in revenue every year.

GameSpot may get a commission from retail offers.

Got a news tip or want to contact us directly? Email news@gamespot.com

Join the conversation
There are 5 comments about this story
5 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for lionheartssj1
lionheartssj1

4059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

"The Times reports that the payouts will depend on the length of their employment and their status as full-time versus contractor."

Ah, so even gender discrimination payouts are discriminatory. Not only does everyone get some money based on their gender, some are more deserving than others. 'I know you were on the attractiveness rankings, but I've been on the attractiveness rankings longer, so I should get more money than you.'

Upvote • 
Avatar image for LordCrisp
LordCrisp

172

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

@lionheartssj1: stop whining, it makes perfect sense... the ones who's been more exposed to it, gets a bigger cut from the sorry-stash... it's only natural

Pretty sure you'd be pissed if you shared your work with an employee who's only there 2 hours a week, and you got equal cuts off of whatever you had made

2 • 
Avatar image for lionheartssj1
lionheartssj1

4059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

@LordCrisp: I just think it's strange that two people exposed to the same discrimination, same offense, get different gradations of pay from the lawsuit. They were demeaned equally. Conversely, to your point, if someone worked so little that they weren't even exposed to it, than why are they getting money at all?

This is also different than sharing their base pay. Of course it wouldn't make sense to split your pay with someone who does a fraction of the work.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for so_hai
so_hai

3908

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 89

User Lists: 0

What did the lawyers get?

2 •