I Can Handle Bloodborne DLC and Dark Souls 3 Simultaneously, says Miyazaki

This is how you do PR. We don't need the ass-kissing we normally get. "Yeah, I really am that fucking good. Count on it." is way more reassuring than what we usually get.

DS3 is basically the Bloodborne expansion. They look the same.

But you still haven't fixed the frame pacing issue in bloodborne that was supposed to be a quick fix, guess quick means bloodborne 2. Just hate playing it with all the stuttering going on. I played it for about 8 hours then got to a point where the frame pacing really started to bother me especially since I played dark souls 2 on PC and it was buttery smooth so I stopped playing and was gonna wait for a patch. That was a week after the game launched. Just wish more devs were like CDPR and stayed on top of things and listened to what people were saying. Yes it's playable but it is something that should've been fixed long ago

My body is ready for both.

\[T]/

A number of combat refinements were made in Dks 2. Like power stance for dual wield types, jump attack for off hand weapons

Bloodborne is one of the stand out games of the ps4.

Truly is an amazing game from the lore, combat and level design. The combat is unbelievably satisfying to the point that you welcome the level up grind just to crunch some bones

Dlc yes please

As I can't play both just right now, all I have to say is Gambare!

"[Yui] Tanimura-san, the director of Dark Souls 2, has already joined the [Dark Souls 3] team"

Bad news.

I am more excited about Bloodborne's DLC

@jordpingitore4: Salty?

@jordpingitore4: Hundreds of critics and millions of gamers say otherwise, your a fool. Probably an angry Xbot who never got to play Demons Souls either. Let me guess that game was trash too? Troll.

@jordpingitore4: Oh noes! Yet another Can't-get-past-the-very-first-enemy statement disguised as shallow criticism?

@jordpingitore4: I know right!? All that fluid, fast paced combat? Garbage! The creepy, Lovecraft inspired enemy designs? Trash! Huge, challenging bosses? Crap!CRAP, I TELL YOU!!

The hours and hours of fun I had playing Bloodborne were just awful. So awful, in fact, that I can't wait for the DLC to come out so I can be miserable playing some of the new (certainly horrendous) content.

@jordpingitore4: sounds like someone woke up on the wrong side of the bed, lmfao! Sounds like bloodborne kicked your ass therefore it's trash! But don't worry, there are others like you, I sure the hell ain't one of them but to each their own!

The real MVP. And now that he mentions it, I think its time for a new AC game too

Not sure why so many are people trashing Dark Souls 2 over other Souls games.
Seems the majority of DkS1 games condemned it as the "terrible Souls game" that should never have existed.

As a fan and seasoned player of the series, Dark Souls 2 was a very satisfying, entertaining, challenging and lengthy experience.
I played about 50% of my time in PVP and rest was dedicated into 2 playthroughs + DLCS.

The PC version was very well made. Not the best port, but far from the worst. In terms of server connectivity and activity, performances, controls, visual fidelity - it was very well done.

Like any Souls game it had it ups and downs, and I think the pros were really good.
Besides even though Miyazaki wasn't directing the game, he was still involved in the production and development.

Dark Souls 2 took PVP to the next level. As a guy who played hundreds of hours on PVP alone, I can vouch for this.

Had some really nice improvement on combat, movesets, two weapon fighting and more. Had a ton of items and varied weapons.

Also Dark Souls 2 DLCs were fantastic. It really brought back the old pathfinding feel of the original Dark Souls, and even surpassed it in some aspects. Like every Souls game, during DkS2 I occasionally wrote notes down on a notepad, marking important unreachable locations and secrets, npcs and paths to take. The DLCs of DkS2 were so open-ended, I found myself doing that a lot more.

The only thing that really sucked about DkS2 was that scam move PC known as "Scholars of the First Money Grab". Sure on PS4 and XB1 it was all good. But for PC gamers of the original DkS2 (dx9), the new DX11 version rapidly killed the former version, by splitting the playerpool and not allowing to transfer saves too.

Anyway.. I can't shake the feeling that Dark Souls III is rushed and coming way too early. Not saying it will be too bad, but I think early 2016 isn't a good sign.

As long as they're still amazing it's all good

Just want Bloodborne DLC

Well duh, they bout the same games, you be the worst game rehasher i have ever since, you give Assassin Creed and Call of Duty a run for their money mate. Cant wait for Bloodborne 2 and Dark Souls 4 in 2017.

Theres plenty times for both games

He just need to take his time

Money, money, money. ..feeling honey...

What a champ! I like it.

Of course he can work on both, there's an entire team doing the heavy lifting....

Cool

Pretty similiar, only differences are that souls are more defensive type with smart use of the shield and stuff while bloodborne is more agile gaming, jump in attack jump out and has a more hack and slash feeling, more forgiving than souls. But I never played dark souls 2 so I can't compare it. Only first and demons soul, and demons souls were far from forgiving one of the few games where I actually shattered a Control and Went mental. I doubt BB expansion will be bad, and I doubt DS3 will be less then good. So pretty much no Point in this News post cause it is constantly repeating a few Words over and over just to fill out some space.?.

PRAISE THE LORD HIDETAKA MIYAZAKI but I feel that Yui Tanimura might ruin Dark Souls 3 as he did with Dark Souls 2. Better not let him mess up the game.

Of course he can, because he's bloody awsome.

of course he can, since they are both basically the same game

:^)