Halo Boss Comments On How Halo Infinite's Multiplayer Is Shaping Up

Halo Infinite provides an update.

10 Comments
Please use a html5 video capable browser to watch videos.
This video has an invalid file format.
00:00:00
Sorry, but you can't access this content!
Please enter your date of birth to view this video

By clicking 'enter', you agree to GameSpot's
Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Now Playing: Halo Infinite Has Splitscreen And Customization - GS News Update

The announcement trailer for Halo Infinite shown at E3 2018 was for the game's new engine, not the game itself. No footage of the game has been released as of yet. That's still the case, but now Halo franchise manager Frank O'Conner has provided an update of sorts on how the game is coming along.

In a lengthy Twitter thread, O'Conner spoke at a very high level about some of the design considerations at play. Crucially, O'Conner explained that one of the challenges--and opportunities--of a game like Halo is that the way in which people play is "subjective and broad." O'Conner remarked that he doesn't use Ground Pound in Halo 5 because he's not skilled enough, though for other players it might be one of their strongest moves.

The numerous and varied ways in which people play Halo all need to be accounted for across the Halo experience. All of these things "must be accounted for in everything from initial design proposals to final schemes and matchmaking performance. Everything is connected and top tier players are stacked on a pyramid of different styles and preferences," he said. "Options help but the core game loop must also be good.

"And that will be true no matter what changes are made to the next game and should be at least fairly considered when having conversations--as should campaign content and player options/choices. The 'perfect' Halo probably exists as an average but logically speaking, there's almost no chance that a mathematical objectively polled average would look like some of the idealization proposals I've watched and read."

That being said, O'Conner said he is "super confident and enthusiastic" about how Halo Infinite will handle its approach to appealing to veteran Halo players and newcomers alike at the same time. Not everyone connected to Halo is so enthusiastic or upbeat about this. Marcus Lehto, who co-created the Halo franchise, said he thinks Halo is in a "no-win" scenario because of the challenging task of pushing the franchise forward with new ideas while also trying to retain and refine the features that veteran fans enjoy and come back for.

For Halo Infinite, O'Conner said he is "extremely happy" with how the multiplayer plays currently. He added that he expects it to continue to change and improve as development continues, including in areas that do not necessarily appeal to how he plans to play. O'Conner didn't get into specifics about Halo Infinite's multiplayer, and that's probably for a number of reasons. He said he has a rule that he will never discuss work-in-progress versions of Halo Infinite, so everyone will have to wait to find out.

"It will keep changing & things I like now will change and things I don't get will improve--but I like every flavor of Halo so far, so in that regard I'm a filthy casual," he said. "What I can do tho is listen to this community."

There is an intriguing rumour that claims Microsoft is planning to launch the game in two parts--first the single-player in 2019, with multiplayer coming in 2020. Microsoft hasn't made any official announcements regarding release plans, however.

Halo Infinite's campaign places more of an emphasis on Master Chief, which is good to hear after Halo 5 controversially strayed away from him. It's also apparently a very big game, as O'Connor already said the game will have "capacious" missions/levels.

No release date has been announced for Halo Infinite, but it's one of our most anticipated upcoming Xbox One games for sure. In other news about Halo Infinite, 343 recently confirmed that the game will have four-player split-screen support, which is great to hear.

Got a news tip or want to contact us directly? Email news@gamespot.com

Join the conversation
There are 10 comments about this story
10 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for andrewsqual
andrewsqual

You'll just have to take his word for it. Incidentally he works at 343i, the home of everything Halo and mediocrity for 11 whole years so far. Why would this new game be anything different?

Avatar image for chewmcgoo
ChewMcgoo

All I want are health packs to be brought back into the game. I hate regenerating health..

Avatar image for rasterror
rasterror

I hope it's as good in Halo 5.

Avatar image for XT14
XT14

So this game is just going to be basically Halo 6 then?
When first announced I thought it was like the Halo version of "Destiny"...which I know Destiny is kinda already that considering their creators...but yeah...obviously some issues there that seemingly never get addressed. I guess with so few details it could still end up being that. Who knows?

Avatar image for jako998
Jako998

Still don't understand why people hated Locke in halo 5. I thought he was a good and new interesting character to the series. Nothing wrong with having more master chief but like he's had 4-5 games with just him. I hope Locke still makes an appearance in the new halo

Avatar image for USDevilDog
USDevilDog

@jako998: I also don't mind Locke as a character. I think the problem is that Halo proper is synonymous with John-117. They should've reduced Locke's role a bit in Halo 5 or even give him a Halo one-time spinoff if they wanted to make him a part of the universe. This is the same problem Metal Gear Solid 2 had with Raiden. You ended up controlling Raiden instead of Solid Snake over 60% of the time. Fans were baffled. If Locke's role had been diminished somewhat, I don't think all this hate would have happened, and he still would have been an integral part of the story. Perspective switches and protagonist changes have been done in well-established games before, but developers need to know its artful balance without losing its identity.

Avatar image for Fartman7998
Fartman7998

@jako998: I agree, Locke was cool. For me though it was the fact that they hyped up the story so much to be something it wasn't; when you boot the game up for the first time, it even says that this game is the "most dramatic Halo game to date", which is not only subjective but hilariously exaggerated. So it wasn't so much Locke as it was the game surrounding him.

Avatar image for nabinator
Nabinator

@jako998: It's because they outright tried to replace him with Master Chief. 70% of the campaign was his, not MC. Doesn't matter who the character was, it was almost like pissing in fans faces.

Regardless of what 343 may say, Halo is about the Master Chief. He's what made the franchise. It's like trying to have Zelda without Link.

Avatar image for gamingdevil800
gamingdevil800

@nabinator: Well also the fact the marketing campaign was hyping the whole story to be some big Locke Vs Chief scenario where one of them could die. Which amounted to some little fisty cuffs fight in a cutscene...

Avatar image for EvilTyger
EvilTyger

Here's my request...

The big fights? Put the player in control. Cutscene is good for after the player did the work of killing someone, not in place of it.