GameSpot may receive revenue from affiliate and advertising partnerships for sharing this content and from purchases through links.

Guardians Of The Galaxy 3's James Gunn Fired By Disney After Old Tweets Surface

Guardians Vol. 3 will be directed by someone else.

305 Comments

The tale of the misfits that comprise the Guardians of the Galaxy will see their trilogy concluded with someone other than James Gunn in the director's chair. Gunn, who served as the writer and director for the first two Guardians movies, has been fired by Disney. The news confirmed the news in the midst of San Diego Comic-Con 2018, where Marvel was not expected to have any major news. [Update: Guardians star Dave Bautista has come out in support of Gunn, as has actress Selma Blair. Subsequently, the core Guardians cast also did so.]

This move comes after old tweets of Gunn's surfaced online. According to The Hollywood Reporter, the controversial messages--which date back almost a decade--see the director joking about topics like pedophilia and rape.

Please use a html5 video capable browser to watch videos.
This video has an invalid file format.
00:00:00
Sorry, but you can't access this content!
Please enter your date of birth to view this video

By clicking 'enter', you agree to GameSpot's
Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Now Playing: Guardians Of The Galaxy 3 Director James Gunn Fired - GameSpot Universe News Update

Disney issues a statement confirming that it was parting ways with Gunn. Walt Disney Studios chairman Alan Horn said, "The offensive attitudes and statements discovered on James' Twitter feed are indefensible and inconsistent with our studio's values, and we have severed our business relationship with him."

Gunn's tweets were resurfaced online by conservative website The Daily Caller. Gunn has since published a series of tweets on his Twitter account in which he does not deny authoring the messages. Instead, he attempts to apologize and explain the messages.

"Many people who have followed my career know when I started, I viewed myself as a provocateur, making movies and telling jokes that were outrageous and taboo. As I have discussed publicly many times, as I've developed as a person, so has my work and my humor. It's not to say I'm better, but I am very, very different than I was a few years ago; today I try to root my work in love and connection and less in anger. My days saying something just because it's shocking and trying to get a reaction are over.

"In the past, I have apologized for humor of mine that hurt people. I truly felt sorry and meant every word of my apologies. For the record, when I made these shocking jokes, I wasn't living them out. I know this is a weird statement to make, and seems obvious, but, still, here I am, saying it. Anyway, that's the completely honest truth: I used to make a lot of offensive jokes. I don't anymore. I don't blame my past self for this, but I like myself more and feel like a more full human being and creator today. Love you to you all."

Gunn had teased that a new, non-Guardians project of his would be revealed at SDCC on Friday during the Sony Pictures panel. According to Variety, he's no longer expected to make an appearance at the panel, which is no shock--it would be a real surprise for him to show up with this news having only just broken. Whether he moves ahead with whatever that project is (possibly the horror movie we heard about previously) remains to be seen. We'll report back if Sony acknowledges the news or Gunn's project during its panel.

Guardians of the Galaxy 3 had been set for release in 2020, though Gunn's removal could affect that. The events of Avengers: Infinity War stand to have a potential impact on the film, though Avengers 4--due out next year--could always make further changes. Without saying how, Gunn had previously teased that Guardians 3 would be "very different."

Aside from his contributions to the Marvel Cinematic Universe, Gunn is also known for writing and directing the movie Super.

San Diego Comic-Con 2018 Coverage

Got a news tip or want to contact us directly? Email news@gamespot.com

Comic-Con 2018
Join the conversation
There are 305 comments about this story
305 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for michaeldark
michaeldark

226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Freedom of of speech ( and any kind of freedom) is dead! Bow to pc or die! We can fire you, publicly humiliate you, even throw you to jail. It doesn't matter if you were kidding, drunk, stressed or emotionally compromised when you post something, anything online. It can and will be used against you in the court of law and beyond. There is only one right way of thinking, our way and if you dare disagree you are a racist, rapist, fascist, fanatic, terrible person in general. The law is retroactive for any past statements as well. We do this in the service of community, diversity, democracy and love. Hail pc!

2 • 
Avatar image for jenovaschilld
jenovaschilld

7748

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@michaeldark: I believe that this is michaeldark's cry to be anally molested many times over by Alabama KKK members. -Protected by freedom of speech.

But really though - life is not that crazy as you make out. We can protest, write, and even say Ni##er as much and openly as we want. And I agree that Gunn doesn't need to be fired (actually they just discontinued his contract -fancy for firing) for old tweets that while dumb and stupid- did not say to in act violence on others, though is lacked any sympathy to victims of such.

IT still has nothing to do with being Politically Correct, but more so with the bottom dollar. If you hire someone to make movies about comic book heroes an space aliens, but found out he wrote tweets saying they everyone should push white privileged males into traffic whenever they can .... well, that would be a huge loss of your target audience, and a crime. Not to mention a probable loss of profits, depending how good the movie was.

I believe everyone should be allowed to say racials slurs all day, every day and at the top of their lungs- but as soon as they tell people to not hire someone or rent to folks because of race, gender, etc etc . Then they need to fry. You can hold as much pedophile and rapey views as you want- just cannot act on it, or tell others to.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Marky360
Marky360

5549

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Marky360

@michaeldark:

Freedom of speech is only a guarantee against your government. James Gunn didn't get arrested for his comments just fired and that doesn't involve the government so there is no constitutional violation here.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Bread_or_Decide
Bread_or_Decide

29761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@michaeldark: Freedom of speech is in regards to the government and day to day life. When you work for a company it's a whole different ball game. My advice: get off twitter and social media, use alt accounts, and don't attach your name and face to your every idiotic thought on the internet. Go into work and say whatever you want real loud, see how fast you get fired. There's no freedom of speech at work.

2 • 
Avatar image for Marky360
Marky360

5549

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Bread_or_Decide:

exactly very on point statement.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Litchie
Litchie

34770

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

Sounds ridiculous. If you're a celebrity, it's probably the safest to not say anything about anything anymore. There's always someone somewhere who has nothing going on in their life and will claim to be offended in order to fill said empty life with some attention.

2 • 
Avatar image for icelandichossi
IcelandicHossi

236

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

Crude jokes are fine.....in moderation, but this dude has a serious obsession with pedophilia and Hollywood already has a problem with pedophiles.

4 • 
Avatar image for gamersince78
GamerSince78

333

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

Edited By GamerSince78

@icelandichossi: so does the church...lol...this is why we cant have nice things.

2 • 
Avatar image for jenovaschilld
jenovaschilld

7748

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@gamersince78: this is why we cant have nice things.- See that is funny - IF Gunn's remarks were as funny, for dark humor, then this would be a non-issue, instead it was like a weird uncle trying to be funny to his nieces in his underwear.

2 • 
Avatar image for jenovaschilld
jenovaschilld

7748

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By jenovaschilld

This issue is more complicated then just a comedian making some jokes. - Without actually seeing what the content of the offensive tweets or whatever they were are, it hard to make a call. If the tweets are Family Guy tongue in cheek paroding - then it is harmless, if it is a call to action for child molestors everywhere to act .... then regardless of when something was said, it can hurt alot of people.

But I do understand Disney's position that employees over 200k people, not counting the myriad of subsidiaries. Some protestors with James Gunns tweets could be wildly damaging and put real people out of work, throw shade where ever you want but it doesnt change the fact that real world people are getting hurt and not marvel comic ones.

I personally believe that free speech is a right for all whether they live in a country that allows it allows or not. And nothing for the sake of comedy should be off limits. But just like calling in a swatting, yelling fire in a theatre or promoting an action that is a crime like that of raping an underage child is very wrong, and having someone like that as the poster child of your company is crazy morally and financially.

But again, without know the tweets - I couldn't make a call nor should anyone else.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Bread_or_Decide
Bread_or_Decide

29761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By Bread_or_Decide

@jenovaschilld:

James Gunn has every right to tweet whatever he wants. No one censored his tweets,

Disney has every right to fire someone they feel will impact the company in a negative light.

2 • 
Avatar image for jenovaschilld
jenovaschilld

7748

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By jenovaschilld

@Bread_or_Decide: No he doesn't have a 'right' to tweet whatever he wants, he can express himself under the first amendment, yes but he cannot use his speech to break the law or put others in danger. (ie calling out that all gingers need a day of purging from the land.) or that age ole law that cannot yell fire in a crowded theatre. Nor can you say if you have the urge to molest a child, you should act on it.

Also Disney does not have the right to fire whoever they feel will impact their company in a negative light. Because Monday they may feel Jews are to much of a pr risk, Tuesday blacks, Wednesday black Jews are cool again but people who cut coupons are embarrassing. The thing is even a huge corporation must still follow the American civil liberties when it comes to fair employment to all regardless of race, gender, .... etc . So a company cannot fire you for stupid quotes or jokes, protesting stuff, the way you vote, etc etc etc.

Now I am sure that James Gunn signed a contract with Disney, lets say the Mel Gibson clause, that if you go on a rant that negatively effects the company, then they can break the contract (firing) and each goes their way. Which is what has happened above.

I kinda agree with you, but also no one has a legal right to tweet whatever they want, and no company has a right to fire who ever they want either, if it was as simple, chaos would assume. Take the Trump presidency. Nothing is that simple as you make it out to be in your post.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Bread_or_Decide
Bread_or_Decide

29761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@jenovaschilld: Well, your examples break the law in regards to discriminating against race, religion, etc etc. The James Gunn firing, and so many others that have occurred because of social media controversy are new ground and until laws are in place to protect a tweet, then they can indeed fire you for your social media misbehavings. Now if tomorrow the gov't protects your tweets from being used against you, that would change everything.

The truth is, as harsh as it may be, a company can fire you for ANY reason as long as those reasons aren't discriminatory. You'd be surprised what you aren't protected from in terms of being fired in the US. Look it up.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for jenovaschilld
jenovaschilld

7748

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Bread_or_Decide:Yes I agree with you for the most part, companies can fire you for almost any reason, but many states have labor rights that protect you from many things like: age discrimination or that you make more money then say someone new. And you would be surprised what you are protected from, so look that up. But you are still wrong regarding your first posting.

Even with a tweet, social media, private print, megaphone on a building - these laws apply NOW- it is also in the Terms of Agreement, and user agreement of those social media sites. For instance, every state says you cannot use your freedom of speech to incite violence, on yourself or others. This includes social media! And regardless if you post it on FAcebook or sky write it in the air, you will be breaking the law. You do not have the write to say or write anything you want - even now many states are adopting bullying laws to shore up speech that is used to push people to suicide or violent acts, an open ended statement like you used above, can mislead the (well idiots like us here on gamespot) to feel free to take harmful actions against others. Ex, the gamergate

So again James Gunn, nor do you, have the right to say anything you want on any platform- speech that will insight or encourage violent sexual acts against children are against the law- although I personally would fight to the death to allow anyone the freedom of speech take make any crude remark they want- as long as it doesn't break the law or encourage others to. For instance like gamergate, Idiots saying woman should not be allowed in the gaming industry - legal,---- idiots calling out that we should raape those wom en - horrific and against the law.

And Disney cannot fire anyone they want for any reason they want, even they have to follow labor protection laws here and abroad where they apply. Most all related to discrimination, some places- other reasons. IF James Gunn signed a contract that he has done nothing in the past or will do nothing in the future to harm the image of Disney through - whatever legalese they care to put in- then the above verbal garbage that Gunn said allows Disney to cancel the contract - (fancy for firing). I do not believe they should fire him though, as his tweets were clearly an attempt at shock humor but lacking any skill. And does not encourage violent acts to be inflicted on others, though it does lack any sympathy to those victims.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for jenovaschilld
jenovaschilld

7748

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By jenovaschilld

@jenovaschilld: I just read some of them, they are just dumb and stupid, but harmless. All i read are satirical (not very funny like say Daniel Tosh) but lacking in laughs, mostly dumb jokes, glad he sticking to writing/directing.

He should be allowed to work at Disney.

2 • 
Avatar image for PlatinumPaladin
PlatinumPaladin

563

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Whether or not Disney is a squeaky-clean corporation behind the scenes, they had to be seen to denounce Gunn's behaviours and attitudes to protect their corporate identity. Do I agree with Gunn's firing? Yes. Am I happy about it? No.

The big question is why did Disney hire him in the first place? A company that's so worried about their public appearance should be vetting potential employees far more closely.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for xenomorphalien
XenomorphAlien

5118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

We're firing people for Tweets made a decade ago now? As if I didn't have enough reasons to not use Twitter.

3 • 
Avatar image for Bread_or_Decide
Bread_or_Decide

29761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@xenomorphalien: People get fired for much less, believe me.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Bread_or_Decide
Bread_or_Decide

29761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By Bread_or_Decide

@timmyp1982: They do now. Better wake up and buckle up. You don't dictate the terms in this world. If you think you do you're in for a rude awakening.

2 • 
Avatar image for KillzoneSnake
KillzoneSnake

2761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 37

User Lists: 0

Oh poor baby generation... he made twitter pedo joke buhuhu... sad times lol. I dont care about the movies anyway.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for lostn
lostn

6658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 97

User Lists: 0

what were the actual jokes he made? I'd need to see them to say whether he was justly fired.

But if they're a decade old, that's pretty extreme. If everyone took Disney's stance, he'll never get another job again, and neither would anyone else who's ever made a mistake in their life or said something they shouldn't have. How many people have lived a squeaky clean life and never made a mistep or bad joke?

3 • 
Avatar image for creepywelps
Creepywelps

2964

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@lostn: https://goo.gl/images/1q2RmP

I guess he also deleted 10,000 other tweets stemming from 09-14.

3 • 
Avatar image for lostn
lostn

6658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 97

User Lists: 0

@creepywelps: Those are some bizarre tweets I must say...

2 • 
Avatar image for chillingnaire
Chillingnaire

302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@creepywelps: Those jokes are terrible! He needs to work on his delivery

Upvote • 
Avatar image for huibert
Huibert

55

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@creepywelps: I can see why Disney doesn’t want to (and can’t) be associated with someone that posted this stuff, but the tweets were deleted and dug up with political motives to get him fired. That’s scary.

3 • 
Avatar image for Sorrow_316
Sorrow_316

187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

I actually read the tweets, and to be honest I’ve seen other people post worse. All the tweets ranged from years ago. I’m sure Gunn stopped paying somebody and that somebody leaked this. This all reeks like blackmail to me.

6 • 
Avatar image for fanirama
fanirama

1245

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

@Sorrow_316: How is it these guys get fired and all that but Trump openly talks about grabbing women by their genitals and has several allegations of sexual assault against him and nothing happens to him?

What a bizzarro double standard times these are.

2 • 
Avatar image for Bread_or_Decide
Bread_or_Decide

29761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@fanirama: I feel that because no one can get to TRUMP, they will go after everyone else instead. It's a sign of his presidency that all this is going on right now.

2 • 
Avatar image for huibert
Huibert

55

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Sorrow_316: Gunn is openly anti-Trump and the tweets were outed by a Republican website.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Sorrow_316
Sorrow_316

187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By Sorrow_316

@huibert: so it was a republican blackmailer maybe. Whoever supports trump 100% is insane, as he switches his story and comments more times than a five year old who stole a candy bar.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Dessicator
Dessicator

89

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

So here we have a giant, tax-dodging corporation with a historical connection to the real, actual Nazis, who made some of the most disgusting racist cartoons in modern history, firing a guy who made some jokes 10 years ago because they were "inconsistent with our studio's values".

**** off Disney. You are a corporation. You don't have values. I am so sick of hearing morally bankrupt fictional legal entities talk about their "values". They don't even know what that word means.

And now they are hypocrites on top of it all.

9 • 
Avatar image for Bread_or_Decide
Bread_or_Decide

29761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@Dessicator: Values? This is, and always has been, about money. Don't F*K with the mouse's money. Just replace values with "profitsr" and it'll make more sense.

2 • 
Avatar image for deactivated-5ed679841254d
deactivated-5ed679841254d

616

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

More proof that society sadly lives in the past 24/7.

2 • 
Avatar image for btotheotothejtothef
BtotheOtotheJtotheF

285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 6

Back in 1938, Disney didn't hire a woman because they didn't consider women for creative positions. Disney would not be thriving today if everyone shared their zero tolerance stance.

2 • 
Avatar image for deactivated-5ed679841254d
deactivated-5ed679841254d

616

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

@btotheotothejtothef: Yep and in other words the “tolerance” these liberal companies claim to believe in is a joke. I’m actually wondering how old these tweets were.

5 • 
Avatar image for lostn
lostn

6658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 97

User Lists: 0

@wrestlingdude: a decade. Says so in the article.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for ormgaard
Ormgaard

301

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 5

FU Disney, a bunch of lame ass morons running that company, had it not been for Gunn there would a been no Guardians movies worth talking about. so much for GOTG 3 probably gonna be just like they ruined Pirates of the caribbian and StarWars.

2 • 
Avatar image for creepywelps
Creepywelps

2964

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Should probably give Gunn's HDD a check just to be safe.

3 • 
Avatar image for PlatinumPaladin
PlatinumPaladin

563

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@creepywelps: Yeah, it's this sort of revelation that can get people speculating. A full investigation would go a long way to mitigating the damage to Gunn's reputation. Social outrage; guilty until proven innoce….. Ah, who am I kidding? Social outrage means your guilty as ****.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for firedrakes
firedrakes

4388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

oh disney knew about it. but the bigger issue the the mob lynch where doing now. sadly the first to go was due process and thought.

3 • 
Avatar image for Vodoo
Vodoo

3694

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

I think this was taken out of context by Disney and shouldn't have fired him from such an old post.

Even though I think the firing excuse was wrong, I think Guardians 2 sucked compared to the first movie. Hopefully someone new will bring it back to its roots. Just my .02¢

Upvote • 
Avatar image for cylor
Cylor

310

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

THIS. IS. BULLSHIT.

6 •