Feature Article

Game Of Thrones: "The Iron Throne" Review & Recap -- A Fitting Finale, A Botched Journey

GameSpot may receive revenue from affiliate and advertising partnerships for sharing this content and from purchases through links.

Game of Thrones spoilers ahead!

Game of Thrones has reached its end, with the series finale airing this past Sunday to all-time record ratings for both the show and HBO. Season 8, Episode 6 brought the long-awaited ending to the show's main storylines, but was it actually satisfying? You can check out our thoughts in the review below. If you were unsatisfied, there's still hope for the books to handle things differently, as A Song of Ice and Fire author George RR Martin says the books' ending won't be exactly the same, as you'd expect.

Next Sunday, HBO will premiere a two-hour Game of Thrones documentary, The Last Watch, which has just gotten a new trailer. That will take a behind-the-scenes look at the making of the show's final season. For more, check out these finale Easter Eggs and references and a look at an interesting theory about Bran.

Please use a html5 video capable browser to watch videos.
This video has an invalid file format.
00:00:00
Sorry, but you can't access this content!
Please enter your date of birth to view this video

By clicking 'enter', you agree to GameSpot's
Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Now Playing: Game Of Thrones Series Finale Breakdown And Recap -- "The Iron Throne"

Given the smelly trash fire that the episodes leading up to it were, there was never any real chance of Game of Thrones' finale, Season 8 Episode 6, "The Iron Throne," being anything other than a disappointment. But at least they tried.

There's a parallel universe somewhere where this exact episode was preceded by two full seasons of the phenomenal storytelling that Game of Thrones was once capable of, and in that brighter timeline, the show went out on the right note. It still would have been bittersweet, but it would have also felt earned, which this definitely did not. Too many plot points were swept under the rug and too many endings came from seemingly out of nowhere for this to feel satisfying.

Unlike the nonsensical Dothraki charge in Episode 3 or Euron's magic scorpion bolts in Episode 4, there was nothing particularly terrible in the Season 8 finale; we got some surprises (Bran the Broken), while other plotlines concluded exactly as they needed to (Arya sailing West, and Brienne finishing Jaime's page in the Kingsguard book). It just all felt a little tawdry thanks to the path we took to get here.

Look at where the show's biggest characters ended, in broad strokes: Jon never fully embraced his secret identity, which was disappointing, but fitting; he'll die a Stark, in the North, as he lived. (I kept waiting all season for something to make me start thinking of him as Aegon Targaryen instead of Jon Snow, but it never happened, seemingly by design.) Dany wound up being her father's daughter after all, which is depressing, but not unrealistic. Some combination of Bran, Sam, and Tyrion--the characters who are supposed to be smart--rewrote the rules of Westerosi politics, transforming the realm from the hereditary monarchy it's been for centuries into, essentially, something resembling a representative democracy. Sansa is Queen in the North, Arya leaves for her own adventure, and the Six-Plus-One Kingdoms are left in somewhat capable hands.

Let's talk about King Bran the Broken, First of His Name (and here's a good joke about that very weird title). On paper, yes, he makes a good king. And it's not completely incomprehensible that he winds up on the throne, since the show established that everyone just sort of accepts his Magic Powers of Knowing Everything as fact for some reason. As with the rest of this, I think there's a version of this ending that lands better--one that follows a story in which Bran wasn't written out of an entire season and didn't return to the show as a soulless, dead-eyed husk of a character who did nothing for several years.

There's an alternate theory for why Bran winds up on the throne that involves things like the Three-Eyed Raven's true identity, both characters' skin-changing/warging abilities, and cryptic Bran statements about how he's not really Bran anymore. But since the show never really committed to any of that (seriously, when was the last time Bran actually warged into anything or anyone and did something useful?), we have to just take what we got at face value. Whatever.

Jon killing Daenerys definitely falls under the umbrella of "things that were inevitable but that doesn't make them any less sad." This episode had some insanely beautiful and effective shots, from Dany walking out to address her soldiers with Drogon's wings spreading behind her to the pivotal scene in the throne room, up to and including the dragon flying away with his dead mother clutched in one claw. Where did he go? Maybe Bran will find him, maybe he won't. Like so many other things in Game of Thrones' neutered final season, that's beside the point.

This is the thing: An ending can make sense without feeling satisfying. The reasons why Game of Thrones' finale felt disappointing have less to do with the ways things actually wound up, and more with how we got here. If Bran had actually been present as a character and not just a doorstop for the past couple of seasons, fans might have cheered at the idea of him ruling over Westeros. If Dany's full-on murderous insanity had been properly built up to--as opposed to simply foreshadowed and then flipped on in an instant, which unfortunately isn't the same thing--her death could have been one of the most emotional television scenes ever, rather than something that felt like it simply needed to be done for the Story to continue its breakneck freefall toward a Conclusion.

No Caption Provided

The moments that worked best in "The Iron Throne" were the ones that were properly set up long ago, like Brienne finishing Jaime's page in the White Book of the Kingsguard. It's the right kind of bittersweet: The Jaime that we got to know over these eight seasons (and five books) wanted nothing more than to leave a legacy that could stand alongside those of past Kingsguard greats like Ser Arthur Dayne. And who knew that side of the Kingslayer better than Brienne?

But therein lies the quintessential difference between page and screen: If you only watch the show, do you know that side of Jaime? In George R.R. Martin's books, events play out from specific characters' perspectives. When we're seeing the world through Jaime Lannister's eyes, we're also privy to his inner monologue, thoughts, feelings, dreams, hopes, and fears. When the show was still based on the books, it felt similar--in early seasons we usually understood why the characters did the things they did. The show did a great job letting us get to know them.

In more recent seasons, it's felt like the show kept us at arm's length, deliberately leaving things offscreen--like Bran, Arya, and Sansa plotting against Littlefinger, or Dany learning to ride and control Drogon--in order to build up surprises and cinematic climaxes. Those moments often worked, but they also left us wondering exactly how the pieces fell into place behind the scenes. Maybe showrunners David Benioff and Dan Weiss orchestrated that shift deliberately, or maybe they just didn't have the answers and so chose to not even try to come up with some. R'hllor knows George R.R. Martin has a hard enough time--the story's complexity is often cited as one of the reasons the books take him so long to write.

The point is: The broad strokes of this ending may be what the author has in mind, and, if he ever manages to finish his own story, this may be the ending that we ultimately get. But the way we get there will likely be characterized not by the bad taste of a botched rush job, but by the careful plotting, endless detail, and realistic, complex characters that the story actually began with.

Here's a silver lining: Even if you wanted Jon on the throne in the end, you have to admit that finally seeing him pet his direwolf again is an even better conclusion to his story. At least they got there in the end.

Photos: HBO/Helen Sloan

Got a news tip or want to contact us directly? Email news@gamespot.com


mrougeau

Michael Rougeau

Mike Rougeau is GameSpot's Managing Editor of Entertainment, with over 10 years of pop culture journalism experience. He lives in Los Angeles with his wife and two dogs.

Back To Top
178 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for fotis52
fotis52

103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 30

User Lists: 0

What I really don't get is why they rushed things so much??

Why didn't we get 2 full 10 episode seasons? I can't believe it was a financial issue.

I didn't mind anyone dying or living, but some things should be given more time.

You can't just have Daenerys die in one shot and next shot is some time-days later, with John captive and the ruthless and revengeful Grey Worm summoning a council with the Tullys and the Arryns?? Really?

7 • 
Avatar image for deactivated-5d495083aed2b
deactivated-5d495083aed2b

724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@fotis52: They just wanted to wrap it up... my guess is writing the story was getting too stressful. Look at the scene where they are choosing Bran as King you can see water bottles by the chairs, so sloppy.

5 • 
Avatar image for Bread_or_Decide
Bread_or_Decide

29761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@NTenseify: And too expensive.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for deactivated-5d495083aed2b
deactivated-5d495083aed2b

724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Bread_or_Decide: HBO gave them massive budget and they prob spent it all on the Winterfell battle... watching that was like watching a high budget movie. Easily could’ve made 10 episodes and dragged out the story more, just unwilling.

4 • 
Avatar image for Bread_or_Decide
Bread_or_Decide

29761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@NTenseify: 90 million for the season isn't much when you have two full battles and non stop CGI dragon that costs hundreds of thousands every time it flaps its wing.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for deactivated-5d495083aed2b
deactivated-5d495083aed2b

724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Bread_or_Decide: 90 mill "isn't much" lmao. They overdid it with the battle scenes in order to compensate for lack of interesting script imo

5 • 
Avatar image for Bread_or_Decide
Bread_or_Decide

29761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@NTenseify: But the story required two huge battle scenes. Rock meet hard place.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for HesamB
HesamB

447

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

@fotis52: HBO actually said we can give you budget for 10 episodes but D&D told them it can be done in 6. go figure

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Bread_or_Decide
Bread_or_Decide

29761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@HesamB: Proof of this?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for VampireLord123
VampireLord123

295

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

@Bread_or_Decide: He is right, i remember reading it somewhere as well. They did not want to stretch the last two seasons.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Bread_or_Decide
Bread_or_Decide

29761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@VampireLord123: But then the largest battles suffer for it? It's a no win situation.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for deactivated-5e90a3763ea91
deactivated-5e90a3763ea91

9437

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 13

I generally agree with Mike. I think the season had some good moments, and the finale was fitting, even if it was a wonky, rushed cram-job of a season.

It's entirely possible the books will end with the events playing out the same way, but with a more natural progression.

I think maybe Bran being chosen as King was meant to be a little dull of a choice, because that fits with the tone of things. He might not have been the best choice, but he was a good choice for numerous small reasons.

Most of the characters couldn't escape their habits. Maybe that is a big message the series wanted to show. And that wasn't entirely a bad thing. Their endings were in-character, and for some had a sense of duality.

I will likely buy the DVD for this season when it comes out to complete the collection. I'll probably even re-watch all of this again one day. It will always be known as the messiest season in the series, but for me I felt like it was adequate enough.

4 • 
Avatar image for jedijax
jedijax

632

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I completely agree. It was a more or less pleasant ending to me though. I expected it to be full of flaws and incoherences, but I guess those were dropped all over the season to set the ending, which was predictable, and while unsatisfying in the larger scheme, decent enough.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for fud_sang
Fud_Sang

526

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By Fud_Sang

Queen for all of 10 seconds before being stabbed by the man she loved. Who was expecting that...everyone. For a series that did everything but play it safe there was a whole lot of that going on in the end. Everyone ends up more or less where they began but with more and far less family to share it with...and of course some people died (though only one died this episode unless you count the Lannister prisoners)

Upvote • 
Avatar image for srfilk86
srfilk86

768

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

GoT failed to deliver any satisfying conclusion to such an epic story. The only good part was Drogon melting the throne.

7 • 
Avatar image for alastor529
alastor529

1263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@srfilk86: I actually believe that scene will be in GRRM books ive always predicted the throne will be destroyed because of what is represents and what it leads to.

2 • 
Avatar image for HesamB
HesamB

447

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

@Richardthe3rd: David is that you?

5 • 
Avatar image for Richardthe3rd
Richardthe3rd

3844

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

@HesamB: Michael, did I hurt your feelings?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for aross2004
aross2004

7618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

Edited By aross2004

@Richardthe3rd: Translation: Rabid fanboy can't stand someone speaking the truth about their precious show. Talk about ranting, that was quite the little tantrum you just threw.

Go cry in the corner while the adults converse.

7 • 
Avatar image for monkyby87
monkyby87

297

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@aross2004: well, when you start a review like they did here, it’s obvious they’re going into this episode already hating it. That makes for a bad review.

2 • 
Avatar image for Richardthe3rd
Richardthe3rd

3844

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

@aross2004: translation: I drink the kool-aid and believe starting a review with "given the smelly, trashy fire" is totally something "adults" do when they're discussing anything with any impartiality.

I'm not the one crying about this, kiddo.

2 • 
Avatar image for aross2004
aross2004

7618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

Edited By aross2004

@Richardthe3rd: Not questioning the validity of the review either way. Calling BS on someone who goes on a complete rant, claiming that someone else was ranting.

How can you talk about how adults discuss things after throwing that 5 year old hissy fit? Hypocrisy much?

It's hilarious and sad all at once!

3 • 
Avatar image for Richardthe3rd
Richardthe3rd

3844

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

Edited By Richardthe3rd

@aross2004: your definition of a "complete rant" = 1 run-on sentence. I wonder how breathless you were after reading this actually long-winded bullshit review. Or maybe you just read single sentences and cant register much more than that?

So yeah, let's talk about hypocrisy, then hyperbole.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for aross2004
aross2004

7618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

Edited By aross2004

@Richardthe3rd: I already told you, I'm not speaking to the validity of the review either way, (but since you're so hung up on that, I agree that it was not impartial).

I'm speaking to your obvious hypocrisy and immaturity with your temper tantrum.

The fact that you just keep flipping out about it, and hurling childish insults at the reviewer, only continues to prove my point. My 13 year old brother is more mature than you are.

3 • 
Avatar image for Richardthe3rd
Richardthe3rd

3844

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

@aross2004: my original post was intended to be an somewhat insulting and humorous rejection of a horridly written article, and somehow it turns into abject, childish ranting?

Sorry, when I see antagonistic bullshit in a review I'm going to respond concisely and dismissively, because that's what it deserves. If the reviewer had hoped to illicit an actual response he shouldve written an actual review.

The only one actually flipping out here is you.

Upvote •