Feature Article

Game Of Thrones: "The Iron Throne" Review & Recap -- A Fitting Finale, A Botched Journey

GameSpot may receive revenue from affiliate and advertising partnerships for sharing this content and from purchases through links.

Game of Thrones spoilers ahead!

Game of Thrones has reached its end, with the series finale airing this past Sunday to all-time record ratings for both the show and HBO. Season 8, Episode 6 brought the long-awaited ending to the show's main storylines, but was it actually satisfying? You can check out our thoughts in the review below. If you were unsatisfied, there's still hope for the books to handle things differently, as A Song of Ice and Fire author George RR Martin says the books' ending won't be exactly the same, as you'd expect.

Next Sunday, HBO will premiere a two-hour Game of Thrones documentary, The Last Watch, which has just gotten a new trailer. That will take a behind-the-scenes look at the making of the show's final season. For more, check out these finale Easter Eggs and references and a look at an interesting theory about Bran.

Please use a html5 video capable browser to watch videos.
This video has an invalid file format.
00:00:00
Sorry, but you can't access this content!
Please enter your date of birth to view this video

By clicking 'enter', you agree to GameSpot's
Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Now Playing: Game Of Thrones Series Finale Breakdown And Recap -- "The Iron Throne"

Given the smelly trash fire that the episodes leading up to it were, there was never any real chance of Game of Thrones' finale, Season 8 Episode 6, "The Iron Throne," being anything other than a disappointment. But at least they tried.

There's a parallel universe somewhere where this exact episode was preceded by two full seasons of the phenomenal storytelling that Game of Thrones was once capable of, and in that brighter timeline, the show went out on the right note. It still would have been bittersweet, but it would have also felt earned, which this definitely did not. Too many plot points were swept under the rug and too many endings came from seemingly out of nowhere for this to feel satisfying.

Unlike the nonsensical Dothraki charge in Episode 3 or Euron's magic scorpion bolts in Episode 4, there was nothing particularly terrible in the Season 8 finale; we got some surprises (Bran the Broken), while other plotlines concluded exactly as they needed to (Arya sailing West, and Brienne finishing Jaime's page in the Kingsguard book). It just all felt a little tawdry thanks to the path we took to get here.

Look at where the show's biggest characters ended, in broad strokes: Jon never fully embraced his secret identity, which was disappointing, but fitting; he'll die a Stark, in the North, as he lived. (I kept waiting all season for something to make me start thinking of him as Aegon Targaryen instead of Jon Snow, but it never happened, seemingly by design.) Dany wound up being her father's daughter after all, which is depressing, but not unrealistic. Some combination of Bran, Sam, and Tyrion--the characters who are supposed to be smart--rewrote the rules of Westerosi politics, transforming the realm from the hereditary monarchy it's been for centuries into, essentially, something resembling a representative democracy. Sansa is Queen in the North, Arya leaves for her own adventure, and the Six-Plus-One Kingdoms are left in somewhat capable hands.

Let's talk about King Bran the Broken, First of His Name (and here's a good joke about that very weird title). On paper, yes, he makes a good king. And it's not completely incomprehensible that he winds up on the throne, since the show established that everyone just sort of accepts his Magic Powers of Knowing Everything as fact for some reason. As with the rest of this, I think there's a version of this ending that lands better--one that follows a story in which Bran wasn't written out of an entire season and didn't return to the show as a soulless, dead-eyed husk of a character who did nothing for several years.

There's an alternate theory for why Bran winds up on the throne that involves things like the Three-Eyed Raven's true identity, both characters' skin-changing/warging abilities, and cryptic Bran statements about how he's not really Bran anymore. But since the show never really committed to any of that (seriously, when was the last time Bran actually warged into anything or anyone and did something useful?), we have to just take what we got at face value. Whatever.

Jon killing Daenerys definitely falls under the umbrella of "things that were inevitable but that doesn't make them any less sad." This episode had some insanely beautiful and effective shots, from Dany walking out to address her soldiers with Drogon's wings spreading behind her to the pivotal scene in the throne room, up to and including the dragon flying away with his dead mother clutched in one claw. Where did he go? Maybe Bran will find him, maybe he won't. Like so many other things in Game of Thrones' neutered final season, that's beside the point.

This is the thing: An ending can make sense without feeling satisfying. The reasons why Game of Thrones' finale felt disappointing have less to do with the ways things actually wound up, and more with how we got here. If Bran had actually been present as a character and not just a doorstop for the past couple of seasons, fans might have cheered at the idea of him ruling over Westeros. If Dany's full-on murderous insanity had been properly built up to--as opposed to simply foreshadowed and then flipped on in an instant, which unfortunately isn't the same thing--her death could have been one of the most emotional television scenes ever, rather than something that felt like it simply needed to be done for the Story to continue its breakneck freefall toward a Conclusion.

No Caption Provided

The moments that worked best in "The Iron Throne" were the ones that were properly set up long ago, like Brienne finishing Jaime's page in the White Book of the Kingsguard. It's the right kind of bittersweet: The Jaime that we got to know over these eight seasons (and five books) wanted nothing more than to leave a legacy that could stand alongside those of past Kingsguard greats like Ser Arthur Dayne. And who knew that side of the Kingslayer better than Brienne?

But therein lies the quintessential difference between page and screen: If you only watch the show, do you know that side of Jaime? In George R.R. Martin's books, events play out from specific characters' perspectives. When we're seeing the world through Jaime Lannister's eyes, we're also privy to his inner monologue, thoughts, feelings, dreams, hopes, and fears. When the show was still based on the books, it felt similar--in early seasons we usually understood why the characters did the things they did. The show did a great job letting us get to know them.

In more recent seasons, it's felt like the show kept us at arm's length, deliberately leaving things offscreen--like Bran, Arya, and Sansa plotting against Littlefinger, or Dany learning to ride and control Drogon--in order to build up surprises and cinematic climaxes. Those moments often worked, but they also left us wondering exactly how the pieces fell into place behind the scenes. Maybe showrunners David Benioff and Dan Weiss orchestrated that shift deliberately, or maybe they just didn't have the answers and so chose to not even try to come up with some. R'hllor knows George R.R. Martin has a hard enough time--the story's complexity is often cited as one of the reasons the books take him so long to write.

The point is: The broad strokes of this ending may be what the author has in mind, and, if he ever manages to finish his own story, this may be the ending that we ultimately get. But the way we get there will likely be characterized not by the bad taste of a botched rush job, but by the careful plotting, endless detail, and realistic, complex characters that the story actually began with.

Here's a silver lining: Even if you wanted Jon on the throne in the end, you have to admit that finally seeing him pet his direwolf again is an even better conclusion to his story. At least they got there in the end.

Photos: HBO/Helen Sloan

Got a news tip or want to contact us directly? Email news@gamespot.com


mrougeau

Michael Rougeau

Mike Rougeau is GameSpot's Managing Editor of Entertainment, with over 10 years of pop culture journalism experience. He lives in Los Angeles with his wife and two dogs.

Back To Top
178 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for endersdragon
endersdragon

207

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Bran being king makes perfect sense from the stories perspective. Emotions, especially love, have caused nothing but trouble for Westeros. Targaryns kept deciding that they were madly in love with their siblings, yea, that never turned out well. Jamie and Cersei decided they were madly in love with each other, worked about as well as it did for the Targaryns. Rhagar and Robert decided they were in love with the same woman, caused a civil war that ended a dynasty. Rob decided he was in love with a woman he should never have, resulted in his death. Etc. Who would make a better king from that perspective than a cold emotionless person? Makes perfect sense.

4 • 
Avatar image for Bluppis
Bluppis

39

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@endersdragon: Either you don't know how love works or the word 'decide' doesn't mean what you think it means lol.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for alastor529
alastor529

1263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@endersdragon: I guarantee you GRRM will not Bran on the throne and his end will be more logical to the world and politics of the series. Bran will just continue to be the three eyed raven keeping things in balance from beyond the wall like the original 3 eyed raven did. or make a fortress in old valeria

the only thing i do believe GRRM will do is Dany will die and the throne will be melted. that for sure will happen in the books and i think alot of people saw that coming ad the chair represents he dark side of mens nature. its literally a symbol for war and conquering.

I do beleive Jon will not assume his targaryen ideetity since all he EVER wanted wa to be a stark. him knowing his true origins will nto chang that i think if anythign h will be king of winterfell. I beleive in the books sansa will die.

arya will more than likley have a similar ending, i also thougth she would be a drifter , i hope GRRM doesnt turn her into princess and have her marry gendry that would be out of chracter for her journey tbh

so that was actually good.
I believe GRRM will end it where all the nations are independent and no more monarchy.

4 • 
Avatar image for Bread_or_Decide
Bread_or_Decide

29761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@alastor529: Oh boy, here come the "george will fix it in the books!" people.

2 • 
Avatar image for alastor529
alastor529

1263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Bread_or_Decide: Oh boy here is the obligatory Bread or Decide comment everyone here must receive and put up with since you have an unlimited amount of time throughout the day.
YAWN

Upvote • 
Avatar image for aross2004
aross2004

7618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

@alastor529: Jon is dead in the books. So yeah...

Upvote • 
Avatar image for alastor529
alastor529

1263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@aross2004: there are two more books, he died in the show and came back. That could've been because George told them he would die so that his "watch" could end.

alot of book readers predict have will come back as to complete his duty at the wall.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for aross2004
aross2004

7618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

@alastor529: A whole lot of predictions going around...

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Shadow-Phax
Shadow-Phax

53

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

Edited By Shadow-Phax

There are plenty of spoilers right from the beginning if you haven't seen this season yet.

I can't say i liked how this season went, they could have done more with the Night King character. He could have talked at least once. But it was good they way they killed him off.

The final episode was pretty predictable. I'm sure everyone knew that Dani had to go. She tried to kill everyone in the city, even the kids. People say Dani went crazy and slaughtered people, I say she went Targaryen( got that from Chris Rock's routine about tigers). I must admit I thought it would be Tyrion who would kill her off with a crossbow while she sat on the toilet. That would have been priceless. Priceless because it would be cool to see that the Mother of Dragons goes to the bathroom like the rest of us but also because it would be hilarious. I must admit that the scene where Snow killed Dani was great. It was clear she just wanted more war and power and she had to go. I'm glad this is over because now I can read the "Song of Ice and Fire" series. Never read the books first if it's possible because the TV show or movie will disappoint you for sure.

Shadow-Phax

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Bluppis
Bluppis

39

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Shadow-Phax: did we watch the same scene? The dialog was on par with a couple of kids meeting in the yard at kindergarten.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for odolwa99
odolwa99

387

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

Did the polar bear from Lost write this ending?

9 • 
Avatar image for flashbak420
flashbak420

37

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

It felt a bit to me like the whole season was Bran/Three eyed raven manipulating events to set himself on the throne. For one he just happens to be sitting outside "Waiting for an old friend" when Sam finds out that Dany killed his father and brother because they refused to kneel to her. Sam comes out rather distraught, almost getting run over, and then there's Bran just sitting there and right then is the perfect time for Jon to find out his heritage, and it has to be from Sam. Of course Jon would trust Bran, but Bran didn't have the axe to grind which Sam definitely did. And Sam didn't disappoint, he came right out and couched the whole thing under the big question of whether Jon would have killed them too. Then after Dany begs Jon not to tell anyone, it was Bran who, while not telling Jon to tell his sisters, implies heavily that its the right thing to do which of course Jon immediately ran and did.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for oobga14
Oobga14

29

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Oobga14

Shout out to Dany's designer for having her "evil" outfit all ready to go for when Dany finally went full "chase down and kill screaming women and children" crazy mode.

6 • 
Avatar image for izraal
Izraal

466

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By Izraal

There are a lot of emotional responses here from viewers, and I have to agree that the review was written from a place of emotion, without sufficient critical detachment. I think it's beneficial to clarify here that people being dissatisfied with the season, or the ending, due to a perception of "rushed pacing," and those who have dissatisfaction in the actual events that played out, are two different groups, currently being erroneously blended into one.

While it's certainly possible that people preferred the more deliberate pace of earlier seasons to the more "bullet pointed" approach of the later seasons, I think it's very possible that even if the events were allowed "time to breathe" many people would be equally unhappy, if not more so, simply because they don't care for the way things ended.

The review states, "If Dany's full-on murderous insanity had been properly built up to--as opposed to simply foreshadowed and then flipped on in an instant, which unfortunately isn't the same thing--her death could have been one of the most emotional television scenes ever, rather than something that felt like it simply needed to be done for the Story to continue its breakneck freefall toward a Conclusion."

Firstly, I take issue with the term "insanity" and "flipped on" being used here. This indicates the author either did not listen to the content of the final episode, or chose to ignore it. Dany's character is consistent with how she has always been portrayed. The episode did address it all in brevity, yes, but it did at least take the time to articulate all of the major themes. The Imp clearly states that when she burned and massacred various groups throughout her journey that people cheered Dany, feeding her notion of "divine right" and failing to see the remorseless killer they'd empowered.

People who want to describe the events as Dany "flipping a switch," rather than being who she always was, likely would be just as unhappy with a more drawn out season or two. It wouldn't be giving them some justification for why a beloved character changed her outlook, but more illumination into the fact that they simply never truly understood the character. Tyrion described it as clearly as possible, speaking both in-fiction to Jon but also to the viewers who cheered Dany's earlier brutality without recognizing her for what she was. Would 10 or 20 more episodes highlighting her messianic complex, her lack of empathy, and her willingness to kill and destroy in pursuit of her ideals really make these viewers feel better? I think, more likely, they'd feel far worse, and maybe even would have abandoned the show prior to the end.

It might be worth taking a step back to really think, then - are you unhappy with the ending only because it was rushed? Or were you simply unhappy with what *happened* and you would have been no matter how long it took to get there? These are two different discussions, and I believe a lot of viewers are incorrectly conflating them into one.

11 • 
Avatar image for council7
Council7

2

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By Council7

@izraal: While I agree that this review is somewhat oddly and hastily written, I do feel that both you and izraal might also be misinterpreting the point of some of us who were unhappy with what happened, as "simply not understanding".

I feel that Dany did "flip a switch towards insanity", but that wasn't simply because I didn't expect her to act in this way, or that I imposed my own expectations on who I wanted her to be on someone who wasn't.

I myself was never a Dany fan. Her whole rise to great power by overcoming obstacles through the convenience of dragon eggs and a royal lineage, was the kind of short-cut that made me more vested in the likes of Tyrion or Jon, who needed to overcome a similar bad hand through means far more relatable, but ended up with less than a clear route towards becoming ruler of the world. As you say, Dany's feeling of entitlement and her messianic-complex may have been built up.

In fact, I was sorta rooting for Dany to become the arch-villain of the show. I expected this to make for a fine tale of hubris.

Except, this fine tale never happened, simply because I feel that Dany failed to be a good villain. My accusation was never that Dany shouldn't have become a villain, or that there wasn't any set-up, but that this set-up never amounted to a satisfying tale.

In stories, you have several types of villain, and some villains are just there to be an obstacle. The Night King was a good example. Not much of his backstory is known, but it doesn't really matter. He's only there to be a threat and to have an impact on our heroes. He's no more a danger than a natural disaster is. Ramsay, though mortal, was another such villain. He's born a psychopath, doesn't consider his actions and is just there to antagonize.

The problem with Dany, is that she ended up exactly being one of these villains. In the end, she's not that dissimilar from the Night King, a natural disaster like a Hurricane, or Ramsay. In the end, she was only interesting in the way that the heroes reacted to her. And indeed, she was set up like one. The Night King got stabbed in the heart and holds a magical grudge towards the living. Ramsay was born wrong in the head and tortures people. Dany, the poor girl, was set up by the circumstances in her life to become the Tyrant dragon queen, just like a Hurricane forms through the forces of nature to barrel down its predetermined path through a cityscape. How could we not have seen this coming, you might tisk.

A good villain though? A good villain works differently. Good villains are actually relatable and speak to humanity's sense of right and wrong. Walter White turns from a mild mannered chemistry professor into a murderous drug dealer through his circumstances, but unlike Ramsay, he stops along the way and asks himself whether he's doing the right thing and whether it's too late to turn back. Mr. Freeze from Batman and the Night King might both be planning to turn the world into a frozen hellscape, but it is Mr. Freeze that does so because they took everything that was warm and good in his life away from him and he's out for his own frigid sense of justice that clashes with Batman's. Isn't he in his own way, right?

Stannis Baratheon and Danyerys are both out to upset the established world order through means ruthless and cruel, burning children, but it is Stannis - ironically described as the person with the least amount of personality by most everyone in Westeros - who sees these things as a moral conundrum, only passes over the treshold as a calculation, and is visibly shaken and conflicted afterwards, with the love for his daughter and his sense of right and wrong being well established in the past few seasons.

Dany meanwhile, vacillates between locking up her dragons because they killed a shepherd's child and inspiring Drogon to kill a hundred more at King's Landing, seemingly without being morally conflicted or giving the dichotomy any thought, just like Ramsay and the Night King aren't concerned with their own actions.

Insanity? Yes, and the switch WAS flicked. It just always alternated between two positions. It's good that you figured out that Dany was a light bulb all along, just like a hurricane travels through a predetermined path, but personally, I find a light-bulb or a villain of this sort, horribly, horribly boring and dissatisfying and had expected - not more of Dany - but more than Dany.

2 • 
Avatar image for izraal
Izraal

466

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By Izraal

@council7: I think your point is well articulated, and it's clear you were dissatisfied in the manner the story was presented and the type of story told, not the events that played out themselves. We can disagree on the notion of "insanity" with the dragon queen, and agree that your issue was primarily the kind of story told and how the story was told, not the content of the story itself, ie the events. It is clear that you wanted a different *kind* of story, if not different events. A lot of people, like the reviewer, wanted different events *and* a different kind of story.

I think your comparison with Stannis is a very good one. He is shown struggling with inhumane acts that are advocated by a religious authority he believes in. Dany is different - she believes herself to be the highest authority. She is the 'chosen one' in her narrative, who answers to no one but herself and her ideals. She isn't struggling with an outside force that overrides her moral code, she is simply convinced - and her notion is reinforced by others - that she is right, she is the chosen one who will bring about a better world, and any violent act along the way, therefore, is justified.

Regarding your statement -I do feel that both you and izraal might also be misinterpreting the point of some of us who were unhappy with what happened, as "simply not understanding"

Not at all - I think there are many like you who are unhappy with the method of storytelling. I also think there are many people who have distaste for the events themselves, and they're aligning themselves with people who took issue with the way the story was told, when these are actually two very different criticisms. The author of the review, for example, made no secret about taking issue with the story itself, the actual events, and made no effort to appear objective in their review of the method of storytelling. The review is not terribly professional.

Lastly, there is what "we want" and what "we got." I understand you "wanted" Dany to have the arc of a protagonist who slides from sympathetic to villainous like Walter White from Breaking Bad. That's not the story that was told here. Dany was always as "good" and as "bad" as she was, there was no Breaking Bad here. She is a self assured fanatic who believes it is her destiny to change the world. She always was.

With each victory, where people applauded lesser atrocities as justified, she had more assurance that she could do no wrong. "Bad/good," or "madness" are terms that don't really have any nuance, however. She felt *justified* in killing the citizens of Kings Landing. She has always felt justified in everything she has done. She isn't changing, in the end, she's just being more of what she always was. It's everyone around who her failed to recognize it until it was too late.

Would a story of her losing her moral center and becoming more ruthless have been more satisfying? Maybe. But that would be a different story altogether. This was a story about people realizing that they put their faith in a cult of personality led by someone capable of ruthlessness and mass destruction of life and property. It's not a pleasant story, and yes, even that story could have been better told, but the "schools of criticism" are distinct and shouldn't be conflated. That's my main point, here.

4 • 
Avatar image for council7
Council7

2

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By Council7

@izraal: Well said.

Regardless of our diverging perspectives and expectations on this matter, I think we've made our cases well enough to ensure into a mutual understanding and respect for each other's position - or at least on this individual basis.

Thank you for the time, effort and considered debate. It's pleasant surprise to find in the comment section of what would otherwise just be another one of the internet's warzones.

Cheers!

2 • 
Avatar image for izraal
Izraal

466

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@council7: Thank you as well, Council. Agreed - it is possible to have different perspectives and expectations, and still achieve some mutual understanding. Cheers to you as well!

2 • 
Avatar image for Bluppis
Bluppis

39

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@izraal: I must say that your discussion with @council7 was a very good read and it is a pleasant surprise to find such a good mannered tone in any comment section.

I just want to add a notion to this quote

Not at all - I think there are many like you who are unhappy with the method of storytelling. [emphasis mine]

I believe it's mostly the horrible, horrible writing a lot of people, including myself, are unhappy with. Not that they chose to tell the story in a certain way but that they did it very poorly.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for izraal
Izraal

466

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@Bluppis: Yes, that is a different but similar critique, the moment to moment dialogue, visuals failing to convey what they're intended to, etc. I suppose each of these criticisms are different from just preferring a longer structure for the narrative, you're correct.

Speaking broadly, I was mainly trying to distinguish between those who did not like the story that was told, i.e. the actual content/events, and those who do not like how the story was told, the latter of which could be relating to dialogue, acting, visuals, even musical cues, or just the general pacing, depending on the viewer's tastes.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Tekarukite
Tekarukite

780

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

@izraal: beat me to it. Very well said. I enjoyed this season and especially the ending, because I both enjoyed the characters and the surprises. But, when you pick those surprises apart, you realize they actually fit the characters. Few shows can be this character AND plot driven and work so well.

3 • 
Avatar image for Richardthe3rd
Richardthe3rd

3844

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

@izraal: very good points.

The ending might not have been perfect, but for those who understood the characters and who they've become, it really did make a lot of sense.

Asking for more... well, we all want more. It was amazing. But I think you're right; watching some of these characters give into their flaws may have turned off an audience that failed to truly understand who they actually were and what motivated them.

My biggest problem with the last 2 episodes really was that the show basically did exactly what you expected, which seemed too brutal to be true. But this show has done that before, it made sense to do so here, and was actually good television that I ended up enjoying a lot.

4 • 
Avatar image for cboye18
cboye18

4129

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

Edited By cboye18

The ending felt hollow; it left no impact for me. Bran and Arya's conclusion were unexpected and unsatisfactory IMO. What's the point of sending Jon Snow to Castle Black? the White Walkers were defeated and the Wild-lings weren't a problem anymore. They never explained how he came back from the dead either. And did Tyrion simply move on? What about the dragon?

3 • 
Avatar image for flashbak420
flashbak420

37

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@cboye18: 1) The White Walkers had been defeated before, they will come back again at some point. As the Stark motto goes, "Winter is coming."
2) His resurrection was along the same lines of that of Dondarion.
3) Tyrion is hand to Bran the Broken. His moving on was addressing the sewer issues of King's Landing, something he had done for Casterly Rock, which had been something of a feat, and had been wanting to have addressed since season 1.
4) Finally, Drogon was last seen flying east.

At least that is my perception of the events.

3 • 
Avatar image for Bluppis
Bluppis

39

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@flashbak420: But now we also now that "Winter is coming" really just mean that a night that's a bit longer than usual will pass and then it's spring again. It's more a catch phrase than anything.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for lilhurk1985187
lilhurk1985187

571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 5

Love the epic amount of salt this has caused and will enjoy watching even more salt flow.

6 • 
Avatar image for mrbojangles25
mrbojangles25

58453

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

Well at least it is over.

Back to the books. Only 3417 pages left to read...

3 •