EA in legal showdown with Dillinger, LLC

Publisher files suit after purported rights holder of famed bank robber demands "millions" for use of name in Godfather games.

88 Comments

GameSpot may get a commission from retail offers.

Earlier this year, EA's second attempt to adapt The Godfather films into a game resulted in lackluster sales and a dismal critical reception. Two months after the game's April 2009 launch on the Xbox 360, PlayStation 3, and PC, EA Games president Frank Gibeau explicitly stated that "we're not going to do another one." But just when EA thought it was out, the Godfather franchise pulls it back in.

The Dillinger family certainly knows how to make a demand.
The Dillinger family certainly knows how to make a demand.

As spotted by Game Politics, EA filed suit in the US District Court of Northern California against Dillinger, LLC last week over the in-game use of a pair of weapons bearing the famed criminal's moniker. Specifically, the firearms in question are the "Dillinger Tommy Gun" found in The Godfather and the "Modern Dillinger" available in The Godfather II as part of a downloadable content package.

According to the filing, the suit stems from legal saber-rattling initiated by Dillinger, LLC, which claims it owns "the publicity rights for and trademark interest in the name of late bandit John Dillinger." The complaint alleges that on July 22--exactly 75 years after the bank robber was gunned down by the FBI in Chicago--Dillinger LLC contacted EA threatening legal action if the publisher did not agree to pay "millions of dollars for the game elements purportedly covered by its publicity rights and trademarks."

As noted by Game Politics, Dillinger, LLC's claim apparently stems from an Indiana law that "protects a person's personality for 100 years after his or her death." EA, on the other hand, contends that its use of Dillinger's name in The Godfather games is protected under the First Amendment, and it does not violate any claimed rights of publicity or trademarks held by Dillinger, LLC.

EA is seeking declaratory judgment in its favor that the use of John Dillinger's name in its games does not violate Dillinger, LLC's rights and to prevent further litigation over the matter in the future.

Please use a html5 video capable browser to watch videos.
This video has an invalid file format.
00:00:00
Sorry, but you can't access this content!
Please enter your date of birth to view this video

By clicking 'enter', you agree to GameSpot's
Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Got a news tip or want to contact us directly? Email news@gamespot.com

Join the conversation
There are 88 comments about this story
88 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
  • 88 results
  • 1
  • 2
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for Ripper_TV
Ripper_TV

2972

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 34

User Lists: 1

But just when EA thought it was out, the Godfather franchise pulls it back in.

Good reference.

Avatar image for hannify
hannify

2220

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Actvision is worse than EA now everyone knows that. example Brutal Legend despute

Avatar image for Quezakolt
Quezakolt

624

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@CoolKidX EA just buys out devs, steal their franchises, sometimes shut down studios, and are generally not good toward their employees. For exemple I could state UbiSoft, which is starting to act in the same way. They own Longtail Studios, kicked everyone out, so they could lower salaries & remove social advantages. The people from Longtail are still bound from their contract which prevents them to work in the industry because of "trade secrets". You can find theses kind of things about EA too, if you look for it. So it was in that sense that I exprimed my self. I do not think huge compagnies which uses such business practises are any good, at all. that's it.

Avatar image for johnryandaplin
johnryandaplin

556

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@CoolKidX all those games you mentioned was made by companies that EA bought, so EA just buys companies, and the company staff makes the games, just so they have the EA logo in them

Avatar image for D3A7HJ0K3R
D3A7HJ0K3R

330

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Activision is the company that milks stuff,

Avatar image for CoolKidX
CoolKidX

873

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Quezakolt Why? So EA wont have any money left to make games like: Battlefield,C&C,Dead Space, The Sims and Spore? Not to forget they own Bioware. So yeah EA sucks for milking stuff and going sometimes to far, but keep in mind what franchises they created.

Avatar image for hannify
hannify

2220

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

USA are just going to kill franchaised games with all these pittyful lawsuits

Avatar image for Quezakolt
Quezakolt

624

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I just want EA to lose every lawsuit they are involved with :D

Avatar image for coenv1
coenv1

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Awsome, I going to buy this one. I dont care about the bugs im used to buggy games so i dont think this will make a diffrence.

Avatar image for mp01juve
mp01juve

89

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I wonder how much the film Public Enemies with Johnny Dep

Avatar image for Chris_Potter
Chris_Potter

123

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

I'd love to see EA fixing this by patching out the gun models of the game and replacing them :P

Avatar image for phynixblack
phynixblack

1113

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

@DrKill09 - It's his family suing. This is perfectly legal and I find it hilarious EA is finally going to get shafted for making such a simple mistake. Also, when your Family member has a famous, iconic gun named after him, robber or not, you will make all the money you can.

Avatar image for DrKill09
DrKill09

6238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

How can you own a person's name? Especially who would want to own a criminal's name? :roll:

Avatar image for benjy117
benjy117

258

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

How can anyone own the rights of a person alive or dead? Wouldn't that kind of being like a dead slave? I guess slavery exists legally in that sense.

Avatar image for pankaj360
pankaj360

61

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

wats there to fight its just a lame issue

Avatar image for pankaj360
pankaj360

61

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

well said paul gamefury

Avatar image for maliGGs
maliGGs

37

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 82

User Lists: 0

what about John T. Thompson? The guy who created the thompson? He won't see jack s**t outta the game. Dillinger, LLC should be stoked they are getting a bit of publicity over the thing, if it weren't for that movie with johnny depp i wouldn't have a clue who dillinger was anyway.

Avatar image for shadowysea07
shadowysea07

9489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

who cares the games sucked

Avatar image for Paul_GameFury
Paul_GameFury

1241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 0

So a group that owns the 'rights' to someone who stole for a living is suing because they think someone stole from them?

Avatar image for painkiller6363
painkiller6363

56

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

dont come after me... my mom is one of the groups lawyers and its johns great nephue who runs it i guess and hes sorta stuck up and idk i wana c watll happin here cross ur fingers 4 EA tho.

Avatar image for Bakkoda24
Bakkoda24

50

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

Big whoop. This is EA trying to desperately save themselves and getting slapped in the face while doing it. In my opinion, it's one of these things that you have to say "why even bother?" to and expect it to be forgotten in a week. Just hope that EA doesn't lose to much money or we may be seeing some titles shut down. With so many games having the EA logo stamped on, they have tech support and customer service all over the PC Gaming world.

Avatar image for fif
fif

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Unless Dillinger LLC can prove that the use of the bandit's name was a revenue driver, I doubt Dillinger will see a dime. Federal law and the Constitution always trump state law when there is a conflict. As a side note to those with EA bashing one liners, read the article. I mean physically read it! EA is filing a counterclaim against Dillinger. Dillinger LLC is wasting EA's time with a BS claim that, even if it had any merit, would not deserve "millions of dollars." If you aren't literate enough to read an article before commenting, go back to your cave with the other bottom 5% of the gene pool. If you honestly have the belief that EA is in the wrong, express it, but comments like "EA is full of greedy scumbags" and "Don't buy EA games" are just irrelevant and demonstrate no capacity to hold an intelligent thought on the topic.

Avatar image for IbnLaAhad
IbnLaAhad

1326

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

What a d***. Dilinger LLC obviously is just cashing in on this small and pointless thing. "Dillinger LLC contacted EA threatening legal action if the publisher did not agree to pay "millions of dollars for the game elements purportedly covered by its publicity rights and trademarks." How stupid. God**** Dillinger LLC. Even John Dillinger, if he was alive today, wouldn't give a d***.

Avatar image for ahnzz
ahnzz

612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

what if someone named their kid John Dillinger ..

Avatar image for Walker34
Walker34

1471

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

EA are a bunch of greedy scumbags

Avatar image for P8rt
P8rt

165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@ grandstream..the awnser is yes ...Son of Sam was overturned in 1991 subsequent revised state laws have also been struck down...@EA ...it is the llc laws that prevent me from selling toliet paper with your logo on it.

Avatar image for Gruug
Gruug

735

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 38

User Lists: 0

Normally I don't agree with much when it comes to EA. On this one I have to say that EA is right. Now, if EA turns around and sues another company because EA now thinks they own the rights to the Dillinger name I withdraw my previous statement.

Avatar image for kakarote22
kakarote22

62

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

70 years later and from beyond the grave, Dillinger is still stealing money from people.

Avatar image for Fransir
Fransir

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

wow really stupid.like how disney bought marvel.stupid idea

Avatar image for Corvan
Corvan

551

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

Another stupid lawsuit. Its a name! get over it and move on.

Avatar image for Dynamo11
Dynamo11

891

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

Oh come on!!!! Any excuse to get a few millions

Avatar image for Revan_911
Revan_911

1709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

How...stupid.

Avatar image for peetowser
peetowser

333

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

LOL at this guy trying to make a living off a deceased bandit 75 years after his death... Is he implying the Godfather game exploited and made profits off of the Dillinger name??? Is he seriously implying this was a good reason for gamers to buy the game, because it had the Dillinger name in it?? This isn't misrepresentation either, it's not like he's accusing EA of tainting the memory of the man... EA used the name for an in-game gun... Maybe letting this guy profit from the actions of a murderer in the first place was the mistake here? Is Marilyn Manson getting sued anytime soon too? You know Charles Manson could use the dough...

Avatar image for djsweete3
djsweete3

210

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

EA STRIKES AGAIN . ea take over game makers and rush them to finish for a quick buck then leave them .. DONT BUY EA GAMES

Avatar image for vivendidoom
vivendidoom

121

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

holy crap, seriously? is the economy THAT screwed up that companies are now suing over rights to a persons name, and its use is in line with the constitution? whats next...Mr. Myomoto sues the American population for masquerading as Mario on Halloween?

Avatar image for jamyskis
jamyskis

779

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

Whoever thought I, an EA-hater of many years, would end up siding with EA...

Avatar image for fps_d0minat0r
fps_d0minat0r

1160

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

@ badtaker microsofts in the race with them too.

Avatar image for ropumar
ropumar

1131

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@mgs16925 Exactly. The claim is ridiculous even if weren't a criminal. But since he is a criminal, the Son of Sam law would be more than enough to make this suit a laugh. Easy win for EA.

Avatar image for shawn7324
shawn7324

8690

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

Always someone trying to sue a company for easy money.

Avatar image for atopp399
atopp399

2281

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

He was a criminal...no case.

Avatar image for YoJim8obaJoe
YoJim8obaJoe

2653

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

man yanks really will try to sue for anything,imagine the shock on their face if they tried that in a country like france and get laughed out of court

Avatar image for shaggydellic
shaggydellic

163

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Only in America.

Avatar image for TruthOpinionSpk
TruthOpinionSpk

249

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Money grubbing bastards.

Avatar image for Grandstream
Grandstream

484

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

I'm confused...if these guys were making such a fuss over how EA utilized the Dillinger name, then what the heck happened with Public Enemies? Did they get compensated in that instance...?

Avatar image for mgs16925
mgs16925

215

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Dillenger is only famous as a criminal. You'd think EA would be protected by the Son of Sam laws. Of course, maybe they are.

Avatar image for DeviantStain
DeviantStain

103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Wow... Thats just lame :p

Avatar image for imjustjames
imjustjames

52

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

The only reason why Dillinger's harrassing EA is because they know they got the money and they want some of it. This has nothing to do with violating some rights for some company or what not. They see how successful EA is and they want some of the action. That's all this is about and all it's always about, money. No pride, no violation of anything, just money. Don't get me wrong, I despise EA as a game company, not because of jealousy, but just because they use their industry position to get away with pumping out subpar games that they know are subpar or "terribly mediocre". There's something about EA that's just plain disgusting, can't quite put my finger on it. Other game companies in the same league as EA just don't seem as sneaky or arrogant as EA. I guess you could say that they're the dirtiest player in this industry and it's affecting my choice as a consumer to not buy their games because it also gives me a sense of disgust that I might be fueling another subpar project of theirs. I think EA is way overhyped as being a "super-publisher" . BTW, I've heard so many bad things about GF2 that I refuse to even rent it.

Avatar image for Frame_Dragger
Frame_Dragger

9581

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

As bad as this game was (thank you rentals!) I could wish that both parties end ventilated by some Dillingers.

Avatar image for DrDeth
DrDeth

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

"We didn't name the guns after John Dillinger. We named them after the producer's dog..."

Avatar image for Haloman22
Haloman22

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Well, what I meant was, EA just brings it on itself. They trashed WHATEVER reputation they had with their strongarm tatics. Ever though this lawsuit is BS, its a sign of what EA's doing. I, myself, hate EA with all fibers of my being not dedicated to hating Jack Thompson.

  • 88 results
  • 1
  • 2