GameSpot may receive revenue from affiliate and advertising partnerships for sharing this content and from purchases through links.

EA clarifies recent offline games comment

Peter Moore confirms that not every EA game will require an online connection, says free-to-play not coming to every EA franchise.

399 Comments

In a blog post today, Electronic Arts COO Peter Moore clarified comments he made at Gamescom recently about moving away from offline games.

No Caption Provided

Moore said it is a fact that EA no longer makes "offline" games, but clarified that not every game EA ships will require an Internet connection.

"Many, if not most, of our games include single-player, offline modes that you can play entirely without an Internet connection, if you so choose," Moore said. "We know that’s something many of our players want, and we will continue to deliver it."

Maxis' upcoming The Sims 4 will not require an Internet connection.

Moore also addressed "confusion" regarding EA's plans for free-to-play games going forward. At Gamescom, he suggested that every major EA franchise will have a free-to-play option. Today, he said this is not the case, though the company is evaluating options for the future.

"I also see confusion about our plans for free-to-play games. Many of our most popular franchises for PCs and mobile--including Battlefield, Need for Speed, FIFA, Star Wars: The Old Republic, Plants vs. Zombies, and now Madden NFL, to name a few--already offer free-to-play experiences. Command & Conquer is another exciting new free-to-play game coming online later this year," Moore said. "However, not all of EA's games will offer a free-to-play mode."

"We will continue to explore new free-to-play experiences for our franchises when we believe there is gamer interest and a cool new game we can build," he added. "But of course, we will continue to deliver award-winning core gaming experiences on all of these franchises."

Please use a html5 video capable browser to watch videos.
This video has an invalid file format.
00:00:00
Sorry, but you can't access this content!
Please enter your date of birth to view this video

By clicking 'enter', you agree to GameSpot's
Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Got a news tip or want to contact us directly? Email news@gamespot.com

Join the conversation
There are 399 comments about this story
399 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for Divedude
Divedude

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Like all director and VP's and everything at this time of big sales. They will tell you what you want to hear just so they get more presales and bigger hype. After release you will be what lies were really told on both sides.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for quidditch3
quidditch3

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

OMFG biggest Backpedal in history!!!!

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Mamamf
Mamamf

29

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Did he have a stroke or sth?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for keech
keech

1451

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

Yeah there will be confusion when you make a statement, then backpedal and say something totally different in a matter of days.

You keep being afraid EA, we dog-piled Microsoft and we're coming after you next! xD

Upvote • 
Avatar image for franky111
franky111

322

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

Looks like EA is pulling a Microsoft...releasing a statement that is undesirable to the consumer, then "clarifying" with a more ambiguous statement.

Yeah, I can see why these two companies partnered together for the xbone.

4 • 
Avatar image for TimberWolf_CLT
TimberWolf_CLT

185

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

You can tell that Peter used to work for Microsoft... :p

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Veenox
Veenox

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

EA happened...

Upvote • 
Avatar image for JDWolfie
JDWolfie

1952

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Thought we were about to have another Sims City disaster on our hands.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for shnelle
shnelle

103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

Wow an EA exec who said one thing then completely backpedaled and said the exact opposite. I'm sure that will never happen again and we can actually trust what this guys says....<giggle>

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Falconoffury
Falconoffury

1722

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Offline "experiences" mean that nothing can be experienced offline. They need to choose their words more carefully.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for OurSin-360
OurSin-360

246

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I can play madden for free?


Upvote • 
Avatar image for frylock1987
frylock1987

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Nothing to clarify here Mr. Moore. Your company, more then likely saw all the negative backlash, so to ensure you keep getting money from your mindless fanbase, you are doing damage control.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for DoogyDonDoogy
DoogyDonDoogy

37

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Yeah sleep with one eye open around EA.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Thanatos2k
Thanatos2k

17660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By Thanatos2k

So Peter Moore is saying that he lied to our fucking faces before?

What a piece of human garbage, babbling whatever he thinks people want to hear.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for RoyialNetwork
RoyialNetwork

166

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

No EA, whats confusing is why you think that and continue to implement the practice in the first play. That's what is confusing.

2 • 
Avatar image for kohle36
kohle36

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I love how single player games are now an optional 'mode'

13 • 
Avatar image for Sublime408
Sublime408

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

EA, committed to doing as many 180s as Microsoft!

5 • 
Avatar image for quidditch3
quidditch3

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

@Sublime408 Or more

Upvote • 
Avatar image for sethfrost
sethfrost

709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

... aside from BF3, I haven't bought a EA game in years, nor have Origin on my machines. I can live without you, Peter Moore. (I bought BF3 for the SP part, played it once and that was that; was curious about the Frostbite2 engine & DX11 implementation by @repi & DICE).

Upvote • 
Avatar image for ignautius
ignautius

179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By ignautius

I actually believe that he misspoke. I really do. But here's the thing I don't get:

How. Can. You. Be. That. Stupid. ?

Suggesting only-online or always-online or required internet or anything of the sort is TOXIC in the video game industry right now. Look at Diablo III. Look at EA's OWN GAME, SimCity, and how awfully that went and how much crap they had to eat over the online requirements. Look at the Xbone and the public backlash over Xbone-phone-home until Microsoft pulled the "feature".

So not only did he misspeak, but he literally took the most hated thing about trends in video gaming AND SUGGESTED IT WAS THEIR NEW BUSINESS MODEL. It's a topic you should be staying as far away from as possible, so he wrote it in the sky in neon lights, and he didn't even NEED TO.

How can you be so stupid?

8 • 
Avatar image for WICGuardian
WICGuardian

85

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

EA seriously thinks they are the most important company in gaming

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Katz
Katz

215

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@WICGuardian They're the trend makers that's for sure...

Upvote • 
Avatar image for somatzu
somatzu

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By somatzu

Peter Moore killed the dreamcast.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for rey2
rey2

142

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

@somatzu So true.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for pbo666
pbo666

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

my god the man acts like a free to play command and conquer is a good thing!!

next you know we will be getting a major presser announcing the the release of KKOTOR (Kinect Knights of the Old Republic) and how great it is that its brought to millions free to play

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Katz
Katz

215

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

EA isn't much into giving gamers what they want.

4 • 
Avatar image for Thisisstupid
Thisisstupid

43

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Katz They're more into telling gamers what they want.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for ddg4005
ddg4005

37

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

What'd I tell you? People say things that are just for marketing purposes then have to backtrack on said statements. No surprises here.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for picho86
picho86

88

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@ddg4005 How is shooting yourself in the foot good for marketing?

3 • 
Avatar image for ddg4005
ddg4005

37

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By ddg4005

@picho86 @ddg4005

Because, unfortunately, these companies never see outlandish statements as self-destructive. They're surrounded by a reality distortion field that tells them what they believe gamers want instead of actually listening to them.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for berserker66666
berserker66666

1754

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

In Plants vs Zombies 2, you don't get any stars for finishing level the first time. (Which is needed to unlock the next world). There's an option of either unlocking the world via real money ($5) or grind through the levels again for stars. You only get a few stars per level and you usually need 15 or more stars to unlock.

So yea, I can reallyyyyyyyyyyy see the appeal of free-to-play games. FROM EA NO LESS............-_-

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Heshertonfist
Heshertonfist

913

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

EA: "No offline modes. Ok, offline modes. But we're making everything free-to-play. Ok, no we're not. Whatever we said a few days ago, that's exactly what we're not going to do anymore. What were we talking about again?"


14 • 
Avatar image for deactivated-5f4b46d20662e
deactivated-5f4b46d20662e

327

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

@Heshertonfist Seems like EA may have some internal struggles for what their new policy should be. Flip flopping around issues just proves it.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for beniboybling
Beniboybling

57

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@Heshertonfist EA PR in a nutshell.

2 •