Diablo III Q&A gets classy

Blizzcon 2009: From paladins to monks, Blizzard developers field questions about the class system in their forthcoming RPG.

175 Comments

Who Was There: Representatives from just about every facet of the Diablo III design team, including the lead programmer, art director, lead world designer, quest designer, lead level designer, sound designer, senior producer, and game director.

What Did They Talk About: Since there was no formal presentation, the Blizzard team was at the mercy of questions from the audience for the duration of the panel, but there was some interesting insight into the Diablo III development process. One of the first questions asked dealt with the issue of hacking--a distinct problem with the original Diablo and its sequel that let people make duplicates of the best items of the game without working for them. The Blizzard team said that it has learned a lot from Diablo II and from World of Warcraft in regard to this issue and it plans to make Diablo III as hack-free as possible.

The next few questions--about player-vs.player (PVP) and Battle.net functionality--couldn't really be answered, but the team did its best. In regard to PVP, Blizzard doesn't support the idea of going hostile at any time, meaning that they don't want someone to join your game and then try to kill you. It hurts cooperative play and even discourages it. Still, Blizzard knows that PVP is important and that there are large communities surrounding such features, and they plan to support them.

Hackers beware in Diablo III...
Hackers beware in Diablo III...

As for Battle.net, the team hasn't done a lot of designing around it since the service is mostly focused on Starcraft II for the time being, but they recognize that the original method for matchmaking wasn't the best. For Diablo III, they want to make sure that it's easier to play with friends or join games with similar players attempting to accomplish the same task.

There were plenty of story-oriented questions throughout the panel, but of course this is one of the several things Blizzard is being extremely tight-lipped about. The first of these questions surrounded the possible appearance of character classes, specifically the paladin and the necromancer. For the paladin, Blizzard said that they want to show what has happened with classes from previous games, even going so far as to say that specific characters from those games would appear in Diablo III.

A similar answer was given for the necromancer, whose existence as a non-player character was revealed during a demo of Diablo III at the show. And naturally, there was one question about the fate of Tyrael, the archangel who destroys the world stone at the end of Diablo II. Blizzard wouldn't say much about this fan-favorite character, but they did say that those in the High Heavens aren't pleased with his actions.

The bulk of questions came from fans wanting to know about gameplay specifics. The answer that got greatest applause from the crowd dealt with loot drops. In previous Diablo games, you could kill a boss, and a lower-level player could come along and steal your loot, but this won't be the case for Diablo III. All loot is generated on a per-player basis and can be seen only by that player, so if you defeat a boss, you'll have your own set of loot that will be different from others.

DIII's funky monk.
DIII's funky monk.

Other answers that got a reaction from the crowd came from the questions about a map editor and third-party UI add-ons. Because of the technology involved in randomly generating maps, there will be no map editor for Diablo III, and since the development team has spent so much time trying to make the UI as straightforward and as easy to understand as possible, the game won't support those add-ons either.

Some other interesting tidbits that came from the panel range from the status of the Horadric Cube to gambling. For the Horadric Cube, Blizzard said that it liked the way you could take items and turn them into new ones, but they weren't happy with the implementation, so they want to keep that mechanic but handle it a little differently.

As for gambling, Blizzard acknowledges that one of the biggest hurdles was understanding how it worked. Some people walked up, spent money, won nothing, and never gambled again, while the hardcore players used it frequently. For Diablo III, Blizzard wants to give people another method for earning items aside from going on runs, so expect to see gambling (or something like it) return, albeit with some tweaks.

Quote: "I wouldn't discount anything, but at this time, I can't say." -- a Blizzard representative's response when asked whether or not the monk will be able to throw hadoukens.

The Takeaway: The main messages that Blizzard tried to convey with this panel is that the team is trying to grow the world of Diablo III while simultaneously making the series more accessible than it already is. Therefore, much of the focus is on the gameplay and ensuring that nothing gets in the way of making a smooth and entertaining gameplay experience that doesn't require hours upon hours of dedication to get the most out of it.

Please use a html5 video capable browser to watch videos.
This video has an invalid file format.
00:00:00
Sorry, but you can't access this content!
Please enter your date of birth to view this video

By clicking 'enter', you agree to GameSpot's
Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

GameSpot may get a commission from retail offers.

Got a news tip or want to contact us directly? Email news@gamespot.com

Join the conversation
There are 175 comments about this story
175 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for luisfer17
luisfer17

44

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

-_- just release the game, god damint

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Brother_of_bit
Brother_of_bit

26

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Its sad that games these days are being dumbed down so much. Im sure im gonna love this game, but it seems they have tried to make it as simple as possible, and while that can be good for some of the stupider players it makes the game boring. The same thing happened with Supreme Commander 2, which was a horrible insult the the legend of the first SupCom

Upvote • 
Avatar image for coliraby
coliraby

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I kind of respect Blizzard's way of dealing with release dates. Having the release date as "when it's done" is great because then we all know the game isn't going to get released until it's the best it will be. This way there's not worry about them rushing to get it done, or continually pushing back the release date. If I remember correctly in the Diablo manual it said Diablo II coming in 1998... but then the game wasn't released until 2000, and I'm not complaining cause it was worth the wait. Keep up the good work Blizzard.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for keith21uk
keith21uk

112

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Why dont Blizzard give us a date for this game coming out? Come on now Blizzard this has got way past way over the top. Stick your necks out and give us an actual quarter at least. They are still too busy milking people on World of Warcraft to give a damn I think. The point in bringing out the new expansion so soon is?? Ofc its all about money, they dont want a single person the quit wow. But guess what Blizz I have quit wow after playing it from the very first day it came out. Far too much of my life wasted on it and no longer becoming fun but hard unpaid work. Remember seeing a date of march 09 last year on Play.com then that got put in the bin. Come on bliz please!

Upvote • 
Avatar image for taevion0
taevion0

173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

wtf happen to the rest of the vid?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for minty_cbo
minty_cbo

98

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

well,i can say a lot about this..and considering im a diablo fanboy from the 90's ,guess i will,well..the graphics.blizzard knows not all the d2 players have great computers and thats where the fan base for this game will be from (duh).(diablo 2 can be ran on a 233mhz computer with dial up internet,think about it) so thers my thought on that aspect.im looking at my other computer right now on d2 on east server atm there are 45390 users playing 31339 games of d2 lod ..thats a nice chunk for a 10 year old game.(granted that can be seen at any given time,it obviously does vary) and that was out of 135736 total playing 39215 games on battle.net alone. as for my thought on tyreal and the gods bein pissed at him..my money says he's gonna be a boss in the mid to end of the game.lastly for now.. if this game is pay to play ..im not getting world of diablo..bad enough the graphics are close to that of WoW ..but oh well..you can run WoW on a modest system..so..time will tell..ps no PvP this will flop,and as for the hacks ..ty ..sick of em as it is..but.. they hacked WoW and wc3 to the point blizzard was at a standstill(patch and reset on d2 has been delzayed 3 months now) so..if they can hack WoW ..wouldnt surprise me here..well..like i said ..time will tell

Upvote • 
Avatar image for hobobobo00
hobobobo00

49

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

i think im definetly getting this game its too bad its not coming out until another year or more likely 2

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Tanatos1488
Tanatos1488

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

I've never been a hardcore fan of the diablo series, first game I didn't even understand it, Diablo 2 was another story I didn't finish it but I did enjoy it, now with the engine blizzard is using on this game I can confidently say "We are looking at the next of Blizzard's blockbusters". Although I'm a little dissapointed about the graphics, when you compare them to the graphics of the upcoming SC2 one can not do anything but wonder, has blizzard despite all its talent, wants to stick only to WoW graphics, nevertheless i'm expecting this game (hopefully i'll have a better computer when it comes out XD ).

Upvote • 
Avatar image for IronTrooper
IronTrooper

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Diablo III will be another revolution, the only bad things are light radius, dropping potion, cartoon graphic. Too bad, it would hit 10 then definitely

Upvote • 
Avatar image for zoeyleft
zoeyleft

363

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

sc2 is supposed to be sc1 with new coat. Those who didnt play sc1 will probably play it now cause it got acceptable graphics. and they might love it or hate it, who cares. same with diablo3, its basically diablo2 on steroids. there's a reason why mario and zelda games are always good, cause it's the same winning game at the core.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for ChristianKiss
ChristianKiss

326

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

@Diernes: I understand where you're coming from. I also felt that Blizzard wanted to mix World of Warcraft and Diablo, which would suck. But after watching the gameplay videos, I kinda liked the fact they decided to maintain the old-school feel. That's why I didn't bother with the lack of *really* new characters and so. Well, I can't say much about StarCraft II, because I'm not really a RTS fan. I got addicted to Warcraft II: Battle.net Edition and then I stopped with RTSes. So far, I'm with ya. StarCraft II does look like the first one, but with remaked graphics. I hope I'm wrong. =) However, looking at *all* the games released by Blizzard, I can't give you a single example of a mediocre game. Not even the oldies, such as Blackthorne and Warcraft: Orcs 'n Humans are bad. Considering the fact that Blizzard never fails on game developing, I guess they'll not screw up with these new titles.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Diernes
Diernes

378

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

Simply because I havent seen anything that has got me excited and I am suck of the boring class design. As for SC II whats it actually doing apart from a new coat of paint? Relic are actually pushing the rts genre further. There is something to be said for if it's not broke ect.... but Blizzard are just resting on ntheir laurels. This Diablo just reeks of being designed by the WOW team and thats a game i have nothing but hatred for. I am also angry they said the necro wasnt in the game because they werent bringing back any new classes, and on the other hand they have the barbarian and now the monk which was from diablo 1. So far the wizard is the only class I am actually interested and thats sad, considering I played all the classes in D2 bar the Barb.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for ChristianKiss
ChristianKiss

326

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

Why this hate about the Monk fella? I see him as a proper replacement to the Assassin. And, please, explain me why so many Diablo fans are bothered with the Wizard class? The game needs a spellcaster character, so they gave a different name this time (since "Sorceror" and "Sorcerer" were used in the first Diablo and its sequel). And, as stated above: "Therefore, much of the focus is on the gameplay and ensuring that nothing gets in the way of making a smooth and entertaining gameplay experience that doesn't require hours upon hours of dedication to get the most out of it." Nuff said, from my point of view. To Diernes: No, I disagree. You said that Diablo II, Warcraft and Starcraft were amazing titles in the past, so what makes you think that Diablo III and Starcraft II will suck? The games weren't even released yet. You're blaming Blizzard for their upcoming titles for no reason, IMO. After I try the game (Diablo III, for example), I'll have an opinion about it. Until then, it's all expeculation. As far as I'm concerned, they're just improving the original formula. Let's wait and see if it will work.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Vargre666
Vargre666

164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

You cant dwnld Diablo III yet...it hasnt been released. Its not going to be released any time soon. What is it, 3rd or 4th quarter of 2010? Awhile yet anyhow...so keep your knickers on.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Medo01
Medo01

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

any one help here

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Medo01
Medo01

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

hey how i can download Diablo III

Upvote • 
Avatar image for ProProzach
ProProzach

36

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

eh i like final fantasy 14 more just cuz of the graphics and im a die hard final fantasy fan

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Hauteon
Hauteon

53

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

oh man, this game is so damn good :O It looks even better than the legendary Diablo 2!

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Megamanx266
Megamanx266

277

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Innovation is not always a good thing.. Why fix something when it isn't broken? Blizzard knows they stumbled on some great formulas for their games.. why go and mess it all up on something you have no idea will work with the community until the game releases. Granted, Innovation can be a good thing too. But you can't go too heavy on Innovation otherwise you ruin the spirit of the game you are trying to improve.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Diernes
Diernes

378

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

Britney spears sells millions of albums to, does that make her music perfection?...... Popularity doesnt always mean good. Blizzard have made some quality titles in the past, but I really think they are starting to ride on the coatails of their successes at this point. Because of the rampart fanboism which goes along with anything they do, with this publisher I think the whole industry gets a little warped about how good their games actually are. Yeah I know my statements are unpopular, but someone has to say it.... For their times Diablo 2, Starcraft and warcraft were amazing titles. Things have moved on though, we need something new and special especially in regard to the Action RPG, but I am just not seeing it yet. Blizzard north were disbanded and it's obvious the WOW people are working on this version of our beloved franchise.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for The_Lord_Rahl
The_Lord_Rahl

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Many hours of my life will disappear once this game is released. Hope it sticks to the basics of the genre while giving new content in every regards.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for thatmy
thatmy

101

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

@JakeYourself wtf.......Hellgate London?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for cowmaster2k3
cowmaster2k3

2551

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

So excited about D3! although I agree with Diernes... I want to see Blizzard announce a brand new IP sometime... seems like they are just milking the same 3 franchises that started over a decade ago. Nonetheless, Diablo is my favorite series from them! :]

Upvote • 
Avatar image for gerti31
gerti31

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

po po shume mire.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for weapon93
weapon93

189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

djwood is right on. Blizzard just dosn't make bad games. They arn't for everyone, but they are great games. Don't like it? Too bad.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for -Hiki-
-Hiki-

44

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Just like djwood said I mean if you don't like it play another game and stop complaining about it. O yeah and I can't wait for both Diablo III and Starcraft II.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for djwood84
djwood84

712

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 37

User Lists: 0

Hey moron bashing blizz, calling it overrated... World of Warcraft (10.7 million subscribers) StarCraft including Brood War expansion (9.5 million) Diablo II (4 million) Diablo II: Lord of Destruction [expansion pack] (3 million) Warcraft III: Reign of Chaos (3 million) Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne [expansion pack] (5 million) Diablo (2.5 million) Warcraft II: Tides of Darkness (1 million) So yeah... I'm sorry, your point was... what?? Blizz always makes a 4star product, you don't like it? Go play something else. Don't call me a fanboy just because I enjoy perfection.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for zhao9us
zhao9us

67

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@ Taylor14 the wizards IS (basically) the sorceress... and the witch doctor has kindof a similar concept as the druid... now if only they could release the necro (under a different name i guess, cuz their "not bringing any of the old classes back"... heh... as if....

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Taylor_14
Taylor_14

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

been waiting for this game like 5 years, come on jesus christ, and i hope they keep the sorceress and druid

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Diernes
Diernes

378

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

Oh and blizzard stop announcing your games so early. Please just wait till it's about a year out and then announce. What you guys do really isnt nessesary. Seriously alot of the time you guys announce a game and then by the time it see's the light of day I am sick to death of hearing about it. I guess you need something to talk about at blizzcon, but how about comming up with some original IP's instead? Oh thats right, all your big hit's were obviously thought up by people such as blizzard north who have since left the company.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Diernes
Diernes

378

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

The monk....... THE MONK!? (goes off to cut wrists.) Did they sit around a table and come up with all their classes for this game in two minutes? For god's sake blizzard get some originality! And what happened about not bringing any other classes back from the previous games? The monk was one of the classes in the original Diablo expantion pack! Where the hell is my necromancer? In other words everything you said about not bringing back the necromancer was a stright up LIE, and no, the witchdoctor is not a replacement! what a cop-out. How about a demonologist type class which can morph into demonic forms, hell even a nice dark knight class would be prefereable to what we have here. I really fail to see why blizzard gets so much hype and fan base. World of warcraft is easy, ugly and boring. Starcraft II is just going to be the same old thing with a fresh code of paint which will probably look dated on release anyway, and now look what they are doing with diablo. I assume the last class will be some sort of thief/ranged damage dealer because it seems blizzard have no original thought. and I will be left with only one class that interests me in the game, the Wizard(ess). Just rename her the sorceress already and be done with it.... yeah flame away blizzard fanboi's. But the reality is I love diablo and ever time something is released about this new entry my heart sink's even further. Blizzard have to be one of the most over rated developers or all time.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for shadowolf612
shadowolf612

80

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

AGAINST FARM ANIMALS YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!! BLOOD AND GORE

Upvote • 
Avatar image for alguLoD
alguLoD

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Marc5477, read the article. Loot is not dependent on who lands the final blow or deals the most damage. The people at Blizzard are not total morons. There is loot dropped for EVERY player when a random mook gets killed, but any one player's loot can't be seen by another player- Say if a three-player party kills Diablo, then three separate sets of loot is dropped, for each player. Gee, read the article next time.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for AlexeyValentine
AlexeyValentine

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

New loot system means i dont have to go kill diablo alone for the item ;_;

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Osiris_of_hell
Osiris_of_hell

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

The D1 exp pac was pretty good even though it was made by sierra. D3 looks awesome but I really hope they tweak with it a bit a few things seem a bit off, but other than that cant wait =Þ

Upvote • 
Avatar image for marc5477
marc5477

388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

I think the loot idea is good but I see another problem. How are "kills" be allocated? I can see it now, other players will simply sit around in a corner and then run up in the last second to get the killing blow thereby getting the loot even though they did nothing to earn it. If they try to do it based on damage done during combat then all the kids will make the same high damage dealing builds and ruin the game for all the other RPG type players who might look for PUG's. I wonder how they plan to implement their new rule.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for thatmy
thatmy

101

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

no no no it's india indians Hellgate London is the best of all times. LMAO. oh D3 welcome back.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for shooters125
shooters125

506

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

klitfet your are so very wrong i mean the monk just being there shows on how diablo will affect all of the places in the world including where the monk is from which shows its international fight against diablo

Upvote • 
Avatar image for harveydanger22
harveydanger22

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

The game looks great! I am really looking forward to playing it, But I also feel that so far it is looking like a lack luster game. Blizzard keeps talking about how flashy the game looks. I do not really want to see the flashiness, but the bloody fleshiness.I say work more on the way a beast dies rather than how it's done in. I mean come on, if stone skin looks like a crystal suit on a sorceress. then you should not call it stone skin, how about crystal armor. The point is im not looking for a flashy light show. Effects are great but that will get old when you see the effect one hundred times. I really want to see a unique skill tree and better drops. In D2 i have killed Diablo countless times and only once did he drop a unique item. I got the majority of my items off of run of the mill kills. Lets all hope that they change these problems or D3 will only be a flasher D2.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Hauteon
Hauteon

53

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

D2 sucked , dude wtf? Diablo 2 was awesome !!

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Obscenemuse
Obscenemuse

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I just hope they make it better than D2 because D2 sucked compared to the first one, and Hellfire Xpac with the Monk for Diablo 1 ROCKED!!

Upvote • 
Avatar image for bharath_yp
bharath_yp

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

good to know, no?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Pyramid_Swim
Pyramid_Swim

8325

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Klitfelt, how does a Monk, who is essentially the holy warrior of DIII, like the Paladin, not fit into the theme of killing demons. Unlike the Paladin, though, he looks like he's based on speed just like the Assassin, who was also based on martial arts, and even had a martial arts tree. The Assassin was second only to Necromancers in fun factor anyway, and the Monk clearly looks inspired by the Assassin.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for foxes8787
foxes8787

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Holy crap learn some patience! I've been waiting for starcraft 2 for a few years now but i understand why they wait to put them out. Think of it this way, the longer they work on it, the better the game will be. Would you like it now and the game only be half made? I didn't think so...

Upvote • 
Avatar image for KristoffBrujah
KristoffBrujah

1860

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Screw Starcraft and Warcraft... where is my Diablo? :)

Upvote • 
Avatar image for rencrash
rencrash

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

this is taking way too long to come out now... making everybody’s expectations a bit to high... will be a great game! but it needs to be released now...

Upvote • 
Avatar image for klitfelt
klitfelt

1987

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

seriously.... a monk in a demonic world!!! I just cant picture it.... Being a huge fan of D and D2 I just think that a karate/kung fu monk is not right in this world of demons, skeletons, undead etc.... Will he defeat diablo with a simple punch or a spinning kick!?!?!... That is not the way to battle hordes of foul creatures in my opinion. I must say.. I'm a little disapointed.What do you think???

Upvote • 
Avatar image for fel_rossi
fel_rossi

371

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

lol

Upvote • 
Avatar image for DrizztDoUrden16
DrizztDoUrden16

105

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Its just so beautiful... if having no life and playing this game 24/7 is wrong then i dont want to be right.

Upvote •