Clinton, Lieberman propose CDC investigate games

Democratic Senators from New York and Connecticut are asking the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to investigate "impact of electronic media use."

208 Comments

A handful of US senators who are longtime foes of the video game industry took a first step Wednesday toward a future government crackdown.

Democrats Joseph Lieberman of Connecticut, Hillary Clinton of New York, and Dick Durbin of Illinois persuaded a Senate committee to approve a sweeping study of the "impact of electronic media use" to be organized by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or CDC.

Even though the legislation--called the Children and Media Research Advancement Act--does not include restrictions, it appears to be intended as a way to justify them. That's because a string of court decisions have been striking down antigaming laws because of a lack of hard evidence that minors are harmed by violence in video games.

This "is a big step toward helping parents get the information they need about the effect of media on their children," Lieberman said after the vote by the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. Lieberman's two Republican cosponsors of the bill are senators Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania and Sam Brownback of Kansas.

The original version of the bill earmarked $90 million for the study, but Lieberman press secretary Rob Sawicki said that the committee had approved the measure without any dollar figure and that such a figure would be added later during the appropriations process.

Lieberman boasts on his Web site that he "held the first hearings on the threat posed to children by video game violence" and strong-armed the industry into developing a ratings system under threat of government action. He and Clinton introduced legislation late last year that would ban the sale or rental of any "mature" or "ratings pending" video game to a minor, and Lieberman has singled out Rockstar's Grand Theft Auto for particular criticism.

If the CDC eventually produces a study claiming a link between violent video games and harm to minors, the future of state and federal laws targeting such games could be radically different. So far, those laws have been ruled unconstitutional because judges have not found that kind of link to exist.

"Down the road when--if there is some sort of finding that there is harm in this--then we're going to see calls to regulate speech because of the potential harm," said Marv Johnson, legislative counsel to the American Civil Liberties Union. "That's where there's going to be a problem."

Missouri's St. Louis County had enacted a law prohibiting anyone from selling, renting or making available "graphically violent" video games to minors without a parent's or guardian's consent. But the 8th US Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that "before the county may constitutionally restrict the speech at issue here, the county must come forward with empirical support for its belief that 'violent' video games cause psychological harm to minors."

In 2004, a federal district judge in Washington state tossed out a law penalizing the distribution of games to minors in which harm may come to a "public law enforcement officer." The "state of the research" does not justify the ban, US District Judge Robert Lasnik ruled.

Lieberman's bill, called CAMRA, would provide funding to investigate the cognitive, physical, and sociobehavioral impact of electronic media on child and adolescent development--everything from physical coordination, diet, and sleeping habits to attention span, peer relationships, and aggression levels. Television, motion pictures, DVDs, interactive video games, the Internet, and cell phones would all be fair game.

But not all reception has been positive. The advocacy group Citizens Against Government Waste deemed Lieberman its "porker of the month" shortly after the measure was first introduced, criticizing him for spending taxpayer money on "redundant studies" already undertaken by groups like the Kaiser Family Foundation and the American Academy of Pediatrics.

It was not immediately clear how much the original bill was amended beyond the funding component or when it would receive a full Senate vote. A similar bill introduced by Rep. Edward Markey, a Massachusetts Democrat, has not yet been considered by the US House of Representatives.

Got a news tip or want to contact us directly? Email news@gamespot.com

Join the conversation
There are 208 comments about this story
208 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for GhettoGamer256
GhettoGamer256

No study has ever proven that video game violence affects children. I've read I don't know how many studies that state that it is the mental state of the child that makes them have problems, not the games. All of us grew up playing Mortal Combat and I still haven't killed anyone... well that anyone knows about.

Avatar image for Sub-Zero82
Sub-Zero82

I would like to see a hard study as well, one that isn't biased in either way. All studies that have been done so far have excluded external factors, such as family situation( beaten, negelected, single parent, etc.) and pressures at school (bullying, etc) The only positive that I see in this is that all forms of entertainment are included, even though I know that games are the target, at least every other form will be targeted as well, and if any law does pass, at least it will be universal to al entertainment.

Avatar image for sjansen100
sjansen100

The fatal assumption they make is that these games have a wide impact. Of course certain individuals are affected. They have difficulty seperating reality from fantasy. The rest of us are being put under a microscope because of it. If they were really worried about our well being they should outlaw tabacco, alcohol, red meat, high polluting cars such as SUV's, stop going to war and pissing off the rest of the world, concentrate on educating the children and get off their high horses.

Avatar image for deactivated-5ae060efb3bf6

Typical Democrats...never want to be responsible for their actions.

Avatar image for Donkeljohn
Donkeljohn

The CDC. . . investigating games? Perhaps they should worry more about the Bird Flu.

Avatar image for Mechakucha
Mechakucha

Oh, hell no. I pay taxes to help society. Build roads, fund schools, police, firefighters, water supplys, all that stuff. Now they want to waste it on this (among other things)? Why can't they just read some the upteen reports that have been done on this already?

Avatar image for frankeyser
frankeyser

i would like to see some indepth study done on this to dissprove or prove that vedio games can influence violence in society. if it does i think it will be the same as other forms of media but i would still like to see a hard study on it.

Avatar image for blackIceJoe
blackIceJoe

THats real nice I can't wait to find out more.What is so wrong in GTA do they want people to do this stuff in real life.I almost wonder if they do want us to.I say it is better to do it in a game and get it out of are system then we feel we do not have to do it.Also me and a lot of other people would never do this in real life.If she is to run for office in the next two year's the way she is going she would never get vote.Even though she never would get it before I just say now there would be no way she would.I think if she does want to get into office she should try more important stuff to get at.She will lose a lot of votes because gamers will not like her and even the new people that can vote and there is a lot of gamers out there.I really can not think what more game she would try to take away if she won.Now that is a scary thought.