Feature Article

Blade's 20th Anniversary: A Marvel Movie That Still Holds Up

There may be cringe-worthy moments, but Blade ages exceptionally well.

Blade turned 20 years old on August 21, and while that may be hard to believe, a look at any CGI scene in the movie makes its age pretty obvious. However, two decades later, Blade still holds up as a great comic book movie. Additionally, the movie is still a ton of fun, even though it feels very much a product of its time.

In 1997, the fourth installment in the Batman movie series, Batman & Robin, came out and was panned by both critics and Batman fans. It was the second Batman film directed by Joel Schumacher, and for many comic book readers at the time, it felt this would be the last attempt at a comic book movie for the foreseeable future. The bright lights, dayglow attire, and atrocious costume design coupled with an asinine story made audiences hate superhero movies. Despite the reception, New Line Cinema released Blade in August 1998. This was the first adapted superhero movie to star a black actor that stepped away from the source material, as others in that specific genre--like Spawn and Steel--came off as goofy or cheesy as they were more direct translations.

No Caption Provided

Blade distinguished itself because it wasn't trying to be a superhero movie. It wasn't trying to be the precursor to the Marvel-movie factory. Blade wasn't even trying to be a good comic book adaptation because it was more concerned with being a cool vampire movie. When it was released, Americans were at the tail-end of a vampire-craze, which started with Bram Stoker's Dracula and gave us such films as Interview With A Vampire and From Dusk Till Dawn. However, being that it was the end of the era, Blade was surrounded by rushed and poorly made vamp films that were the real-life equivalent of your grandparents learning about memes: it's a cute attempt, but they're doing it wrong. For its time, that's why it stood out: it was surrounded by really bad movies.

The film didn't destroy box office records. While it cost $45 million to make, Blade raked in $131 million globally; however, this was a rated-R movie, which limited its audience. Many critics hated Blade. Some didn't like the movie because it wasn't enough of a horror film, others for it not being more like Interview With A Vampire, and some spent too much time comparing Blade to screenwriter David Goyer's previous work, Dark City. What they, and even those involved with the film, failed to realize is that Blade was a complete reboot to the superhero genre.

It became a template for how to create a superhero movie that isn't cheesy or handcuffed to its source material. Sure, Blade contains some incredibly cheesy moments, like when Blade and a vampire are throwing multiple roundhouse kicks at each other like two people practicing their capoeira routine for their upcoming showcase on a Travel Channel show. There is also the fact the CGI has not aged well, and while the movie relies much more on practical effects, a scene towards the end of the film where winged skeletons fly around Deacon Frost (Stephen Dorff) wouldn't have held up in 2001, let alone 2018.

And like most movies from the late '90s, Blade contains a rave scene, but at least Blade makes it interesting with a rainshower of blood. What makes this movie work is that it effectively mixes genres and doesn't take itself too seriously. There are a few witty one-liners laced throughout, but unlike later Marvel movies, Blade isn't trying to be a comedy.

The character Blade on his own wouldn't make for an exceptionally interesting movie. He's a daywalking, half-vampire who kills other vampires. Where this movie shines is with Deacon Frost's story. He's a younger vamp who finds the ways of the vampires in charge to be apathetic and complacent with their role in society, so by reading into some old vampiric prophecies, Frost brings in a changing of the guard by destroying the elders and empowering himself with La Magra, the blood god.

The story of a villain turning on his allies isn't something new by any means. However, the way Blade incorporates the Marvel Comics villain and some of his storylines, and adapts it to the big screen, making it stripped down and more palatable for the average moviegoer, was incredibly fresh for the time, and something we're much more used to seeing today, like with Loki. Loki sure does love betraying his friends.

In many ways, Blade is better than many comic book movies from the past decade. There's no origin story, and viewers aren't bogged down with the same "hero's journey" tale they've seen time and time again. There is no "call to arms" for Blade. He's already killing vampires, and he's really good at it. This is yet another reason it's so watchable two decades later--it puts us right into the action, as Blade isn't a complicated character. The audience doesn't need an expositional scene of Blade running through all his powers and why he is like he is: it's sprinkled throughout the film, rather than treating the viewer like a simpleton who won't understand what's going on without an explicit explanation.

Sure, Blade is one of the few comic book adaptations from the mid-to-late '90s that's watchable in 2018. If you're ever wondering how comic book movies got so popular and what started the superhero craze, look towards Blade, as it is the movie that kicked off this current trend with X-Men and Spider-Man following in its footsteps a couple years later. Blade is currently available for purchase on Google Play, Vudu, iTunes, Amazon Video, and YouTube. For a couple dollars more, you can buy all three Blade movies, on Blu-ray, on Amazon.

Got a news tip or want to contact us directly? Email news@gamespot.com


Mat Elfring

Editor of GameSpot Entertainment. Continues to Bolieve. Very snarky about wrestling on the Twitter.
Back To Top
15 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for spartanx169x

Why is a 5 month old article being recycled?

Avatar image for Darko-TDR


I've seen it happen with some other articles here, but not 5 month old ones.

Avatar image for ichigo16

It was awesome movie i remember watching it back in the day. THe special effects are nothing great in current day but still it's a great movie defienietly worth to watch and way better then many new "great" movies

Avatar image for Hondje89

Funny how in the first paragraph it's stated that Blade takes it self seriously and then two paragraphs later it's stated that it doesn't.

Avatar image for Fartman7998

I agree. Blade is underappreciated big time. I'm just waiting for his popularity to rise inevitably with Marvel's new stuff so I can feel like an OG fan

Avatar image for arithonuk

Blade was an excellent film and still stands out. Blade was the first DVD I ever bought. It's a film I still go back and watch frequently. Sad to say the sequels didn't live up to the original.

It was the first mainstream black superhero (or at least anti-hero) film without selling itself as such. It was just a good film. Damn good. People poke fun at the CGI or other flaws two decades later, but compare it with the "big releases" of that year Godzilla, Armageddon, Lost in Space, etc. there's no contest.

The vampire films proceeding it - like Coppola's (not Stoker's) Dracula with it's cringe-worthy accents "excellent vampire dude!" (Bill & Ted's Romanian adventure) or Interview with a Vampire with is miscast lead & illogical plot changes, Tom Cruise is not a 6ft tall young French nobleman in any universe (dark or otherwise) - they altered the source material and the nature of the Vampires to include some political agenda of the time, much to the detriment of the story and the end result.

As a big fan of the Vampire genre, Blade is a film that got it right, where so many get it horribly wrong. "I am Legend" being a recent disaster - a vampire film with no vampires in it, just CGI zombies?!

The most stand-out Vampire film since, was 30 Days of Night. The rest, if you'll pardon the pun, mostly suck.

Avatar image for cornbredx

I disagree. While the open blood club scene is great, the pacing for the rest of the movie is bad, and the plot is middling at best. Even the off beat vampire designs are fairly rote at this point. Imnot sure if i used "rote" right, but anyway the design in that film became fairly cliche and somewhat lamer over time.

Avatar image for vfighter

@cornbredx: Good thing you're a very small minority with that opinion.

Avatar image for superklyph

Damn good movie. Blade 2 was pretty good as well. Blade 3? Yuck.

Avatar image for cornbredx

@superklyph: i respectfully disagree.

blade 2 is significantly worse with a really poor script, multiple awful heel turns (several of which are obvious), and tons of padding.

The only good parts of the film is the fight choreography, and the practical effects.

Yes, blade 3 is trash, though.

Avatar image for wicked_laugh

@cornbredx: blade 2 has perhaps some of the best martial arts fight scenes overall in a western movie, perhaps ever? For sure the best final fight. Not surprising considering Donnie Yen was the choreographer.

The rest of the movie is as you say though.

Avatar image for vfighter

@cornbredx: Blade 2 is just as good as the first but for different reasons, it's the rare sequel that holds up just as well as the original. And just like all marvel movies (minus captain) the third movie was awful.

Avatar image for superklyph

@cornbredx: I thought Blade 2 was pretty good. The RT aggregate score is higher than the first one too. I certainly liked the first one better though.

Avatar image for lonewolf1044

@superklyph: Yep 1 and 2 was my favorite movies, I didn't know Snipes is an weapons expert.