Banned Hearthstone Player Speaks Out After Blizzard Releases Statement

"Our relationships in China had no influence on our decision."

218 Comments

Blizzard recently found itself embroiled in controversy when it banned a professional Hearthstone player and rescinded his thousands of dollars in prize money after they expressed support for the Hong Kong protests in China.

The player, blitzchung, made his statement during a victory interview--and this was in violation of "rules he acknowledged and understood, and this is why we took action," Blizzard's president J. Allen Brack said in a statement.

Brack went on to say its decision was not driven by its relationship with its partners in China. "The specific views expressed by blitzchung were NOT a factor in the decision we made. I want to be clear: our relationships in China had no influence on our decision," Brack said.

The executive went on to say that Blizzard enforces rules about what can and cannot be said during player interviews to "keep the focus on the game and on the tournament." For this reason--and this reason alone--Blizzard decided to take action against blitzchung.

"If this had been the opposing viewpoint delivered in the same divisive and deliberate way, we would have felt and acted the same," Brack said.

While Blizzard is standing by its decision to punish, Brack acknowledged that the company made some mistakes in how it handled the situation and specifically how it determined the penalties against blitzchung. "We've had a chance to pause, to listen to our community, and to reflect on what we could have done better. In hindsight, our process wasn't adequate, and we reacted too quickly," Blizzard said.

"We want to ensure that we maintain a safe and inclusive environment for all our players, and that our rules and processes are clear. All of this is in service of another important Blizzard value--Play Nice; Play Fair."

Brack said that blitzchung competed in the Hearthstone tournament in a fair manner, and as such, he still should have been paid the prize money he earned. "We now believe he should receive his prizing," Brack said.

However, Brack said "playing fair" encompasses conduct during match play and after, which would include his Hong Kong comments from the post-match interview.

In terms of his suspension, Brack said a six-month ban is "more appropriate" than the one-year suspension that was announced earlier. "There is a consequence for taking the conversation away from the purpose of the event and disrupting or derailing the broadcast," Brack said.

The shoutcasters were also caught up in the controversy, and Blizzard is banning them as well for steering the conversation away from the game. "With regard to the casters, remember their purpose is to keep the event focused on the tournament. That didn't happen here, and we are setting their suspension to six months as well," Brack said.

"One of our goals at Blizzard is to make sure that every player, everywhere in the world, regardless of political views, religious beliefs, race, gender, or any other consideration always feels safe and welcome both competing in and playing our games."

Responding to Blizzard's statement, blitzchung said in his own statement that he is grateful for Blizzard for reducing his ban. He added that, at the time he deviated from the script and spoke about the Hong Kong protests, he knew he "might have penalty or consequence for my act." Going forward, blitzchung said, "I will be more careful on that and express my opinions or show my support to Hong Kong on my personal platforms."

Regarding the reinstatement of his prize money, blitzchung said he spoke with Blizzard on the phone and he accepts their decision. Regarding the reduction in time of his suspension from one year to six months, blitzchung said he appreciates Blizzard reconsidering, but maintains that six months is still too long.

"To be honest, I think six months is still quite a lot to me," he said.

And on the subject of the penalties that some Hearthstone shoutcasters received, blitzchung said, "I wish Blizzard can reconsider about their penalty on the two casters involved."

While blitzchung will be able to compete again in professional Hearthstone tournaments, he's not sure if he will. "Honestly, I have no idea on that yet. Since my next tournament is very likely to be the grandmaster tournament of next season, it's probably at least a few months from now on," he said. "I will take this time to relax myself to decide if I am staying in competitive Hearthstone scene or not."

"Hearthstone changed my the way I live, I really love this community. Blessing to all the players out there, and blessing to Blizzard."

Blitzchung's statement can be read in full below.

After Blizzard announced its action against blitzchung, whose real name is Ng Wai Chung, the response was fierce, with gamers calling for boycotts and some deleting their accounts. US Senators criticized the move as censorship, some Blizzard employees staged their own protest, and host personalities like Brian Kibler announced they would no longer shoutcast Hearthstone events. Most recently Hearthstone's first ever World Champion, James Kostesich aka "Firebat," called the penalty ridiculous and unreasonable.

Blizzard's big fan convention, BlizzCon, is scheduled to November. A group of gamers are organizing a protest over the Hong Kong situation at the event.

Full Blizzard Statement:

"Hello Blizzard Community . . .

I want to take a few minutes to talk to all of you about the Hearthstone Grandmasters tournament this past weekend. On Monday, we made the decision to take action against a player named blitzchung and two shoutcasters after the player shared his views on what’s happening in Hong Kong on our official broadcast channel.

At Blizzard, our vision is “to bring the world together through epic entertainment.” And we have core values that apply here: Think Globally; Lead Responsibly; and importantly, Every Voice Matters, encouraging everybody to share their point of view. The actions that we took over the weekend are causing people to question if we are still committed to these values. We absolutely are and I will explain.

Our esports programs are an expression of our vision and our values. Esports exist to create opportunities for players from around the world, from different cultures, and from different backgrounds, to come together to compete and share their passion for gaming. It is extremely important to us to protect these channels and the purpose they serve: to bring the world together through epic entertainment, celebrate our players, and build diverse and inclusive communities.

As to how those values apply in this case:

First, our official esports tournament broadcast was used as a platform for a winner of this event to share his views with the world.

We interview competitors who are at the top of their craft to share how they feel. We want to experience that moment with them. Hearing their excitement is a powerful way to bring us together.

Over the weekend, blitzchung used his segment to make a statement about the situation in Hong Kong—in violation of rules he acknowledged and understood, and this is why we took action.

Every Voice Matters, and we strongly encourage everyone in our community to share their viewpoints in the many places available to express themselves. However, the official broadcast needs to be about the tournament and to be a place where all are welcome. In support of that, we want to keep the official channels focused on the game.

Second, what is the role of shoutcasters for these broadcasts?

We hire shoutcasters to amplify the excitement of the game. They elevate the watchability and help the esports viewing experience stay focused on the tournament and our amazing players.

Third, were our actions based on the content of the message?

Part of Thinking Globally, Leading Responsibly, and Every Voice Matters is recognizing that we have players and fans in almost every country in the world. Our goal is to help players connect in areas of commonality, like their passion for our games, and create a sense of shared community.

The specific views expressed by blitzchung were NOT a factor in the decision we made. I want to be clear: our relationships in China had no influence on our decision.

We have these rules to keep the focus on the game and on the tournament to the benefit of a global audience, and that was the only consideration in the actions we took.

If this had been the opposing viewpoint delivered in the same divisive and deliberate way, we would have felt and acted the same.

OK, what could Blizzard have done better, and where do we go from here?

Over the past few days, many players, casters, esports fans, and employees have expressed concerns about how we determined the penalties. We’ve had a chance to pause, to listen to our community, and to reflect on what we could have done better. In hindsight, our process wasn’t adequate, and we reacted too quickly.

We want to ensure that we maintain a safe and inclusive environment for all our players, and that our rules and processes are clear. All of this is in service of another important Blizzard value—Play Nice; Play Fair.

In the tournament itself blitzchung *played* fair. We now believe he should receive his prizing. We understand that for some this is not about the prize, and perhaps for others it is disrespectful to even discuss it. That is not our intention.

But playing fair also includes appropriate pre-and post-match conduct, especially when a player accepts recognition for winning in a broadcast. When we think about the suspension, six months for blitzchung is more appropriate, after which time he can compete in the Hearthstone pro circuit again if he so chooses. There is a consequence for taking the conversation away from the purpose of the event and disrupting or derailing the broadcast.

With regard to the casters, remember their purpose is to keep the event focused on the tournament. That didn’t happen here, and we are setting their suspension to six months as well.

Moving forward, we will continue to apply tournament rules to ensure our official broadcasts remain focused on the game and are not a platform for divisive social or political views.

One of our goals at Blizzard is to make sure that every player, everywhere in the world, regardless of political views, religious beliefs, race, gender, or any other consideration always feels safe and welcome both competing in and playing our games.

At Blizzard, we are always listening and finding ways to improve—it is part of our culture. Thank you for your patience with us as we continue to learn.

Sincerely,

J. Allen Brack

President of Blizzard Entertainment"

Blitzchung Statement

"Thank you for your attention in the past one week, this is a personal statement and my view on Blizzard's latest decision. First of all, I'm grateful for Blizzard reconsidering their position about my ban. Earlier this week, I told media that I knew I might have penalty or consequence for my act, because I understand that my act could take the conversation away from the purpose of the event. In the future, I will be more careful on that and express my opinions or show my support to Hong Kong on my personal platforms.

Many people has been asking me if I accept the latest decision of Blizzard, I will discuss that on two parts. Tournament prizing and suspension. For tournament prizing, I quoted what Blizzard said on the official website, they mention that I played fair in the tournament and they believe I should receive my prizing. This is the part I really appreciate, Blizzard also said they understand for some this is not about the prize, but perhaps for others it is disrespectful to even discuss it. People from Blizzard had explained this to me through a phone call and I really appreciate that and I accept their decision on this part.

For second part about the suspension, Blizzard had changed their suspension on me from a year to six months. Once again, I appreciate for their reconsideration on this. To be honest, I think six months is still quite a lot to me. But I also being told that I can continue to compete in the hearthstone pro circuit which they mean the grandmaster tournament. I appreciate for this decision they made because grandmaster is currently the highest level tournament in competitive hearthstone. However, I wish Blizzard can reconsider about their penalty on the two casters involved.

Lastly, many people wants to know if i would be competing in hearthstone in the future. Honestly, I have no idea on that yet. Since my next tournament is very likely to be the grandmaster tournament of next season, it's probably at least a few months from now on. I will take this time to relax myself to decide if I am staying in competitive hearthstone scene or not.

Hearthstone changed my the way I live, I really love this community. Blessing to all the players out there, and blessing to Blizzard."

GameSpot may get a commission from retail offers.

Got a news tip or want to contact us directly? Email news@gamespot.com

Join the conversation
There are 218 comments about this story
218 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for jsprunk
JSprunk

2124

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 5

F Blizzard

F the Chinese gov’t

Love the Chinese people.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Shebuka
Shebuka

60

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

This is nuts guys...

Sports (and e-sports) must always be politics-free. Have you ever seen any first-place winner of any competition talk about politics? Any sport like F1, football/soccer, biathlon, short-track, etc. the winners in the interview are talking about the sport, not politics! And if they talk about politics there is always a consequence and even blitzchung knew it! I'm with Blizzard on this, keep sports politics-free.

If a Fortnite or PUBG or CS:GO champion talk about politics on their competition-winning e-sport interview there will be consequences for them too.

Do you want to talk about politics? Do it on a platform that allows it!

You are champion, you gain follower, you become an influencer, you go to podcasts and other social platforms and talk politics. But not in sports.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for apnance
apnance

119

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

NOT a fan of this new comment system.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for mogan
Mogan

14563

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

Mogan  Moderator

@apnance: Heck, man, I still miss DOWN votes.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for sparrow88
Sparrow88

30

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

So if someone starts spouting LGBT propaganda now can they be banned by their rules?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for sparrow88
Sparrow88

30

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

This makes me laugh, these companies are always so happy to let everyone how woke they are and how socially conscious they are but the min they actually have to take a stand on a REAL issue not some culture war bullshit they cave so quickly and so easy.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for totallytc
totallytc

165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Saying shit like it had nothing to do with china means... it had everything to do with china. blizzard just made things worse with that statement. Worthless corporate fucks.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for stunningham
Stunningham

118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@totallytc: and it's people like you that are the reason they had to come out and make this statement. It's clear from your attitude nothing will appease you.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for wretch1d
Wretch1d

925

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 5

Edited By Wretch1d

@stunningham: Better to see through the lies than be an apathetic sheep

Upvote • 
Avatar image for totallytc
totallytc

165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By totallytc

@stunningham: you mean people like me who can see directly through corporate bullshit. Its because of gullible people like you that this world is in the shape it is in. Open your fucking eyes

Upvote • 
Avatar image for deactivated-5ee6ac75b4256
deactivated-5ee6ac75b4256

7

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

So let me see if i understand this. There's protesting going on in Hong Kong and some Heartstone player said that he supported the protest and Blizzard which has nothing to do with Hongkong suspends/bans the player and takes his money away from him?

Wow something is seriously wrong with Blizzard. They basically is banning players because they have a difference of opinion. He committed no acts of violence or made any threats, just said he supported the protest lol. Great job Blizzard, good thing not everyone at the company feels that way though.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for stunningham
Stunningham

118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@radeonprowx: the point of it was that it detracted from the event, during an interview about the game you are expected to talk about the game. The casters weren't doing their job and were largely the reason why as well since they allowed it and pushed him into it.

It's the exact same reason many people get upset with, say, Brie Larson for talking about women's rights during interviews when they just want to know about the movie. Except it's flipped this time and people are upset that the guy wasn't allowed to talk about it.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for wretch1d
Wretch1d

925

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 5

Edited By Wretch1d

@stunningham: Womans rights and the totalatarian takeover of a region, i would say are a bit different. He did violate the rules but he also drew a lot of attention to the cause, Blizz overacted and were too heavy handed as they have vested interest in the Chinese market, company allegiances are something to look out for. Unless you dont care what you are supporting with your money.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for totallytc
totallytc

165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@stunningham: people fucking died all through out history for freedom and democracy. The right time to talk about being pro democracy is ALWAYS.

Go ask a Nam or Korean vet how they feel that chinese communist govt is affectively silencing amercians and americans corps. . Learn some fucking history and some respect

Upvote • 
Avatar image for dzimm
dzimm

6078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

This is what happens when socialist snowflakes are in charge.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for totallytc
totallytc

165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@dzimm: that makes no sense. Stop just saying shit without understanding a word of what you are saying. How is the bullshit comment coming from a Corporate Overload socialist?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for sparrow88
Sparrow88

30

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By Sparrow88

@totallytc: he's sort of right. Blizzard is pretty open about politics when it's "woke" politics and politics that they no are not gonna hurt them. When it comes to actually taking a moral stand they don't do it.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for dzimm
dzimm

6078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

@totallytc: Triggered.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for totallytc
totallytc

165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@dzimm: yeah sue me, i get triggered by idiots

Upvote • 
Avatar image for dzimm
dzimm

6078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

@totallytc: In that case, I suggest you avoid mirrors.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for totallytc
totallytc

165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@dzimm: Good one Cletus

Upvote • 
Avatar image for ecs33
ecs33

1748

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

Edited By ecs33

Ah cancel culture. Don't you love it?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Litchie
Litchie

27115

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

Edited By Litchie

It's gonna be hard for Blizzard to sit like hawks on all streams they have, so that no one ever talks about anything politicial again. Because if they don't, that whole statement they just gave us would be bullshit.

If anyone mentions Trump during a blizzard stream, I expect an immediate 1 year ban. If there was prize money invovled, I expect it to be revoked.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for lionheartssj1
lionheartssj1

4805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

So they don't allow ANY political talk? If someone started protesting American politics, they would also be banned?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for sparrow88
Sparrow88

30

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@lionheartssj1 said:

So they don't allow ANY political talk? If someone started protesting American politics, they would also be banned?

I'm betting if someone said **** trump they wouldn't ban them.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for sparrow88
Sparrow88

30

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@lionheartssj1: doubtful.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for naruto945
naruto945

479

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 63

User Lists: 0

So say they do just wanna stay on good terms with China what’s wrong with that? It’s their game they made and their tournament they created with their rules already set in place? Am I supposed to be outraged that they want to keep making money as a company? Since when is China’s corruption number one on the modern Americans conscience anyway?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for totallytc
totallytc

165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@naruto945: we fought two fucking wars to keep their influence from our shores.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

It seems obvious that their desire to maintain a solid relationship with China did have a big role in their decision. At least that's my perspective on it. This whole statement comes across as insincere and pandering.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for naomha1
naomha1

696

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

Personally, I feel like Blizzard is full of $hit. Do you winners not talk about anything at the Emmy's? The Oscars? The MTV music awards? Fuc'n gamers are more than just people pining away at a keyboard and mouse. For Blizzard to ban, in any way, a winner that has an opinion on something other than gaming is simply selfish and brazen.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for basketballfan
BasketballFan

510

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Not one use of the word sorry. All that matters.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for xshinobi
Xshinobi

2996

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

I'm conflicted on this whole situation. On one hand I agree with blitzchung's and the casters' statement but on the other hand I can't think of any employer that would allow me to use their platform or venue to express my personal political views. I feel that if Blizzard allowed blitzchung to use their platform to express his political views then they would have to allow everyone to use their platform and events to express their political views and how long would it be until someone with views that we don't like or agree decides to use Blizzard's platforms and venues to express their views.

I do feel that Blizzard went too far as I think that a warning or a month ban would have been preferable but I can understand that they don't want their platforms used to air the political views of its employees or players.

In end I really feel like Blizzard should have just warned him and casters and used this incident to inform people that going forward they ask that they don't use their platforms to express personal political views.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Thanatos2k
Thanatos2k

15799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@xshinobi: Most people aren't mad that he was punished, it's the severity being so out of whack (the STEALING of his prize money foremost, and the FIRING of both casters who had the gall to exist as he made the statement) with his offense such that it was clearly being driven by politics inside Blizzard.

Saying "no politics" but then punishing him based on politics is so hypocritical it can't be done while continuing to claim any sort of morals or integrity whatsoever, which is why the employees defaced the company values at HQ.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for phili878
phili878

2117

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

Blizzard is gone for me. That statement was nothing but lies. Go lick China’s feet for your money, modern day corporate prostitution at its best.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for ButDuuude
ButDuuude

1783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Not boycotting Blizzard. Don’t care how much the “woke” crowd whines about it.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for basketballfan
BasketballFan

510

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@ButDuuude: Have fun when we draft for WW3 son. Id be worried lol.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for sparrow88
Sparrow88

30

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@basketballfan: I already served.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for deactivated-5ee6ac75b4256
deactivated-5ee6ac75b4256

7

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@basketballfan: There's no WW3 coming, there was never any WW1. Relax.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for locke90
locke90

815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@ButDuuude said:

Not boycotting Blizzard. Don’t care how much the “woke” crowd whines about it.

Awww thats cute you think those opposed to china are woke.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for santinegrete
santinegrete

4785

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 45

User Lists: 0

@ButDuuude: you'll see a "not so rare rarity" military wanting the democracy abolished here and there, don't feel that special.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Sound_Demon
Sound_Demon

846

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

@ButDuuude: "Guys I just came here to say, I don't care!"

Upvote •