Ark: Survival Evolved Dev Talks Frame Rate Issues, PS4 Version, Comparisons to Minecraft

The best is yet to come.

52 Comments

Ark: Survival Evolved is a dinosaur game no one in the public knew about a year ago, developed by a studio you probably still do not know exists. Now, it's sold millions of copies on PC and the Xbox One version off to a fast start as well following its launch in the middle of December. These milestones are particularly noteworthy given the game isn't even done yet. Far from it, Studio Wildcard co-founder and creative director Jesse Rapczak tells GameSpot as part of a wide-ranging new interview.

No Caption Provided

On PC, Ark is available through Steam's Early Access program, while the Xbox One version is one of the few games in the console's Game Preview system. Ark is also coming to PlayStation 4, but Sony only allows certain games into its alpha program--and Ark isn't one of them (more on that later).

This level of openness and transparency represents something of a new wave for big-game development; the more traditional method is to spend years behind closed doors before releasing a finished product. That's a fine model that works well for many games. While early access is nothing new on PC, Ark is one of the first games of that nature on consoles--and it's enjoying success along the way.

GameSpot recently had the opportunity to catch up with Rapczak to discuss Ark's unique development model and more. Our conversation covers Ark's success so far, some of the challenges it's faced (frame rate concerns among them), plans for lots more seasonal and event-themed content, comparisons to Minecraft, why PS4 players will benefit from the Xbox One early access period, and more.

You can see our full interview below.

You've been out for over a month now. What kind of feedback are you getting?

Players told us that this is their favorite game ever. It seems weird to say that but it's not something that I've ever heard on any game that I've worked on before. You get a lot of people I think that are surprised that a game like this is on console with this type of game play, that they hadn't played a game quite like this before. A lot of people going into it I think didn't know what to expect and were finding themselves sinking hours and hours and hours into the game and being like, "Wow, this is just crazy. I've never played a game like this before." It's really interesting to see that coming from the console gamers because there wasn't really a game like this [on console]. On PC of course we have all these other survival games, multiplayer survival games that people are playing all the time. On console I mean, a lot of people are comparing it to Minecraft or something because that's kind of the closest thing they have in a lot of ways. We've heard things like, "This is like Minecraft for adults," which we love because I mean of course obvious reasons, Minecraft is awesome and blew up huge.

A lot of people have analogies with Minecraft's development path which is interesting to us because you know when Minecraft first came out it was a little rough around the edges for a while and then as they got more polished it spread from the PC to the consoles and everything like that. I think some people see some parallels they're making in their minds between the two. It's just been really interesting to hear that feedback.

Some have raised concerns about Ark's frame rate. What's your response to that?

The interesting thing about what's happening, you know Digital Foundry does an analysis of the game.... As a developer the game's not even in alpha as far as we're concerned. We still have a lot of features to add, you just talked about the game being open-ended, which is true but we also have kind of a backstory the players can discover that we're putting into the game, next month with Ruins and Explorer Notes all around the island, and this is a major system that's not even in the game yet.

Not to mention of course we still have a bunch of dino content to add, and also an end-game with bosses. If you just look at the games development objectively stepping back, that's like a third of the features that aren't even in the game yet. I think because Game Preview is so new and we're in Game Preview earlier I think than most of the other games that have been in Game Preview, we still have many months to go until we're actually focusing on optimization and polish.

Rapczak
Rapczak

Our plan was to be in alpha around March and then have a couple solid months of alpha and the move to beta with final polish and bug-fixing. And then to finally release in summer on Xbox and PC together. And so, from our perspective, we're not even in the optimization and polishing phase yet.

But because we're released on console and we've had such high player counts and the game's on top of the store on Xbox and stuff like that, I think people are looking at it now and reviewing it as if not a finished game, a game that's in alpha or beta and is about to be finished.

That's just not true, and there's nothing to really compare it to, to say otherwise, except that people are just going to have to wait and see with this new model, especially on console, that in the next six or seven months, the game will go through a much more different development period I think than period are used to seeing when they're playing console games earlier on either Xbox One or PS4.

Is it a problem of messaging?

Well, I don't know if you can message it more. When the game first came out, I know when they do an ad on the store for Xbox for example it actually goes to a blocking page before it even goes to the store page where it's like full page, "Hey this game is in development, are you sure you want to continue looking at this game?" Then you have the free trial download. I think that there's a lot of messaging around it, and to message it any more would be kind of like overkill a little bit. I think it's more people's expectations of what they might be getting into at this stage. we're definitely focusing on the gameplay first right now; that's why we have a lower resolution and the frame rate can ... especially, I think Digital Foundry probably did their analysis in single-player which is much less optimized than multiplayer ironically because it has to run the whole server calculations of the island on the single-player map.

I think it's looking at that stuff and for us we want to finish our gameplay features and get all that stuff in there, make sure all of our systems are working together before we go back and pump up our frame rates, and pump up our resolution, and do all of that stuff. Otherwise we're wasting work. One thing people don't know is we're planning to do a whole other path on the island, moving some biomes around, moving snow over, making it bigger, taking out some of the swamps and replacing with redwood forests and things like that. If we had already optimized the current state of the island all of that work would have been thrown out the window. It's just the state of where we're at.

I think the game has been out for a little over a month; we've updated a few times, initially around the holidays, just to kind of patch some stuff right when it came out, and then we had our second update a couple weeks ago, or last week I believe, to do the newest content. I think the messaging as we continue to update, and continue to add more stuff, and continue to fix bugs, and continue to respond to community's feedback, I think the messaging will change a little bit because people will see that what it means for a game to be in development likes our is, and responding to the fans, and changing. I hope that will help people understand how this is different from some of those other games that are out there just in an open alpha, or open beta, or something. Or closed alpha, open beta type situations.

Do you have any specific targets in terms of what you'd like to achieve with frame rate and resolution? 1080p, 60fps?

No concrete goals yet, but we definitely don't want to ... you know, where the game's at now we don't want that to be what it's like when it launches. We want people to look at the game and feel like it's appropriate for the generation of hardware it's on. Considering we're doing a lot of things that other games don't, like fully dynamic destructible world and lighting, and seventy players, it's kind of hard for people who are in development or people who aren't as technical of understanding game design, like the type of things our game does that other games don't have to worry about. I think there's some messaging around that, but most people wouldn't care. We just want to try to make sure that we're on par with some of the things the players expect from this console generation, even if it ends up being on the low end a little bit of some of these other games like a Call of Duty or something like that where they're targeting high frame rates and high resolution. That's also not really as important to our game considering the gameplay and stuff like that.

We have some basic technical issues to that we do want to fix; it's not just optimization, it's also quality. Things like drastic pop-in, and things like that that's currently in our game. That's because that was the easiest way for us to get it onto the console quickly and going through the next several months we'll be looking at maybe that system performs the same but it looks better, you don't see the stuff popping in as close, or we have stand-in models, proxy models, that take over past a certain distance and stuff like that.

No Caption Provided

What's the breakdown between free and paid Ark players on Xbox One? And what are your player levels like right now?

We haven't been out long enough to know all the details of what's what in the backend yet. I mean there's like a forty-five day delay or something until we get all the final breakdown of everything [as it relates to sales numbers]. What we can see kind of on a daily basis which is really amazing is our player counts. Our daily unique user count has been hovering around 105,000 a day. One thing we do know is that can't be mostly free players because you can only play the trial for an hour. Considering every day we're seeing peaks around that, the game has way more concurrent players than the PC game ever did, even at its highest peak of like 85,000 or something like that.

You have to consider also the game is much cheaper on PC [Ed note: the PC edition sells for $30, but has dropped to $18 during sales, while the Xbox One versions goes for $35]. There's not a free trial, but still, I mean, players are able to get the game on PC on discount sometimes quite cheaply. It's harder for us to do that on Xbox because we don't have as much flexibility with pricing; it legitimately is a lot more expensive for us to develop on Xbox. Even that being said, we've never had player counts this high on PC and that puts kind of our peak cross-platform player count lately around the high hundred thousands--you know, 175,000, 180,000, kind of creeping up towards 200,000. It's pretty amazing. We're still continually amazed by the console reception of the game, so as much as people are out there nitpicking technical features, I mean, more people are playing the game than we ever thought would be at this point. It just keeps growing.

For us it's just more motivation to make the game that much better and live up to everybody's expectations. I think more types of gamers are playing the game than we thought when we set out to make this game, and so it's not just the types of games they like to play but also early access and what not, what their expectations are from a game. It's kind of like the thing on PC where people were playing the game and turning all the graphic settings all the way down just so they could play the game, voluntarily. Now players don't have the option to do that on Xbox; you're kind of stuck with whatever we set it as. You'll see people on their tablet PCs on Steam like turning everything down to minimum settings and playing at 12 FPS just because they love the game so much and it's like, "Well we can't probably do anything in the long run for those people; they probably just have to get a better machine to play the game once it ships." Still you know, it's been pretty amazing to see.

Switching gears a bit, while some games are doing away with split-screen, you're embracing it. Why?

You know with Ark, there are a lot of families that play Ark together; a lot of people have bought multiple Xboxes, multiple TVs, multiple room, so that they can play games together. With Ark being more of a sit- down family-type game in its co-op mode, it's really important for us to enable that split-screen so that people don't have to separate, go into another room, or whatever. They can still have a good experience playing together and something that's like relatively ... it's becoming more rare on consoles to be able to sit down and just hit Start and hop into a game like Ark that's a first-person game and take over a guest player basically, and be in the same world and help out. It's really intended to be like a co-op feature; the way it functions, it doesn't work in any of our dedicated server modes, so like official servers and things like that. It's more for local play and non-dedicated multiplayer. This is currently capped at four players but we're going to increase that probably with this patch coming in mid-February with split-screen to a maximum of eight players, which is something that people have been asking for to just have more player support in that hosted multiplayer mode.

"Like anything, performance is probably just going to be okay when we first launch but it will definitely get better over time" -- Rapczak on Ark's split-screen and expected frame rate issues

We want to allow all those people to connect and play split-screen as well so you can have four people playing if you've only got two Xboxes in two rooms of your house, or your friend's house, or whatever. You can get a lot more people together and playing; you're not limited to the number of Xbox Live accounts you have, and Xboxes, and things like that. That's kind of our main motivation behind it. Like anything, performance is probably just going to be okay when we first launch but it will definitely get better over time. In addition to optimizing the game we also have to optimize for split-screen, but I think the feature is big enough that as we optimize it, and people give us feedback on how it works, and what they do and don't like about the functionality of it, we expect it to be a really big kind of differentiating factor for the game.

It's not only of the first online survival games on console, I think it's definitely the first split-screen online multiplayer survival game, maybe ever. I think it's pretty important for us to do that just because of, like I said earlier, the way people are associating with Minecraft and things like that. They just like to hang out in the game; it's kind of one of the things that helps enable that.

Ark was released around the launch of Jurassic World, which you've said probably elevated its profile somewhat. But Ark has endured. You've stayed popular and are growing. How?

You know, I think part of it is that the game is like evolving over time. There are a lot of players playing the game, especially on PC, and in their own way creating mods, having custom server settings. And then on Xbox where we don't have that ability yet, players are seeing the new content come in, they feel like the game is changing with them, there is always something new to see in the game, it's not like you played back in July and had 12 hours of gameplay and you've been there, done that. I mean the game changes so much all the time, we really are trying lately to take the dinosaurs that are even in the game from before, give them better AI, give them new behaviors, and stuff like that, that's more in line with how they're described in our dossiers and stuff like that. People have a lot to look forward to with the game, not just what's been happening with the game.

I think because of that it's very sticky, it's kind of the thing that's ... you know Ark was the number four game on YouTube last year. It's the kind of thing that people just love to create content for whether it's role-playing, or combining mods and coming up with new ways to ... come up with games to play, or ways to entertain their fan base or community if they're streamers or content creators. It just seems to be one of those games that's almost for everybody, whether you're a content creator, a player, a streamer, a casual gamer. I mean it's really funny, I got my family Xboxes for Christmas because none of them had Xboxes; they all had Nintendos and PlayStation 3s and things like that, they didn't come into this generation ever because they're like, "Well there's not really a game that I really want to play or a reason for me to upgrade." Now they're always playing Ark. I don't even tell them to play; I can't even play with them enough because I'm too busy making Ark and they're just always hopping on, building their stuff together. My mom plays; she has never played a shooter in her life, it's just really funny. None of them have ever been that into a game I've made before. If they're doing it I know I must be doing something right.

I think the regular updates you've done have probably helped keep Ark popular. Do you have plans for more? Valentine's Day is coming up...

Yeah, so we do have some fun stuff planned for that. Another reason I think people like the game is we do tend to do those things. We do events, and fun stuff, I would say on average once a month if you think about it but it's probably more like every two months. It just seems like we had once a month for the end of the year because it was Halloween, Thanksgiving, Christmas. We do want to keep the game fresh and live with events like that as well, and then I mentioned earlier modding. We're running another mod contest too that's starting, it's an international mod contest this time. We're a little restricted in the number of places that could submit last time, but this time anybody can submit a mod. We see the game changing in other ways as people create new game modes and things like that.

No Caption Provided

What are your goals in terms of content parity with PC?

We're going to try to keep it very close. One of the reasons for that, that we haven't talked about yet, is you know on PC we have private-hosted servers and we don't have that on consoles yet. We're working now to allow both players and third-party hosting companies to host Windows-based Xbox servers. That actually most of the people that play Ark on PC play on private servers; we could just never pay for all the servers for the players that are out there. That's especially true on Xbox; it would be enormously expensive to keep these persistent servers up basically forever. Players start a character on there and that's where their progress is. We're really excited to get that support out there, and part of that will be to make sure that the Xbox version and those servers are kind of kept up to date with the PC version, and really allow those players to take advantage of the latest stuff. And when they're hosting their own servers and stuff like that be able to configure them with the newest content and kind of customize it to the way they want.

How we are now, we're probably two or three weeks behind on the Xbox updates, but we plan to continue that; I think that's keeping it pretty up to date with PC. As we're in early access, you can think of PC as the lead kind of platform right now, and making sure we get all the gameplay feedback somewhat ironed out before we go and do our console update, which is a little bit of a longer process. Submitting to Microsoft and doing all of that stuff.

Can you explain how using an extra Xbox One as a server works?

So you can now have a dedicated Xbox [hosting] up to fifty players. There's not a 100 percent reliability for people to connect to those servers; that will also help alleviate some of the crowded server issues once we get that fixed. The idea behind that is you can fire up an Xbox as a dedicated server, and leave it running 24/7, and people can use it just like a normal kind of official server on Xbox right now. You have a little bit more control over how the game plays with [dinosaur] taming times, and multipliers for everything scale as you want.

You come from Microsoft and you worked on the HoloLens team. Do you have plans for Ark to support VR and AR in the future?

Yeah we definitely have plans for VR; Oculus support is currently in there, it's been in there, we just used it last week when we were reviewing something. We do plan to have at least a pretty good VR solution implemented when we hit our final launch after we redo our user interface and everything like that to make it a little more VR-friendly. We'll have that in there for PC for sure. On PS4, we've announced more Morpheus support so we're looking forward to that as well. As far as AR goes, no specific plans yet; there's a lot of stuff we could do but I think that's a little bit further behind, even VR, when it comes to commercial adoption so we'll probably kind of wait and see with that to see when the right time is to think about it.

You've described Studio Wildcard as the studio "that never sleeps." What's it like internally now, as you're firing on all cylinders? It sounds like you have kind of a startup vibe.

It does feel like kind of a startup mentality. The game grew way faster than we did in terms of our actual on-site personnel. That being said we still have about 60 people working on the game, and part of the reason we say we're the studio that never sleeps is because we've got people in almost every time zone. There's always somebody working on something. We've got the guys over in Egypt, we've got guys in South America, in Europe. At some point in the day, regardless of what somebody's schedule is, somebody is always working on something. Internally, we're adding a lot of new members to the team as we grow and kind of parallelize some of our development as we start optimizing things on console and adding our final content into PC. We're growing some of our key roles in-house, probably doubling our staff size in our Bellevue studio now. Then as we go towards launch when we we spin up some of our extra stuff that we're doing with Survival of the Fittest, we're putting that as it's own game mode, getting some partner help with that.

"We're just trying to do more and more with the IP; we don't want to rest on our laurels" -- Rapczak

We're just trying to do more and more with the IP; we don't want to rest on our laurels. The game IP has been extremely successful and the only thing that makes sense is to continue to invest in it and to find new avenues where people can enjoy the game, and new game modes, and new whatever, right? People want mobile apps, people want better websites; it's really becoming quite a big production. That's one of the reasons we're expanding is because, if we still had the team we did when we launched, we'd be having all sorts of problems with just scalability. We've just recently brought on more customer service capacity to really help with server issues on our official servers and things like that, so we're growing in kind of all directions right now.

We haven't heard much about the PS4 version, and maybe this is a question for another time, but how is that edition shaping up?

We're pretty excited about PS4. We wish Sony had an early access program, and a lot of people have been asking us for it. We just kind of got to say, "Well you know, it's not really up to us. It's the way Sony runs things, the game pretty much has to be finished." There are a few exceptions that we're not quite sure why they made an exception for one game or the other, but Ark is in the state where at present time unless it's finished, it's not coming out on PS4 until they have some other program that allows us to do that. That being said we are really excited about it.

It feels weird to say this, but fortunately the Sony players will benefit greatly from the Xbox early access. Even though they're different platforms, they're both consoles. Console gamers have lots of similarity; it doesn't matter what platform you're playing on. That being said, all of the feedback we're getting from Xbox is really great for whatever console we ever launch Ark on. It's unfortunate that some gamers can't experience that right now and take part in development as the Xbox players are, but you know, I do encourage anybody who's a PlayStation fan and has a PS4 to ask Sony for the program; maybe they'll decide to let a game like ours be in an early access-type program. Also if they do want to be involved there's still PC. Even if you've got an older PC you can still play the game on PC, give us feedback. A lot of the changes that we're making on Xbox will be rolled back into the PC version eventually like the way the controller works and things like that.

It's not like they can't get involved; it's just like, "Hey find a PC that you can play Ark on and try it play it there. Know that eventually it will come to PS4 and you'll be able to play it there as well."

<><><><><>

For more on Ark, you can check out GameSpot's early access review. Additionally, a $60,000 worldwide modding contest for the game is currently up and running; get all the details on it here.

Got a news tip or want to contact us directly? Email news@gamespot.com

Join the conversation
There are 52 comments about this story
52 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
  • 52 results
  • 1
  • 2
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for Snyper22
Snyper22

So I can see where people are coming from on this whole "it's too slow or buggy to play" thing as this has now entered console territory and frame-rate is dependent on the quality of optimization on that side. But to the PC having access to Alpha staged games even before paying for them has been a thing for years, poor optimization is a standard to be expected.

Ark: Survival Evolved though, kind of finds it's way into a grey area where they know they have a huge following with no shortage of feedback. So the way they're going about finishing the game is smart. Because it will get done faster rather than optimizing everything now, which would essentially double the work needed to get it done.

Unfortunately what this means is the console and old PC's get the short end of the stick, large amounts of the game won't be running smoothly until they're finished implementing new things.

Now comparing this to another MMO survival game, Like "7 days to die" where they've been in Alpha stage since 2013 because they've been optimizing after every new feature.

Granted that game is really shaping up into something amazing, they went this route of development because the fan base is lacking compared to others like Rust, H1Z1 or The Forest even. Which can sometimes be the factor that makes or breaks it.

Basically what I'm try to saying is that every game has a development cycle that works well for them, most are similar but Ark: Survival Evolved is an exception because they're doing something that hasn't been done before i.e:, "The first console MMO FPS crafting survival game with split-screen co-op".

Avatar image for NC4545
NC4545

I can't believe you guys are shelling out money on this crap. Do you even pay attention to the steam reviews? 1. They make non sensical updates that are making the game worse. 2. The devs have been BANNING people who criticize his game on forums. 3. It's early access and they are making millions of dollars. Do you really think they are gonna finish the game? Be honest with yourself. I refuse to pay for bad games with bad business practices. That's just my take though.

Avatar image for CrusaderForever
CrusaderForever

Wow, split screen available at launch on the PS4!!! That is amazing! My son is a huge Dinosaur-Animal-Riding FAN!!! He is going to eat this game up. I can see us having many, many, well over 200 hours of amazing Dinosaur riding game play with Ark! Keep up the good work and I can't wait to through some money your way.

Avatar image for Wiro_
Wiro_

Just love it when a game runs at 20 fps, then you enter 4-player splitscreen, and it runs at 5-10 fps. But you know, they will optimize the game, so at launch it will run just fine at 15 fps. Then, after launch, it will get even better, and the game will run at 22 fps.

Avatar image for straightcur
straightcur

I'm happy that Sony only allows finished games. I think they could actually be more stringent with quality control of what is released on their platform. They need some basic standards to avoid becoming the "App store"

Avatar image for letsgame82
letsgame82

Hate Early access, devs still get paid so what incentive do they have to release their game ASAP? They can milk early access and still make more money when they finally release it fully, if ever! Just look at Dayz,H1Z1 etc I don't mind Demos or Betas

Avatar image for Chyld989
Chyld989

@letsgame82: I don't want developers to feel like they need to release their game ASAP. I want them to feel like they can take their time to ensure the game is fun and works before officially releasing it, but I also want them to be able to eat during that time.

I 100% understand why some people won't buy an Early Access game, just like I understand people that would rather not pledge on Kickstarter and are okay waiting for the product to become available through standard means, but don't for a second act like this is a bad thing.

Avatar image for wookiegr
wookiegr

I can't believe gamers are so frivolous that they even spend their money on games that are advertised as "not finished and still under development" and then turn around and bitch about having to pay for microtransactions, dlc and season passes on other games.

Avatar image for deactivated-5893d17ed65b4

I'll be excited to give it a go on the PS4, but with Gravity Rush Remastered, The Witness and Digimon Cyber Sleuth released this year, with Firewatch and Street Fighter V releasing this month... Then MLB 16: The Show, Ratchet & Clank and Uncharted 4... I think I can wait for a finished game.

Avatar image for jordycruz
JordyCruz

"...no one in the public knew about a year ago, developed by a studio you probably still do not know exists. " I guess I'm a singularity, I've known about this game for easily about a year :)

Avatar image for PsychicKiller82
PsychicKiller82

I cant stop playing ark on Xbox!! It's the best game to play with friends and kill dinos, tame, build up bases and raid people full of content and fun!!!

Avatar image for Ahiru-San
Ahiru-San

split-screen + own dedicated server with own rules = insta-buy!

even without hosting, at least we can play 2+2 in the same room shouting nonsense at each other while running away from dinos!

Avatar image for bandcelks00024
bandcelks00024

Heres a better way to describe. Make a con list for far cry primal based on everything youve heard. No guns. No dinos. Ect. Ect. Ect. Ark probably has this feature. So it will be a short lived 6 months for primal.

Avatar image for cmdr_danbo
cmdr_danbo

@bandcelks00024: why are you comparing two different games with different gameplay with nothing but the setting in common ?

Avatar image for bandcelks00024
bandcelks00024

I was like a far cry game already??? Do they think theyre assassins creed and in spring to boot. Did they forget they were aaa??? Then i played ark and it all made sense.

Avatar image for bandcelks00024
bandcelks00024

I was like a far cry game already??? Do they think theyre assassins creed and in spring to boot. Did they forget they were aaa??? Then i played ark and it all made sense.

Avatar image for bandcelks00024
bandcelks00024

So i just cant give this game my immediate purchase approval any harder. This labor of love has big corporate aaa games releasing early and unfinished so you dont ever talk about what shouldve been on game if they wait. This game is like bethesda in that you have to give it a pass for its flaws when you see everything theyve done w it. This game shows like payday that you dont have to be aaa to have production quality.

Avatar image for bandcelks00024
bandcelks00024

So i just cant give this game my immediate purchase approval any harder. This labor of love has big corporate aaa games releasing early and unfinished so you dont ever talk about what shouldve been on game if they wait. This game is like bethesda in that you have to give it a pass for its flaws when you see everything theyve done w it. This game shows like payday that you dont have to be aaa to have production quality.

Avatar image for bandcelks00024
bandcelks00024

So i just cant give this game my immediate purchase approval any harder. This labor of love has big corporate aaa games releasing early and unfinished so you dont ever talk about what shouldve been on game if they wait. This game is like bethesda in that you have to give it a pass for its flaws when you see everything theyve done w it. This game shows like payday that you dont have to be aaa to have production quality. I own both systems, but if i was ps only, i would be hating how i have to hate to wait for it too. Better idea is to make yourself a dual owner today. Game is huge and theyre building from early game to end game. So unless you rent gta v and own everything on gta online a week later, you will need some time here anyways. If you cant afford a box, try to stomach that primal until release. If you work any kind of employment even semi part time, you would be hard pressed to catch up to the devs at this point.

Avatar image for Zinoxy
Zinoxy

This is the best early access game I've ever played, hands down. I love that I once again can sit down with my little brother and play a game on the same screen. Haven't been able to do that since Minecraft. So far I am playing alone on PC and my brother desperately wanna join. So that Wildcard are embracing split screen is a dream come true. ARK is truly a revolution to us that likes to sit down with a cold beer and take our time in a game. You guys are amazing!

Avatar image for InYourMouf
InYourMouf

I'll have to wait for the PS4 version...framerate was terrible on my PC.

Avatar image for Snyper22
Snyper22

@InYourMouf: That's probably the way to go anyway. Frame-rate won't be their priority until they've implemented all the features and systems they want. Optimizing is redundant because once a new system is put in place it needs to be optimized again.

Avatar image for noctisumbra
Noctisumbra

@InYourMouf: it's the current lack of optimization. Framerate isn't that great on Xbox One in a lot of areas either. I would say try the PC version again closer to release then decide what to do

Avatar image for mcann87
mcann87

Does anyone ever ask why all the interviews are with the Jesse and not Jeremy Stieglitz (formerly of Trendy and the actual creator of Ark)? Just seems weird that they never cover that.. Hmmm maybe someone should dig a little further into that story.

Avatar image for dylan35
dylan35

Even in the condition it is Ark is an unbelievable great time. Getting to play and watch it improve overtime is worth the $$. Hate all you want this is the best unfinished game yet :)

Avatar image for brn-dn
brn-dn

Thank you Sony for not selling us an unfinished game!

Seriously though, this practice is stupid. Make your damn game and then sell it.

Avatar image for PsychicKiller82
PsychicKiller82

@brn-dn: Seriously though, your comment was stupid. The devs want feedback to make it a better game; oh I see now you are a Sony fan boy who was brainwashed into thinking not getting games through early access is stupid and think Sony does it for the gamer. Sony just didn't want to waste time on creating a program for it.

Avatar image for brn-dn
brn-dn

@PsychicKiller82: Seriously though, I said seriously though because the first part of my comment was a joke, seriously though.

Feedback is fine but paying $30+ for a game that's not even in alpha is not fine and encouraging that is not good.

Avatar image for noctisumbra
Noctisumbra

@brn-dn: considering that you get the finished product for a lower price, in exchange for dealing with the plethora of in-game issues, I don't see the issue. Plus, if you have a dev that listens to the feedback, odds are that a much better game gets released as a result. And it's still better than pay $60 for an unfinished game, and you know what you are getting into if you have a basic literacy level. O would you rather Kickstarter the game?

Avatar image for Fenixx
Fenixx

So when asked about the frame rate issues, he completely changes the subject and doesn't actually answer the question. I tried this game out a few months back when it had a free weekend and the frame rate and glitches completely killed the experience. I was hoping to see in the patches following that they would do something about that but all it ever talks about is "We've added a new dinosaur you can ride!" How about making the game properly functional before adding more and more content, especially things that are completely unnecessary.

The guy pointed out the biggest flaw with Ark. He says they don't even view the game as being in Alpha stage yet. The problem with this is they keep listening to what the community wants and they are adding stuff according to what people are wanting. Of course there's no problem with that but that sort of thing is supposed to be done after the game is complete. Build and finish your game, then you can start spending your time adding content that people might want. You don't keep your game a buggy mess, which it is, and waste your time with the community before you even have a finished product.

Avatar image for Chyld989
Chyld989

@Fenixx: Except he didn't completely change the subject. He said that right now they're more focused on adding new content, and that optimization will be coming later. You know, like basically every project ever. Programming optimization before you have all the features in is stupid because as you add new features you're going to have to redo your optimization. Might as well do all of it at the end once you know what you're actually dealing with.

Avatar image for Fenixx
Fenixx

@Chyld989: That's what I said, except they're not doing that. They should be focusing on the core game and getting that done, which also includes optimizing and fixing very obvious glitches. But instead they're spending a lot of their time listening to the community and adding content that the people are requesting. They even went and created a modding kit for the game, which again is more time wasted on something that should be done after the game is actually finished.

It's great to have content but there's more important things to be dealing with. They need to optimize the game at the early stages because if it already runs like crap then it's only going to get worse. I also experienced a lot of texture and shading glitches. The dinosaurs would be constantly getting stuck on the environment. Even my character would get hung up on a seemingly smooth surface. These are all serious issues that should be taken care of before you focus on content. You get the basic functionality working first before you add the extras.

Avatar image for Chyld989
Chyld989

@Fenixx: I'm just gonna go ahead and quote myself on this one:

"Programming optimization before you have all the features in is stupid because as you add new features you're going to have to redo your optimization. Might as well do all of it at the end once you know what you're actually dealing with."

Avatar image for Fenixx
Fenixx

@Chyld989: I know how to read =) But it's better to have things running smoothly at the beginning. It sets up a better foundation to build things off of. When a game is just getting itself going, it's perfectly acceptable for it to not run the greatest. Ark is basically a finished game, in terms of the basics and mechanics and everything is all there. At the stage it's at, it should be running a whole lot better then what it is. If you don't fix the problems it has at an early stage, it makes it tougher to find them later down the road as you pile more stuff on top of it.

I've been dealing with game development for a number of years so I'm not just tossing around some random opinions. It's a smart way of handling your project.

Avatar image for bandcelks00024
bandcelks00024

@Chyld989: well said. The exact answer to the other guys ?

Avatar image for game4metoo
game4metoo

Ark is such an amazing game i really hope ps4 players get their hands on it soon and also for the ps4 players check this out

http://store.steampowered.com/app/396900/ it's in early access on steam but its a really good game. It's coming to ps4, not sure when though, but for anyone that wanna play it it's really nice.

Fyi no word on an xbox port

Avatar image for Spartan_418
Spartan_418

Morpheus/PSVR support for the PS4 version sounds interesting, but... won't the game need to look and perform an order of magnitude better than the existing Xbox One version, for a decent VR experience?

There's not that much of a power gap between the two consoles

Avatar image for deactivated-5893d17ed65b4

@Spartan_418: Remember, the PSVR has an independent processing unit outside of the PS4's.

Avatar image for xantufrog
xantufrog

@Spartan_418: I believe a key part of the PSVR is the external auxiliary processing unit, but your concern still holds - my understanding is this runs rather rough on PC even

Moderator
Avatar image for Spartan_418
Spartan_418

@xantufrog: True, and he explains further up that they haven't really started optimizing the game yet, so it's probably not fair to judge its visuals

Avatar image for Sammy296
Sammy296

Wow, im not sure if English is this guys first language, regardless he should not be doing further interviews for the company. his grammar and sentence construction is terrible, half of what he said didn't even make sense and he often didn't answer the questions!!

anyway Ark is cool, people should check it out!!

Avatar image for xzerocarnagex
XzerocarnageX

@Sammy296: you understood it , so what's the problem. Spelling and grammar trolls are the ecumenical of the internet, all they do is bitching and moan. Really it was a good read who cares about spelling and grammar when the information gets across.

Avatar image for Sammy296
Sammy296

@xzerocarnagex: his spelling was fine actually.

My point is that i found it difficult to read and it was more of an effort to understand than it should have been.

I'm certainly not bitching and moaning. As a fan of ark and a reader of interviews, im simply pointing out that this is a public interview done unprofessionally. Whether they like it or not this is a huge promotional piece for the game and studio as a whole, from a marketing and PR perspective they'd be far better off getting someone else to do the interviews in future!.

Avatar image for cmdr_danbo
cmdr_danbo

@Sammy296: I rather have him than some pr tool as you suggest.

Avatar image for Sammy296
Sammy296

@cmdr_danbo: I certainly didn't suggest that some PR "tool" do the interviews. Nor do i believe everybody in PR is necessarily a tool, though it may be a industry that has more tools than others! :P

I would suggest that they get someone on the dev team who's better at answering questions and with a better command of the English language to do future interviews though!

Avatar image for Saidrex
Saidrex

@Sammy296: that's ok, it's the other kind of language that matters for developers

  • 52 results
  • 1
  • 2