Kane & Lynch: Dead Men Video Review

  • 164,187 Views
  • Posted Dec 4, 2007

What makes Kane & Lynch such a letdown? Find out in our video review.

Upload Your Own Videos

Watch cool and crazy videos from GameSpot users just like you, and vote for your favorites! Subscribers and users level 10 and higher get to upload their own.

Please enter your date of birth to download this video.

By clicking "Enter", you agree to GameSpot's Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Use these links to add the GameSpot player to another site (html) or your GameSpot blog (bbcode).

  • BBCODE:

  • 640PX WIDE:

  • 480PX WIDE:

close [x]

After The Fact: Reviews Revisited

Update: Bonus Content
Posted: Nov 6, 2008 10:20 am PT
In April, a free update known as "The Dope Bag" added four new maps titled Clean Cut, Hooker's Trail, Flying High, and Hasta La Vista for use in the Fragile Alliance multiplayer mode. Five new achievements worth a total of 250 Gamerscore points were also added on the Xbox 360.  

135 Comments

  • Bog101

    Posted Dec 20, 2009 9:49 am PT

    who gets fired over this review

  • tomtomwolfwolf

    Posted Dec 19, 2009 10:34 am PT

    looks like sh*t
    i dont have an xbox360 but i herad he was fierd becaus of this review so i just wanted to check it out

  • mrmoneyclips posted Dec 11, 2009 3:40 pm PT (does not meet display criteria. sign in to show)

    mrmoneyclips

    Posted Dec 11, 2009 3:40 pm PT (hide)

    I'm glad he got fired. He always focuses his reviews on the bad, even on the games he gave a good score to. Greg Kasavin was (and still is) my favorite reviewer. He knew how to evenly review a game.

  • Truegamer1994

    Posted Dec 10, 2009 2:08 pm PT

    im gonna use this opptunity to give giant bomb a plug
    USE GIANT BOMB
    gamespot is a load of balllllllss

  • Jonwh18

    Posted Nov 28, 2009 6:35 pm PT

    did gamespot make it or what why do they care if the game sucked he told the truth bad game = bad review if all of the games got A+ reviews then: no one would trust gamespot because games gamespot said were good sucked
    therefore no one would go to gamespot
    therefore they wouldn't get money for advertsing
    the smart thing would have been for gamespot to just not review the game if they knew it sucked and then they wouldn't have pissed off the guys paying them to advertise
    but thats just MY opinion

  • ADTR-ZERO

    Posted Nov 24, 2009 6:12 pm PT

    I don't miss these guys one bit...because I'm watching them on Giantbomb right now!

  • Arach666

    Posted Nov 19, 2009 2:29 pm PT

    I guess honesty gets you fired these days...

  • BelaidKL

    Posted Nov 18, 2009 4:32 pm PT

    if its a bad game its a bad game....i just find it hilarious how gamespot put all that money into advertising it then Jeff gives it a bad review.....LEGEND!!!!

  • Shtinky

    Posted Nov 18, 2009 2:00 pm PT

    the lulz is strong w/ this 1.

  • 24_bullets

    Posted Nov 17, 2009 4:13 pm PT

    GIANTBOMB RULES

  • JK731

    Posted Nov 1, 2009 10:17 am PT

    its kind of a good thing this happened sometimes, because the guys at giantbomb work really well together, and have a lot more freedom than anyone does here.

  • Berkie420

    Posted Oct 19, 2009 10:33 pm PT

    Watch out guys, I got banned from this site just for mentioning the site Jeff, Brad and Ryan D. started. For me, the heart and soul of this site just ain't the same since Gerstmanngate....

  • aramoe

    Posted Sep 29, 2009 4:10 pm PT

    gamespot sucks at reviewing now..I'm going to giantbomb

  • geoff-uk123

    Posted Sep 17, 2009 12:45 pm PT

    @barber_force: Yeah I agree with that. Kevin is probably the best game reviewer on Gamespot right now.

  • Frostmore33

    Posted Sep 14, 2009 2:54 am PT

    Why did he lose his job over this anyway???
    I thought it was a pretty solid review
    I do like giant bomb, its an awsome site
    I like K&L. Its a guilty pleasure

  • Toriko42

    Posted Aug 24, 2009 7:43 pm PT

    People still on about this, Giant Bomb is the place to go if you want Jeff alright. The past sadly won't correct itself.

  • wolwering

    Posted Aug 24, 2009 4:00 pm PT

    Hmm, if Geff was fired because of this review, than that shouldn't have been done. Even so, he really portrayed this game as a bad one and I really don't think that's the case. Other than it's length and a bit inaccurate aiming, it's a decent game. It has good voice acting, engaging story, it's challenging and it feels rewarding. I was angry because I thought Jeff was fired for making this review and I thought it was fair for the game to be bashed but I got it recently and played it through and I realized a lot of effort was put into it. In short I think this game is quite underrated here and people should stop judging it harshly because they think Jeff was fired because of reviewing it.
    PS
    Even so, firing him was a bad idea, if they did it because he gave Kane and Lynch a low score.

  • RuffRyder101

    Posted Aug 24, 2009 12:07 am PT

    Jeff was just telling the truth and that what he's supposed to do because he is a critic. He shouldnt have been fired,

  • JimmeCata

    Posted Aug 23, 2009 10:13 pm PT

    To think... one simple review would start one of the greatest controversies in videogame history- Gertsmanngate. The whole scandal totally redifined our ideas about the reliability and trustworthyness of industry reviewers, and the industry reeled in it's wake.

  • Dark_Muse

    Posted Aug 23, 2009 9:53 pm PT

    game does look like crap...
    Gladly for Gamespot, you lost all your best reviewers.
    CHEERS?
    It will take some time to get with the new reviewers like we did with jeff, shoemaker and ocampo... even the legendary Greg. But please, don't give high scores for games because their companies pay you :\ It's just not ethical...
    Btw, I don't have xbox, just wanted to see what the fuss :p

  • Fandango_Letho

    Posted Aug 21, 2009 8:01 pm PT

    @epdug , jeff works for giantbomb now. Check it out, their site is great.

  • epdug

    Posted Aug 18, 2009 4:57 pm PT

    Well I picked the game up and have been playing it, Im a good bit into it, I agree with the below comment, there are some parts of Jeffs review I agree with, other parts I don't, but to fire him over it? That was really really harsh, the whole point of his role was to give his honest and experienced opinion, Im suprised he hasn't sued Gamespot! And why is his review still up after him being fired??

  • xtremeflem2day

    Posted Aug 17, 2009 6:55 pm PT

    The reason why jeff was fired wasn't exactly because gamespot disagreed with his review, but because gamespot was paid highly to advertise it when it came out, as far as giving gamespot a kane and lynch theme, then jeff comes along and gives it a bad score, thats why he was fired. Personally i think jeff is a great reviewer, and is one of the most respectable journalists out there, and i disagree with a lot of what he had to say in this review, and agree with some of it too, but firing him was a big mistake for gamespot.

  • epdug

    Posted Aug 17, 2009 6:21 pm PT

    Wow he really laid into this game didn't he?! I'll have to pick it up and see for myself, I dont't know bout this whole story that he got fired over it, sounds messed up, but I'll be back, gonna check this out for myself.......

  • steven_bergen

    Posted Aug 16, 2009 4:52 pm PT

    im glad they fired jeff, if they never fired we wouldnt have Giantbomb right now.

  • SkidRow18

    Posted Aug 15, 2009 2:16 am PT

    at least he is honest about his review

  • Seeker108 posted Aug 14, 2009 6:57 pm PT (does not meet display criteria. sign in to show)

    Seeker108

    Posted Aug 14, 2009 6:57 pm PT (hide)

    this game is not that bad yes too much cursing but still alot of fun. terrible review

  • destroyandy

    Posted Aug 9, 2009 5:58 pm PT

    this is a good game! but its just a review and u cant argue with what other people have to say about it.

  • DooM_MerchanT

    Posted Aug 3, 2009 10:27 am PT

    Jeff Gerstmann is a great critic. He is a critic, he's allowed to not like a game and I totally agree with his review. I can't say if this is why so many left or why he was fired. If it was, it's a Massive shame.

  • triptiger94

    Posted Jul 26, 2009 11:34 pm PT

    ha they end up saying the f word at the end ha

  • makincopies

    Posted Jul 19, 2009 5:47 pm PT

    did he really get fired for this review because edios bribed gamespot?

  • richmond5

    Posted Jul 17, 2009 6:59 pm PT

    This review is what probably marked the beginning of the end of the "tradition" in Gamespot. Jeff G., Ryan, Greg K., and Brad Shoemaker told GameSpot to F@#% Off after this. These reviewers were what made me want to watch Gamespot and now they are all gone. What we are left with on Gamespot are a bunch of Limey reviewers who are tools of this bull@&$T new order in Gamespot.

  • Ikouze

    Posted Jul 14, 2009 11:35 am PT

    That was his opinion that the game sucks. GS shouldn't have fired him like that. I guess GS doesn't care about people's opinions. But it's true the game was bad. I played it for an hour and I really hated it. I never picked it up again.

  • nightcall14

    Posted Jul 14, 2009 8:33 am PT

    Jeff shouldn't have been fired over this review. All reviews are opinions of a game and he just gave his.

  • xtremeflem2day

    Posted Jul 10, 2009 4:15 pm PT

    I only played the demo for kayne and lynch and jeff is right, there is wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyy too much F-bombs being dropped, but i like the cover mechanics, and the guns arent too hard or too easy to aim. Regardless of whether or not the characters are understandable, jeff didn't see what was understandable, thats just one review, he shouldn't be fired for it.

  • raev92

    Posted Jul 7, 2009 10:02 pm PT

    this review always make me laugh!

    R.I.P. Jeff

  • Bringerofpwnage

    Posted Jul 7, 2009 7:40 pm PT

    Thanks Jeff for staying true to your heart and love of gaming.

  • Azuki

    Posted Jul 4, 2009 4:23 am PT

    Ah so this is the infamous review that got poor jeff fired. Luckily he's kicking ass on GiantBomb.com now (the greatest gaming site in existence imo) so eh.

    Still amazes me that he got fired for simply telling it like it is, the game was as awful as he said it was and no one should have bought it.

  • travisstaggs

    Posted Jun 29, 2009 7:46 pm PT

    Poor Jeff he was one of my favorites.

  • Np_Pro

    Posted Jun 28, 2009 6:15 pm PT

    @ bodygaurd1
    no one should be fired for a review. it was his opinion and gamespot hired him to give it. just because you disagree with him doesn't mean that he had a grudge. i happened to hate the new prince of persia; that doesn't mean Kevin VanOrd was being paid by UbiSoft to say good things about it.

  • luniac

    Posted Jun 25, 2009 5:26 am PT

    lol just wanted to check out the infamous video.

  • Lebowski-Dude

    Posted Jun 22, 2009 8:22 pm PT

    It's ridiculous and unwarranted to fire him for this; though it did seem like he said many negative things about the game, that's how he felt. He was one of the best reviewers.

  • vidiexas

    Posted Jun 22, 2009 9:52 am PT

    I can't believe it i miss you Jeff all players, gamers, reviewers, all who knows you will remember you as a great guy with great reviews.

  • southsideTaft

    Posted Jun 21, 2009 7:15 am PT

    this game was good better then wat they rated it the story was very good if you played it and the shooting was bad but you could deal with it and the multiplayer was good 2

  • vegan_cannibal

    Posted Jun 20, 2009 10:31 pm PT

    Ok guys, one and a half years later I do feel that the audio quality is pretty sub par and its a little too harsh to the game (though it may deserve it), so maybe GS ***might*** have a point.

    But seriously, you guys shouting about how cool giantbomb is need to stay there. Why come here and say something like "Giantbomb is the place to be??" Its not where you are right now, is it? Also, get a REAL purpose in your life.

    No hate to Jeff though, he's cool, and his new site is cool too, except the name which I think he named after one of his farts.

  • blaze11987 posted Jun 18, 2009 3:41 pm PT (does not meet display criteria. sign in to show)

    blaze11987

    Posted Jun 18, 2009 3:41 pm PT (hide)

    you know what else is ugly? YOU JEFF GERSTMANN!

  • bodygaurd1 posted Jun 13, 2009 8:14 pm PT (does not meet display criteria. sign in to show)

    bodygaurd1

    Posted Jun 13, 2009 8:14 pm PT (hide)

    Personally, I'm glad he got fired. This guy seriously had some type of grudge against this game. I played it and I had fun with it. The graphics were okay, the story was great! And the characters, unlike what Jeff said, are understandable and likable. Jeff really deserved to be fired for this. They should have a different/new review so that people will understand how this game actually is.

Kane & Lynch: Dead Men Quick Links

Summary | Reviews | News | Previews & Features | Images | Videos | DLC & Expansions | Downloads | Answers | Hints & Cheats | Forum | Check Prices

Kane & Lynch: Dead Men Boxshot Enlarge the boxshot
Kane & Lynch: Dead Men

Game Stats

  • Rank:
    1,403 of 78,795
    (down by 318)
    X360 Rank:
    219 of 1,933
    Tracking:
    3,908 Track It»
    Wishlists:
    2,110 Wish It»
  • Player Reviews:
    196
    Player Ratings:
    5106
    Users Now Playing:
    373
  • Number of Players:

    1-2, 8 Online | Offline Modes: Cooperative | Online Modes: Competitive

  • Top 5 User Tags:
    1. kane
    2. kane and lynch
    3. dead men
    4. lynch
    5. kane & lynch
  • Mature Rating Description

    Titles rated M (Mature) have content that may be suitable for persons ages 17 and older. Titles in this category may contain intense violence, blood and gore, sexual content and/or strong language. Learn more

Full Game Details »Close
Also on

Games you may like…

Users who looked at content for this game also looked at these games.

See More Similar Games
advertisement