Call of Duty: World at War Video Review

  • 421,171 Views
  • Posted Nov 12, 2008

Call of Duty heads back to World War II in this Video Review for World at War.

Upload Your Own Videos

Watch cool and crazy videos from GameSpot users just like you, and vote for your favorites! Subscribers and users level 10 and higher get to upload their own.

Choose your preferred download format:

HD Windows Media
274.6MB 
Sign In
Hi-Res H.264 MP4
76.4MB 
Download
Lo-Res MPEG
65.9MB 
Download
Lo-Res IPOD / PSP
16.8MB 
Download
close [x]

Use these links to add the GameSpot player to another site (html) or your GameSpot blog (bbcode).

  • BBCODE:

  • 640PX WIDE:

  • 480PX WIDE:

close [x]

626 Comments

  • hunterkill1997

    Posted Dec 12, 2009 2:51 am PT

    I think for em that Waw is better because it is more jampacked of action and sounds of explosives!! but the choice is in the person though....

  • 23matto23

    Posted Dec 10, 2009 6:31 pm PT

    iamagamer21, whatever im not saying its better than MW2, but WaW is still a wikid game, it uses the same engine as MW1 but its still WAY different

  • iamagamer21

    Posted Dec 8, 2009 6:42 pm PT

    MW2 OWNS WaW.. WaW was an add on to MW1... no new ideas, no new anything.. So goodbye WaW, juggernaut, MP 40, etc.

  • Ryan10901994

    Posted Dec 3, 2009 6:07 pm PT

    @ it009x9281

    "I think ppl would choose call of duty games over medal of honor any day"
    you're probobly right but medal of honor has still made its way into our hearts as we were young children first being introduced to world war 2, personally I thank medal of honor for what it gave us, a welcoming world war 2 experience that was great for introducing young players to FPS's. For me medal of honor brought me into the fascination of the events that unfolded during world war 2, but call of duty perfected it giving a more realistic approach to world war 2 that would help demonstrate to players of all ages that war in not a simple game where you are given infinite lives but instead a dreadful experience that shows the horrors that young men faced during our countries time of need, the series presented something so remarkable it will take years of success and failure to achieve such greatness that call of duty has thankfully given us

  • it009x9281

    Posted Nov 26, 2009 5:25 am PT

    Hopfully by christmas i can try MW2

  • it009x9281

    Posted Nov 26, 2009 4:58 am PT

    I think ppl would choose call of duty games over medal of honor any day

  • Bog101

    Posted Nov 23, 2009 1:51 pm PT

    I hate all those Mp40 bazooka juggernaut noobs

  • Naicco

    Posted Nov 10, 2009 12:36 pm PT

    I'm wondering how many people will move to play modern warfare 2, as cod4 modern warfare is going to be pretty empty in a few weeks.

  • ninstigator

    Posted Nov 6, 2009 8:46 pm PT

    you like the zombie mode? meh i thought it wasnt that great, the drama of the gameplay really drew me in 10/10 from me

  • thetravman

    Posted Oct 31, 2009 8:38 pm PT

    If MW2 copies the zombie mode in some way, I'd buy it. It's the main reason I bought WAW. I don't like the multiplayer mode much.

  • mrobisongamer20

    Posted Oct 20, 2009 8:59 pm PT

    I think the single player campain on Modern warfare was better ...but Nazi Zombies is one of main reasons I'm buying CoD world at war. overall I would say that CoD 4 modern warfare is slightly better

  • N64isBEST

    Posted Oct 20, 2009 7:04 am PT

    How long is campaign and can you play against AI bots in multiplayer?

  • earkl

    Posted Oct 19, 2009 4:15 pm PT

    I can't wait until Modern Warfare 2.

  • earkl

    Posted Oct 19, 2009 4:14 pm PT

    Nazi zombies is really fun. I also like the online. I would like it more if people wouldn't use mp40 with juggernaut so much.

  • Rheinmetal

    Posted Oct 8, 2009 11:27 pm PT

    Seems as a major improvement of the "Medal of Honor" games genre. On the other hand, if someone has played one of them, has seen everything..

  • MoutainBear

    Posted Oct 7, 2009 4:16 pm PT

    way to may ww2 games but nazi zombies is fun

  • 360CoDgamer360

    Posted Oct 7, 2009 12:46 pm PT

    Not as good as CoD 4 but it is pretty good... Nazi Zombies is the best part about it

  • bab725

    Posted Oct 4, 2009 6:25 pm PT

    modern warfare is better but this is a good expansion

  • falloutguy318

    Posted Oct 3, 2009 4:45 pm PT

    cod 5 is cod 4 in ww2 form. but i like 4 better because of the moddern guns and the guns in cod 5 sound like pea-shoters lol

  • speedfreak48t5p

    Posted Sep 24, 2009 9:08 am PT

    might rent this one

  • hockeyman343

    Posted Sep 21, 2009 8:35 pm PT

    rented it today

  • hockeyman343

    Posted Sep 20, 2009 8:28 pm PT

    gettin it in two weeks for my b day

  • hockeyman343

    Posted Sep 20, 2009 5:50 pm PT

    awesome game

  • ShootumUP26

    Posted Sep 8, 2009 11:59 am PT

    weapons are like ancient we all want something with more bang

  • spylol

    Posted Sep 6, 2009 6:06 pm PT

    I swear if I see another ww2 fps im gona puke. . . On the upside W@W is the best ww2 fps out of the lot

  • billywillis

    Posted Sep 6, 2009 5:51 pm PT

    well at least they're making adding more to the modern warfare series

  • eal-zubieri

    Posted Sep 3, 2009 6:32 am PT

    this world war 2 theme start to get really old, i liked COD4 more this this one .

  • jokerzrus

    Posted Aug 30, 2009 12:35 pm PT

    Hmm can't decide between getting this or halo 3 or modern warfare...any suggestions?

  • Laiska_pummi

    Posted Aug 29, 2009 6:58 am PT

    OH! The zombies are not in the story. Well that changes my opinion of this game.

  • Gamelova08

    Posted Aug 28, 2009 7:47 am PT

    This, or Modern Warfare 2?

  • Gamelova08

    Posted Aug 28, 2009 7:41 am PT

    So sorry, I meant, this or Killzone 2?

  • Gamelova08

    Posted Aug 28, 2009 7:41 am PT

    This, or Halo 3?

  • EZlearner

    Posted Aug 25, 2009 11:33 am PT

    I think it's way better than cod 4 (mostly cos you get get to mutilate people) but the multiplayer sucks because it always spams you with downlaods and patches.

  • silverwing825

    Posted Aug 22, 2009 5:17 pm PT

    im getting this for wii looks great.

  • diezombie

    Posted Aug 22, 2009 9:32 am PT

    he sucked at zombies. when you have insta-kill, you have to knife the zombies, and don't spend all of your points on the carbine, buy the random weapon box room

  • lindseyiluvyou

    Posted Aug 21, 2009 9:07 am PT

    Cod WAW had an okay campaign and had a harder campaign. The online sucked.

  • Belchior6420

    Posted Aug 18, 2009 8:22 am PT

    awesome!

  • matt_teh_gamuh

    Posted Aug 16, 2009 12:01 pm PT

    they did so much more than repackage cod 4...

  • hockeyman343

    Posted Aug 16, 2009 9:51 am PT

    i just dont think it idk it just actually its very similar to eachother

  • duxter1

    Posted Aug 15, 2009 10:18 pm PT

    better than modern warfare imo

  • hockeyman343

    Posted Aug 15, 2009 10:17 pm PT

    i feel so bad for everybody who died during world war II

  • hockeyman343

    Posted Aug 15, 2009 10:16 pm PT

    i dont think its as good as 4 but still good

  • Gooshnads

    Posted Aug 12, 2009 6:41 am PT

    @reddrader - i dont believe so =]
    value wise yeah its a lot better but my respect for treyarch has not gone up from cod 3...
    they just took what cod 4 had and repackaged it and added some more stuff and changed the skins... its more like an expansion pack to cod 4 than actual cod 5...
    it's a great game, yeah but idk... it did lack the fresh feel cod 4 had..

  • pod81

    Posted Aug 10, 2009 4:53 pm PT

    Take MW use the great multiplayer. Bring the setting back to the series singniture setting in WW2 spice the game up with co-op, the most dark take ever in the series. Then add Nazi Zombies, Include all three map packs, and you will have yourself months of fun.

  • CreatureRising

    Posted Aug 9, 2009 9:15 am PT

    Modern warfare 2 Needs Zombies!

  • reddrader

    Posted Aug 8, 2009 12:37 pm PT

    i bought both games COD 5 & COD 4. both are good games, but Cod 5 10/10 gore and blood, longer campaing, co-op campaing, vehicle in multiplayer/ more maps and larger/ Nazi zombie wow excelent/ cod 5 owned cod 4.

  • fuzzball95

    Posted Aug 5, 2009 7:13 pm PT

    ive been playing multiplyer all day every day

  • BladeStrike1234 posted Aug 4, 2009 2:37 am PT (does not meet display criteria. sign in to show)

    BladeStrike1234

    Posted Aug 4, 2009 2:37 am PT (hide)

    It's a decent WWII shooter on its own but a massive disappointment compared to CoD4. Treyarch proved why they're the B Team...

    Don't like what I have to say WaW fanboys? Go cry to your mommy...because this game is average at best.

  • jokerzrus

    Posted Aug 2, 2009 12:56 pm PT

    I like this reviewer way better then the guy who reviewed modern warfare1

Call of Duty: World at War Quick Links

Summary | Reviews | News | Previews & Features | Images | Videos | DLC & Expansions | Answers | Hints & Cheats | Forum | Check Prices

Call of Duty: World at War Boxshot Enlarge the boxshot
Call of Duty: World at War

Game Stats

Full Game Details »Close
Also on

Games you may like…

Users who looked at content for this game also looked at these games.

See More Similar Games
advertisement