Flash Player 9 is required to watch this video.

Watch this video in HD 540p

You're watching our standard resolution format (up to 480x360). Click to watch this video in 540p resolution (960x540). 540p is available for all users.

36 Comments

  • Robomate

    Posted Jun 27, 2009 8:56 pm PT

    Tasteless, buggy and filled with insanely bad voice acting. This game fcking sucks..

  • superbladude

    Posted Jun 13, 2009 4:32 pm PT

    Really, the inventory is that bad? When RE5 does the same thing? And you guys loved that game! And RE5's controls were wonky too! You guys just had too high of expectations of this game. Alot of games controls and stuff are like this ones, and you loved them! And also, you say the driving is bad? IN A SURVIVAL HORROR GAME?! What do you expect, gran turismo? Shutup and stop trying to be funny. You fail. I gave this game a 8.7/10

  • berthold123

    Posted Jun 3, 2009 3:15 pm PT

    I just got this game for my xbox and it sucks not only the story but the gameplay is the worst ever !!!!
    I use to be a huge fan of this game but they just send the franchis to hell

  • KingsterX

    Posted Apr 6, 2009 7:02 am PT

    Chris always does a great review

  • dudu22

    Posted Mar 16, 2009 10:31 am PT

    Alone in the Dark is dead

  • diegogarden

    Posted Mar 7, 2009 6:26 pm PT

    Atari worked really hard for a 6.5???

  • picklesrocks

    Posted Mar 1, 2009 4:23 am PT

    this game is terrible

  • madmax_thegamer

    Posted Feb 28, 2009 10:33 pm PT

    I thought Chris did a good job. Maybe not the funniest review ever but it gets the point across. The game is interesting, bust also rather flawed. It's to easy to take damage while checking your jacket inventory, also the cars handle terrible, and sometimes using the fire and light mechanic is incredibly frustrating. Speaking of frustrating, well actually it;s more annoying really, don't even get me started on the root burning sequences! arrrgghhh! Nice to hear the voice of Max Payne in a game agian though.

  • MercedesBenz82

    Posted Feb 27, 2009 11:29 am PT

    decent review, thanks.

  • dan_151

    Posted Feb 24, 2009 12:43 pm PT

    dead space beats this game hands down.i appreciate the ideas of this game compared to some of dead spaces borrowed ideas but the horrible controls and other flaws weigh it down

  • jbm08

    Posted Jan 12, 2009 11:56 am PT

    wat a smug git
    love no more i total a

  • Hanus_mcAnus

    Posted Dec 29, 2008 11:04 pm PT

    yeah played this for a few hours and its probably the most punishing game ever. never gives you tips on what to do. find out for urself move to the next room and spend another 10 minutes figuring out wtf do i do now. the game has a lot of bugs too and the gameplay just isnt fun. probably give it a 6 the game needs like some kinda system that tells u what to do

  • lovenomore

    Posted Dec 27, 2008 11:01 am PT

    He either seems like a stoned loser or a smug trust fund kid, I can't quite tell which :\.

  • op1e2345

    Posted Dec 17, 2008 11:59 am PT

    ive found that every review i watch on this site is done by a monotone wannabe funny loser. not only that but most of the time they are overcritical and nitpicky. i get info on games from this site, but the reviews are unreliable. they always go at least a point lower than what i would give a game. thats my review of this review.

  • Michformer

    Posted Nov 26, 2008 8:21 am PT

    That reviewer is pretty good

  • chilipepperman

    Posted Nov 2, 2008 3:21 pm PT

    ya man. this guy tries too hard to do a good video review. but its a good one nonetheless, but i dont think i want to play this game cause it looks like crap

  • Bahgahyahduh

    Posted Nov 1, 2008 1:19 pm PT

    The review was the worst I've ever seen. GameSpot has really gone down in quality, and the most important aspect, reviewing games. You only had to blink in the beginning of the game, but the reviewer makes it sound like you have to do it throughout the entire game. I agree with him on some other stuff, but that stuff is obvious. I think the game shouldve gotten like a 7.7. I'm glad i'm not a total access member anymore, or whatever that paid membership crap is called.

  • terabyt

    Posted Oct 31, 2008 6:13 am PT

    Should have tested this game properly before releasing it, Eden Studios! The game is flawed so much and voice acting is dreadful.

    As for Gamespot that was one of the worst video reviews I've ever seen.

  • _M_o_R_g_0_t_H_

    Posted Oct 23, 2008 10:43 am PT

    Awesome concept for a game...I'm gonna rent this one for sure.

  • xsqmko

    Posted Oct 23, 2008 6:58 am PT

    U the guy who reviews this u really su.ck at it.
    Learn to review a vid u lazy kid, and sens of humour lack more than this game.
    Get a life u nab

  • psycho_path

    Posted Oct 22, 2008 8:55 am PT

    Gosh, this review is lame. The reviewer's trying so hard to make it funny but it's not. What a shame. Maybe he wants to portray the lameness of this review to this lameness of this game. Who knows?

  • dannyrago

    Posted Oct 11, 2008 12:31 pm PT

    that review was very cheesey

  • rashmaster

    Posted Sep 27, 2008 4:31 am PT

    The reviewer here is plain bad and the video editing is all over the place. Can the suits at Gamespot please restore dignified reviewers by learning from this mishap?

    I rented the game because the beginning is downright entertaining. Unfortunately, once you get to Central Park it becomes such a chore, especially with those 'Roots of Evil'. Ugh.

  • -NOXiK_AOPK-

    Posted Sep 25, 2008 8:44 am PT

    graphics look nice...but thats about it...

  • Raven1504

    Posted Sep 19, 2008 6:18 pm PT

    The ones who made the game should hire someone to at least play the game for errors , this could have been good though it wasnt

  • Fioth

    Posted Sep 10, 2008 11:57 pm PT

    Alone in the dark tries to do thing that most games these days stay away from for the sake of two thing:Every "I want more of the same tired formula" moron will keep playing the same Silent Hill 'til it hits number 1000 and tried and true things tend to SELL!Give AiTD a try, it is very innovative and original despite its flaws.And what's with the whole "retarted" stuff?You can hear the damn word from every low IQ 14 years old american these days...

  • mentos_eater424

    Posted Sep 8, 2008 6:41 am PT

    Wow this review wasn't rehearsed...

  • Kill-er

    Posted Sep 7, 2008 7:22 pm PT

    the guy who's reviewing the game is so f*ckin retarded its unbelievable

  • Hyork

    Posted Sep 7, 2008 12:32 am PT

    Not sure the reviewer really does his job here... if a game is bad, its his responsibility to say it, for the potential buyer's sake. This game is very bad, but this reviewer seems to want to emphasise the very few vaguely competent aspects over the very many godawful ones. Nevarro woudn't have been nearly so kind.

  • geryboti

    Posted Aug 31, 2008 12:23 pm PT

    this review is a piece if sh!t

  • shahinps3

    Posted Aug 22, 2008 7:44 am PT

    Evnthought i never played Alone in the dark but it's very similar to RE. cant wait for it be released on PS3.

  • ahmed22

    Posted Aug 20, 2008 6:54 pm PT

    actually this gamespot editor is pretty funny

  • RyanM GameSpot staff member

    Posted Jul 26, 2008 1:07 am PT

    love this one, minus the audio mix.

Alone in the Dark Video Review

  • Posted Jun 26, 2008
  • 55,158 Views

Don't blink now: GameSpot editor Chris Watters reviews Alone in the Dark.

Download

Please enter your date of birth to download this video.

By clicking "Enter", you agree to GameSpot's Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Use these links to add the GameSpot player to another site or your GameSpot blog.

  • BBCODE:

  • HTML:

Upload Your Own Videos

Watch cool and crazy videos from GameSpot users just like you, and vote for your favorites! Subscribers and users level 10 and higher get to upload their own.

Game Stats

Also on

Games you may like…

Users who looked at content for this game also looked at these games.

See More Similar Games