World in Conflict seems interesting on the surface but is mind-numbingly repetitive.
User Rating: 5 | World in Conflict (Collector's Edition) PC
The good points of this game listed on Gamespot include voice acting, visuals, and storyline. I honestly think the voice acting isn't that good and in the military, soldiers aren't nearly as defiant as they are in World in Conflict. Many times you'll find yourself listening to lowly soldiers bickering and squabbling with their commanding officers for no reason whatsoever. With the technology of war hand-to-hand combat is nearly abolished in today's conflicts. In this game, tanks are your primary source of offense and don't contain real strategy. This game doesn't contain strategy, they tell you what you have to do and you do it, simple as that. So it's basically Call of Duty just controlling units of soldiers instead of taking the place of one. In no way is this RTS. Warfare is no longer roll in tanks and blow enemies up. They use airstrikes, choppers, and use their technology to destroy targets pinpointed from satellites in the sky.Also, World in Conflict is extremely pretentious, after their flashy introduction and constant war radio feeds you scroll around and roll tanks across the map. The voiceovers on the loading screens are also extremely pretentious. World in Conflict is good if that's what your looking for. I don't believe that most people are looking for a mediocre supposedly RTS game with very little strategy involved.
