advertisement

Analysts: EA 'overpaying' for Take-Two

Industry watchers boggle over Madden NFL publisher's $2 billion bid for GTA maker, agree stockholders will acquiesce to the deal sooner rather than later; TTWO stock skyrockets 54 percent.

Yesterday, EA decided to put the screws on Take-Two management by making public its erstwhile private $2 billion acquisition offer that would yield an at-the-time princely 64 percent premium to shareholders. Take-Two formerly rejected the proposal on February 19, saying the offer "substantially undervalues" its franchises, creative talent, and consumer loyalty. The publisher also called the proposal's timing opportunistic due to the impending release of surefire hit Grand Theft Auto IV, reasons which have all been formally rebuffed by EA kingpin John Riccitiello. EA has also set up an official Web site to provide a FAQ and other updates on the deal.

Today, industry analysts continue to scratch their heads over why Take-Two's board would turn the offer down, as well as question EA's willingness to drop so much cash on the transitioning publisher. In a company update today, Goldman Sachs analyst Mark Wienkes said that despite popular belief that EA will soon enact a hostile takeover of Take-Two by buying up a majority of outstanding stocks, the publisher will at least raise its bid once more.

"Given all of the moving parts with respect to the assets that may or may not be included in any potential transaction, the relatively small impact to the aggregate offer for each $1 increment to the bid, we think it's rational to expect a higher bid," said Wienkes. EA's initial offer, made in a private letter to Take-Two chairman Strauss Zelnick on February 6 and formally rejected on February 15, offered shareholders a buyout offer of $25 per share. However, Wienkes also cautioned Take-Two with a carpe diem warning, saying "the more protracted this process becomes...the less desirable the target would become, in our view."

In a note titled "Take-Two Declines EA's Offer to Overpay," Pacific Crest Securities analyst Evan Wilson believes that even though EA isn't afraid to reach deep into its pockets, the publisher is squandering its cash by offering so much for Take-Two. "Given that Take-Two's business overlaps EA's in many areas, the uncertainty in the future of the GTA developers, and Take-Two's ongoing legal issues, we believe that EA is willing to pay too high of a price."

To justify the purchase price, Wilson notes that GTAIV must live up to expectations. "For the acquisition to make any financial sense, it needs to be closed in time for EA to realize GTA profits. Without GTA, Take-Two is certainly not worth $2 billion and there is no certainty that the talent behind GTA will stay for the next installment." Wilson also notes that knocking Take-Two out of the sports market would certainly be a boon for the Madden NFL publisher, but "eliminating a competitor in sports brings only a modest benefit."

On the other side of the table, Wilson says that Take-Two shareholders should get behind EA's takeover bid. "EA's $26 offer is more than fair, in our view. [Earnings] of 19x in a GTA year is a significant premium to the historical trading range of second-tier publishers, especially given its struggle to achieve profitability. Given lackluster success outside of GTA, even under current management, the offer exceeds our expectations for TTWO over the next year." Wilson also notes that there are few other publishers in a position to capitalize on what Take-Two can offer, and by dallying, Take-Two's stock outlook has "turned negative since the potential for EA to walk away from its bid is far more significant than the potential upside from a higher bid."

While Wilson feels Take-Two's lack of action is cause for a stock downgrade from "Outperform" to "Sector Perform," Wedbush Morgan Securities analyst Michael Pachter upgraded his stock advisement from "Sell" to "Hold" in a research note this morning. Pachter, who last year outright dismissed speculation of EA offering to buyout Take-Two due to a perceived conflict in corporate culture, unreservedly redressed prior guidance.

"We were shocked and awed by the offer, and our Sell recommendation was wrong," Pachter remarked. "After numerous rumors over the past several years surrounding an acquisition of Take-Two that have been dispelled, a bona fide serious offer has been made. We believe EA fully intends to complete this acquisition, and believe that Take-Two's investors will decide that a sale is the best option for them."

While Pachter laid out the bulk of his reaction to GameSpot yesterday, the verbose analyst lent further insight into the buyout offer today. Rationalizing the deal from Take-Two's perspective, Pachter notes that the deal EA has extended is far better than they'd get from any other media company.

"In our view, the offer is more than adequate," said Pachter. "We agree that Take-Two has several game franchises that have great potential, and acknowledge that its creative talent is as good as any in the industry. However, the company has failed to make a profit for over two years, and although its turnaround efforts are sincere, they have as yet to yield significant results. We believe that EA's offer is significantly higher than the amount that would be paid by a major media company, and think that the company is uniquely positioned to derive synergies from a combination with Take-Two. Other prospective bidders are simply not in the same position to value Take-Two as is EA."

Addressing the likelihood of overlapping products and redundancies created by the merger, Pachter believes some franchises will benefit, while others will invariably follow a more spaced-out release schedule. While Take-Two titles such as Civilization, BioShock, Max Payne, Bully, Manhunt, and Red Dead Revolver will see a bump from the superior marketing and distribution capabilities of EA, titles such as Burnout, Need for Speed, and Midnight Club would necessitate "a more leisurely release of all three franchises."

Pachter also once again addressed the possibility of change-of-control clauses in top developers' contracts. "We found it interesting that EA's offer was not predicated on successfully retaining the Rockstar North studio personnel, nor upon renewing the contracts of Rockstar's founders, Sam and Dan Houser. We believe that this negotiation will necessarily fall outside the terms of the acquisition, as it will likely entail either a significant increase in the compensation paid to the Housers and to Rockstar North, or will entail a separation agreement."

Echoing the sentiments of other analysts, Pachter reiterates that EA is unlikely to tarry in its buyout bid. "We envision this deal playing out over the next few weeks. Although we think that Take-Two management will posture and seek to delay a deal, we think that EA management will make a 'take it or leave it' offer, and expect EA to lose patience in a month or so. Ultimately, we think that Take-Two shareholders will embrace a deal, as virtually all of them will profit immensely and immediately."

As of the end of trading hours on Monday, Electronic Arts was trading down on the New York Stock Exchange by 5.2 percent to $47.14. Take-Two stockholders, on the other hand, have cause to rejoice, as the publisher's stock has spiked an astounding 54.9 percent to close out the day at $26.89.

234 Comments

  • scrymonster

    Posted Mar 1, 2008 8:52 pm PT

    Respect to Take-Two for turning down EA's big.

    EA's just been a corporate monster gobbling up their competition and destroying the video-game market with their stiffled mediocre products. Do they really think that aquiring other companies will their their junk better? Maybe they need to worry more about their own staff insead of always looking at the greener grass on all sides but theirs.

  • viberooni

    Posted Mar 1, 2008 8:42 am PT

    I'm no expert in the stock market, but if Take-Two is sitting at above $26 a share right now thanks to the offer, and EA's offer was $26 a share, and GTA is being released right around the corner.. wasn't turning down the offer the best possible move for Take-Two's shareholders in the end?


    I don't doubt that EA's muscle would make Take-Two profitable. But the timing is just so wrong, and there's other big fish out there (Microsoft, Sony, Ubisoft, Activison) that probably wouldn't mind making offers as well (if they haven't already). This hostile takeover threat is just a way to keep Take-Two from choosing who their overlords will eventually be, before they have leverage from GTA's sales figures, while eliminating their sports franchises for good measure. Also, Bioshock on cell phones!

  • popping4it

    Posted Mar 1, 2008 12:34 am PT

    simple solution dont buy **** ass EA games ugh...

  • Avenger1324

    Posted Feb 28, 2008 6:46 am PT

    One reason Take-Two wouldn't want to accept the offer is because most, if not all of 2K Sports, will lose their jobs - after all there is no need for EA to make 2 versions of each sports game. All the 2K series sports games will disappear, along with the need for those employees.

  • mjswooosh

    Posted Feb 28, 2008 1:12 am PT

    One final note: I have personally worked at Intel & Microsoft in various capacities, and I can tell you from personal experience that the corporate culture at MS is very, very cool...very fun and full of generous, talented people who are encouraged to care about what they do, not just about profit. I felt like I was playing much of the time I was at work and the mood in our offices and in general all over the campus was just simply fun...we had nerf gun fights all the time and you would always hear people laughing and joking as they were working. It was a lot of fun to work at MS and I may work there again someday after grad school. As for Intel, well, all I can say is it was night and day. Not fun at all, very "suit" driven (instead of "geek" driven like at MS), and just a complete CHORE and a GRIND to get through each day. High pressure, high stress, in constant fear of how you are being compared to your neighbor in terms of performance and, in general, boring. From what I know of associates who have worked there, EA is a lot more like Intel than Microsoft. So, you can be "angry" at MS all you want...but the REALITY is that MS is a great place to work. You may not agree with their business practices (hell, I don't agree with everything they do either)...but at least they have some regard for their customers, treat their employees VERY well, and in general have a corporate focus on more than just profit (despite what everyone thinks). Just my $.02 from someone who has actually worked there.

  • liddoriceboi

    Posted Feb 28, 2008 1:06 am PT

    Astex, next time we ask for your opinion, we'll talk to your parents first. Next thing we need are PS3 sacriders. Failboat.

  • mjswooosh

    Posted Feb 28, 2008 1:05 am PT

    Gwarpup, you must be living in an alternate dimension. The corporate culture at EA has basically been a white collar sweat shop for quite some time. This is *common* knowledge in the industry. Google the class action lawsuit that is being taken against EA by current and former employees. This is only part of the story. In general, the way EA does business in terms of acquisitions/mergers, treats their employees, and regards their competitors and customers/consumers is nothing anyone should envy and is simply immoral and entirely profit based. As a company they are certainly in the bottom half of any large corporations in terms of corporate culture or being a good "citizen" in the community. Along with other such moral luminaries as Wal-Mart they are the poster child for what is wrong with corporate America.

  • Razzi65

    Posted Feb 27, 2008 10:23 pm PT

    i think take two people wil earn EA's bid only in few month of gta release..

  • maverick_76

    Posted Feb 27, 2008 1:57 pm PT

    People don't realize that the reason the stocks shot up so much was mainly because of the impending buyout. If this deal falls through, watch how fast that stock will fall. Take Two will be looking at share prices ending up lower than before the proposed buyout going public. It's just an artificial rise, this always happens because people are trying to cash in on the buyout. Lets say you bought 100 shares of stock for $19, that $26 a share buyout will net you $700 for doing nothing. Now imagine these large stock brokers buying thousands of shares, comes to a nice little profit, if you bought when the price was still under $20. But if this deal does not go through, people are gonna cut and run, dumping the stocks to hopefully recoup any losses.

  • mr_killer_man

    Posted Feb 27, 2008 11:16 am PT

    EA needs to start making better racing games. Prostreet sucked and what happened to the team racing thing? They just dropped it. Could've put it in Prostreet somewhere or had the cops on it.

  • Sn0wOn420

    Posted Feb 27, 2008 6:26 am PT

    astex shut your mouth , ps3 is not getting any exclusive content because its SUCKS

  • mackin25

    Posted Feb 27, 2008 2:37 am PT

    ea making a move for take-two is wrong on so many levels. the only reasons they are doing this is because a) gta will be such a massive hit when released that the pay off will be massive!! and b) they take out yet another games competitor. yes i know that ea is comprised of smaller games creators (criterion) but when ea offer their input everything definatly goes to hell. they really should stick to publishing games not making them!

    take two should stick to their guns and tell them to beat it back to the hell from where they came where only the daft buy their "games"!! (if they can call them that). i do have some concerns if take two do cave in to pressure, what will happen to xbox exclusive episodes of gtaIV?? (in your face PS3!! ha)

  • wars45

    Posted Feb 27, 2008 2:20 am PT

    they can buy gta but they need to leave it to the makers of gta and not get involed with makeing the game or if they do it wiil be crap

  • RoyaleWivCheese

    Posted Feb 27, 2008 1:44 am PT

    "my fear is the GTA team will walk after this deal goes through and after IV has been released. "

    That wouldn't surprise me at all. If it does happen it will be the end of GTA as we know it. Look what happended to Rare after Nintendo sold their stake to Microsoft. Half the company left to start Free Radical.

    Then again, if they stay GTA will be ruined anyway. An EA GTA will not be a game I'll be buying.

Check Prices: $19.99 – 37

advertisement

Game Stats

Also on

Games you may like…

Users who looked at content for this game also looked at these games.

See More Similar Games