Warlock: Master of the Arcane Review
Warlock: Master of the Arcane's emphasis on combat makes it feel fresh in the 4X strategy genre. It just needed some fine-tuning to be truly great.
- Engaging combat
- Strong unit balance and variety
- Powerful neutral units
- AI is great when playing the defensive role.
- AI struggles on offense
- Tech trees are online but not in the game or manual.
War--what is it good for? In Warlock: Master of the Arcane, war is good for absolutely everything. Warlock focuses on the "exterminate" portion of the 4X (explore, expand, exploit, exterminate) strategy formula, with rudimentary diplomacy and research systems, leaving a fun and sometimes intense turn-based strategy game that's all about throwing armies of high-fantasy creatures into conflict. While the game's enemy great mages (aka the "AI") could use a better grasp of their own systems, Warlock provides a satisfying challenge, provided you play on its higher settings.
The turn-to-turn gameplay is similar to Civilization and other 4X games--you send out units across the map, build and expand cities, or fight (or all three, depending on the turn). Warlock is set in Ardania, the land of the Majesty series of fantasy sim games. Your goal is to become the strongest of the great mages and establish a mighty empire. The game has three factions: the humans, which feature units such as warriors, archers, and mages; the monsters, who have goblins, ratmen, trolls, and the donkey knights (yes, donkeys are one of Warlock's many resources); and the undead, who sport the usual assortment of skeletons, ghosts, and vampires that you'd expect--along with ghost ships like the Flying Galleus. Each turn, you decide where to explore, move units, attack, and, depending on where you are, research new spells or construct new buildings.
The game looks and plays a lot like Civilization V, with hexes, one unit per hex, similar-looking formations, and so on. But where it diverges from Civ is in management; all you need to worry about (besides the enemy and aggressive neutrals) are four resources: gold, food, mana, and research. You don't have to worry about pollution, about happiness, about diplomacy--just maintaining and providing for your army. And this makes Warlock refreshing. The game puts you into combat quickly, generally starting your first city near some sort of enemy, be it a neutral city (which can be any of the three factions) or a neutral monster generator that spews enemies on a regular basis (such as cockroaches, rats, and spiders--and even stronger creatures, like bears and ogres).
Warlock works because of balance--each faction has strengths and weaknesses. Take the undead. Their death magic makes them powerful, and their ghosts are immune to most forms of damage. But this is counterbalanced by the life magic of the human faction, which can shred through the undead. The monster faction has strong units that use spirit magic but are costly to maintain.
What's great about the faction is that while they're balanced well against one another, they each feel different. When you're playing as the monsters, your tanklike trolls feel different from the other factions' heavy melee units. The Flying Galleus of the undead is distinct from the galleon of the humans. One thing that helps make the units and factions distinct is voice-overs. A number of units speak when you click on them, and each line fits the faction. The lines of many of the monsters are funny (goblin archers sometimes screech "Best archers in the world!"), and most of this dialogue adds flavor, such as the ghostly captain voice of the Flying Galleus. It doesn't grow tiresome, even after dozens of hours of playtime.
A group of neutral units may also complement your armies. You may recruit minotaurs and halberdiers--and even dragons--by building on spaces that spawn such creatures. Spells let you summon some low-level monsters and, later, elementals. When you take over a foe's city, you can't raze it. You instead make it yours, but you keep the other faction's buildings and units (which is how you may end up with mages of the human faction backing your ghosts). You may also set up your game with portals to other worlds. These planes are stocked with powerful monsters, but if you establish a foothold, you can recruit some of the most powerful units in the game. This variety is invigorating: you may play the same faction several times in a row but wind up relying on different unit makeups.
Your units also gain access to various upgrades and perks. Combat earns experience, and when a unit reaches a new level, it receives a new perk. These can boost offense, defense, range, sight, or the rate at which you regenerate life or acquire experience. Be savvy in how you use these perks--if you choose carefully, you can develop low-level units into threats. Upgrades come from special buildings you construct on resources, such as iron and magic nodes. It costs some gold to implement an upgrade, but it's worth it; like with perks, you can buff your units in a variety of ways.
The diplomacy system is just really bad and unfortunately the game becomes quite boring after a while and I doubt I'll play it again. Still it was cheap and I enjoyed the 25 hours I spent playing it.
I read some of the reviews just as I was about to play Civ 5 - this sounded interesting, so I checked out Steam. It's 9.99 on sale for this weekend. So I just bought it.
??????From the article: "The enemy Great Mages (sadly, these aren't hero units, as in Master of Magic) that lead the opposing forces...."
In Master of Magic, the player was not a hero unit either. You could hire hero units, but the player's Mage was not represented on the map as a unit. This doesn't really affect the review, aside from the fact that it would be nice to think the reviewer knows what he is talking about when comparing it to another game.
I though this was RPG game, those that stay true with old-school D&D formula.
guess I'm sooo wrong.
I played 1 longer game so far and i find it very sad that the game is dumbed down like CivV. Its quite good but it could have been so much better with much more depth at least like Civ 4. I dont understand this. Its not a console game. Its not aimed at 11 year old COD trash talking kiddies. Its aimed at ppl who like to play a grand strategy game and this TARGET group dont want a grand strategy game to be shallow and feel dumbed down. I miss a lot in this game. Like i said its good but there is virtually nothing to do except the combat . I wish for more depth in diplomacy spying, city building and management. And i also wish the devs would look in the dictionary and find the definition for the word "keyboard shortcuts" and "hotkeys". They seem to forget that most ppl have also a keyboard and not just a mouse on their computer and that many ppl would want to hit a key instead if many clicks.
WoooW....when I saw the pics, I thought it's related to Civ V or J.W is mentioning Civ V, but damn this really looks like Civ!!! Hope it's not CPU hungry like Civ when you're late in the game, coz hell the load times between turns was a pain in the as* for my mid-range CPU in Sid Meier's one
@Mehrdadmaskull FYI, I've played several games and it has never crashed, unlike Civ 5, which I cannot play because it ALWAYS crashes
It's a great game, and I enjoy playing it, but it suffers greatly from a hotkey problem. As in, there aren't ANY, except for the four keys to move around the map. If they could just implement some hotkeys, and maybe a "fortify" option for units (though that's something I can live without if I must), I'd be very happy.
Also, the review mentions that you can't raze cities once you capture them. Actually you CAN raze them. There's a little button next to the city name in the city screen that destroys it, allowing you to build in a more strategic location should you wish.
Best turn-based fantasy game since Master of Magic for me. Even so that with patches, DLCs and expansions Warlock: Master of the Arcane may eventually surpass MOM.
The game still needs a lot of development and tuning (beyond fine). Spell research ends far too early, leaving the game as a slugfest with dozens of cities, taking forever to close.
Additionally, other realms have almost zero use, being too hard to crack open and use until nearly end-game, when there's no point in using them anymore.
Has the potential to be a great game, but right now falls into the "very mediocre" rating. I've shelved it after a mere two nights of play.
It looks like a complete rip of Civ 5, but I am willing to give it a chance. I didn't really like how irrational the CPU in Civ 5 was regarding trades and other things. At least this game leaves all of that by the wayside and allows you to focus primarily on military units.