Sign on Options
Theme: [Light Selected] To Dark»
ForumsWargame: AirLand Battle ForumWhile I liked World in Conflict

While I liked World in Conflict

Forum Actions
  • May 28, 2013 10:55 am GMT

    I wasn't a huge fan of the lack or realism in the ground units. A 152mm HEAT shell from a Sheridan tank can destroy pretty much any tank out there. One time I had a near miss on a PT-76 light tank in steel panthers MBT and the PT-76 blew up anyways. Tank battles are usually decided by who gets the first shot. There shouldn't be a preset number of hits to kill a tank, its one hit one kill.

     

    Is this game a realistic strategy game or is this more unrealistic like WIC or Command and Conquer?

    Edited on May 28, 2013 10:56 am GMT Edited 2 total times.

    ---

    Did I ever tell you the definition of Insanity? Patch, Patch, Patch, Patch, Patch, Patch, Patch, Patch, Patch, Patch, Oh look a new hat, Patch, Patch, Patch, Patch.

    I wasn't a huge fan of the lack or realism in the ground units. A 152mm HEAT shell from a Sheridan tank can destroy pretty much any tank out there. One time I had a near miss on a PT-76 light tank in steel panthers MBT and the PT-76 blew up anyways. Tank battles are usually decided by who gets the first shot. There shouldn't be a preset number of hits to kill a tank, its one hit one kill.

     

    Is this game a realistic strategy game or is this more unrealistic like WIC or Command and Conquer?

  • May 29, 2013 9:58 am GMT
    That would be the most boring game ever spam Sheridans woop woop automatic win! i hope this isn't that realistic at all.
    That would be the most boring game ever spam Sheridans woop woop automatic win! i hope this isn't that realistic at all.
  • May 29, 2013 2:01 pm GMT

    darkziosj wrote:
    That would be the most boring game ever spam Sheridans woop woop automatic win! i hope this isn't that realistic at all.

    Boring to you maybe. Also sheridans arn't that great anyways. They are light tanks and have little to no armored protection. Also, they cannot fire quickly or accurately. It takes a while to reacquire their target and they tend to flip over if they shoot their gun while on a slope. World in Conflict was boring, controlling two platoons of tanks is boring. I am talking about large scale battles of up to a division of tanks at a time.

    ---

    Did I ever tell you the definition of Insanity? Patch, Patch, Patch, Patch, Patch, Patch, Patch, Patch, Patch, Patch, Oh look a new hat, Patch, Patch, Patch, Patch.

    [QUOTE="darkziosj"]That would be the most boring game ever spam Sheridans woop woop automatic win! i hope this isn't that realistic at all.[/QUOTE]

    Boring to you maybe. Also sheridans arn't that great anyways. They are light tanks and have little to no armored protection. Also, they cannot fire quickly or accurately. It takes a while to reacquire their target and they tend to flip over if they shoot their gun while on a slope. World in Conflict was boring, controlling two platoons of tanks is boring. I am talking about large scale battles of up to a division of tanks at a time.

  • Jun 3, 2013 1:00 am GMT
    I'm a huge realism fan and have played a lot of simulator games. So, to me, this game is no where close to being realistic; however, if you compare this to WIC, it IS more real and tactical. Although still a bit arcady, WAB is slower paced, has bigger maps, and does require you to plan out your moves( Recon is cruicial )
    I'm a huge realism fan and have played a lot of simulator games. So, to me, this game is no where close to being realistic; however, if you compare this to WIC, it IS more real and tactical. Although still a bit arcady, WAB is slower paced, has bigger maps, and does require you to plan out your moves( Recon is cruicial )
  • Jun 5, 2013 4:06 pm GMT

    And what about the game do you find "nowhere close to being realistic"? And which games are more realistic compared to WAB? I'd like to know.

    And what about the game do you find "nowhere close to being realistic"? And which games are more realistic compared to WAB? I'd like to know.

  • Jun 5, 2013 8:43 pm GMT

    SipahSalar wrote:

    And what about the game do you find "nowhere close to being realistic"? And which games are more realistic compared to WAB? I'd like to know.

    You obviously haven't played games such as Achtung Panzer: Kharkov 1943, "threatre of war" series... any Simulator fan knows WAB isn't a simulator game, and it's realism level is very limited. Ultra realistic games like IL-2 sturmovik 1946, silent hunter 4... aren't easy to play. WAB is fun for people don't want extreme realism.

    [QUOTE="SipahSalar"]

    And what about the game do you find "nowhere close to being realistic"? And which games are more realistic compared to WAB? I'd like to know.

    [/QUOTE]

    You obviously haven't played games such as Achtung Panzer: Kharkov 1943, "threatre of war" series... any Simulator fan knows WAB isn't a simulator game, and it's realism level is very limited. Ultra realistic games like IL-2 sturmovik 1946, silent hunter 4... aren't easy to play. WAB is fun for people don't want extreme realism.

Forum Actions
ForumsWargame: AirLand Battle ForumWhile I liked World in Conflict

Game Stats

  • Rank:
    28 of 0
    PC Rank:
    14 of 18,676
    Highest Rank:
    NANot Ranked
    Followers:
    260Follow»
    Wishlists:
    20Wish It»
    • Player Reviews: 6
    • Player Ratings: 37
    • Users Now Playing: 5
  • T Rating Description

    Titles rated T (Teen) have content that may be suitable for ages 13 and older. Learn more

Games You May Like

Users who looked at content for this game also looked at these games.